14:57:42 RRSAgent has joined #ldp 14:57:42 logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/12/10-ldp-irc 14:57:44 RRSAgent, make logs public 14:57:44 Zakim has joined #ldp 14:57:46 Zakim, this will be LDP 14:57:46 ok, trackbot, I see SW_LDP()10:00AM already started 14:57:47 Meeting: Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group Teleconference 14:57:47 Date: 10 December 2012 14:58:05 AndyS has joined #ldp 14:58:12 zakim, who's there? 14:58:12 I don't understand your question, dret. 14:58:56 dret, it's "here" 14:59:01 zakim, who's here? 14:59:02 On the phone I see +1.510.206.aaaa 14:59:02 On IRC I see AndyS, Zakim, RRSAgent, nmihindu, dret, deiu, MacTed, betehess, SteveS, jmvanel, Arnaud, bblfish, trackbot, ericP, sandro, Yves 14:59:10 zakim is picky 14:59:35 Ashok has joined #ldp 15:00:05 +Arnaud 15:00:13 +[IBM] 15:00:21 zakim, +1.510.206.aaaa is me 15:00:21 +dret; got it 15:00:23 zakim, code? 15:00:23 the conference code is 53794 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), AndyS 15:00:24 SteveBattle has joined #ldp 15:00:25 +??P9 15:00:28 Zakim, [IBM] is me 15:00:28 +SteveS; got it 15:00:46 hello everybody! 15:00:52 +bblfish 15:01:12 hi 15:01:32 +??P27 15:01:35 +Ashok_Malhotra 15:01:37 zaki, ??P27 is me 15:01:45 zakim, ??P27 is me 15:01:45 +AndyS; got it 15:02:00 rogerm has joined #ldp 15:02:09 +Yves 15:02:10 +rogerm 15:02:23 +??P30 15:02:37 + +44.754.550.aabb 15:03:03 zakim, who's here? 15:03:03 On the phone I see dret, Arnaud, SteveS, ??P9, bblfish, AndyS, Ashok_Malhotra, Yves, rogerm, ??P30, +44.754.550.aabb 15:03:06 On IRC I see rogerm, SteveBattle, Ashok, AndyS, Zakim, RRSAgent, nmihindu, dret, deiu, MacTed, betehess, SteveS, jmvanel, Arnaud, bblfish, trackbot, ericP, sandro, Yves 15:03:17 zakim, aabb is me 15:03:17 +SteveBattle; got it 15:03:42 krp has joined #ldp 15:03:48 Zakim, ??P30 is me 15:03:48 +nmihindu; got it 15:03:54 JohnArwe has joined #ldp 15:04:12 +JohnArwe 15:04:13 +[OpenLink] 15:04:19 Zakim, [OpenLink] is temporarily me 15:04:19 +MacTed; got it 15:04:20 Zakim, mute me 15:04:20 MacTed should now be muted 15:04:33 hi 15:04:43 zakim, who's here? 15:04:43 On the phone I see dret, Arnaud, SteveS, ??P9, bblfish, AndyS, Ashok_Malhotra, Yves, rogerm, nmihindu, SteveBattle, JohnArwe, MacTed (muted) 15:04:45 On IRC I see JohnArwe, krp, rogerm, SteveBattle, Ashok, AndyS, Zakim, RRSAgent, nmihindu, dret, deiu, MacTed, betehess, SteveS, Arnaud, bblfish, trackbot, ericP, sandro, Yves 15:05:21 +??P43 15:05:36 zakim, ??P43 is me 15:05:37 +krp; got it 15:06:07 Sorry if it was me 15:06:15 Zakim, unmute me 15:06:15 MacTed should no longer be muted 15:06:24 zakim, ??P9 is me 15:06:25 +rogerm; got it 15:06:25 Zakim, mute me 15:06:25 MacTed should now be muted 15:06:49 zakim, ??P9 is not me 15:06:49 I don't understand '??P9 is not me', rogerm 15:06:53 Zakim, who's here? 15:06:53 On the phone I see dret, Arnaud, SteveS, rogerm.a, bblfish, AndyS, Ashok_Malhotra, Yves, rogerm, nmihindu, SteveBattle, JohnArwe, MacTed (muted), krp 15:06:55 On IRC I see JohnArwe, krp, rogerm, SteveBattle, Ashok, AndyS, Zakim, RRSAgent, nmihindu, dret, deiu, MacTed, betehess, SteveS, Arnaud, bblfish, trackbot, ericP, sandro, Yves 15:07:03 this is like zork 15:07:07 Zakim, rogerm.a is ??P9 15:07:07 +??P9; got it 15:07:15 go west 15:07:29 zakim, who's here? 15:07:30 On the phone I see dret, Arnaud, SteveS, ??P9, bblfish, AndyS, Ashok_Malhotra, Yves, rogerm, nmihindu, SteveBattle, JohnArwe, MacTed (muted), krp 15:07:32 On IRC I see JohnArwe, krp, rogerm, SteveBattle, Ashok, AndyS, Zakim, RRSAgent, nmihindu, dret, deiu, MacTed, betehess, SteveS, Arnaud, bblfish, trackbot, ericP, sandro, Yves 15:07:32 best to ignore unidentified caller... 15:07:38 jmvanel has joined #ldp 15:08:00 Zakim, unmute me 15:08:00 MacTed should no longer be muted 15:08:14 Zakim, mute me 15:08:14 MacTed should now be muted 15:08:27 ruben and sandro emailed regrets 15:08:29 I can 15:08:51 -??P9 15:09:01 ok, sometimes my connection breaks 15:09:15 -krp 15:09:25 svillata has joined #ldp 15:09:45 Topic: Previous meeting minutes 15:09:49 +1 15:09:50 cygri has joined #ldp 15:09:57 +1 read it but was not there 15:09:58 +??P43 15:10:08 zakim, ??P43 is me 15:10:08 +krp; got it 15:10:39 +MHausenblas 15:10:40 zakim, mhausenblas is temporarily me 15:10:40 +cygri; got it 15:10:57 someone: So there was an indexical problem under 4 proposed and resolved, not clear who it was 15:11:12 s/someone/JohnArwe/ 15:11:13 +[GVoice] 15:11:25 APPROVED: minutes of last week 15:11:30 Zakim, [GVoice] is me 15:11:31 +ericP; got it 15:11:41 Topic: Next year's F2F meeting 15:12:00 there seems to have been at TPAC a preference for March 15:12:37 Zakim, who's noisy? 15:12:40 Zakim, mute ericP 15:12:40 ericP should now be muted 15:12:48 MacTed, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Arnaud (26%), ericP (27%) 15:12:54 -ericP 15:13:15 -krp 15:13:34 Arnaud: going over the situation as decided by TPAC and available online ( xxx ? ) 15:13:54 xyz: Proposed Boston 15:14:06 +??P43 15:14:07 s/xyz/SteveSpeicher/ 15:14:14 .... for reasons of it being close to a lot of people. 15:14:17 zakim, ??P43 is me 15:14:17 +krp; got it 15:14:32 Arnaud: was wondering how to go about this. A Poll?, .... 15:14:34 +??P46 15:14:49 .... nobody seems to be voicing an opinion one way or the other. 15:14:51 +1 for 3 days, since we go through the trouble of traveling that far 15:14:52 Zakim, ??P46 is me 15:14:52 +svillata; got it 15:15:06 +[GVoice] 15:15:41 ... 14-16 of March seems is discussed. but 13-15 would be better as it does not cover meeting 15:15:46 +1 for 3 days 15:15:48 roger: supports 3 days 15:16:00 march 16 is a saturday too 15:16:02 +[GVoice.a] 15:16:28 -[GVoice] 15:16:30 s/does not cover meeting/does not cover meeting on saturday/ 15:16:42 Arnaud: 13-15 in Boston would be the proposal 15:16:54 ... needs to verify with MIT 15:17:10 q+ 15:17:20 ... if those dates are workable 15:17:35 ashok: why not start on the 12, which is Tuesday? 15:17:52 Arnaud: Bart had a conflict on Tuesday 15:18:11 achille_z has joined #ldp 15:18:20 ... assuming that Erik can get the meeting rooms.... 15:18:29 Eric is looking in his calendar 15:19:10 Eric: ... not the coolest room ( which is not the one next to the bar ) but with a bit of money one can get the bar 15:19:37 Eric: those who sponsor the event get their name somewhere, and people can toast your company 15:19:57 .... 13-15 is possible on the 8th floor of Stella 15:20:11 Arnaud: this is going to be the default then 15:20:22 Topic: Actions and Issues 15:20:39 q+ 15:20:49 q- 15:20:50 Arnaud: anyone want to claim his actions 15:21:18 q- 15:21:20 Arnaud: Where at Actions here 15:21:43 http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/ISSUE-37 15:21:49 -krp 15:21:58 s/Where at/We are at/ 15:22:16 +??P40 15:22:28 which action are we speaking of? 15:23:00 zakim, ??P40 is me 15:23:00 +krp; got it 15:23:41 me. got lost sorry. 15:24:02 Arnaud: we can close the Action 15:24:07 close action-32 15:24:07 ACTION-32 create wiki page to structure and consolidate discussions around LDP model (ISSUE-37) closed 15:24:25 action-32? 15:24:25 ACTION-32 -- Erik Wilde to create wiki page to structure and consolidate discussions around LDP model (ISSUE-37) -- due 2012-12-03 -- CLOSED 15:24:25 http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/actions/32 15:24:40 Arnaud: Let's look at Issues... 15:25:06 Issue-40? 15:25:06 ISSUE-40 -- creating/deleting/changing non RDF resources -- raised 15:25:06 http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/40 15:25:16 +??P43 15:25:23 Zakim, ??P43 is me 15:25:23 +deiu; got it 15:25:24 Issue-41? 15:25:24 ISSUE-41 -- Standard way to manage members with attachments -- raised 15:25:24 http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/41 15:26:12 q+ 15:27:46 SteveBattle: Added the corresponding use case 8 for this, so Issue-40 can be opened and closed. 15:28:03 open Issue-40 15:28:35 open issue-40 15:28:51 q- 15:29:11 set Issue-40 to pending review 15:29:37 talking about Issue-41 15:29:50 q+ 15:30:09 -krp 15:30:19 ack steveb 15:30:32 +??P40 15:30:35 SteveBattle: has added scenarios covering Issue-41 to use case 8 15:31:03 zakim, ??P40 is me 15:31:03 +krp; got it 15:31:35 .... so this can put to pending review 15:31:53 please set it 15:32:00 -SteveBattle 15:32:20 -krp 15:32:21 ok, I updated it to pending rewview 15:32:42 Topic: Use Cases And Requirements 15:33:10 Arnaud: Is the document ready for review 15:33:15 q- 15:33:21 q? 15:33:25 I've dropped off the call 15:33:40 SteveBattle: do you believe it is ready for review? 15:33:41 SteveBattle, do you want to push fro WG review on UC&R today? 15:33:49 Yes please 15:34:04 roger 15:34:15 We'll freeze the document for the coming week. 15:34:19 So the plan is for the WG to review the UCR for next monday 15:34:46 +??P31 15:35:02 Arnaud: So the aim is to get the document to be published before the end of the year 15:35:11 zakim, ??P31 is me 15:35:11 +krp; got it 15:35:13 +SteveBattle 15:35:20 Zakim, who is speaking? 15:35:31 bblfish, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: dret (3%), Arnaud (33%) 15:35:33 OK - I'm back 15:35:51 people need to look at what is in there. 15:35:53 q+ 15:36:26 ack steveb 15:36:53 SteveBattle: asking people to review the content, the examples, is there something that should be taken out, is in scope, ... 15:37:06 Arnaud: we can annotate the document with open issues. 15:37:32 ... so that we don't have to resolve the issues, but we can annotate them 15:38:03 SteveBattle: Please try to get reviews in before Friday... 15:38:16 who is speaking? 15:38:21 ericp 15:38:28 SOTD: The WG intends to address the use cases and requirements in the document. Other use cases and requirements may be added in the future. We invite community feedback on these and other use cases. 15:39:08 ericp: propose a status of the document so that people would know ( ? ) 15:39:24 ... so reviewers can understand what they are reviewing to 15:39:26 +1 to ericP's SOTD 15:39:27 OK - we'll add that. 15:40:38 ericp: an html version of this document that passes the pubrules requirements 15:40:58 ericp: there is a wiki page somewhere explaining this ( please point us to it if you have it ) 15:41:14 SteveBattle: we'll use respec version 3 15:41:30 s/SteveBattle/SteveSpeicher/ 15:41:37 ericP: we need to look at what the short name should be 15:41:48 SteveSpeicher: ldp-ucr? 15:42:08 -krp 15:42:19 That's what we're pushing for :) 15:42:21 Arnaud: it would be great if we can publish this before the end of the eyar 15:42:32 s/eyar/year/ 15:42:34 +??P31 15:42:38 Topic: LDP spec 15:43:46 Arnaud: the charter requires a refresh of the spec, beginning of 2013 January 15:44:03 ... but I am not sure we have made enough progress 15:44:26 ... and it is good to help us make progress 15:44:35 Zakim, who is speaking? 15:44:46 bblfish, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: dret (21%) 15:45:02 dret: looking at issue 38 15:45:30 s/dret/steves/ 15:45:41 I also expect to spend a block of time over the holidays trying to clean up anything I can on spec. 15:45:53 Steve Spiker: looking at issue 38 and this could make some changes to spec 15:46:02 s/Spiker/Speicher/ 15:46:21 s/Steve Spiker/ SteveS/ 15:48:27 Ashok: you have written up the AtomPub part but ours is somewhat different, where we can create and delete collections, so then we have to speak of collections, what happens to the members 15:48:29 q+ 15:48:52 -??P31 15:49:14 +??P31 15:49:50 xxx: we are doing something more complex indeed that AtomPub, but we have it 15:50:04 s/xxx/Ashok/ 15:50:15 SteveS: we have issues for this on this 15:50:23 who is speaking? 15:50:34 dret 15:50:49 dret: we can link open issues to this page ( which one again?) 15:51:12 http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/ISSUE-37 is the page 15:51:16 thanks 15:51:42 -??P31 15:52:06 Zakim, unmute me 15:52:06 MacTed should no longer be muted 15:52:09 Ashok: are you asking that I should editi the wiki page that dret wrote up. 15:52:22 Arnaud: everybody should be ok to edit this page 15:52:58 q- 15:53:02 dret: that's ok I did this for AtomPub, and I think it would be good if other people can do the same for other protocols 15:53:26 dret: it is useful to help see what kinds of questions we need to answer. 15:53:39 Arnaud: this page gives us a framework. 15:53:49 q+ 15:54:02 Ashok has joined #ldp 15:54:17 Arnaud: regarding the issues, we can have references from that wiki page to the open issues 15:54:39 +??P31 15:54:40 MacTed: this page is to expose issues by analysing these other protocols in parallel to our stuff. 15:54:59 agreement all around. 15:55:25 MacTed: requests a bit richer use of html 15:55:44 MacTed: in the first paragraph "any atompub server exposes a "service document" (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5023#section-8) " 15:55:49 zakim, ??P31 is me 15:55:49 +krp; got it 15:56:08 this should be [http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5023#section-8 service document] 15:56:10 q+ ISSUE-30 15:56:32 -krp 15:56:39 ack me 15:56:40 dret: I'll do that, just had pasted my e-mail to the wiki 15:56:47 ack macted 15:56:49 +??P31 15:56:55 ack 15:57:06 ack 15:57:07 ack issue-30 15:57:18 Zakim, mute me 15:57:18 MacTed should now be muted 15:57:21 issue-30? 15:57:21 ISSUE-30 -- Hierarchical bugtracking service -- open 15:57:21 http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/30 15:57:31 q+ 15:57:47 ack 15:57:53 ack steveb 15:58:25 SteveBattle: this is can be closed, it was moved to ucr 15:58:34 PROPOSAL: close issue-30, it was moved to UCR 15:58:41 +1 15:58:52 +1 15:58:52 +1 15:58:54 +1 15:58:55 +1 15:58:56 +1 15:58:57 +1 15:59:02 +1 15:59:09 close issue-30 15:59:09 ISSUE-30 Hierarchical bugtracking service closed 15:59:16 RESOLVED: close issue-30, it was moved to UCR 15:59:34 Zakim, unmute me 15:59:34 MacTed should no longer be muted 16:00:15 q+ 16:00:18 Arnaud: the only way to make progress is to close these issues 16:00:26 ... and this needs proposals 16:00:56 Arnaud: so is suggesting to go down the list and propose to close the issue 16:01:10 ack macted 16:01:15 -SteveS 16:01:45 ... and so if people don't have proposals then the issue gets closed 16:02:07 thanks everybody! 16:02:13 Thanks 16:02:13 -Ashok_Malhotra 16:02:15 -rogerm 16:02:15 -Yves 16:02:15 MacTed: suggests that there should be a heads up on which issues should be decided in the topics for the teleconf 16:02:16 bye 16:02:18 bye 16:02:18 -MacTed 16:02:19 -cygri 16:02:20 -Arnaud 16:02:21 -dret 16:02:23 -deiu 16:02:24 -ericP 16:02:24 -svillata 16:02:26 -bblfish 16:02:28 -??P31 16:02:31 -JohnArwe 16:02:33 rrsagent, pointer? 16:02:33 See http://www.w3.org/2012/12/10-ldp-irc#T16-02-33 16:02:36 -AndyS 16:02:38 -SteveBattle 16:02:59 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:02:59 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/12/10-ldp-minutes.html MacTed 16:03:02 RRSAgent, set logs public 16:03:05 -nmihindu 16:03:07 SW_LDP()10:00AM has ended 16:03:07 Attendees were Arnaud, dret, SteveS, bblfish, Ashok_Malhotra, AndyS, Yves, rogerm, +44.754.550.aabb, SteveBattle, nmihindu, JohnArwe, MacTed, krp, ??P9, cygri, ericP, svillata, 16:03:07 ... [GVoice], deiu 16:03:12 AndyS has left #ldp 16:03:21 trackbot, end meeting 16:03:21 Zakim, list attendees 16:03:22 sorry, trackbot, I don't know what conference this is 16:03:29 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 16:03:29 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/12/10-ldp-minutes.html trackbot 16:03:30 RRSAgent, bye 16:03:30 I see no action items