13:10:03 RRSAgent has joined #coremob 13:10:03 logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/09/19-coremob-irc 13:10:20 rrsagent this will be core mob 2012-09-19 13:10:38 meeting: Coremob 2012-09-19 13:10:43 chair: jo 13:10:48 scribe: jo 13:10:53 present+ jo 13:11:03 present+ tobie 13:11:03 present+ Andrew 13:11:07 [resent+ gmandyam 13:11:12 present+ gmandyam 13:11:17 Present+ Dong-Young_Lee 13:11:27 rrsagent pointer? 13:11:43 rrsagent draft minutes 13:11:48 present+dan 13:12:08 rrsagent: draft minutes 13:12:08 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/09/19-coremob-minutes.html jo 13:12:27 rrsagent: make logs public 13:13:43 Jo: want to cover two things, mainly tobie report on document editing and also F2F prep contributions to agenda etc. 13:15:49 [discussion about FB's approach to HTML5 - decided to hold on list as not strictly in scope of the meeting] 13:15:59 Topic: Report from Tobie 13:17:09 tobie: been busy on [other things] not much progress on the spec work, but close to a point where the feature set is pretty much frozen and the question is about the completeness of the spec we choose wrt a dta we still have to set at which we want to publish or make final core mob spec 13:17:28 suggest I carry on working and refining the issues and talking to the relevant groups and getting them on track 13:18:18 by the F2F we decide on a date on which we want to release core mob spec and list all specs that are at risk of not being includable by that point 13:18:50 also want to add the question - depending on what that looks like by then - should we release early with fewer features or later with more? 13:18:59 I have my own views on that 13:19:24 jo: tobie is the question you ask for discussion now 13:19:41 tobie: better at the F2F, mostly what we feel we want to have done to feel successful 13:20:01 should discuss on 2nd day of F2F 13:20:10 jo: want to have moved on the framework 13:20:28 tobie: good thing discuss what we want by set date (irrespective of what day it is on) 13:21:12 dansun: target is to release by end of 2102? 13:21:24 jo: preferably a lot before 13:21:36 s/2102/2012/ 13:22:35 tobie: when you want the final spec to be done? all part of the same discussion. Feature set is frozen, the question is can we point to stuff that doesn't exist, mostly the answer is "no" 13:22:54 tobie: so the discussion is hold we wait to get more more features 13:23:02 jo: set a date is my view 13:23:18 tobie: set a date and aim for it and know that features are not ready get lost 13:23:35 need to decide which specs are at risk and what can get done in other working groups by then 13:24:03 dansun: agree with tobie, not get lost but not included in 2012 13:24:06 tobie: 13:24:33 tobie: yup, goes into 2012 - but we need to have enough for 2012 to make it worth attaining 13:24:55 jo: plus we note features that we wanted but had to get chopped in 2012 I suggest 13:25:13 prsent+ Josh_Soref 13:25:21 s/prsent/present/ 13:25:23 jo: need to continue this discussion for F2F, one for the agenda, definitely 13:25:33 josh: I was on vacation 13:25:46 jo: breathes sigh of relief that the proper scribe has appeared 13:25:52 Scribe: Josh_Soref 13:26:02 s/[resent+ gmandyam// 13:26:14 topic: F2F 13:26:17 trackbot, start meeting 13:26:19 RRSAgent, make logs 25 13:26:19 Zakim has joined #coremob 13:26:21 Zakim, this will be 13:26:21 I don't understand 'this will be', trackbot 13:26:22 Meeting: Core Mobile Web Platform Community Group Teleconference 13:26:22 Date: 19 September 2012 13:26:37 RRSAgent, make logs public 13:26:42 RRSAgent, draft minutes 13:26:42 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/09/19-coremob-minutes.html Josh_Soref 13:27:45 s/rrsagent pointer?// 13:27:54 Topic: F2F Planning + Agenda 13:28:02 jo: we have 15 registered attendees 13:28:09 s/rrsagent draft minutes// 13:28:14 s/rrsagent: draft minutes// 13:28:20 RRSAgent, draft minutes 13:28:20 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/09/19-coremob-minutes.html Josh_Soref 13:28:52 https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/52857/CoremobF2FLondon20120802/ 13:29:09 https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/52857/CoremobF2FLondon20120802/results 13:29:30 jo: if you haven't registered, please register 13:29:52 Josh_Soref: if you aren't going, you can still reply indicating you won't attend 13:30:03 jo: the plan... for the meeting 13:30:08 ... is pretty much the same agenda 13:30:13 ... discuss the document on day 1 13:30:18 ... discuss testing on day 2 13:30:28 ... with the proviso, that there shouldn't be as much to discuss on the document 13:30:37 ... as tobie should have it closer to where it should be 13:30:46 ... so i anticipate more discussion on testing 13:31:10 jo: Document, Test Framework, Tests 13:31:25 ... Cars and Roads are different 13:31:41 ... the test runner (roads) and what it runs (cars) are different 13:32:27 ... anyone have things to add to the agenda? 13:32:37 tobie: tied to this is when to add things for the next spec 13:32:44 ... and when to release it 13:32:47 ... 2013? 13:32:53 ... wrt Testing/Test stuff 13:33:03 [tis relates to ISSUE-34] 13:33:07 s/tis/this/ 13:33:10 s/tis/this/ 13:33:31 ... i'd like to hear from people who have tests to know if they have plans to open source/donate their tests to w3c 13:35:21 tobie: i'm happy to talk about TestTheWebForward 13:35:37 jo: i'll add an agenda item for Other Initiatives that are complementary to our work 13:35:43 ... and how we can build on them 13:36:12 Topic: AOB 13:37:00 XXX: do we want to talk about Facebook's approach to testing? 13:37:04 Dan 13:37:10 s/XXX/Dan/ 13:37:23 jo: generally speaking, people asking about member companies activities 13:37:29 ... is relevant up to a point 13:37:42 ... what Facebook does with HTML5 may be relevant 13:38:01 ... we can have a formal discussion about Facebook's position if it's relevant to an issue raised in the WG 13:38:08 [ this is a CG not a WG ] 13:38:24 jo: we can have an informal discussion about things beyond that 13:39:01 jo: Facebook describing interesting issues it has had using the Web as we know it, provides input to the WG 13:39:18 ... WG in the loosest possible sense 13:39:48 ... i don't want us to have "why did you guys do this? why did you guys do that?" 13:39:55 ... i think having it on the list is better 13:40:05 ... and i don't want anyone to feel it's "open season" on any member 13:40:22 ... but if Facebook wants to describe things it has experienced within scope, that's ok 13:40:28 tobie: i'm happy to discuss that 13:41:01 dan: i saw a W3C Perf Workshop hosted by Google in November (7th?) 13:41:13 ... i'm not sure if it's related to Facebook's news item 13:41:33 tobie: i can't answer that, you should ask the web perf wg chair 13:41:48 ... i'll probably try to go there 13:42:23 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-perf/2012Aug/0020.html 13:42:37 tobie: my understanding is that the Web Perf WG is rechartering soon 13:42:44 ... they have carriers expressing some interest 13:42:52 ... so they're trying to find areas to work on 13:43:27 jo: i'll send a more precise agenda to the list shortly 13:43:30 ... thanks all 13:43:34 [ Adjourned ] 13:43:45 with many thanks to FT for hosting the audio 13:43:48 trackbot, end meeting 13:43:48 Zakim, list attendees 13:43:48 sorry, trackbot, I don't know what conference this is 13:43:56 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 13:43:56 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/09/19-coremob-minutes.html trackbot 13:43:57 RRSAgent, bye 13:43:57 I see no action items