21:02:34 RRSAgent has joined #webappsec 21:02:34 logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/10/23-webappsec-irc 21:02:47 imelven has joined #webappsec 21:02:49 P1, I suspect that is gioma1 21:02:53 +??P9 21:02:54 giorgio, can you try muting your line? 21:02:54 -??P1 21:03:01 hmm. not it 21:03:03 hullo 21:03:06 jrossi has joined #webappsec 21:03:07 mozilla, can you try muting? 21:03:11 I just joined 21:03:13 im muted 21:03:25 Meeting: WebAppSec Teleconference 23 October 2012 21:03:26 +??P1 21:03:31 Chair: bhill, ekr 21:03:33 Zakim, ??P9 is gioma1 21:03:33 +gioma1; got it 21:03:46 Zakim, ??P1 is mkwst 21:03:46 +mkwst; got it 21:03:50 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webappsec/2012Oct/0059.html 21:04:05 zakim, who is here? 21:04:05 On the phone I see +1.650.648.aaaa, +1.425.865.aabb, +1.650.678.aacc, ??P3, +1.206.624.aadd, [Mozilla], +1.866.317.aaee, [Microsoft], gioma1, mkwst 21:04:07 On IRC I see jrossi, imelven, RRSAgent, Zakim, ekr, jeffh, bhill2, ccarson, mkwst, erlend, gioma1, abarth, dveditz, Velmont, timeless, caribou, tobie, trackbot 21:04:21 zakim, aadd is bhill2 21:04:21 +bhill2; got it 21:04:55 still figuring out zakim.. first wg call 21:05:18 i think aaee might be me 21:05:26 but dunno fer sure 21:06:07 brad: minutes from last meeting not poste4 unfortunately, so move on to agenda bash 21:06:27 bhill: no requests, so reviewing tracker items 21:07:18 bhill: have a new rev of CORS spec with comments from list (bhill, jeffh) will send out later today hopefully 21:08:02 bhill: issues 58, 70, 79 in CORS will be addressed 21:08:08 +[IPcaller] 21:08:23 zakim, who is here? 21:08:23 On the phone I see +1.650.648.aaaa, +1.425.865.aabb, +1.650.678.aacc, ??P3, bhill2, [Mozilla], +1.866.317.aaee, [Microsoft], gioma1, mkwst, [IPcaller] 21:08:26 On IRC I see jrossi, imelven, RRSAgent, Zakim, ekr, jeffh, bhill2, ccarson, mkwst, erlend, gioma1, abarth, dveditz, Velmont, timeless, caribou, tobie, trackbot 21:08:49 bhill: action #76: any features at risk in cors due to lack of impl ? 21:08:57 tanvi has joined #webappsec 21:09:00 zakim, ??P3 is erlend 21:09:00 +erlend; got it 21:09:08 Zakim, who is here 21:09:08 tanvi, you need to end that query with '?' 21:09:19 Zakim, who is here? 21:09:20 On the phone I see +1.650.648.aaaa, +1.425.865.aabb, +1.650.678.aacc, erlend, bhill2, [Mozilla], +1.866.317.aaee, [Microsoft], gioma1, mkwst, [IPcaller] 21:09:23 On IRC I see tanvi, jrossi, imelven, RRSAgent, Zakim, ekr, jeffh, bhill2, ccarson, mkwst, erlend, gioma1, abarth, dveditz, Velmont, timeless, caribou, tobie, trackbot 21:09:28 [Mozilla] is tanvi 21:09:30 zakim, if you know that why don't you supply/assume it? 21:09:30 I don't understand your question, dveditz. 21:09:40 Zakim, [Mozilla] is tanvi 21:09:40 +tanvi; got it 21:09:48 Zakim, [Microsoft] is jrossi 21:09:48 +jrossi; got it 21:09:48 s/poste4/posted/ 21:09:49 bhill: odin and gopal not on call ? might want to wait for them to discuss. Odin working on CORS test suite into shape, will put this on agenda for tpac f2f discussion next week 21:10:19 bhill: #77, bhill editing 21:10:41 is bhill on a submarine? 21:10:49 #80, haven't heard back from ? will try to followup 21:10:50 I think he is sailing to france for tpac 21:10:53 #81: will close 21:11:03 abarth sounded fine :-) 21:11:17 a little, yes 21:12:24 bhill: CSP and CSS discussion from list 21:13:09 bhill: Ian, please explain 21:13:44 imelven (ian): doesn't think should slow down 1.0 spec; will pay attention to csp1.1 21:14:21 + +1.978.944.aaff 21:14:24 tanvi: tho might be issues wrt gecko vs webkit impl diffs 21:14:47 + +1.206.245.aagg 21:14:51 -bhill2 21:15:36 zakim, aagg is bhill2 21:15:36 +bhill2; got it 21:15:39 ian: there's diff understandings wrt aspects of CSSOM and DOM, and discussion on list is good and has reached some conclusions, can address spec changes in v1.1 21:15:47 zakim, who is making noise? 21:15:59 bhill2, listening for 11 seconds I heard sound from the following: +1.650.648.aaaa (3%), erlend (78%), tanvi (26%) 21:16:12 erlend, can you please mute? 21:16:14 I'm muted 21:16:21 I'll try to reconnect 21:16:21 zakim, who is making noise? 21:16:25 -erlend 21:16:33 ekr, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: +1.650.648.aaaa (16%), tanvi (39%), bhill2 (40%) 21:16:37 erlend, the submarine noise was you... 21:16:38 submarine sank 21:16:45 abarth: thinks addrssing in 1.1 is fine, tho happy to be flexible on which spec we address it in (?) 21:16:49 I think the technical term there is "discomfort noise" 21:16:56 ( is that what abarth said ? ) 21:17:04 +??P3 21:17:12 zakim, ??P3 is erlend 21:17:12 +erlend; got it 21:17:26 Is it still as bad? 21:17:33 ian: seems like we're converging on an understanding on the list discussion 21:17:39 erland: noise is gone 21:17:40 thx 21:17:46 Ok, sorry about that 21:17:53 I was muted, so I didn't think it was me 21:18:40 who from Moz was mentioned as going to TPAC ? 21:18:45 -mkwst 21:18:55 mkwst == Mike West 21:19:01 -[IPcaller] 21:19:06 hrm. zakim dropped me. 21:19:07 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webappsec/2012Oct/0022.html 21:19:28 +??P1 21:19:37 zakim, ??P1 is mkwst 21:19:37 +mkwst; got it 21:19:51 gopal has joined #webappsec 21:19:59 now discussing above mail msg 0022.html 21:20:08 bhill: add specific language to spec to address ? 21:20:26 It's already in the test suite 21:20:35 abarth: don't really understand what the issue is? 21:20:38 dveditz has joined #webappsec 21:20:46 abarth: don't understand how policy is circumvented 21:21:12 +[IPcaller] 21:21:19 dveditz has joined #webappsec 21:21:36 bhill: 21:21:37 zakim, who is here? 21:21:37 On the phone I see +1.650.648.aaaa, +1.425.865.aabb, +1.650.678.aacc, tanvi, +1.866.317.aaee, jrossi, gioma1, +1.978.944.aaff, bhill2, erlend, mkwst, [IPcaller] 21:21:40 On IRC I see dveditz, gopal, tanvi, jrossi, imelven, RRSAgent, Zakim, ekr, jeffh, bhill2, ccarson, mkwst, erlend, gioma1, abarth, Velmont, timeless, caribou, tobie, trackbot 21:22:06 abarth: this sounds like a bug -- poster sounds confused 21:22:32 ?: but he's saying that in some browsers self /can/ alter the base tag it seems 21:22:47 abarth: if that's it, then it should be fixed 21:23:06 bhill: is there text that says that base tag shouldn't alter self ? 21:23:30 He refers to a hidden webkit bug: Reference Bug: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99318 21:23:32 abarth: not sure which browser is he working with? wud be surprised if webkit or geko 21:24:06 tanvi/dveditz: yes, the url is resolved ahead of time, we don't use the base attr to determine what self means 21:24:21 abarth: we should talk to him more on list and get more info 21:24:54 dveditz: < thinks there might be a way that it might happen > 21:25:13 abarth: will followup on list with poster 21:25:54 dveditz: anything in bug 99318 that's interesting/relevant? 21:26:08 abarth: oh, it's not public, will fix that so we can look at it 21:26:22 jeffh: tanvi is going to TPAC 21:26:30 jeffh: I am as well 21:26:45 gotchat, thx 21:26:46 jeffh: other mozilla people are going to other WG 21:27:02 not sure about sicking, and bz, i dropped them a mail 21:27:31 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webappsec/2012Oct/0008.html 21:27:49 abarth: the bug is just a copy of the email msg -- will followup on list in any case 21:27:54 bhill: moving on 21:28:50 bhill: issues with document promotion that was discussed on the list 21:29:12 bhill: do any WG members on call think we should re-open any of the issues? 21:30:09 don't hear any objections to closing issues 11, 16, 17 , 18, 19 -- any motion to close these, and advance csp 1.0 to CR ? 21:30:14 jeffh: so moved 21:30:19 tanvi: seconded 21:30:25 dveditz: thirded 21:30:28 *applause* 21:30:29 21:30:43 RESOLVED: issues 11, 16, 17, 18 and 19 to remain closed as previously resolved, CSP to CR 21:31:04 zakim, who is making noise? 21:31:06 or making espresso? 21:31:18 bhill2, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: bhill2 (72%) 21:31:25 hehe 21:31:41 coffee's done? 21:32:15 bhill: make a formal request to advance UI safety directives to FPWD ? 21:32:20 21:32:43 RESOLVED: Advance UISafety Directives for CSP to FPWD 21:32:49 portion of that spec may be subject to discussions at IETF-85 atlanta, the week following TPAC 21:33:02 next item 21:33:08 TPAC agenda? 21:34:32 bhill: "test the web forward" event the weekend prior to TPAC in paris -- some of us will be there, want to make some time to discuss that, as well as test suite status, specific areas of spec that needs work, test cases need to be generated, solicit folks to work on these, set scheduoles, this is nec. to get to CR 21:34:46 next item: rechartering for WG 21:34:46 -mkwst 21:34:54 ... 21:35:14 +??P1 21:35:25 zakim, ??P1 is mkwst. 21:35:25 +mkwst; got it 21:36:21 bhill: doesn't seem anything we're doing in CSP 1.1 necessitates changes to charter, but is oppty to upgrade charter with additional work; without additional actual deliverables, this WG may close after completing CSP v1.1 and UI Safety 21:36:28 jonas will be at TPAC 21:36:29 bhill: please think about that 21:37:10 bhill: will send povisional list of discussion items out to list -- any that folks can think of right now? 21:37:47 bhill: not hearing other proposed items, will send to list, we'll have time to discuss online 21:38:00 bhill: next item 21:38:14 bhill: wrt "test web fwd" -- any info? 21:40:57 gopal: welcomes participation, pls submit test suites if you have them, offering to help you with them if you need help; need to get our test coverage numbers up; want to try to get a regression count -- has been going a bit slow, if can get some help should speed it up; will keep working on it in any case, again welcomes any contributed test cases 21:42:02 bhill: an impt aspect of moving to CR is demonstrating we have actual impls of spec features -- having test cases to demonstrate that will be big help 21:42:22 this is WRT CORS 21:42:57 do we have a deadline for CR 21:43:17 bhill: wrt CSPv1.0, we're regarding on impl self-declaration; but CORS has additional complexities, so having actual test cases will be helpful 21:43:18 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webappsec/2012Oct/0009.html 21:44:01 bhill: Re: CSP 1.1: Paths in source list definitions (msg URI above) 21:44:12 tanvi: thinks agreement on list is fine 21:44:22 dveditz: agrees 21:44:47 https://blog.mozilla.org/tanvi/ 21:44:47 bhill: ok, at end of agenda 21:44:53 agrees as long as that understanding makes it into the spec :-) 21:45:04 UserCSP Add-on: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/newusercspdesign/ 21:45:04 UserCSP Code (Open Source): https://github.com/patilkr/userCSP 21:45:04 UserCSP Documentation: https://wiki.mozilla.org/SummerOfCode/2012/UserCSP/Wiki 21:45:14 tanvi: over summer worked on google code project "UserCSP" 21:45:20 see above 21:45:47 cool! 21:46:28 tanvi: has aspect that helps developers craft CSP policy for given "page" 21:47:09 tanvi: is presently per page, would like feedback, want to make it gen policy for "per site/domain" 21:47:34 bhill: anything else? 21:48:25 -jrossi 21:48:26 - +1.978.944.aaff 21:48:28 - +1.650.648.aaaa 21:48:30 -tanvi 21:48:31 -erlend 21:48:32 - +1.425.865.aabb 21:48:33 bhill: not hearing anything, so see some of you @TPAC next week, will be at ietf following week and have oppty to liase 21:48:34 zakim, list attendees 21:48:34 As of this point the attendees have been +1.650.648.aaaa, +1.425.865.aabb, +1.650.678.aacc, +1.206.624.aadd, +1.866.317.aaee, gioma1, mkwst, bhill2, [IPcaller], erlend, tanvi, 21:48:34 ... jrossi, +1.978.944.aaff, +1.206.245.aagg 21:48:37 -[IPcaller] 21:48:37 -mkwst 21:48:37 -gioma1 21:48:45 -bhill2 21:48:51 rrsagent, make minutes 21:48:51 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/10/23-webappsec-minutes.html bhill2 21:48:56 rrsagent, set logs public-visible 21:49:04 thanks for scribing, Jeff! 21:49:10 welcome :) 21:49:27 - +1.866.317.aaee 21:51:22 - +1.650.678.aacc 21:51:23 SEC_WASWG()5:00PM has ended 21:51:23 Attendees were +1.650.648.aaaa, +1.425.865.aabb, +1.650.678.aacc, +1.206.624.aadd, +1.866.317.aaee, gioma1, mkwst, bhill2, [IPcaller], erlend, tanvi, jrossi, +1.978.944.aaff, 21:51:23 ... +1.206.245.aagg 23:49:54 Zakim has left #webappsec