07:54:17 RRSAgent has joined #webapps 07:54:17 logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/10/30-webapps-irc 07:54:26 ScribeNick: ArtB 07:54:35 Scribe: Josh_Soref 07:55:01 Meeting: WebApps F2F Meeting 07:55:07 Date: 30 November 2012 07:55:18 Chair: Art, Charles 07:55:43 Agenda: http://www.w3.org/wiki/Webapps/TPAC2012Meeting 07:56:17 tokamoto has joined #webapps 07:56:32 Sungok_You_ has joined #webapps 07:57:02 byungjung__ has joined #webapps 07:57:03 acolwell has joined #webapps 07:57:14 glenn has joined #webapps 07:57:54 Present: Art_Barstow, Adrian_Bateman, Tobie_Langel, Arnaud_Braud, Olli_Pettay, Mike_Smith, Bryan_Sullivan, Hao_Dong, Magnus_Olsson, Wayne_Carr, Jonas_Sicking, 07:58:22 Arnaud has joined #webapps 07:58:23 tomoyuki has joined #webapps 07:58:27 MikeSmith has joined #webapps 07:58:33 present+ Arnaud_Braud 07:58:59 MagnusOlsson has joined #webapps 07:59:08 adrianba has joined #webapps 07:59:46 aizu has joined #webapps 07:59:55 Present+ Hiroyuki_Aizu 08:00:08 morrita has joined #webapps 08:00:34 a12u has joined #webapps 08:00:56 Lachy has joined #webapps 08:01:12 kensaku has joined #webapps 08:01:30 nsakai has joined #webapps 08:01:42 present+ Tomoyuki_Shimizu 08:01:45 kotakagi has joined #webapps 08:02:54 kotakagi has joined #webapps 08:03:08 sakkuru has joined #webapps 08:03:17 Ujiie has joined #webapps 08:03:24 nkic has joined #webapps 08:03:54 Yoshihiro has joined #webapps 08:04:33 Norbert has joined #webapps 08:04:34 nkic has joined #webapps 08:04:43 dnkim has joined #webapps 08:04:57 nsakai has joined #webapps 08:05:46 rotsuya has joined #webapps 08:06:52 scribenick: Lachy 08:07:12 Present: Simon_Pieters, James_Graham, Lachlan_Hunt 08:07:13 oh has joined #webapps 08:07:19 jaubourg has joined #webapps 08:07:22 ScribeNick: Lachy 08:07:25 chaals: we'll begin, first, figure out what's left on the agenda 08:07:27 bradee-oh has joined #webapps 08:07:32 … Process stuff to continue with 08:07:41 takuya has joined #webapps 08:07:43 Topic: Agenda Bashing 08:07:47 edoyle has joined #webapps 08:07:50 … real discussions: Offline app cache, widget packaging, proposals, etc. 08:08:07 Arno has joined #webapps 08:08:13 … IME, Selectors API 2. Short, do together in a session 08:08:16 … Testing. 08:08:29 … We have a session on web intents at 16:45 08:08:43 RRSAgent, make minutes 08:08:43 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/10/30-webapps-minutes.html ArtB 08:09:06 IDL2. Do people want to get into technial discussion? 08:09:10 SimonPieters has joined #webapps 08:09:11 RRSAgent, make log Public 08:09:15 Cyril has joined #webapps 08:09:16 RRSAgent, make minutes 08:09:16 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/10/30-webapps-minutes.html ArtB 08:09:22 sakih has joined #webapps 08:09:23 … Maybe/ 08:09:31 KenjiBX has joined #webapps 08:09:46 … It's possible that next year's TPAC will be in Asia. 08:09:49 nsakai has joined #webapps 08:10:00 We are proposing to have an F2F in Silicon Valley for HTML and WebApps 08:10:09 We did it in May this year. Think it was worth doing 08:10:14 … Anyone object? 08:10:15 Present: Art_Barstow, Adrian_Bateman, Tobie_Langel, Arnaud_Braud, Olli_Pettay, Mike_Smith, Bryan_Sullivan, Hao_Dong, Magnus_Olsson, Wayne_Carr, Jonas_Sicking, Simon_Pieters, James_Graham, Lachlan_Hunt 08:10:33 slejeune has joined #webapps 08:10:33 Present+ sgodard 08:10:44 … Assuming people want to turn up. The current idea is the week of April 22. HTML gets a couple fo days, webapps gets a couple of days. 08:10:46 paul-huawei has joined #webapps 08:10:49 shan has joined #webapps 08:11:02 Present+Hiroyuki_Aizu 08:11:04 s/fo/of 08:11:09 … Who would be likely to turn up in CA in April? [Dozen or so hands raised] 08:11:10 Present+ Brady_Eidson, Maciej_Stachowiak, Wonsuk_Lee 08:11:18 present+ Norbert_Lindenberg 08:11:31 yamaday has joined #webapps 08:11:32 efullea has joined #webapps 08:11:47 …One of the things worth thinking about is that we have virtually no joint meetings at this F2F. TPAC is where we can invite other groups to talk to us. 08:11:48 Present+ Adam_Klein 08:12:01 Present+ Soonbo_Han 08:12:03 Present+ Travi_Leithead 08:12:10 Present+ Ryan_Sleevi 08:12:13 jbb has joined #webapps 08:12:15 s/Travi_Leithead/Travis_Leithead/ 08:12:22 … We should think about the groups who we should be talking to. 08:12:26 haraken has joined #webapps 08:12:40 … Templates. Are we going to make any progress today? Worth continuing? 08:12:40 nsakai has joined #webapps 08:13:01 Present+ Hiroyuki_Aizu 08:13:07 mjs has joined #webapps 08:13:14 … No. Drop it off the agenda. 08:13:41 … Paul suggested yesterday that a zip archive API would be useful. There have been proposals before. 08:13:42 Present+ Kenji_Baheux 08:13:49 … It's probably not in our current charter. 08:14:05 … The rule is that we have to change the charter to work on new work. Complicated process. 08:14:05 sakkuru has joined #webapps 08:14:11 … Do we think it's worth doing? 08:14:22 Jonas: We just shipped an API for this. 08:14:26 … We think it would be useful. 08:14:30 Present+ Julian_Aubourg 08:14:42 s/Jonas/sicking/ 08:14:49 +1 to considering zip archive API 08:15:03 Present+ Eduardo_Fullea 08:15:05 +1 for ZIP archive API 08:15:07 XXX: When we talked about App cache in London, there was a lot of use cases that could be fulfilled by the archive API. 08:15:21 Chaals: does anyone object? 08:15:39 nsakai has joined #webapps 08:15:40 maciej: Can someone give a brief pitch about why it's useful for the platform? 08:15:46 s/XXX/tobie/ 08:15:47 s/XXX/tobie/ 08:16:11 q+ 08:16:17 Mozilla bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=772434 08:16:23 sicking: The requests have come from the gaming community. They make a single request to download resources for a game. Want to be able to extract specific files as needed from the package. 08:16:38 waynecarr has joined #webapps 08:16:43 Shinji has joined #webapps 08:16:43 … Reduce number of requests, getting compression from zip. 08:17:12 Jungkee has joined #webapps 08:17:15 maciej: has anyone done any testing to see if zip performance is better than other approaches? 08:17:16 Present+ Jungkee_Song 08:17:19 sicking: no. 08:17:25 the use cases I am thinking of are similar, e.g. generically the ability to download content as a package and store locally for use in the app 08:17:35 … I don't think it's just performance. Convenient for deployment to have a single file. 08:17:41 alexandremorgaut has joined #webapps 08:17:42 spoussa has joined #webapps 08:17:44 Present+ Odin_Horthe_Omdal 08:17:50 jet has joined #webapps 08:17:55 RRSAgent, make minutes 08:17:55 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/10/30-webapps-minutes.html ArtB 08:17:55 chaals: Chair hat off. One of our metrics is developer convenience 08:18:02 massimo has joined #webapps 08:18:07 … People are used to working with zip archives, have tools for it. 08:18:19 Present+ Sakari_Poussa 08:18:22 nsakai has joined #webapps 08:18:30 … Could argue that HTTP pipelining is an alternative approach, but working with zip is something people are used to doing and won't be difficult. 08:18:32 Wonsuk has joined #webapps 08:18:53 sicking: We did do an API and got feedback saying it wasn't the right approach. There are many ways to do it, difficult to get right. 08:19:10 massimo_ has joined #webapps 08:19:14 maciej: For the use cases, it seems useful to download a zip and then reference its resources by URL. 08:19:27 sicking. It would be useful to have a zip protocol handler. 08:19:46 … It could possibly work with a URL, like jar handler. 08:19:54 maciej: Is there a list of these use cases? 08:19:59 sicking: I can get them. 08:20:09 chaals: We need to go through formal call for concensus. 08:20:15 Present+ Wonsuk_Lee 08:20:24 … The decisions in this meeting aren't binding; call for concensus on mailing list. 08:20:40 evanli has joined #webapps 08:20:50 … The next step will be to send a proposal to the list, make a formal work item, have call for concensus on the list. 08:21:12 Present+ Mounir_Lamouri 08:21:13 … We can get into the technical details then. 08:21:39 ACTION: Chaals: Get the ZIP archive proposal on the table as a formal work item. 08:21:39 Created ACTION-673 - Get the ZIP archive proposal on the table as a formal work item. [on Charles McCathie Nevile - due 2012-11-06]. 08:21:49 maciej: I want to the use cases on the table. 08:22:12 chaals: We will. That comes with the proposal. Discussion about it will take place over several weeks. 08:22:52 … Testing. We had this as an agenda topic. 08:23:13 … We could spend a lot of time looking in details, or we could spend the extra time actually making tests. 08:23:18 nsakai has joined #webapps 08:23:27 Topic: Testing 08:23:39 Chaals: We need a test facilitator. 08:24:14 … It's useful to have a person overseeing the creation of the testsuite. Not necessarily writes all the tests themselves. 08:24:17 Yuan has joined #webapps 08:24:17 RRSAgent, make minutes 08:24:17 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/10/30-webapps-minutes.html MikeSmith 08:24:25 … I have a list of specs that currently don't have a test facilitator. 08:24:33 … I'm going to read them out, ask for volunteers. 08:24:56 Art: People can think about it and get back to chaals or I. 08:25:22 Chaals: The list of things we want is someone to co-ordinate things for DOM Parsing and Serialisation 08:25:29 … All of the file specs. 08:25:33 … XHR 08:25:43 … Full screen API 08:25:49 … Gamepad 08:25:53 … Templates 08:26:28 … Progress events 08:26:40 … This is a pretty small thing, but kind of annoying because you need another spec to test them in. 08:26:57 … Push API. 08:27:01 … Pointer API 08:27:08 … Server sent events. 08:27:12 … Screen orientation 08:27:17 … Streams 08:27:24 … App Manifest 08:28:07 nsakai has joined #webapps 08:28:35 jgraham, The point of the test facilitator is not that you have to write the tests. You take responsibility for making sure there is a test suite. 08:28:44 julian: I volunteer for XHR 08:29:18 tantek has joined #webapps 08:29:48 Sgodeard: I volunteer for App Manifest 08:30:05 s/Sgodeard/sgodard 08:30:34 chaals: I have a proposal for something that falls into the App Cache area. Not sure if this is the right group. Called Prefetch. 08:31:15 … It allows a site that uses a lot of resources again and again, give a manifest of files to prefetch. 08:31:24 … Not sure if I'm going to propose it as a work item. 08:31:35 Topic: Introductions 08:32:17 XXX, YYY, ECMAScript. 08:32:40 Present+ Greg_Billock, Alexandre_Morgaut 08:32:46 [inaudible] 08:32:56 nsakai has joined #webapps 08:33:09 XXX, Telefonica, used to be AC Rep. Push API 08:33:33 s/XXX, YYY, ECMAScript/Norbert Lindenberg working on ECMAScript Internationalization API under contract for Mozilla/ 08:33:35 s/XXX, YYY/Norbert Linbenberg/ 08:33:37 Topic: IME 08:33:51 AAA: I would like to talk about IME API. 08:34:12 … Today I would like to show use cases, explain what IME is. 08:34:16 jcdufourd has joined #webapps 08:34:21 … It would help if I could present something on the screen. 08:34:25 s/AAA:/Kenji Baheux/ 08:34:40 RRSAgent, make minutes 08:34:40 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/10/30-webapps-minutes.html Ms2ger 08:35:06 Chaals: We had a discussion about IME. Someone started making a sales pitch about why it's a great thing. Don't give us the sales pitch, give us the usecases. 08:35:15 JonathanJ has joined #webapps 08:35:43 Kenji Baheux: Starting with the use cases 08:36:05 … The first one is on search websites, there are suggestions for what the user is currently typing. 08:36:17 … Bad overlap from the IME suggestions and the search suggestions. 08:36:30 … A lot of complaints from Chinese and Japanese users. 08:36:56 … Suggestions shown based on Kanji. 08:37:08 … Overlapping suggesitons shown on screen. 08:37:09 Present+ Kris_Krueger 08:37:26 Travis has joined #webapps 08:37:29 … Try to find a better way to combine search suggestions and IME suggestions. 08:37:43 … Second category. Games. 08:38:05 rotsuya has joined #webapps 08:38:22 … Two use cases. 1. On Windows, if you play a FPS game, and you press one of the IME keys, it creates problems. Need to avoid IME menu interferring with game. 08:38:53 … 2. Entering a name in a game, native UI for IME suggestion doesn't fit with game design UI. 08:39:20 evanli has joined #webapps 08:39:48 … Third; Presentation software. Editing text in fields using IME interfers with live preview. 08:40:18 … Sample API shown on screen. 08:40:20 q? 08:40:31 Zakim has joined #webapps 08:40:32 chaals: There is a discussion in HTML about Input Mode. 08:40:43 krisk has joined #webapps 08:40:58 … When you have an input for text or phone numbers, right now, it's kind of painful. Being able to give a hint about expected input is useful. 08:41:04 a1zu has joined #webapps 08:41:31 … e.g. If I have my keyboard set to Russion, username in russion, password in english. Is that usecase related? 08:41:46 Kenji Baheux: Somewhat related. 08:42:07 Sungok_You_ has joined #webapps 08:42:08 nsakai has joined #webapps 08:42:11 q+ 08:42:20 chaals: What's the implementation status? 08:42:28 Kenji Baheux: No implementation. 08:42:36 Chaals: Would anyone like to work on it? 08:43:10 adrianba, I recognise the use cases. I wasn't completely clear on the scope of the proposal. Can you clarify for me which use cases are solving with the current spec? 08:43:18 annevk has joined #webapps 08:43:34 KenjiBX: Currently in scope: Composition stream. 08:43:44 Present+ Hallvord_Steen 08:44:05 … Also get the different boundaries. 08:44:15 … Can also render your own composition text. 08:44:16 -> http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/association-of-controls-and-forms.html#input-modalities:-the-inputmode-attribute The @inputmode attribute in HTML 08:44:17 q+ 08:44:27 massimo has joined #webapps 08:44:27 JonathanJ has joined #webapps 08:44:46 chaals has joined #webapps 08:45:07 … You can let the browser know what's happening so it can avoid the system IME and show your custom IME. 08:46:08 … Games case not covered by the spec. 08:46:14 tantek has joined #webapps 08:46:20 … Presentation case is covered. 08:46:25 ack adrianba 08:46:41 s/Games/Custom IME design for games/ 08:46:46 evanli has joined #webapps 08:46:52 adrianba, You mentioned the JavaScript API for disabling the IME. For a long time in IE, we've had IME mode CSS mechanism for disabling IME. 08:47:00 [Sorry Dmitry, but it was when you started getting impassioned that it started turning into a sales pitch… I thought you had explained your technical perspective well enough to let people think about the ideas...] 08:47:06 … It's in one of the draft specs. Have you considered that and is it similar? 08:47:28 KenjiBX, There is a function for that to hit at that. Similar to CSS, but in JS. 08:47:44 adrianba, maybe we could consider if we need both. 08:47:58 q+ 08:48:18 adrianba: Microsoft is interested in improving this general area, but highest priority is the the use case around positioning. 08:48:30 … Seems like it's not currently covered by the spec. 08:48:43 … If we add that, it would be substantial scope change. 08:49:05 nsakai has joined #webapps 08:49:07 … that's the place where we'd most like to work on this. What are your priorities? 08:49:21 KenjiBX: I'm interested in that. Thought about it. 08:50:06 ack mounir 08:50:09 q+ 08:50:11 rotsuya_ has joined #webapps 08:50:29 mounir: First use case is like a UA implementation details. 08:50:39 … The UA could just show it quietly and not have the two UIs. 08:50:44 s/and show your custom IME/or adapt the site design and behaviour to the IME/ 08:50:48 s/quietly/correctly/ 08:50:56 … I was wondering for the styling use case. Have you considered CSS? 08:51:16 KenjiBX: Yes. 08:51:27 [could not hear answer properly] 08:51:44 AnssiK has joined #webapps 08:51:47 mounir: Why don't you think it's a UA implementation detail? 08:51:58 nsakai has joined #webapps 08:51:58 hallvord has joined #webapps 08:52:10 KenjiBX: I think it's better to let the web app decide on the best UX for this case. 08:52:37 maciej: I think there might be a misunderstanding. The candidate window is provided by the OS, the suggestions are provided by the web app. 08:52:43 ack mou 08:53:04 … Need to tell the IME system where to put the IME popup. 08:53:06 nsakai has joined #webapps 08:53:22 … I agree with Microsoft about what the most important use cases are. Avoiding candidate window and overlap. 08:53:31 … The other cases seem periferal. 08:53:53 ack mjs 08:54:11 … It seems to be designed solely for the purpose of implementing their own input methods. I don't think that is a good idea. JS implementations are not likely to work across devices. 08:54:13 q? 08:54:15 ack takuya 08:54:18 q+ chaals 08:54:20 q+ 08:54:43 pbakaus, we're talking about IME here in webapps 08:55:02 KenjiBX: The current draft says the UA can get the current position of the candidate window. [???] 08:55:54 chaals: chair hat off: In many ways I agree that JS is a terrible way to handle user input in general. Handling keyboard input breaks accessibility, etc. 08:55:58 ack chaals 08:56:06 … Except that we use it because the Operating Systems don't make things easy. 08:56:25 … In Yandex Translate, we provide an input method for converging latin characters into Russian, or vice versa. 08:56:44 … So I'm nervous about focussing on the use case of a site being able to build its own IME. 08:56:55 … The overlapping of the suggestion and IME is a bigger problem. 08:57:07 … Agree with mjs. 08:57:28 … A lot of assisted input systems fake being a keybaord. Concerned about the interaction with this API. 08:57:34 q+ 08:57:42 naokii has joined #webapps 08:57:52 … Authors make assumptions about the user's keyboard that are not true. 08:57:58 nsakai has joined #webapps 08:58:09 … This is an area where I would expect comments about robustness. 08:58:21 … This is a warning of things I've seen go wrong 08:58:25 q? 08:58:28 ack mjs 08:58:45 RRSAgent, make minutes 08:58:45 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/10/30-webapps-minutes.html MikeSmith 08:59:05 mjs: For touch screen devices that have touch screen keyboards, if you've written a custom IME that works for keyboards, it's most likely going to break on the iPad virtual keyboard. 08:59:26 … I think using JS for this is intrinsicly not cross platform. 08:59:43 chaals: True, but my TV doesn't have a russion keyboard option. 08:59:59 Alex: I think it's interesting that there is a battle for control between the OS and JavaScript. 09:00:31 chaals: More technical comments? 09:00:32 Present+ Alex_Russell 09:00:33 q? 09:00:56 chaals: Break. No coffee for 30 minutes. 15 minute break. Then short session on selectors API 2. 09:02:57 kim has joined #webapps 09:03:10 nsakai has joined #webapps 09:04:19 tokamoto has joined #webapps 09:06:01 RRSAgent, make draft minutes 09:06:01 I'm logging. I don't understand 'make draft minutes', Lachy. Try /msg RRSAgent help 09:06:06 RRSAgent, make minutes 09:06:06 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/10/30-webapps-minutes.html Lachy 09:06:10 tokamoto has joined #webapps 09:08:03 nsakai has joined #webapps 09:08:22 glenn_ has joined #webapps 09:09:17 edoyle has joined #webapps 09:10:50 glenn_ has joined #webapps 09:12:42 glenn has joined #webapps 09:12:56 nsakai has joined #webapps 09:14:28 jcdufourd has joined #webapps 09:15:47 jcdufourd_ has joined #webapps 09:15:57 nick jcdufourd 09:16:17 morrita has joined #webapps 09:16:37 Cyril has joined #webapps 09:17:18 Arno has joined #webapps 09:17:30 topic: Selectors API Level 2 09:17:39 ScribeNick: mjs 09:17:58 LH: I'll start by giving an overview 09:18:15 LH: functionality of the find and matches methods is pretty stable 09:18:19 LH: test suite has many tests 09:18:26 LH: hopefully we can get implementations soon 09:18:40 LH: I'm hoping we can settle the naming issue for the methods find and findAll 09:18:59 LH: Issue for parsing comments in selectors still needs to be addressed - hopefully CSS WG can address it in Selectors 4 09:19:14 LH: there was a brief discussion with Anne about merging Selectors API v2 with DOM4 09:19:24 LH: and possibly introducing extra functionality 09:19:35 LH: I wanted to discuss the return type for the findAll method 09:19:48 LH: NodeList, Array, or some new object that provides a combination of functionality 09:19:50 massimo has joined #webapps 09:19:54 LH: Use cases: 09:20:03 LH: (1) get a collection of elements as a result of the query 09:20:07 glenn has joined #webapps 09:20:13 LH: (2) run methods that apply collectively to all the elements 09:20:24 LH: right now you have to iterate individually 09:20:30 q+ to try and squash the naming issue 09:20:34 LH: (3) filter the list or run additional queries on the list 09:21:25 LH: (4) do method chaining, just like in jQuery 09:21:34 nkic has joined #webapps 09:21:46 LH: possible solutions: 09:21:55 aklein has left #webapps 09:22:00 aklein has joined #webapps 09:22:08 LH: (a) normal JavaScript array - would give normal Array functionality but could not add selectors-specific methods 09:22:19 LH: (b) return a NodeList; but no Array-like functionality 09:22:54 LH: (c ) define a custom object which imports functionality from Array and NodeList, but adding Selectors-specific stuff 09:23:37 AR: I'm from ECMA TC39; hard to add Array functionality due to NodeList because of closures 09:23:39 s/selectors-specific methods/selectors-specific methods (e.g. having a new .findAll() make a union)/ 09:23:51 AR: I'd prefer to define an Array subtype or to recast NodeList as an Array 09:24:10 glenn has joined #webapps 09:24:19 AR: there's a preference to make these things Arrays from the pov of developers and JavaScript 09:24:27 CMN: I'd like to address names 09:24:41 CMN: everyone likes find(), findAll(), right? 09:24:45 (no objections heard) 09:24:54 CMN: that's straw consensus and it's a non-technical issue 09:24:58 LH: that about covers it 09:25:17 CMN: as an implementation question, what about compatibility? 09:25:40 rubylin has joined #webapps 09:25:42 LH: the problem with converting NodeList to an Array is that NodeLists are generally live in many uses so you can't import mutable methods from Array 09:25:50 AR: I actually don't think that's a big problem 09:26:14 AR: first, the liveness is a feature of someone else holding an API 09:26:31 AR: this is not something that is foreign 09:26:42 AR: but for the question of adding new invariants, we can model that with proxies 09:27:11 CMN: any other comments, questions? 09:27:21 LH: matches() is implemented with a prefix in all browsers 09:27:29 LH: no one implements scope or reference nodes yet 09:27:43 CMN: any other implementor notes? 09:27:55 Yoshihiro has joined #webapps 09:28:06 TL: just an observation that the extra functionality for chaining seems like a much more generic feature - maybe should not be specific to Selectors API, maybe should be in DOM 4 09:28:19 CMN: back to agenda 09:28:37 CMN: working backwards, at 16:45 we have Web Intents - can't change that time, dial-in 09:28:48 CMN: session on testing, James has agreed to lead 09:28:59 CMN: the goal is to sit in the room and write tests - hands-on session 09:29:18 CMN: will end at 16:45 and will begin when we finish everything else 09:29:26 CMN: after lunch, short session on the Web Platform effort 09:29:35 CMN: those guys do documentation, that's useful 09:29:54 CMN: closer to the concerns of this group, a session on web driver 09:30:06 RRSAgent, make minutes 09:30:06 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/10/30-webapps-minutes.html MikeSmith 09:30:12 CMN: test harness for browsers to avoid manual tests 09:30:28 divya has joined #webapps 09:30:36 CMN: at 11:15 (which means 11:30) we are going to have a session on appcache, offline cache, manifest formats, etc 09:30:42 CMN: at 10:30, coffee break 09:30:53 CMN: it's 10:30 now, coffee break 09:36:04 shepazu has joined #webapps 09:36:49 Cyril has joined #webapps 09:39:19 spoussa has joined #webapps 09:39:42 tokamoto has joined #webapps 09:45:36 tokamoto has joined #webapps 09:51:34 Arno has joined #webapps 09:51:58 tomoyuki has joined #webapps 09:53:48 jcverdie has joined #webapps 09:56:13 tomoyuki has joined #webapps 09:57:43 tomoyuki has joined #webapps 09:58:37 morrita has joined #webapps 09:59:15 yamaday has joined #webapps 09:59:51 tomoyuki has joined #webapps 10:00:17 Shinji has joined #webapps 10:01:05 tomoyuki has joined #webapps 10:05:16 shan has joined #webapps 10:05:59 jcverdie has joined #webapps 10:06:19 alexandremorgaut has joined #webapps 10:07:29 tomoyuki has joined #webapps 10:07:30 jcdufourd has joined #webapps 10:07:41 AnssiK has joined #webapps 10:07:47 AnssiK1 has joined #webapps 10:08:17 rotsuya has joined #webapps 10:09:09 rotsuya_ has joined #webapps 10:11:31 jet has joined #webapps 10:12:25 jsoh has joined #webapps 10:13:24 darobin has joined #webapps 10:13:26 JonathanJ has joined #webapps 10:14:18 edoyle has joined #webapps 10:14:42 edoyle has joined #webapps 10:15:44 kensaku has joined #webapps 10:16:36 JonathanJ1 has joined #webapps 10:17:19 Cyril has joined #webapps 10:17:29 a12u has joined #webapps 10:18:26 jgraham - let me know when you pushed the opera websocket tests and I'll help convert so of them 10:18:40 byungjung__ has joined #webapps 10:19:10 tmpsantos has joined #webapps 10:21:26 BO_HU_CHINA_UNICOM has joined #webapps 10:23:24 aizu has joined #webapps 10:25:01 kotakagi has joined #webapps 10:25:23 massimo has joined #webapps 10:25:26 ScribeNick: ArtB 10:25:40 jfmoy has joined #webapps 10:25:47 Topic: AppCache, Offline, Packaged WebApps, App Manifest, ... 10:26:02 Yoshihro has joined #webapps 10:26:02 CMN: we have a couple of specs in our charter 10:26:07 … e.g. Widgets 10:26:12 … and application manifest 10:26:15 scribe: Josh 10:26:18 scribenick: timeless 10:26:26 chaals: in html, there's AppCache 10:26:30 ... loved by everybody 10:26:35 ... because it allows you to do the same thing 10:26:42 ... with wonderful functionality 10:26:50 ... so wonderful that darobin will describe it 10:27:00 KenjiBX has joined #webapps 10:27:00 ... mozilla has a json based manifest 10:27:10 ... i tossed into an email the prefetch stuff we're looking at 10:27:10 ED for App manifest is: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/app-manifest/raw-file/tip/index.html 10:27:17 ... i don't know if this group is interested in this stuff 10:27:19 ... we are 10:27:28 ... because it gives big improvement in load times 10:27:33 ... this is a free form discussion 10:27:35 ... where are we at 10:27:42 sicking has joined #webapps 10:27:45 ... what are the pieces of this stuff and who are using it 10:27:49 q+ 10:27:51 ... people are building widget systems 10:27:53 ... can we unify it 10:28:03 ... should it be our problem, html's problem, someone else's problem 10:28:11 ... a lot of the people who can give input are in this room 10:28:23 ... i'd like to start this discussion with what is html's appcache doing 10:28:45 RRSAgent, make minutes 10:28:45 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/10/30-webapps-minutes.html ArtB 10:28:45 bryan has joined #webapps 10:28:59 tokamoto has joined #webapps 10:29:03 darobin: AppCache - a small group of people have been meeting in corners to take it to the WG 10:29:07 Present+ Robin_Berjon 10:29:09 ... something will start happening "very soon" 10:29:13 q+ to talk about venue 10:29:14 ... as soon as html enters CR 10:29:20 ... so in a few weeks 10:29:34 ... i'd be happy for someone else to take it 10:29:43 sicking: mozilla organized one of these corners 10:29:48 ... we're very interested in making appcache work 10:29:54 is there a doc ready to be shared from the dark corners, soon? 10:29:58 ... from our point of view -- it doesn't 10:30:06 s/these corners/these dark corners/ 10:30:21 ... from our point of view, how much back compat we keep is up for discussion 10:30:24 tokamoto has joined #webapps 10:30:37 ... we haven't had anyone to put together a proposal 10:30:41 ... and we haven't found a good venue 10:30:48 divya has joined #webapps 10:30:48 q+ 10:30:50 npdoty has joined #webapps 10:30:50 ... i'm reluctant to have someone submit a proposal to the HTML ML 10:30:55 ... i'd prefer to have a separate ML 10:31:08 ... a separate ML is required 10:31:16 ack me 10:31:16 chaals, you wanted to try and squash the naming issue 10:31:16 ... i'd prefer to do it somewhere else 10:31:16 ... either in this WG 10:31:19 ack sic 10:31:22 ... i believe it's still in our charter 10:31:28 ... we can transfer from HTML to this WG 10:31:30 ... or do it in a CG 10:31:43 ack mjs 10:31:43 mjs, you wanted to talk about venue 10:31:47 mjs: w/ my HTML WG cochair hat 10:31:55 ... i don't have a strong opinion about this WG or that WG 10:32:09 ... there's definitely precedence for WebApps taking up when it's more non-markup level 10:32:20 ... there's also precedence for adding apis on, such as data-cache api 10:32:29 ... i don't think HTML WG would object 10:32:40 ... i think HTML WG would support extensions to HTML 10:32:49 ... w/ my vendor hat on, i'm ok w/ either group 10:32:57 ... i'm also happy to see the proposal in super sketchy form 10:32:57 q+ 10:33:05 ... i've heard of the proposall 10:33:07 s/all/al/ 10:33:20 ... but without details to know if we'd be interested 10:33:27 q+ 10:33:28 darobin: i had 2 questions for sicking / anyone else 10:33:33 rubylin has joined #webapps 10:33:36 +q 10:33:36 ... you mentioned potential backwards compat breaking changes 10:33:42 ... i'm not sure it's a good/bad idea 10:33:48 s/+q/q+/G 10:33:56 ... i'm wondering how serious you are about that 10:33:59 sicking: we don't have a proposal 10:34:06 ... we haven't figured out a cohesive idea 10:34:20 here are some of the ideas -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Sep/0060.html 10:34:20 ... the most tangible thing i can say is 10:34:31 ... we want to get rid of this whole master entry idea 10:34:38 ... add more JS API to it 10:34:39 q+ to talk about compatibility 10:34:45 ... so you can add/remove to-from the AppCache 10:34:53 ... and create an appcache for an origin 10:35:07 ... re:back-compat because we don't have anything more tangible, it can go either way 10:35:11 Cyril has joined #webapps 10:35:19 ... i think we can do most things w/o breaking 10:35:29 ... but if getting rid of master entries breaks it, then... 10:35:32 darobin: re:venue 10:35:36 s/Date: 30 November 2012/Date: 30 October 2012/ 10:35:41 ... i can understand why you'd be reluctant to work w/ html 10:35:42 RRSAgent, make minutes 10:35:42 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/10/30-webapps-minutes.html ArtB 10:35:48 ... we're trying to make this WG a friendly venue 10:35:54 ... the way it's broken now is shameful 10:36:08 ... if whomever @mozilla would like to sit down with me, 10:36:15 https://etherpad.mozilla.org/appcache-london, https://etherpad.mozilla.org/appcache 10:36:17 ... i'm happy to share it with the group 10:36:18 JonathanJ1 has left #webapps 10:36:29 tobie: there's output from both meetings which i shared 10:37:11 q? 10:37:15 slightlyoff: we're interested in all of this 10:37:16 ack me 10:37:18 ... we have similar thinking 10:37:18 ack tobie 10:37:21 ack slightlyoff 10:37:25 ... about optionality of master 10:37:26 q+ 10:37:33 ... we want to make camping of a domain more controllable 10:37:39 paul-huawei has joined #webapps 10:37:44 pbakaus: we have such a mess right now 10:37:52 Present+ Paul_Bakaus 10:37:55 ... i think it's important to have a workshop w/ industry leaders 10:37:56 q+ 10:38:01 ... i count us as one of them, we really want this 10:38:02 ack pbakaus 10:38:04 ack pbakaus 10:38:07 ack mjs 10:38:07 mjs, you wanted to talk about compatibility 10:38:11 q+ 10:38:13 mjs: i'd like to make a plea for compat 10:38:22 ... it doesn't have to be fully back-compat w/ syntax and features 10:38:30 ... maybe there's versioning 10:38:36 ... we do have content that uses the current format 10:38:41 ... it's more common on mobile 10:38:45 q+ 10:38:48 ... mobile apps seem to tend to try half backed tech 10:38:56 ... i see the great importance of providing a better model 10:39:10 ... it's clear from web-dev feedback that current app cache doesn't meet their needs and isn't a good design 10:39:23 ... i'm interested in seeing ideas which improve it 10:39:26 ... even breaking the model 10:39:29 ack adrianba 10:39:32 adrianba: agree w/ mjs 10:39:37 ... and about compat 10:39:37 paul-huawei has left #webapps 10:39:38 nkic has joined #webapps 10:39:41 jet has joined #webapps 10:39:47 ... it's inevitable that we'll have to make breaking changes 10:39:52 paul-huawei has joined #webapps 10:39:57 ... we're keen on making sure that existing content keeps workinnng 10:40:05 s/nnng/ng/ 10:40:09 ... ms is interested in working on this as well 10:40:21 ... i pasted the link ms sent to html-wg a little while ago 10:40:33 ... in IE10, we supported an additional mechanism that extends the manifest 10:40:39 ... we provided it in the html5 bug database 10:40:45 ... which allows you to change the way the manifest works 10:40:54 ... this was essential to making Exchange offline mail work 10:40:55 ack sicking 10:41:08 sicking: not breaking existing content seems like a requirement 10:41:38 ... arranging a workshop or something 10:41:49 ... i feel like we should get to the point of having concrete proposals to discuss 10:42:04 ... they always reached a halt when it comes to coming up w/ proposals for fixing it 10:42:12 ... it takes too much time to come up w/ proposals 10:42:15 ack chaals 10:42:25 chaals: 12 months ago, there was a workshop on exactly this topic 10:42:32 ... they concluded exactly what we just said 10:42:44 timeless: [Scribe: why did i have to minute this whole thing if that workshop did this already?] 10:42:52 chaals: there's position papers... 10:43:01 ... i keep on hearing this, yeah we want to do these things 10:43:16 ... it seems we're really in a position where writing a proposal is less work than spending two days in a workshop 10:43:28 ... we could make the workshop unpleasant to encourage writing a proposal 10:43:33 ... perhaps the venue question is part of the issue 10:43:39 ... talking about it here, it's in scope for this WG 10:43:49 ... we really do have on our charter the ability to do this 10:43:53 ... you can bring your proposal here 10:43:57 ... i'd like to do something 10:44:02 ... AppCache is one part of this 10:44:06 ... metadata stuff around an app 10:44:10 ... widget configuration/packaging 10:44:14 ... or mozilla's proposal 10:44:20 ... which was just sat on for a few months 10:44:29 ... a JSON based more or less equivalent functionality 10:44:35 ... is in this WG as a listed item 10:44:40 q+ 10:44:43 ... i'd like to understand if it's worth working on this stuff 10:44:57 ... as a vendor, yandex has stuff which does apps based on a JSON package 10:45:12 ... as our app is built from Chromium, it uses the same JSON as Chrome 10:45:16 ... which is similar to Mozilla 10:45:25 ... there's the dark corner of widget spec backers 10:45:30 ... mutterings is 10:45:37 ... given there's roundtripping between JSON and XML 10:45:47 ... unifying that isn't really difficult 10:45:56 ... wondering if people from those corners are interested in that as a workitem 10:46:01 ... i don't think it's scope creep 10:46:13 ... it's a fairly straightforward is a simple conversion of values 10:46:16 JohnJansen has joined #webapps 10:46:20 ... just as mozilla-chrome is straightforward 10:46:28 ... Q: what are the workitems we should take up 10:47:14 ... do we think doing it here is the right place 10:47:16 ack ArtB 10:47:17 ack me 10:47:23 yes, it should be done, and here 10:47:24 ArtB: art barstow, nokia 10:47:25 ... about venue 10:47:37 ... i'm mostly indifferent about here, HTMLWG or a CG 10:47:45 ... (which was already created) 10:48:00 ... but in considering venue, we need producers/consumers of appcache to be comfortable to come in and give feedback 10:48:06 ... i think a CG may be more comfortable for them 10:48:20 ... hashing out multiple drafts there may be easier before a WG 10:48:20 q? 10:48:22 q+ to say yandex would prefer this in the WG 10:48:36 paulc: interested in knowing if anyone is in this WG 10:48:41 ... that isn't in HTML WG 10:48:46 ... wants to do this work here 10:48:46 shh has joined #webapps 10:48:52 ... HTML WG is about to be rechartered 10:49:07 ... we'd like this to be clarified before we're rechartered 10:49:12 ... if you don't clarify today 10:49:18 ... before we meet Thu/Fri 10:49:21 ... an AC question 10:49:31 ... if we proposed Yes/No for doing AppCache in our charter 10:49:39 ... will there be objections from Member companies in this room 10:49:45 s/room/room-group/ 10:49:50 ... that aren't in our group? 10:49:56 sicking: i can't speak officially for mozilla 10:50:03 ... i'm not sure we'd object for it to be in charter 10:50:09 ... i'd personally prefer WebApps WG or a CG 10:50:12 ... i feel so far 10:50:24 ... we've had an easier time talking about these things on webapps ML 10:50:37 ... i feel like this isn't super tied into HTML as a Markup Language 10:50:43 ... scope wise, it makes as much sense here as HTML 10:50:51 ... i don't think we'd object to it being in HTML WG 10:51:03 chaals: Yandex, first preference is doing it in Web Apps WG 10:51:12 ... second preference is the Native WebApps CG 10:51:16 ... which is dormant 10:51:18 q+ 10:51:20 ... third preference is HTML 10:51:29 ... if it doesn't work out like that, we're not going to object 10:51:40 ... we have a strong preference, but won't spend our life arguing about it 10:51:42 sato has joined #webapps 10:51:45 adrianba: Adrian, Microsoft 10:51:53 ... i proposed to continue this discussion in the HTML WG 10:52:01 ... because it's already in the spec 10:52:14 ... MS has no objection for doing it here 10:52:19 ... we had the data-cache discussion 10:52:22 ... we prefer one WG or the other 10:52:27 ... [i.e. not a CG] 10:52:40 chaals: how many people feel we shouldn't do this work anywhere 10:52:45 mjs: stop trolling the WG 10:52:57 chaals: how many people couldn't care less where the work takes place 10:53:16 chaals: how many people have a preference for where the work takes place? 10:53:30 ... i'll pass the mic around, and ask you to state your preference 10:53:42 pbakaus: Zynga, web apps because i believe most of the apis should be in js 10:54:02 hsivonen: XXX, webapps, good track record of WG 10:54:18 adrianba: MS, i gave my preference, but guess it'll be in WebApps 10:54:27 darobin: HTML, because i think we'll fix that group, and it'll rock 10:54:30 [ laughter ] 10:54:46 SimonPieters: Opera, WebApps because it's a functional group and HTML currently isn't 10:54:59 sicking: first preference is "Fix AppCache CG" 10:55:10 ... second preference is WebApps WG 10:55:14 s/first/Mozilla, first/ 10:55:26 smaug: WebApps, what hsivonen said 10:55:34 rafaelw: Google, WebApps it makes sense here 10:55:46 chaals: this is the side that doesn't care 10:55:49 odinho_: Opera, WebApps 10:55:52 webapps, because we see this as related to app packaging and synergistic with the webapps experience with widgets, and other APIs that webapps may consider (e.g. offline webapp support in general) 10:56:09 bryan: AT&T, WebApps, we see this related to webapp packaging, synergistic w/ widgets 10:56:13 ... and offline in general 10:56:19 chaals: ignoring darobin (good idea) 10:56:25 ... there's a strong preference here to do it here 10:56:27 paul___irish has joined #webapps 10:56:28 ... for the people who care 10:56:38 ... if we said, hey paulc, we think we'll do it here 10:56:40 kseo2 has joined #webapps 10:56:49 ... tell HTML WG that WebApps wants to do it here, and themselves 10:56:53 ... will we have a turf war? 10:57:07 paulc: i don't know the answer, we'll find out on thursday 10:57:22 chaals: message to HTML WG is "we want it here, if that's ok with you guys" 10:57:37 paulc: chairs should take an action to send a message to the html wg 10:57:42 wasn't mjs's comment earlier that he didn't expect that to be a particular problem? 10:58:07 paulc: the question applies to html wg too 10:58:23 ... is there anyone in html and not in webapps who'd object to it not being in html 10:58:34 ... i took the silence as "no one objected to it being in html" 10:58:47 sicking: i'll object to do it in the html wg on the main ML 10:58:54 ACTION: barstow respond to HTMLWG's question re WebApps has a strong preference to work on AppCache in WebApps WG 10:58:54 Created ACTION-674 - Respond to HTMLWG's question re WebApps has a strong preference to work on AppCache in WebApps WG [on Arthur Barstow - due 2012-11-06]. 10:58:55 ... but wouldn't object to it being its own ML 10:59:17 npdoty, I don't expect it to be a problem but paul is correct that there could be people who would have strong feelings about doing it in html wg that have not spoken up yet 10:59:25 chaals: we'll send an email to HTML we'd like to do it here 10:59:40 chaals: what are issues other than lack of concrete proposals 10:59:44 mjs, understood, thanks for clarifying 10:59:51 ... appcache 11:00:16 ... without anyone speaking up, we don't care 11:00:33 q+ 11:00:37 pbakaus: for the record, we, Zynga, think it's worth doing 11:00:45 chaals: we could entertain the question 11:00:49 q- 11:00:52 ... within JSON based metadata 11:00:59 AT&T thinks its worthwhile to evolve and converge the widget specs with whatever comes out of the appcache evolution 11:01:06 ... we'd like to see JSON convergence 11:01:27 s/we'd/we, Yandex, would/ 11:01:35 sicking: when we submitted, we didn't hear any response 11:01:40 ... so i'm surprised to hear 11:01:47 ... and happy to hear, if that's no longer the case 11:01:52 the lack of response may be simply a bandwidth issue 11:01:54 ... we were planning on submitting it to sysapps 11:01:56 ack sicking 11:02:00 ... along with a runtime 11:02:08 ... i think runtime+packaging go together 11:02:18 ... they're co-dependent 11:02:26 ... i'm wondering if group is working on packaging format + runtime 11:02:37 ... feedback from google people on mozilla's spec 11:02:45 ... was we don't understand the security implications 11:03:04 ... it fits strangely in my mind with "but we're shipping an app store solution based on it" 11:03:10 ... what is it with this 11:03:11 q- 11:03:17 ... are you just not interested in convergence 11:03:25 q- chaals 11:03:35 q+ 11:03:49 slightlyoff: our format creates a separate origin 11:04:07 ... to the extent that they're independent, we don't have the same problems we'd have as when we join it with the rest of the web 11:04:08 ack sicking 11:04:19 JonathanJ1 has joined #webapps 11:04:27 sicking: google's answer was "it doesn't make sense to define a packaging format before you have a runtime" 11:04:36 ... the packaging format describes what you put into the runtime 11:04:42 ... my question is "should we do that work here" 11:04:47 ... otherwise, it's in the sysapps charter 11:04:54 ... i'm fine with it in either 11:05:08 ... but discussions will happy in sysapps regardless 11:05:24 chaals: i here myself and sicking saying we'd like convergence on JSON 11:05:41 here is a related email from Adam Barth http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2012AprJun/1017.html re Manifest and SysApps WG 11:05:44 ... pbakaus saying they'd like to see convergence for XML w/ JSON (for packaging) 11:05:52 ... onus would be on us to produce a convincing proposal 11:06:02 darobin: or just do the work 11:06:03 chaals: right 11:06:10 ... so we might end up in sysapps w/ manifest 11:06:16 ... which brings us back to appcache 11:06:33 timeless: i will protest if i'm minuting this discussion next year 11:06:54 chaals: appcache 11:07:02 ... we note the lack of concrete proposals 11:07:16 pbakaus: an implementation detail 11:07:26 ... i'd like to make sure it works w/ file system apis we discussed yesterday 11:07:35 ... our main goal is to limit the number of requests we make 11:07:39 ... it needs to be highly dynamic 11:07:48 [ silence ] 11:07:53 q? 11:08:04 SungOk_You has joined #webapps 11:08:18 shepazu: is the queue empty because people don't think app cache is needed 11:08:27 sicking: problem is we don't have any proposals to discuss 11:08:35 odinho_: what sicking said [+1] 11:08:40 chaals: my impression too 11:08:53 what sicking said 11:08:54 we havent seen into the dark corners yet, once there are proposals it will be good to consider and discuss them. 11:09:05 (I've been working on something for months and it's nearly out, but not there yet) 11:09:22 pbakaus: maybe we can get a wishlist about what we want this to cover 11:09:34 bryan: The stuff on the mozilla etherpad exist. 11:09:34 [2] https://etherpad.mozilla.org/appcache 11:09:34 [3] http://www.w3.org/2011/web-apps-ws/ 11:09:40 chaals: we could, i've sat through two of those already 11:09:54 ... any proposal that would be accepted would have to point to a wishlist/requirements reference 11:10:02 -> https://etherpad.mozilla.org/appcache-london Appcache London 11:10:12 hallvord has joined #webapps 11:10:14 ScribeNick: ArtB 11:10:31 -> https://etherpad.mozilla.org/appcache AppCache second meeting 11:10:34 Josh: we need some requirements work first 11:10:42 … before we start on the spec 11:10:45 morrita has joined #webapps 11:10:55 chaals: +1 from a WG member 11:10:57 s,[2] https://etherpad.mozilla.org/appcache,, 11:11:04 s,[3] http://www.w3.org/2011/web-apps-ws/,, 11:11:07 s/work first/work - published - first/ 11:11:08 ScribeNick: timeless 11:11:50 s|s,[3] http://www.w3.org/2011/web-apps-ws/|| 11:11:57 s|s,[2] https://etherpad.mozilla.org/appcache,,|| 11:12:02 chaals: add an XHR update after lunch 11:12:06 ... i won't be here after lunch 11:12:35 ArtB: displaying tentative agenda this afternoon 11:12:40 ... come back @1:30pm 11:12:47 ... shepazu will talk about web platform docs 11:13:03 ... i was hoping Simon Stuart would talk about WebDriver 11:13:09 s|[3] http://www.w3.org/2011/web-apps-ws/|| 11:13:20 ... jgraham to talk about testing 11:13:33 s/Stuart/Stewart/ 11:13:41 s|[3] http://www.w3.org/2011/web-apps-ws/|| 11:13:52 jgraham: i guess, what we do depends on what people are interested in 11:13:57 ... good time to gauge that 11:14:05 ... how many are interested in hearing about testing at all? 11:14:12 [ nearly half ] 11:14:23 shepazu: who isn't interested in testing? 11:15:10 chaals: if you don't want to talk about testing, you can skip most of the afternoon 11:15:19 jgraham: sounds like TestTheWebForward w/ liam 11:15:24 ... introduction on how to write tests 11:15:28 ... get people writing tests 11:15:40 s|w/ liam|Lyon| 11:15:42 ... maybe an opportunity to have a discussion amongst the people who have to run the test 11:15:48 ArtB: thanks jgraham 11:16:09 s|[2] https://etherpad.mozilla.org/appcache|| 11:16:21 RRSAgent, make minutes 11:16:21 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/10/30-webapps-minutes.html ArtB 11:16:35 morrita has joined #webapps 11:17:06 Shinji has joined #webapps 11:20:32 jet has joined #webapps 11:22:10 aklein has left #webapps 11:22:13 aklein has joined #webapps 11:22:47 rubylin has joined #webapps 11:23:31 Arno has joined #webapps 11:38:08 sicking has joined #webapps 11:45:15 shh has joined #webapps 11:47:34 leehomlin has joined #webapps 11:51:46 RRSAgent, make minutes 11:51:46 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/10/30-webapps-minutes.html MikeSmith 12:03:56 Arno has joined #webapps 12:03:59 rotsuya has joined #webapps 12:04:06 rotsuya has joined #webapps 12:05:13 tantek has joined #webapps 12:11:41 evanlee has joined #webapps 12:12:58 morrita has joined #webapps 12:14:47 smaug has joined #webapps 12:16:11 tomoyuki has joined #webapps 12:16:50 richt has joined #webapps 12:17:11 kensaku has joined #webapps 12:17:52 tokamoto has joined #webapps 12:19:59 tpacbot has joined #webapps 12:23:33 ethan has joined #webapps 12:24:24 richt has joined #webapps 12:25:28 jfmoy has joined #webapps 12:27:53 Cyril has joined #webapps 12:28:34 edoyle has joined #webapps 12:32:48 spoussa has joined #webapps 12:35:26 mjs has joined #webapps 12:36:17 abarsto has joined #webapps 12:38:27 bradee-oh has joined #webapps 12:38:58 abarsto has joined #webapps 12:40:49 KenjiBX has joined #webapps 12:40:59 ScribeNick: ArtB 12:41:24 topic: Web Platform Docs 12:41:29 Doug's presentation: http://www.w3.org/Talks/2012/10-lea-webplatform/wpd-talk/#intro 12:41:44 shan has joined #webapps 12:41:53 Lachy has joined #webapps 12:41:55 Yoshihiro has joined #webapps 12:41:57 adrianba has joined #webapps 12:44:29 Norbert has joined #webapps 12:48:29 sicking has joined #webapps 12:49:36 shh has joined #webapps 12:52:01 adrianba has joined #webapps 12:52:38 http://www.webplatform.org/ 12:52:52 Topic: Testing (James Graham) 12:53:08 smaug has joined #webapps 12:53:27 MagnusOlsson has joined #webapps 12:53:53 shepazu has joined #webapps 12:54:33 sicking has joined #webapps 12:54:39 ScribeNick: lachy 12:54:55 krisk has joined #webapps 12:55:14 AnssiK has joined #webapps 12:55:17 seo has joined #webapps 12:55:33 schuki has joined #webapps 12:55:53 alexandremorgaut has joined #webapps 12:56:33 Topic: Testing the Web Backwards, Lyon 12:56:45 byungjung has joined #webapps 12:56:54 noriya has joined #webapps 12:56:55 darobin has joined #webapps 12:58:33 jsoh has joined #webapps 12:58:35 a12u has joined #webapps 12:59:56 a1zu has joined #webapps 13:00:05 jcverdie has joined #webapps 13:00:09 a12u has joined #webapps 13:00:13 jgraham: I will talk for up to 30 mintues. Then we will get people writing tests. 13:00:27 jgraham: In the past 12 to 18 months, the testing situation at the W3C has improved a lot. 13:00:44 … When CSS 2.1 was going to REC, there was a big panic about there being no tests. 13:00:58 … Now we are starting to have some agreement about what format to write tests in. 13:00:59 lmclister has joined #webapps 13:01:01 a1zu has joined #webapps 13:01:05 … The same format for WebApps, HTML, etc. 13:01:11 a12u has joined #webapps 13:01:21 … The tests are all in mercurial repo. 13:01:30 … http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webapps/ 13:01:48 … [Showing the repo website on the screen] 13:02:07 jyp has joined #webapps 13:02:24 … We have a folder for each spec, containing all of its tests. 13:02:41 … For each, there is an "approved" directory and "submitted" directory. 13:02:42 http://w3c-test.org/webapps/ 13:03:08 … This is a bit annoying right now, so we are going to try and develop a system much like they have in CSS, where the spec can be annotated with relevants tests. 13:03:17 Example of approved tests: http://w3c-test.org/webapps/WebSockets/tests/ 13:03:29 … http://w3c-test.org/webapps/WebSockets/tests/approved/ 13:03:55 tokamoto has joined #webapps 13:04:11 yamaday has joined #webapps 13:04:11 jgraham: the situation now is that we are accepting tests in 3 formats, depending on what you're trying to test. 13:04:25 … For this group, we want to test DOM APIs, so we can write tests using JavaScript. 13:04:34 … testharness.js framework for writing tests. 13:04:41 sicking has joined #webapps 13:04:46 … Similar in idea to others like QUnit, etc. 13:05:09 … https://github.com/jgraham/testharness.js 13:05:15 … For cases where rendering is important, we use reference tests. You two files. One uses the thing being tested. One creates the same rendering using different techniques. 13:05:42 … If the two look the same, then you assume it works. If they're different, the test fails, something is broken. 13:05:50 Yuan has joined #webapps 13:05:57 Dewa has joined #webapps 13:06:01 … We also have self-describing tests. 13:06:14 … This is basically a list of steps that describe what to do and what the result should be. 13:06:33 a12u has joined #webapps 13:06:41 … testharness tutorial by Robin Berjon: http://darobin.github.com/test-harness-tutorial/docs/using-testharness.html 13:06:48 … I will now go through the features of testharness.js. Then in the next session, people can try writing some tests. 13:07:25 darobin, I suggest we put that documentation on w3c-test.org 13:07:40 kotakagi has joined #webapps 13:07:41 sgodard has joined #webapps 13:07:44 jcdufourd has joined #webapps 13:07:44 shh has joined #webapps 13:08:30 npdoty has joined #webapps 13:09:08 jgraham: [Slides on screen, from testing the web forward event in paris] 13:09:23 … For testing JS, no manual interaction 13:09:27 … Two types of tests. 13:09:33 … 1. Synchronous tests. 13:09:49 … [Showing boilerplate test file on screen] 13:10:48 shoko has joined #webapps 13:11:06 … The function called test takes another function as a parameter. The inner function runs the actual test, with various assertions. e.g. assert_true(…) 13:12:22 … [Showed example assertion from a spec] 13:12:45 … [Now showing an example testing function that tests this assertion] 13:13:01 … 2. Async tests. 13:13:28 … Some tests depend on waiting for events, network responses or other non-synchronous features. 13:14:16 … Test authors should write using the normal event handlers for the feature being tested and include test functions within those event handlers. 13:14:52 … [Example on screen showing an asynchronous test function called by setTimeout] 13:15:20 Arno has joined #webapps 13:15:43 … t.step() takes a function, which runs the tests. 13:16:11 … t.step_func() is similar, but generates a testing function, which may be used directly as an event or timeout handler. 13:16:27 … [Showing an example assertion from the local storage spec] 13:16:52 sangwhan1 has joined #webapps 13:17:33 Norbert has joined #webapps 13:17:42 … [Example tests the onstorage event. Uses t.step_func() to generate an event handler for onstorage. Includes assertions to verify the result.] 13:17:54 Zakim has left #webapps 13:17:56 … This includes multiple assertions in the single tests. But if one fails, the whole test fails. 13:18:29 Zakim has joined #webapps 13:18:37 q? 13:19:29 … We can set more properties on the test that are useful as metadata. 13:19:50 … The CSS WG used to link to the part of the spec being tested. 13:20:03 … What we can use instead is a help property to point at the part of the spec being tested. 13:20:15 sangwhan has joined #webapps 13:20:34 … This helps identify which parts of the spec have and have not been tested. 13:20:57 … PLH has been working on adding this for HTML. 13:21:15 … I propose that we structure the directories based on the section of the spec. 13:21:36 chaals has joined #webapps 13:21:38 Cyril has joined #webapps 13:22:31 Lachy: I don't like the idea of using directory structure as a kind of metadata. 13:22:49 jgraham: There are pros and cons. THis is an issue that can be discussed tomorrow or some other time. 13:23:26 The step_func() method lets authors specify a timeout for an individual test. 13:23:41 s/The step_func()/... The step func()/ 13:24:05 … The setup() method allows setting a global timeout for the entire testsuite. 13:24:31 s/step func()/async_test()/ 13:24:58 … There are a range of asserts. e.g. assert_true, assert_false, etc. (Others shown on screen) 13:25:21 … assert_throws knows how to capture an exception and check that it's the right one. 13:25:33 Yoshihiro has joined #webapps 13:26:04 … A notification API allows you to findout when certain things occur during the test, using callbacks. 13:26:12 … There is lots of documentation. 13:26:25 … darobin has written a tutorial as well. 13:26:39 at 16:00, we will try writing some test. 13:26:58 http://darobin.github.com/test-harness-tutorial/docs/using-testharness.html -> Test Harness Tutorial 13:27:12 http://w3c-test.org/resources/testharness.js 13:27:30 kotakagi has left #webapps 13:27:57 topic: XMLHttpRequest 13:28:11 Julian Aubourg 13:28:37 julian: We have a test coverage report for XHR 13:29:16 … There is a CSS and Javascript file that can generate this report within the specs. 13:29:41 jgraham: There will be more sessions on testing tomorrow. 13:30:02 topic: Web Driver 13:30:46 Simon Stewart 13:30:52 Simon: My name is Simon Stewart 13:31:31 … Over here we have Andreas from Opera, David who works on Firefox and Mozilla web driver, XXX who works on Chrome's 13:31:35 … Demo. 13:31:54 … We have support for tests written in python, java c#, etc. Basically any language. 13:32:06 … Facebook have contributed PHP bindings. 13:32:11 … There are Perl bindings as well. 13:32:24 … Demo, on screen. 13:32:48 … Obtaining a driver instance using: d = webdriver.Firefox() 13:32:58 … [More code on screen] 13:33:24 … We have a version of Firefox 13:33:39 … Using d.get() method to navigate to URL 13:34:07 … d.find_element() method to find elements in a page by an attribute value. 13:34:27 … e.send_keys() simulates keyboard input 13:34:48 … Demo of WebDriver playing the piano. 13:35:30 … Javascript based piano. WebDriver is sending click events to the piano keys on the page. 13:35:43 … Demo was using Chrome. 13:35:48 … We also support Opera 13:36:02 … Using web driver to send keyboard inputs 13:36:23 trackbot has joined #webapps 13:36:34 … Also querying using javascript and JSON to find out the position of items on the screen, in order to play a game. 13:36:52 … What are the kinds of thing that people are doing with these things? 13:37:05 … QA engineers doing end-to-end testing of their systems. 13:37:16 shige_ has joined #webapps 13:37:27 … With high fidelity user input, we can do things like drag and drop. 13:37:49 … On Chrome and Opera, those browsers have been modified to allow web driver to inject events directly 13:38:11 … For IE and Firefox, we get hold of the hwnd and pump WM messages into it. 13:38:29 … The second audience are browser vendors. 13:38:43 … They want to be able to test their browser before inflicting it upon the world. 13:39:22 … The third audience is spec authors wanting to write conformance tests for things that can't be expressed solely in javascript. 13:39:35 … Interacting with modal dialogs, for example, or other things that require user interaction. 13:39:49 q+ to ask about device interaction 13:39:50 … Web Driver can handle alert(), prompt(), etc. 13:40:06 ack darobin 13:40:06 darobin, you wanted to ask about device interaction 13:40:37 Wonsuk has joined #webapps 13:40:55 darobin: One of the problems we had trouble automating is platform device functions. No way to detect and verify physical actions, like phone vibrations. 13:41:30 simon: It's fairly easy to extend. 13:42:27 … We mandate that implementations should communicate in a common way, to reduce fragmentation of implementations. 13:42:38 … That's a high level overview. Any questions? 13:43:18 SimonPieters: For the W3C tests, jgraham said we have 3 formats. Can we replace manual tests with WebDriver tests? 13:43:39 simon: The manual tests which are a sequence of user interaction and checking the result are good candidates for web driver. 13:43:56 … There may be edge cases where we don't have that functionality. 13:44:08 … We have an advanced interaction API. 13:44:23 … We have a basic touch implementation. 13:47:18 Lachy: Is there any ability to interact with the browser chrome. 13:47:32 simon: Not yet. Possible to extend into this area in the future. 13:47:58 jwheare has joined #webapps 13:48:32 simon: web driver is an attempt to avoid getting into a place where web apps cannot be automatically tested. 13:48:56 massimo has joined #webapps 13:49:06 ArtB: How much time before the web driver spec is at feature freeze? 13:49:17 simon: We're kind of doing this backwards. The implementations are fairly solid. 13:49:40 … Lots of major companies. Facebook, Mozilla, BBC, etc. are happy to put a lot of weight behind this. 13:49:49 … The actual specification is lagging behind. 13:50:06 … If you were able to look at the open source tree, you would be able to make a compatible implementation today. 13:50:26 … We are working on porting our tests to a W3C test suite alongside the specification. 13:50:37 ArtB: If you have comments, submit them sooner rather than later. 13:50:52 slejeune has joined #webapps 13:51:18 John: (Microsoft, Principle testee for IE). I was in the meetings for web driver spec. We are looking at and and trying to evaluate it. Cannot say whether we weil support it. 13:51:30 simon: Mozilla will be using WebDriver extensively 13:51:42 chaals has joined #webapps 13:51:50 s/testee/test lead/ 13:52:23 odinho_: Is it possible to take control over the browser and interact with it yourself while web driver script is running. 13:52:28 s/John/JohnJansen 13:52:33 s/we weil/we will/ 13:52:46 trackbot has joined #webapps 13:52:51 simon: It's a bad idea. Mozilla runs it in a non-interactive way. 13:52:56 s/in the meetings/in the meetings as an observer/ 13:53:10 rrsagent, draft minutes 13:53:10 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/10/30-webapps-minutes.html chaals 13:53:41 … For people who run websites, it is possible to detect if web driver is being used by the client. 13:54:03 … I would be interested in providing a way to identify when a browser is under web driver control. 13:54:34 dveditz has joined #webapps 13:55:36 … I will hang around if people want to ask me questions later. 13:55:47 … Thank you 13:56:05 ArtB: Break. 13:56:23 … jgraham will continue with testing at 16:00. Web Intents will start at 16:45 13:57:24 … testing is at 15:30 instead 14:02:32 JonathanJ1 has joined #webapps 14:05:56 edoyle has joined #webapps 14:08:30 RRSAgent, make minutes 14:08:30 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/10/30-webapps-minutes.html ArtB 14:10:04 morrita has joined #webapps 14:12:53 tomoyuki has joined #webapps 14:15:30 mishida has joined #webapps 14:19:11 Present+ Tomoyuki_Shimizu 14:20:13 JohnJansen has joined #webapps 14:23:20 mjs has joined #webapps 14:24:52 smaug has joined #webapps 14:25:47 Arno has joined #webapps 14:28:40 dnkim has joined #webapps 14:29:55 Norbert has joined #webapps 14:30:39 Daisuke has joined #webapps 14:35:20 miketaylr has joined #webapps 14:38:53 nkic has joined #webapps 14:39:11 jsoh has joined #webapps 14:41:20 ScribeNick: ArtB 14:41:30 Topic: Testing Tutorial by James and Simon 14:41:57 JG: if you have any questions about writing tests, Simon and I would be glad to help 14:42:02 … just let us know 14:48:31 Cathy has joined #webapps 14:48:56 Shinji has joined #webapps 14:50:03 robin has joined #webapps 14:50:32 morrita has joined #webapps 14:50:57 jcdufourd has joined #webapps 14:51:00 shoko has joined #webapps 14:51:51 jcverdie has joined #webapps 14:52:53 yamaday has joined #webapps 14:53:09 a12u has joined #webapps 14:57:03 chaals has joined #webapps 14:57:22 Cathy has joined #webapps 14:57:37 darobin has joined #webapps 14:57:51 npdoty has joined #webapps 14:57:57 lmclister has joined #webapps 14:57:58 sicking has joined #webapps 14:58:09 alexandremorgaut has joined #webapps 14:59:43 RRSAgent, make minutes 14:59:43 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/10/30-webapps-minutes.html ArtB 15:01:29 morrita has joined #webapps 15:01:30 mishida has joined #webapps 15:01:30 shepazu has joined #webapps 15:01:54 spoussa has joined #webapps 15:01:57 KenjiBX has joined #webapps 15:02:30 Arno has joined #webapps 15:02:49 mjs has joined #webapps 15:03:52 rubylin has joined #webapps 15:04:14 paul-huawei has joined #webapps 15:06:31 adrianba has joined #webapps 15:06:48 kotakagi has joined #webapps 15:06:49 paul-huawei has joined #webapps 15:09:23 paul-huawei has joined #webapps 15:09:56 tantek has joined #webapps 15:11:21 /join #tpac 15:11:29 doh 15:13:34 lmclister has left #webapps 15:13:50 Shinji has joined #webapps 15:14:21 krisk has joined #webapps 15:15:14 Wonsuk has joined #webapps 15:17:20 sicking has joined #webapps 15:20:14 rotsuya has joined #webapps 15:20:19 paul-huawei has left #webapps 15:21:08 shepazu has joined #webapps 15:21:35 shh has joined #webapps 15:21:56 kensaku has joined #webapps 15:24:53 Hidetoshi has joined #webapps 15:25:04 abarsto has joined #webapps 15:25:30 RRSAgent, make minutes 15:25:30 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/10/30-webapps-minutes.html ArtB 15:25:37 Dewa has joined #webapps 15:26:21 zakim, dial Rhone_3 15:26:21 sorry, ArtB, I don't know what conference this is 15:26:59 takuya has joined #webapps 15:28:26 zakim, this is IA_WebApps 15:28:26 ArtB, I see IA_WebApps()4:00AM in the schedule but not yet started. Perhaps you mean "this will be IA_WebApps". 15:28:38 zakim, this will be IA_WebApps 15:28:38 ok, ArtB; I see IA_WebApps()4:00AM scheduled to start 448 minutes ago 15:28:48 sakkuru has joined #webapps 15:28:51 zakim, dial Rhone_3 15:28:51 ok, ArtB; the call is being made 15:28:51 IA_WebApps()4:00AM has now started 15:28:53 +Rhone_3 15:29:17 -Rhone_3 15:29:18 IA_WebApps()4:00AM has ended 15:29:18 Attendees were Rhone_3 15:29:46 zakim, dial Rhone_3 15:29:46 ok, ArtB; the call is being made 15:29:47 IA_WebApps()4:00AM has now started 15:29:48 +Rhone_3 15:30:39 zakim, who is here? 15:30:39 On the phone I see Rhone_3 15:30:41 On IRC I see sakkuru, takuya, Dewa, ArtB, kensaku, shepazu, rotsuya, sicking, Wonsuk, krisk, tantek, kotakagi, adrianba, rubylin, mjs, Arno, KenjiBX, spoussa, mishida, morrita, 15:30:41 ... alexandremorgaut, npdoty, darobin, chaals, a12u, yamaday, jcverdie 15:31:29 leehomlin has joined #webapps 15:31:37 sato has joined #webapps 15:32:26 seo has joined #webapps 15:33:51 \o/ 15:35:13 Hidetoshi has joined #webapps 15:35:58 mjs has joined #webapps 15:36:52 Great, It's very cool with tests inside document, good job 15:37:23 massimo has joined #webapps 15:37:49 shh has joined #webapps 15:38:27 Daisuke has left #webapps 15:38:58 edoyle has joined #webapps 15:40:48 nsakai has joined #webapps 15:43:21 shh has joined #webapps 15:43:27 jsoh has joined #webapps 15:43:31 mjs has joined #webapps 15:44:07 kinji_matsumura has joined #webapps 15:44:31 Yoshihiro has joined #webapps 15:44:48 spoussa has joined #webapps 15:45:15 Topic: Web Intents 15:45:51 shige has joined #webapps 15:45:52 Cathy has joined #webapps 15:45:59 zakim, who is here? 15:45:59 On the phone I see Rhone_3 15:46:00 On IRC I see Cathy, shige, spoussa, Yoshihiro, kinji_matsumura, mjs, jsoh, shh, nsakai, edoyle, massimo, Hidetoshi, sato, leehomlin, sakkuru, takuya, Dewa, ArtB, kensaku, shepazu, 15:46:00 ... rotsuya, sicking, Wonsuk, krisk, tantek, kotakagi, adrianba 15:46:11 Daisuke has joined #webapps 15:46:29 Claes has joined #webapps 15:47:09 Greg: I'm going to talk about web intents and our prototype implementation 15:47:21 … Web Intents is a draft in collaboration with device APIs. 15:47:55 … It's kind of like an RPC framework, when one app can start an activity that is satisfied by another web app. 15:47:55 shh has joined #webapps 15:48:11 dveditz has joined #webapps 15:48:17 … You can see some extensions and apps I have installed in Chrome. (on screen) 15:48:17 jeff has joined #webapps 15:48:17 is anyone there from Mozilla to bring up web activities? 15:48:59 … The page has a way to pick an image from anotehr web app. If i click on this button, it takes me to another app called Quicksnapr. 15:49:23 … Using web cam APIs to take a picture directly on the web page. 15:49:46 … [taken several pictures] 15:50:03 … Can pick one and send it back to the Imagemator app (the first one he started at) 15:50:34 … Using file system API to save the picture locally. 15:51:13 … I can now load up another local Chrome app and see the image on the local file system. 15:51:22 bjkim has joined #webapps 15:51:34 morrita has joined #webapps 15:51:44 … The apps don't necessarily know about each other. The intents allow them to be loosely hooked up in an adhoc way. 15:51:58 mounir - glad to hear it. carry-on then. thanks. 15:52:02 … The nice thing is that the first web app that launches the intent doesn't have to know about the next one. 15:52:17 … That's the loosely couple benefit that comes from this system. 15:52:36 … It does cause some problems though. 15:52:49 dnkim has joined #webapps 15:53:03 … The current status: We've done a tonne of work on the mechanics of the spec, resolving ambiguities, standard spec work, etc. Also developed an interchange format. 15:53:19 … e.g. the details of how an image gets transferred from point A to B 15:53:40 hbang has joined #WebApps 15:54:08 … More to come. e.g. When we first proposed this API, we were thinking in terms, than when picking an image, you would always get specific user interaction approaches. 15:54:13 jgraham - re: - http://w3cmemes.tumblr.com/post/22399681762 15:54:22 davidb has joined #webapps 15:54:50 … That was a mistake. We want to move to an event model. 15:55:26 plh has joined #webapps 15:55:40 … The problems are mostly around the UI and figuring out the responsibilities of the UA and web app. 15:56:09 … The first one is that when you have a few tabs cooperating. I have one tab that started the intent, another that satisfied the intent. 15:56:11 npdoty has joined #webapps 15:56:16 tantek jgraham: also http://w3cmemes.tumblr.com/post/29085196102 15:56:19 … How should this link be conveyed to the user. 15:56:52 … How to manage the fact that there are two tabs involved in the same activity. 15:56:58 virginie_galindo has joined #webapps 15:57:44 … We thought the web app picker would be a benefit becuase they can select a new app that could satisfy the intent. 15:57:54 … The use of this picker is a lot higher than we would like. 15:58:04 … It ends up being a lot of steps. 15:58:46 … User has to check permissions when setting up a new app. Incorporating app discovery and installation into the picker doesn't work, from a user interaction perspective. 15:58:58 darobin has joined #webapps 15:59:27 … If we imagine a defaulting model, where there is a system default for known intents. 15:59:41 … So users wouldn't be presented with the picker so often. They would just use their default. 15:59:57 shh has joined #webapps 16:00:12 … It's possible that these issues may need API tweaks to solve them. 16:00:23 In Chrome 24, the feature is behind an experimental flag. 16:00:23 rrsagent, make minutes 16:00:23 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/10/30-webapps-minutes.html adrianba 16:00:25 takuya has joined #webapps 16:00:46 kinji_matsumura has joined #webapps 16:01:05 … that's basically the demo and getting everyone up to speed. Any questions or discussion? 16:01:24 q? 16:02:02 noriya has joined #webapps 16:02:37 Greg. It has changed. For a while we thought we needed extra metadata in the pay load. 16:02:46 … Currently the API is very task oriented. 16:02:47 seo has joined #webapps 16:03:05 komoroske has joined #webapps 16:03:16 … If the model is more a persistent system or app to app connection, that may not be the best API to use. 16:03:33 q? 16:04:24 XXX: You spoke a lot about interacting with 2 tabs. Could you explain? 16:04:38 s/XXX/mounir/ 16:05:10 Greg: There's 1 tab that initiates the intent, one that satisfies it. What should happen if the user closes the second tab. How should that be handled by the browser or the web app? These issues are not clear. 16:06:33 … I characterise it as more of a UI problem that browser vendors need to pay attention to. 16:07:26 davidb has left #webapps 16:07:27 sicking: I haven't been following web intents, but I was under the impression that there was some mechanism to set up a communication link between two tabs. Is that there? 16:08:02 Greg: The way the experiement works in Chrome is that there's always a UI that the service presents. 16:08:18 … The tab is always opened either inline or in a new tab. 16:08:56 massimo has joined #webapps 16:09:10 XXX: Chromes specification indicates that there is a pause attribute. 16:09:18 s/pause/ports/ 16:09:24 s/XXX/mounir/ 16:09:24 jgraham, consider objected to 16:09:24 s/pause/port/ 16:09:40 Greg: It passes a structured clone. 16:10:18 s/experiement/experiment/ 16:10:29 YYY: I wonder about the servicing page. 16:11:00 Greg: The draft spec calls for ways to register dynamically as a extension or app with a manifest 16:11:02 q? 16:11:04 q? 16:11:26 efullea has joined #webapps 16:12:33 Greg: For Chrome 24, we were experiementing with an icon in the URL bar tha when clicked would should things like bookmark, share, etc. with some app that you have installed. That would use the intent system to link with apps. 16:12:49 s/tha/that/ 16:13:54 q+ to follow up on the distinction between user-invoked and page-invoked 16:14:16 sicking: The impression I got around intents is that hte hard part is building a user experience that basically satisfied the people we want to implement the intents. The actual mechanics of shuffling data from one tab to another is on the hard bit. 16:14:31 s/YYY/MagnusOlsson/ 16:14:32 timeless, I object to adding new elements to and I object to adding new void elements 16:14:41 Greg: It's like a two sided market. The hope is that there are lot of clients and services invoking and servicing intents. Getting that market is tough. 16:14:56 … Our initial plan is using features like that dropdown I was talking about earlier. 16:15:25 … The reason we don't have that in Chrome 24 is because of the UI problems we discoverd. 16:15:37 Shinji has joined #webapps 16:15:47 … Having a bunch of eco systems set up around an API that was going to change wouldn't be the best plan. So we hid it behind a flag 16:15:49 q? 16:16:05 ack npdoty 16:16:05 npdoty, you wanted to follow up on the distinction between user-invoked and page-invoked 16:16:07 q+ 16:16:12 q? 16:16:46 npdoty: I mostly work on privacy in standards. To follow up, as I understand, the intents spec as it is now, the intents are done as service by a user clicking a button. 16:17:17 … But a user could also potentially share any URL from teh browser UI, even if the page doesn't explicitly support the intent. 16:17:42 q+ to ask status on intents semantics 16:17:54 Greg: The spec deals with it in a tangental way. It says that the intent may not be invoke by the API given and allows for the browser to get in the middle on one end or the other of the system. 16:18:21 … The spec can't force the browser to do it, so it's allowed but not mandated in the spec. 16:19:25 … I think we have a good sense of the interchange format to say how to transfer images or URLs as a data packet. 16:20:09 sicking: We in Firefox had the need for something similar to this, but since web intents wasn't done, we did something else. 16:20:36 … We have web activities which is similar. It has the same capabilities. Very much tied into apps. The user brings up an app, rather than a new tab. 16:21:32 … one of the UI problems we had is that if you have multiple handlers for a given intent, you need to show some sort of UI so the user can choose. 16:21:40 … what text string to you put in the title of that UI. 16:22:21 … We put application names next to each option. I don't know if you can do that in your implementation, given that there is no trusted name for a website. 16:23:15 Greg: In Chrome, the picker has a string that is related to the action that was performed by the user. There's a custom string per action and a generic one if we don't know what the action is. Something like "which service should we use?" 16:23:21 Sicking: how do you describe the options? 16:23:47 Greg: We think that using the name of the app is the most clear. The service can provide a custom string for this. 16:24:29 … I think the reason that that ends up being useful than just the name of the application is that when you see the UI, you're picking an application. 16:25:01 sicking: one problem is trust. It's possible to phish this. 16:25:20 … I could change my icon and title to Bank of America, and fool the user. 16:25:42 … It's part of the Chrome UI, so it feels more trustwothy, but in reality, it's part of the web content. 16:25:55 Greg: That's a problem with the picker that we had. 16:26:33 … That's one slice of the problem with using the picker that we discoverd. I agree there would be a phishing risk. 16:26:35 q+ to comment on that 16:26:41 ack sicking 16:26:43 q+ to comment security concerns 16:26:44 ack Arno 16:26:45 Arno, you wanted to ask status on intents semantics 16:27:21 Greg: The reason we were using a data URL is that there's a problem with web kit. 16:27:29 … It's bug we need to fix. 16:27:47 it seems like a concern that the picker also doesn't make it clear what kind of data is being passed along, in addition to it being uncertain whom you're passing the data to 16:28:08 q? 16:28:08 ack me 16:28:09 timeless, you wanted to comment on that and to comment security concerns 16:28:12 ack timeless 16:28:40 seo has joined #webapps 16:28:51 timeless: sicking asked about security concerns.All the browsers that ship have the ability to ask other services if a website is risky. 16:29:05 … Firefox has the concept of how often you've been to a page. 16:29:06 The question was about wether or not there was a work on intent semantics, as for example on the edit intent when the intent "returned" the data could either be a datablob or a data : URL 16:29:42 sangwhan has joined #webapps 16:29:44 … Been to Facebook a lot. Have not been to a phishing site a lot. I expect that that would be taken into account by the Ui when trying to counter phishing attempts. 16:29:59 sangwhan1 has joined #webapps 16:30:08 kotakagi has left #webapps 16:30:37 Greg: Those are good points. 16:30:55 … Some of those things are valuable to solve the problem. 16:31:09 … We also only accept the API when it's a gesture 16:31:25 q? 16:31:35 ArtB: Are there other implementations? 16:32:07 Greg: I think that someof the problesm I talked about with tabs would likely show up with web activities applied to the same kind of use cases. 16:32:40 sicking: We've only done it for Firefox OS. Have not shipped yet. 16:32:59 … it's intended to solve exactly the same use cases. Picking, sharing, images, etc. 16:33:24 … We do use it internally for things like the camera app. We have a button to open your gallery using an intent. 16:33:30 … Other apps can hook into that. 16:33:46 … Likewise, when you have an input type=file, we fire a pick event that other apps can hook into. 16:33:50 s/problesm/problems/ 16:33:50 a12u has joined #webapps 16:34:06 … The goal is definitely to solve the same problem between 3rd party apps 16:34:34 mounir: We had an issue in Firefox OS. When you open an app, and an app opens another. In that case, we had to know when ??? 16:35:40 q? 16:36:02 mounir: we had to know if the opener wanted to get a result or not 16:36:12 ArtB: Thank you very much Greg. 16:36:20 ArtB: meeting ajourned. 16:36:25 mounir: in the case of a result was expected, we had to handle the case of the handler activity being left 16:36:28 RRSAgent: make minutes 16:36:28 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/10/30-webapps-minutes.html Lachy 16:36:45 mounir: to not be in the situation where we actually don't know if the result will be sent 16:37:06 RRSAgent: make minutes 16:37:06 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/10/30-webapps-minutes.html Lachy 16:37:23 mjs has joined #webapps 16:41:02 smaug has joined #webapps 16:41:40 zakim, who is here? 16:41:40 On the phone I see Rhone_3 16:41:41 On IRC I see smaug, mjs, a12u, Shinji, efullea, komoroske, noriya, takuya, shh, darobin, virginie_galindo, bjkim, jeff, dveditz, Claes, Cathy, spoussa, jsoh, nsakai, Hidetoshi, 16:41:41 ... sakkuru, Dewa, ArtB, shepazu, rotsuya, sicking, Wonsuk, krisk, tantek 16:41:58 was it not adjourned? 16:41:58 paul-huawei has joined #webapps 16:42:05 shh has left #webapps 16:42:14 trackbot, end meeting 16:42:14 Zakim, list attendees 16:42:14 As of this point the attendees have been Rhone_3 16:42:22 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 16:42:22 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/10/30-webapps-minutes.html trackbot 16:42:23 RRSAgent, bye 16:42:23 I see 2 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2012/10/30-webapps-actions.rdf : 16:42:23 ACTION: Chaals: Get the ZIP archive proposal on the table as a formal work item. [1] 16:42:23 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2012/10/30-webapps-irc#T08-21-39 16:42:23 ACTION: barstow respond to HTMLWG's question re WebApps has a strong preference to work on AppCache in WebApps WG [2] 16:42:23 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2012/10/30-webapps-irc#T10-58-54