Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Teleconference

01 Nov 2012

See also: IRC log


Gregg_Vanderheiden, Bruce_Bailey, mijordan, [Microsoft], Kathy, Robin_Tuttle, Loretta_Guarino_Reid, James_Nurthen, Marc_Johlic


<trackbot> Date: 01 November 2012

<scribe> scribe: Kathy

<AWK> Scribenick+ Kathy

<AWK> ScribeNick+ Kathy

<Loretta> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/20121102misc/results

LC-2584 : The description of what is sufficient to pass as a simple table is insufficient

<AWK> This is not the case for all tables (e.g. simple tables which only have row headings) but describes a common scenario.

<Loretta> Simple tables generally have only one level of headers for columns, one level of headers for rows, or both.

<Loretta> Otherwise, the column 1 cells would contain data and would be marked up as data cells.

RESOLUTION: Accepted as amended

Approval of WCAG2ICT "Understanding Key Terms"

<robin> more grammer: under User Agent, Notes 1 and 2 use "is not" but Note 3 uses "isn't"

<robin> more grammer: under Content, Note 2 has "user agent isn't required in order communicate the content's information" and is missing "to" after "in order"

<robin> more grammer: the definition for User Agent has a period, the others do not

<robin> more grammer: most all notes end in a period, but not all

<robin> under software, in note 3, was the double "provide" already mentioned?

<robin> the "provides" on either side of the struck out "user agent functionality"

<Loretta> * James, I intentionally avoided saying that. It feels like we have devolved into a TaskForce meeting.

<greggvanderheiden> I am off but can you call consensu on this one?

<greggvanderheiden> and on Maureens edit to the last one?

<Loretta> I'm asking Alex.

<greggvanderheiden> can someone patch me in 608-514-9539

<Loretta> Because we couldn't reach consensus on Alex's last comment, we will send this back to the Task Force for additional work.

<greggvanderheiden> can you get consensu on these edits

<greggvanderheiden> WCAG2ICT can take up further discussion

<greggvanderheiden> that topic didn’t come from WCAG2ICT

<greggvanderheiden> don't reject their language

<greggvanderheiden> because of a new topic

<Loretta> We are sending back the edited version for further discussion. (Edits accepted).

<greggvanderheiden> OK

<greggvanderheiden> thanks

RESOLUTION: Send the edited version back to the Task Force for review and discussion on Alex's comment on user agents.

<Loretta> We will hold the last survey item until next week.

Summary of Action Items

[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.137 (CVS log)
$Date: 2012/11/01 21:34:47 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.137  of Date: 2012/09/20 20:19:01  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Found Scribe: Kathy
Inferring ScribeNick: Kathy
Default Present: Gregg_Vanderheiden, Bruce_Bailey, mijordan, [Microsoft], Kathy, Robin_Tuttle, Loretta_Guarino_Reid, James_Nurthen, Marc_Johlic
Present: Gregg_Vanderheiden Bruce_Bailey mijordan [Microsoft] Kathy Robin_Tuttle Loretta_Guarino_Reid James_Nurthen Marc_Johlic
Found Date: 01 Nov 2012
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2012/11/01-wai-wcag-minutes.html
People with action items: 

[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]