13:24:30 RRSAgent has joined #rd 13:24:30 logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/10/24-rd-irc 13:24:32 RRSAgent, make logs world 13:24:32 Zakim has joined #rd 13:24:34 Zakim, this will be 7394 13:24:34 ok, trackbot; I see WAI_RDWG()9:30AM scheduled to start in 6 minutes 13:24:35 Meeting: Research and Development Working Group Teleconference 13:24:35 Date: 24 October 2012 13:24:44 WAI_RDWG()9:30AM has now started 13:24:51 +[IPcaller] 13:25:25 vivienne has joined #rd 13:26:13 yo 13:26:13 +Shadi 13:26:41 annika has joined #rd 13:26:42 zakim, IPcaller is me 13:26:42 +Justin_Brown; got it 13:29:45 Agenda+ Welcome & Logistics (Regrets, Agenda Requests, Comments) 13:29:45 Agenda+ Arrangements for TC and E2R (20m) 13:29:45 Agenda+ Resources on eAccessibility (20m) 13:29:45 Agenda+ Further Next Topic Discussion - User Modeling, Graphics, Alerts and Interrupts, Education Any Others (20m) 13:29:45 Agenda+ Metrics W3C Note Status (5m) 13:29:46 Agenda+ Mobile W3C Note Status (5m) 13:29:48 Agenda+ Issues and Actions (Standing Item) 13:29:50 Agenda+ Any Other Business (Standing Item) 13:30:40 +??P22 13:30:44 zakim, code? 13:30:44 the conference code is 7394 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), shawn 13:30:56 +Shawn 13:31:01 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-rd/2012Oct/0017.html 13:31:03 chair: Shadi 13:31:28 zakim, ??P22 is annika 13:31:28 +annika; got it 13:31:43 christos has joined #rd 13:32:00 +??P0 13:32:10 klaus has joined #rd 13:32:16 +??P24 13:32:28 zakim, ??P24 is me 13:32:28 +christos; got it 13:33:00 zakim, ??P0 is me 13:33:00 +klaus; got it 13:33:13 zakim, mute me 13:33:13 christos should now be muted 13:33:18 zakim, mute me 13:33:18 annika should now be muted 13:33:18 zakim, mute me 13:33:19 klaus should now be muted 13:33:33 regrets: Simon, Luz, Markel, Markku 13:34:20 zakim, unmute me 13:34:20 annika should no longer be muted 13:35:01 regrets+ Peter 13:35:07 scribe: annika 13:35:31 agenda? 13:35:57 zakim, drop agendum 1 13:35:57 agendum 1, Welcome & Logistics (Regrets, Agenda Requests, Comments), dropped 13:36:03 zakim, take up next 13:36:03 agendum 2. "Arrangements for TC and E2R (20m)" taken up [from shadi] 13:36:49 giorgio has joined #rd 13:37:13 HI guys, sorry won't be able to participate - audio not working - will keep trying 13:37:20 shawn: TC update: all but two papers were resubmitted. most of the resubmitted paper will be accepted. About 9 papers will be in the symposium. 13:38:50 shadi: what's the status for the tc4r agenda? 13:39:02 shawn: to be discussed tomorrow. 13:39:37 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-rd/2012Oct/0019.html 13:40:01 yeliz has joined #rd 13:40:08 -Justin_Brown 13:40:33 shadi: any further comments on the message (apart from what was discussed by email already)? 13:40:33 Hello to everybody. Right now audio is not working for me. Will keep trying it. 13:40:56 I cannot also call 13:41:08 shadi: the message is a good example that can be re-used in future symposia. 13:41:20 I will try in a bit again, but the W3C 1.617.761.6200 is not working for me 13:41:59 shawn: depends on selection of papers. Not all aspects are covered in the submissions for the tc4r. The email is useful to get additional input. 13:42:07 +??P20 13:42:17 -??P20 13:42:26 +[IPcaller] 13:42:38 zakim, [IPcaller] is yeliz 13:42:38 +yeliz; got it 13:42:43 zakim, mute me 13:42:43 yeliz should now be muted 13:43:10 +[IPcaller] 13:43:56 +??P26 13:43:57 Hello everybody 13:44:04 -??P26 13:44:29 zakim, who is on the phone? 13:44:29 On the phone I see Shadi, annika, Shawn, klaus (muted), christos (muted), yeliz (muted), [IPcaller] 13:45:21 Justin_brown has joined #rd 13:45:56 zakim, unmute yeliz 13:45:56 yeliz should no longer be muted 13:46:15 scribe: yeliz 13:46:16 zakim, mute yeliz 13:46:16 yeliz should now be muted 13:46:18 +??P26 13:46:32 zakim, ??p26 is giorgio 13:46:32 +giorgio; got it 13:46:36 zakim, ??P26 is me 13:46:36 I already had ??P26 as giorgio, Justin_brown 13:47:05 zakim, IPcaller is me 13:47:05 +Justin_brown; got it 13:47:10 Shadi: The discussion is when to send the call to the IG 13:47:10 q+ 13:47:17 Shadi: Any thoughts about this 13:47:19 zakim, ??p26 is giorgio 13:47:19 I already had ??P26 as giorgio, giorgio 13:47:31 ack me 13:47:33 Shawn: My preference will be to get the papers out ASAP 13:47:49 Christos: I think it is better to publish papers asap 13:48:04 so the discussion can start early, and putting in a link to the existing papers would be good 13:48:15 Shadi: people might have reactions to the existing papers 13:48:28 zakim, mute me 13:48:28 christos should now be muted 13:48:39 Shawn: If people have questions/comments then they can send it to the list early, may be we should add that to the message 13:48:54 Shawn: I am afraid it might be very long, so a summary would be good 13:49:09 Shadi: I agree, there are 4 parag.s to get to the what you are looking for 13:49:21 Shadi: Any questions Shawn? 13:49:29 zakim, mute me 13:49:29 Shawn should now be muted 13:49:31 zakim, unmute me 13:49:31 klaus should no longer be muted 13:49:35 Shawn: As soon it is ready I will send a list 13:49:45 annika has joined #rd 13:49:48 Klaus: We received 17 papers 13:50:11 Klaus: Receieves were done last week, all done, thanks so much for reviewing the paper 13:50:29 Klaus: the quality is good, out of 17 3-4 received very low numbers 13:50:52 Klaus: Others got very close scores, we will probably have 12/13 papers 13:51:17 Klaus: We can have further selections, we can focus on topics, 13:51:32 Klaus: it might be a option to do it in two parts 13:51:52 Klaus: We can have different considerations which can be discussed in the group 13:52:14 Klaus: we have three domains: about guidelines, definitions, rules for easy to read 13:52:24 Klaus: 7 papers-? 13:52:36 Klaus: Tools (5 papers) and tools development 13:52:45 s/papers-?/papers on globish 13:53:15 Klaus: Some papers on workflows in easy to read 13:53:32 Klaus: one submission is of the topic, guidance on blind users, we emailed them back 13:53:43 saying that they should wait for another seminar 13:53:51 we are now preparing the feedback to participants 13:54:22 and for this we need to have a discussion in the group to see how we will proceed what will be the outline, and how many papers will be accepted, etc 13:54:49 Shadi: we discussed this last week, and we agreed that it would be diffcult to have another one in this topic before Christmas 13:55:03 and we also duscussed that longer than two hours will be difficult 13:55:42 Shadi: we can presentation and discussion in part 1, and have a short break and continue to the discussion after the break 13:55:58 ...asking questions to each author, we can ask questions to cluster of papers/authors 13:56:02 +[IPcaller] 13:56:13 ZAKIM, IPcaller is me 13:56:13 +vivienne; got it 13:56:16 ...but this still has problems, as getting answers will take long 13:56:37 Shadi: Are there any brilliant ideas to resolve this 13:56:54 Shadi: we have too many good papers, and how to fit that into a short time as briefly as possible 13:57:03 zakim, mute me 13:57:03 vivienne should now be muted 13:57:06 ...any thoughts?? 13:57:55 Klaus: may be we come up with a proposal, taking into account the considerastions, like time limit, etc. 13:58:05 ...we should merit the submissions 13:58:18 ...they also have possibility to express themselves 13:58:39 ...first panel and presentations, and then have a more focused with a discussion, I don't see a negative aspect in this 13:58:48 ....perhaps this could lead to a longer discussion 13:59:33 q+ 13:59:51 Shadi: two hours limit came out from the last week's discussion, especially considering people with mother languages other than English 14:00:27 Klaus: we can allow them with 5 minutes presentation, and have discussion would be good 14:00:36 ....have discussion afterwords would be good 14:01:00 Shadi: we kind of moved away from the presentation model, are you planning to do that? 14:01:10 q- 14:01:22 Shadi: it will be very difficult to have people stick to the time limits 14:01:27 Zakim, q+ 14:01:27 I see yeliz on the speaker queue 14:01:43 zakim, unmute me 14:01:43 yeliz should no longer be muted 14:03:25 zakim, mute me 14:03:25 yeliz should now be muted 14:03:45 Yeliz: clusters/themes... maybe send questions ahead of time, and post author answers ahead of time 14:04:06 zakim, unmute me 14:04:06 yeliz should no longer be muted 14:04:30 Yeliz: when answers are written - it's good for the Note/report 14:05:15 zakim, mute me 14:05:15 yeliz should now be muted 14:05:26 ... panel can just be discussion based on the answers. nobody give presentations, nobody answers specific questions directly. it's just a discussion 14:05:56 Yeliz: Specific questions to send to each authors, and then the panel could be grouped into 3 themes, and you start the discussion with specific questions 14:06:00 [ Yeliz sharing perspectives from Mobile sympsoium & report(Note) writing :-] 14:06:06 :) 14:06:09 q+ 14:06:18 zakim, q- 14:06:19 I see annika on the speaker queue 14:06:37 Klaus: If the questions are already answered, why one will attend the panel 14:06:37 ? 14:07:27 ....may be the questions will change the format of the discussion 14:07:38 ...and we also force people to write more 14:07:51 Shadi: I agree that they must be frustrating to write more and answer more questions 14:07:51 q? 14:08:16 ack a 14:08:19 zakim ack me 14:08:26 ...but from the experience of the previous symposiums, presentations people just read what they already said in the paper 14:08:42 q+ 14:08:50 Anika: I think it is a good idea to send them the questions 14:09:12 ...but I don't like writing the answers as I think it becomes scripting 14:09:38 ...I attended the 1st symposium and the time limit was very difficult to maintain 14:10:07 ....questions can be prepared beforehand and they could be asked beforehand 14:10:28 zakim, unmute me 14:10:28 yeliz should no longer be muted 14:10:35 zakim, mute me 14:10:35 annika should now be muted 14:10:42 q+ 14:10:50 zakim, mute me 14:10:50 yeliz should now be muted 14:11:07 i'm sorry. 14:11:12 i'll type it then 14:11:27 i think it's a pbm with mine setup 14:11:52 ack me 14:12:39 we have 2 requirements: 1 is to let people run a discussion; 2 let each of the authors to have a chance to say something. thus I would go for 1 or 2 questions that could challenge all presenters, and ask them to respond and elaborate on them 14:12:41 Christos: If we already separated papers into three themes, and have 3 panels, we can have generic questions and we can have specific questions 14:13:21 ...3 panels approach would be good 14:13:43 q- giorgio 14:13:44 zakim, mute me 14:13:45 christos should now be muted 14:13:58 Shadi: I hope this discussion will give you an idead 14:15:09 Shadi: any more questions/comments? 14:15:22 zakim, take up next 14:15:22 agendum 3. "Resources on eAccessibility (20m)" taken up [from shadi] 14:15:31 zakim, mute me 14:15:31 klaus should now be muted 14:15:43 Shadi: This was not on the agenda 14:16:01 Shadi: we discussed with Simon, but did not manage to bring it to discussion here 14:16:31 Shadi: the idea is to have RDWG Wiki to have internally for discussion, etc 14:16:49 Shadi: the idea is to give the discussions to public face 14:17:04 Shadi: have categories, etc and publicise it 14:17:36 Shadi: the idea to create synopsis of a topic and then have this public 14:17:44 ...Wiki has no review, etc 14:17:47 http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/resources/ 14:17:55 ...but we can filter them and publicise them with small synopsis 14:18:30 Shadi: how would we organise such information, may be more tabular format, etc. Have tiles, which would allow you to drill down 14:18:35 ...or it could be in list format 14:18:48 { syn·op·sis [si-nop-sis] - plural syn·op·ses [-seez] :-} 14:19:00 ...we would like to discuss to create this public face, so that the community can be involved in the discussion 14:19:15 ...put pointing them to Wiki is cumbersome and difficult 14:19:25 q+ 14:19:30 q+ on using tags 14:19:36 ack me 14:19:40 ...any ideas how to do it? 14:19:59 Christos: Is the resources open to public? Can people comment on them? 14:20:19 ...and also is it something that we are going to update it? 14:20:47 Shadi: Will this be something that public will comment? or is it something that we will maintain? 14:21:09 Shadi: It should be more controlled resource, something that is reveived by the group 14:21:45 ...ofcourse we would like to have comments from the public, but we will have the control to add resources 14:22:10 ....Topic: involving users, and resources, etc 14:22:29 zakim, mute me 14:22:29 christos should now be muted 14:22:41 ...somebody might come along and say we have a resource on that topic, and there will an email that they can send the resources 14:23:07 Giorgio: I have a suggestion: tagged cloud as a main page, and tag could be part of topics, etc 14:23:21 ...Issue: issue is who is going to maintain it 14:23:32 ...maintain topics, tags, etc 14:23:42 Shadi: good question 14:23:58 Shadi: we have it as a deliverable in the group charter so the group needs to maintain it 14:24:17 Shadi: I like the tag idea so we can consider that 14:24:23 ...Other thoughts/questions? 14:24:36 ack me 14:24:38 Shadi: Shawn, any comment with your EO hat on? 14:25:01 q- giorgio 14:25:22 Shawn: I think it is a great idea, very simple, I think one of the questions is how much time/effort will take to do it? 14:25:55 Shadi: the idea is to put the bunch out 14:26:18 Shadi: We can transfer piece by piece 14:26:22 zakim, q+ 14:26:22 I see yeliz on the speaker queue 14:26:23 q+ 14:26:29 zakim, unmute me 14:26:29 yeliz should no longer be muted 14:27:17 Yeliz: great idea. important for visbility of group. concerns about maintaining the list of resources. better to keep simple at the beginning. list of topics with synopsis, but not a lot of details. 14:27:28 zakim, mute me 14:27:28 Shawn should now be muted 14:27:33 ... low maintenance 14:27:54 zakim, mute me 14:27:54 yeliz should now be muted 14:28:30 Yeliz: I think "maintenance" is someting that we have to consider from the beginning 14:28:46 Shadi: we can think of it as a public face to the Wiki data 14:28:48 ack me 14:29:40 Christos: I think a tag cloud is a good. Wiki page can be tagged properly and the tag cloud can be generated automatically 14:29:55 ...and that would be all we need to maintain 14:30:29 Shadi: we can always update the Wiki page as we all have login 14:30:40 ...but I think the public face is more controlled 14:30:50 ...it should represent the group consensus 14:30:52 zakim, mute me 14:30:52 christos should now be muted 14:30:55 Yeliz: I agree with this 14:31:14 Yeliz: It is public face so it should reflect the groups consensus 14:31:29 Shadi: please remember to garden/updare the Wiki 14:31:47 Shadi: we could not go through all the items in the agenda so we will continue with these 14:32:15 Shadi: and if you have any suggestion, please let us know for the next topic 14:32:25 bye 14:32:27 Shadi: thanks all 14:32:28 bye 14:32:28 good night all 14:32:29 -Justin_brown 14:32:29 goodbye 14:32:31 -giorgio 14:32:31 vivienne has left #rd 14:32:32 -Shawn 14:32:33 bye 14:32:33 zakim, unmute yeliz 14:32:33 yeliz should no longer be muted 14:32:41 -christos 14:32:43 -klaus 14:32:45 -vivienne 14:32:46 shawn has left #rd 14:32:47 -yeliz 14:32:48 -annika 14:32:49 -Shadi 14:32:49 WAI_RDWG()9:30AM has ended 14:32:51 Attendees were Shadi, Justin_Brown, Shawn, annika, christos, klaus, yeliz, giorgio, vivienne 14:33:11 annika has left #rd 14:36:50 trackbot, end meeting 14:36:50 Zakim, list attendees 14:36:50 sorry, trackbot, I don't know what conference this is 14:36:58 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 14:36:58 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/10/24-rd-minutes.html trackbot 14:36:59 RRSAgent, bye 14:36:59 I see no action items