15:43:20 RRSAgent has joined #mlw-lt 15:43:20 logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/11/12-mlw-lt-irc 15:43:26 meeting: MLW-LT WG 15:43:32 chair: felix 15:43:44 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Nov/0081.html 15:43:56 present+ felix 15:44:15 scribe: tbd 15:49:57 regrets: olaf-michael, pedro, tadej, jirka 15:50:03 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/11/12-mlw-lt-minutes.html fsasaki 15:51:18 shaunm has joined #mlw-lt 15:51:32 present+ dF 15:52:51 present+ ankit 15:53:15 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/11/12-mlw-lt-minutes.html fsasaki 15:54:08 regrets+ jörg 15:54:09 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/11/12-mlw-lt-minutes.html fsasaki 15:54:14 Ankit has joined #mlw-lt 15:55:16 present+ arle 15:56:08 Arle has joined #mlw-lt 15:56:34 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/11/12-mlw-lt-minutes.html fsasaki 15:56:58 Yves_ has joined #mlw-lt 15:58:32 present+ yves 15:58:35 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/11/12-mlw-lt-minutes.html fsasaki 15:59:39 Des has joined #mlw-lt 15:59:43 present+ dom 15:59:51 present+ georgios 16:00:23 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/11/12-mlw-lt-minutes.html fsasaki 16:00:42 dF has joined #mlw-lt 16:00:57 present+ shaun 16:00:57 Rollcall 16:01:01 present+ leroy 16:01:04 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/11/12-mlw-lt-minutes.html fsasaki 16:01:16 present+ naoto 16:01:53 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/11/12-mlw-lt-minutes.html fsasaki 16:02:00 scribe: Arle 16:02:04 renatb has joined #mlw-lt 16:02:10 DomJones1 has joined #mlw-lt 16:02:14 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Nov/0081.html 16:02:15 pnietoca has joined #mlw-lt 16:02:27 present+ pnietoca 16:02:29 present+ dave 16:02:41 Topic: Work schedule update 16:02:44 daveL has joined #mlw-lt 16:02:54 Naoto has joined #mlw-lt 16:03:03 topic: atims 16:03:17 action-283? 16:03:17 ACTION-283 -- Felix Sasaki to to integrate dave's email about standoff mechanism for provenance into spec -- due 2012-11-14 -- OPEN 16:03:17 http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/actions/283 16:03:33 action-263? 16:03:33 ACTION-263 -- David Filip to summarize the options and the recommendations related to HTML parsing workflow in the CMS, see discussion at http://www.w3.org/2012/11/01-mlw-lt-irc#T10-13-41 -- due 2012-11-08 -- OPEN 16:03:33 http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/actions/263 16:03:53 leroy_ has joined #mlw-lt 16:04:02 Felix: This was discussed in face-to-face in Lyons. David, do you have an update or will you get to it? 16:04:09 action-281? 16:04:10 ACTION-281 -- David Lewis to ask for use cases of data category-specific confidence scores -- due 2012-11-12 -- OPEN 16:04:10 http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/actions/281 16:04:18 David: Yes, I finished this week. 16:04:26 Fredrik has joined #mlw-lt 16:04:30 Felix: Dave, do you have an update on ACTION 281? 16:04:52 present+ renat 16:05:15 present+ des 16:05:21 Dave: After discussion with ???, I don't think the text analytic annotation works by itself. If you apply the same annotation to a span for different purposes, we run into overwrite problems. Flags don't help unless you got standoff markup. 16:05:30 present+ christian 16:05:44 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/11/12-mlw-lt-minutes.html fsasaki 16:05:55 .. The other suggestion, made last week, is that MT confidence is fundamentally different. MT should not be merged with the others. 16:06:02 philr has joined #mlw-lt 16:06:11 present+ philr 16:06:35 .. Should we consider having a confidence score in those data categories? E.g., for terminology, disambiguation, domain. Although domain is very complex. 16:06:54 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/11/12-mlw-lt-minutes.html fsasaki 16:07:07 present+ fredrik 16:07:19 .. Disambiguation and terminology might have their own optional confidence attribute. If you include it you need an ITS rules defined in the document for that data category. 16:07:28 Felix: Do you need more time? 16:07:35 mdelolmo has joined #mlw-lt 16:08:00 Dave: We don't have a conclusion, so yes. Can we add an optional elements to terminology from a backward compatibility standpoint? 16:08:02 Felix: Yes. 16:08:10 topic: Work schedule update 16:08:12 Dave: Then I'll propose it on the list. 16:08:30 Felix: First week of December for last call. 16:08:39 ..The dates are on the wiki. 16:08:44 http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/Main_Page#Upcoming 16:09:15 .. After the last call, we have six weeks to get comments from outside and then we will discuss at our face to face. 16:09:51 Felix: Christian, can you introduce yourself? 16:10:42 Christian: I work for SAP, been working on ITS for 15 years. Worked on multilingual content production. Background on NLP. My background that was noted was with terminology, work on interchange. 16:10:52 .. Also worked on content interchange similar to XLIFF. 16:10:58 .. Worked on XLIFF. 16:11:08 .. Contributed to ITS 1.0. 16:11:34 topic: Update on XLIFF-ITS mapping. 16:11:37 https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/issues/55 16:11:55 present+ milan 16:12:00 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/11/12-mlw-lt-minutes.html fsasaki 16:12:10 chriLi has joined #mlw-lt 16:12:26 David: I missed the last XLIFF TC call, but I believe the last call covered extensibility in and . Yves, can you update us? 16:12:45 .. I'm worried that we may not be able to extend . 16:12:56 Milan has joined #mlw-lt 16:13:03 Yves: It would be better to have extensibility, but people would be happy with a module. 16:13:10 GeorgiosPetasis has joined #mlw-lt 16:13:28 David: The problem is that will take too long, so our markup would be illegal until that is defined. 16:13:49 Yves: I think you will find a lot of opposition to extending extensibility. 16:14:11 Yves: If we can't add extensibility from our side that is an XLIFF problem. We should assume we can do it. 16:15:47 http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/XLIFF_Mapping 16:16:01 Dave: You wanted to keep a pointer in for standoff markup. 16:16:27 .. Scroll down in that link to where provenance is covered. There is something called phase group. 16:16:59 http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#translation-agent-provenance-implementation 16:17:13 search for "Or (standoff markup)" 16:17:16 .. You could write a rule that uses pointers in provenance to map to these. These would be in addition to stand-off. The question is if we worry about doing this explicitly. 16:18:04 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/11/12-mlw-lt-minutes.html fsasaki 16:18:21 Des: A question about this. Looking at the document, it looks like the mappings are fairly stable. 16:18:39 Yves: Probably yes. There is no show-stopper. I think most are mapped correctly. 16:19:27 topic: 2013 planning 16:19:27 David: I have an action to color-code things that are dependent on unstable things. But we needed to map this to see if there are show-stoppers. 16:19:36 Felix: Skip this topic. 16:19:46 action: felix to update the wiki with 2013 planning 16:19:46 Created ACTION-285 - Update the wiki with 2013 planning [on Felix Sasaki - due 2012-11-19]. 16:20:01 topic: Data category overview table 16:20:11 Felix: Think about any other venues we should go to. Also consider location for the final workshop in 2013. 16:20:18 http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#datacategories-overview 16:20:51 Felix: Proposed that we replace this table in 6.1 with what Shaun and Olaf-Michael started. Thoughts? 16:21:19 Shaun: The table there now has information not present in my table. Combining them would make a table that is too wide. 16:21:39 Dave: Both have useful information, but combining them makes the table too big. 16:22:27 .. Jirka provided an algorithm to do the mapping from XML attribute names to HTML names. 16:22:50 Felix: So you think that Shaun and Olaf-Michael’s table as an appendix? 16:23:02 Arle, for minuting purpose, my quesstion was specific to the XLIFF 1.2 specification. I understand the 2.0 spec is still in a state of flux. Apologies for my poor audio on the question. 16:23:15 action: shaun to put data category table into non-normative appendix in the spec 16:23:15 Created ACTION-286 - Put data category table into non-normative appendix in the spec [on Shaun McCance - due 2012-11-19]. 16:23:32 s/fairly stable/fairly stable for XLIFF 1.2 16:24:13 Shaun: For some of the categories there are many different properties. Do any of the categories have complex defaults, or can we do it just on data categories? 16:24:20 Felix: I think data categories are fine as the basis. 16:24:22 topic: Test suite format 16:24:45 Felix: Who can summarize the discussions? 16:25:35 Leroy: If you look at LocNote, the discussion is whether we have LocNote and LocNotePointer or just locNote. 16:25:48 various versions are summarized here http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-tests/2012Nov/0019.html 16:25:58 (versions = with or without "pointer") 16:26:09 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/11/12-mlw-lt-minutes.html fsasaki 16:26:48 Shaun: If you want to know whether the test output identifies a pointer, the suite doesn't test whether you are able to find the relative expression from the pointer. That's another test of capability. 16:27:04 .. But I'm not sure what the output from the test would be, a path or the value. 16:27:10 mhellwig has joined #mlw-lt 16:27:11 Yves: For 1.0, we put the string value. 16:27:50 Felix: I was first for having pointers, but am fine with removing them. 16:28:27 Leroy: Second question.