01:55:13 timbl has joined #ldp 08:00:37 ahaller2 has joined #ldp 08:01:10 bblfish has joined #ldp 08:58:31 cgueret has joined #ldp 09:03:46 melvster has joined #ldp 09:26:50 SteveS has joined #ldp 09:43:08 bblfish has joined #ldp 10:42:37 cgueret has joined #ldp 10:46:04 cygri has joined #ldp 11:05:27 cgueret has joined #ldp 12:16:45 jmvanel has joined #ldp 12:17:04 AndyS has joined #ldp 12:22:02 JohnArwe has joined #ldp 12:48:11 SteveS has joined #ldp 13:48:24 betehess has joined #ldp 13:56:51 deiu has joined #ldp 14:14:38 Arnaud has changed the topic to: LDP WG Informal meeting November 5, 2012: http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2012.11.05 14:16:01 MacTed has joined #ldp 14:54:29 MacTed has joined #ldp 14:55:00 AndyS has joined #ldp 14:56:53 ghard has joined #ldp 14:58:06 dret has joined #LDP 14:59:06 Zakim has joined #ldp 14:59:12 trackbot, start meeting 14:59:15 RRSAgent, make logs public 14:59:17 Zakim, this will be LDP 14:59:17 ok, trackbot, I see SW_LDP()10:00AM already started 14:59:18 Meeting: Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group Teleconference 14:59:18 Date: 05 November 2012 14:59:23 -??P0 14:59:23 Zakim, who's here? 14:59:24 On the phone I see OpenLink_Software 14:59:24 On IRC I see dret, ghard, AndyS, MacTed, deiu, betehess, SteveS, JohnArwe, jmvanel, bblfish, Arnaud, webr3, tpacbot, trackbot, RRSAgent, Yves, sandro, ericP, LeeF 14:59:33 jkopecky has joined #ldp 14:59:33 Zakim, OpenLink_Software is temporarily me 14:59:34 +MacTed; got it 14:59:41 + +1.510.206.aaaa 14:59:42 Zakim, mute me 14:59:42 MacTed should now be muted 14:59:57 +JohnArwe 15:00:05 +??P0 15:00:09 +Arnaud 15:00:21 Zakim, ??P0 is me 15:00:22 +ghard; got it 15:00:23 +??P5 15:00:27 zakim, 206.aaaa is me 15:00:27 sorry, dret, I do not recognize a party named '206.aaaa' 15:00:31 zakim, ??P5 is me 15:00:34 +jkopecky; got it 15:00:40 zakim, +1.510.206.aaaa is me 15:00:40 +dret; got it 15:00:46 timbl has joined #ldp 15:00:56 +[IBM] 15:01:09 zakim, [IBM] is me 15:01:09 +SteveS; got it 15:01:17 zakim, who's there 15:01:17 I don't understand 'who's there', dret 15:01:24 zakim, who's here? 15:01:24 On the phone I see MacTed (muted), dret, JohnArwe, ghard, Arnaud, jkopecky, SteveS 15:01:26 zakim, code? 15:01:27 On IRC I see timbl, jkopecky, Zakim, dret, ghard, AndyS, MacTed, deiu, betehess, SteveS, JohnArwe, jmvanel, bblfish, Arnaud, webr3, tpacbot, trackbot, RRSAgent, Yves, sandro, 15:01:27 ... ericP, LeeF 15:01:28 the conference code is 53794 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), AndyS 15:01:45 +[IPcaller] 15:01:52 zakim, IPCaller is me 15:01:52 +AndyS; got it 15:01:54 +Yves 15:02:57 +Sandro 15:03:58 q+ to ask about what the limits are for members being added only "through" the container. does that prohibit the container implementation adding members outside of POST requests? 15:04:40 cygri has joined #ldp 15:04:59 JohnArwe, you mean having duplicate members? 15:05:02 mhausenblas has joined #ldp 15:06:18 +MHausenblas 15:06:25 zakim, i'm with mhausenblas 15:06:25 +cygri; got it 15:06:27 Yves, no. I remember language somewhere saying that members could be added by the container without POST requests. E.g. if someone creates a file in a filesystem, the container implementation could detect it and add it as a member "internally" (i.e. w/o POST) 15:08:11 zakim, who is on the phone? 15:08:11 On the phone I see MacTed (muted), dret, JohnArwe, ghard, Arnaud, jkopecky, SteveS, AndyS, Yves, Sandro, MHausenblas 15:08:13 MHausenblas has cygri 15:08:48 JohnArwe - I'd expect resources to be created then added to one or more containers in additional to in the container first. c.f. file system links, mv 15:09:02 JohnArwe, ok. Adding things outside of network interaction is not something the spec should talk about, it may happen, but not linked to our spec 15:09:50 one question might be "is it OK to create a member using PUT" 15:11:12 q- 15:12:10 Yves, Ok thx. If I see the language I referred to before in the future, I'll raise an issue to remove it. 15:12:37 JohnArwe, we resolved ISSUE-25 stating that it would follow composition semantics, POST to container would create and add. We have a resolution to investigate supporting weak aggregation. ISSUE-25 edits have NOT been made 15:13:25 SteveS that's fine, but fundamentally I am/was asking about the semantics of "composition semantics" as defined by this WG. Is that question out of order? 15:14:18 JohnArwe, no, just giving a summary of where things stand 15:14:53 http://www.w3.org/wiki/LDP_Implementations 15:15:32 +[GVoice] 15:15:52 Zakim, [GVoice] is ericP 15:15:52 +ericP; got it 15:17:28 Kalpa has joined #ldp 15:18:26 Yves - is that because the name is "under" a container? (seems reasonable) 15:21:14 + +1.937.279.aabb 15:21:39 q? 15:21:57 zakim, aabb is me 15:21:57 +Kalpa; got it 15:25:49 sandro, AndyS, we *did* talk about it, but didn't resolve it. 15:26:25 a container is a member of its container, no? so if it's a member, it's resolved per previous resolution 15:26:56 if the server creates container, it maybe should attach associated behavior. 15:27:04 q+ to talk about Bart's use case 15:27:12 Zakim, who's noisy? 15:27:27 MacTed, listening for 12 seconds I heard sound from the following: Arnaud (87%), jkopecky (4%), AndyS (4%) 15:27:42 Zakim, unmute me 15:27:42 MacTed should no longer be muted 15:28:18 it's probably not quite clear what to do: accept the "container data" and become a manager of that piece of data, or accept the "container semantics" and become a manager of a new container. 15:28:34 q+ to ask about mv 15:28:48 ack eric 15:28:48 ericP, you wanted to talk about Bart's use case 15:30:03 sounds very useful, but only works if the server manages both containers, right? 15:34:51 ack andy 15:34:51 AndyS, you wanted to ask about mv 15:35:03 +bblfish 15:35:09 maybe that's a good issue to discuss? REST-wise, binding resource relationships to URI structures would be unfortunate. 15:35:10 hi 15:35:51 yes 15:36:26 q+ 15:37:18 ack dret 15:38:04 +1 re: "binding resource relationships to URI structures would be unfortunate" 15:40:30 in AtomPub, clients suggest URIs, but servers pick them (upon creation), and they pretty much always (i've never seen another implementation) pick URIs under they authority. if we remove this constraint, interactions become rather different, because a link from the container to an contained item can move across authority boundaries. 15:40:36 q? 15:40:57 +??P21 15:41:08 Zakim, P21 is me 15:41:08 sorry, deiu, I do not recognize a party named 'P21' 15:41:14 Zakim, ??P21 is me 15:41:14 +deiu; got it 15:41:18 Zakim, who's noisy? 15:41:28 Zakim, mute deiu 15:41:28 deiu should now be muted 15:41:30 MacTed, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Arnaud (19%) 15:41:30 i don't hear anything right now. planes? 15:41:56 Zakim, mute me 15:41:56 MacTed should now be muted 15:43:01 http://www.w3.org/wiki/LDP_Implementations 15:43:07 +1 to sandro 15:43:25 dret, authority is an organizational scope - is this not like URIs in general, where "if authority1 != authority2, client MUST assume they are different" but the server may have additional knowledge (like it's told via config that it "owns" URI assignment under both authorities) 15:43:36 reminds me to add http://paygoo.info/ and continue implementing it ;) 15:43:41 :-) 15:43:55 yes was very helpful 15:43:58 great chairing 15:44:03 thanks, arnaud! 15:44:04 learnt a lot :-) 15:44:09 Thanks! 15:44:10 -Sandro 15:44:11 -Yves 15:44:11 -MHausenblas 15:44:11 Bye 15:44:12 thanks 15:44:12 thanks indeed 15:44:12 -SteveS 15:44:13 -Arnaud 15:44:14 -dret 15:44:18 -jkopecky 15:44:21 jkopecky has left #ldp 15:44:22 -ghard 15:44:23 -Kalpa 15:44:27 -JohnArwe 15:44:52 Kalpa has left #ldp 15:45:59 Zakim, unmute me 15:45:59 MacTed should no longer be muted 15:46:49 zakim, who is on the phone? 15:46:49 On the phone I see MacTed, AndyS, ericP, bblfish, deiu (muted) 15:47:23 small comment: can't add new entries on the implementations wiki page (only editing existing entries works) 15:47:45 oh, sandro? 15:48:46 -AndyS 15:49:03 deiu, don't you have an edit button at the top of the page? 15:49:04 Opps - I didn't press a button ... one moment 15:49:14 Arnaud, no 15:49:20 zakim, code? 15:49:20 the conference code is 53794 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), AndyS 15:49:22 are you logged in? 15:49:26 yes 15:49:33 weird 15:49:37 I only have an edit button next to each entry 15:49:43 +[IPcaller] 15:49:47 I have page discussion edit history etc. 15:49:48 zakim, IPcaller is me 15:49:48 +AndyS; got it 15:50:01 when I click edit I can edit the whole page 15:50:02 Right, got it 15:50:23 I was expecting to see that button near the contents list 15:57:31 zakim, who is on the phone? 15:57:31 On the phone I see MacTed, ericP, bblfish, deiu (muted), AndyS 16:01:21 bye 16:01:26 -AndyS 16:01:28 bye AndyS 16:01:31 AndyS has left #ldp 16:10:02 -ericP 16:13:56 http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/meeting/2012-11-01 16:14:00 http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/meeting/2012-11-02 16:19:22 http://www.w3.org/wiki/EditingData 16:19:44 http://www.w3.org/wiki/LDP_Implementations 16:22:28 Zakim, who's here? 16:22:28 On the phone I see MacTed, bblfish, deiu (muted) 16:22:29 On IRC I see cygri, timbl, Zakim, ghard, MacTed, deiu, betehess, SteveS, JohnArwe, jmvanel, bblfish, Arnaud, webr3, tpacbot, trackbot, RRSAgent, Yves, sandro, ericP, LeeF 16:24:42 http://doodle.com/9g9zibrmcvs3t9xa? 16:25:04 -bblfish 16:25:07 -MacTed 16:25:17 trackbot, end meeting 16:25:17 Zakim, list attendees 16:25:17 As of this point the attendees have been MacTed, JohnArwe, Arnaud, ghard, jkopecky, dret, SteveS, AndyS, Yves, Sandro, MHausenblas, cygri, ericP, +1.937.279.aabb, Kalpa, bblfish, 16:25:21 ... deiu 16:25:25 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 16:25:25 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/11/05-ldp-minutes.html trackbot 16:25:26 RRSAgent, bye 16:25:26 I see 3 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2012/11/02-ldp-actions.rdf : 16:25:26 ACTION: sandro to create a new page open to anyone with a W3C account in the W3C wiki [1] 16:25:26 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2012/11/02-ldp-irc#T13-17-11 16:25:26 ACTION: betehess to create a wiki page for the test suite and validator proposals [2] 16:25:26 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2012/11/02-ldp-irc#T13-53-17 16:25:26 ACTION: cygri to create wiki page for Deployment Guide [3] 16:25:26 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2012/11/02-ldp-irc#T15-56-40