19:55:09 RRSAgent has joined #wai-wcag 19:55:09 logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/09/13-wai-wcag-irc 19:55:11 RRSAgent, make logs public 19:55:13 Zakim, this will be WAI_WCAG 19:55:13 ok, trackbot; I see WAI_WCAG()4:00PM scheduled to start in 5 minutes 19:55:14 Meeting: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Teleconference 19:55:14 Date: 13 September 2012 19:56:20 shadi has joined #wai-wcag 19:56:22 Kathy has joined #wai-wcag 19:56:46 WAI_WCAG()4:00PM has now started 19:56:53 +Kathy 19:57:24 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2012JulSep/0081.html 19:57:57 zakim, code? 19:57:57 the conference code is 9224 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), shadi 19:58:22 chair: Loretta_Guarino_Reid 19:58:39 +Cooper 19:58:41 +Shadi 19:58:46 ericvelleman has joined #wai-wcag 19:58:51 +Bruce_Bailey 20:01:00 +David_MacDonald 20:01:15 +Eric_Velleman 20:01:29 Loretta has joined #WAI-WCAG 20:01:41 David has joined #wai-wcag 20:02:33 +Loretta_Guarino_Reid 20:03:38 marcjohlic has joined #wai-wcag 20:04:01 +Marc_Johlic 20:05:07 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2012JulSep/0086.html 20:05:53 -Bruce_Bailey 20:06:04 +Bruce_Bailey 20:06:14 greggvanderheiden has joined #wai-wcag 20:06:29 TOPIC: Website Accessibility Conformance Evaluation Methodology 1.0 20:06:30 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/ED-methodology-20120910 20:06:33 +??P9 20:06:41 Hi 20:07:10 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/ED-methodology-20120910#step4b 20:07:22 q+ 20:07:24 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2012JulSep/0086.html 20:08:44 scribe: Kathy 20:08:56 TOPIC: Website Accessibility Conformance Evaluation Methodology 1.0 20:11:15 regrets: Robin_Tuttle, Cherie_Eckholm, Alex_Li 20:11:58 [[Reminder: Techniques and failures in the context of WCAG 2.0 are only informative. They can help assess if WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria are met by providing documented ways of meeting them and commonly occurring failures in meeting them. However, as per the WCAG 2.0 conformance requirements, only the Success Criteria must be met.]] 20:12:14 MoeKraft has joined #wai-wcag 20:12:18 proposal: ADD [[And you can use any techniques that meet the success criteria, whether they are documented yet by the WCAC WG or not.]] 20:12:50 q+ to say change "The evaluator must be considerate of these limitations..." replace "considerate" with "aware" or "conscious" or something 20:14:22 +MoeKraft 20:14:26 Reminder: Techniques and failures in the context of WCAG 2.0 are only informative. They can help assess if WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria are met by providing documented ways of meeting them and commonly occurring failures in meeting them. However, as per the WCAG 2.0 conformance requirements, only the Success Criteria must be met. [And you can use any techniques that meet the success criteria, whether they are documented yet by the WCAC WG or 20:14:26 not.] 20:14:53 WCAG 2.0 techniques are not the only way to meet WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria and WCAG 2.0 failures are not the only way in failing to meet WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria. [The working group documented] techniques and failures are not exhaustive and cannot cover every possible situation. Also, the techniques used to meet WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria during the development may not be known to the evaluator. Particularly for newly released web 20:14:55 technologies, or when these web technologies are used in particular contexts, there may be no publicly or proprietary documented techniques and failures available to the evaluator. The evaluator must be considerate of these limitations when using [the] techniques and failures [provided by the WCAG working group] to evaluate conformance with WCAG 2.0. 20:16:47 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/ED-methodology-20120910#step1e 20:18:30 is there a dif version up 20:19:41 q+ 20:20:21 ack g 20:21:29 ericvelleman_ has joined #wai-wcag 20:22:15 q+ 20:22:51 q- 20:23:28 ack m 20:23:28 MichaelC, you wanted to say change "The evaluator must be considerate of these limitations..." replace "considerate" with "aware" or "conscious" or something 20:25:18 q+ 20:25:30 q+ to say that I agree about the use of "likely" 20:26:04 ack g 20:31:37 ack l 20:31:37 Loretta, you wanted to say that I agree about the use of "likely" 20:32:19 [[WCAG 2.0 techniques are documented ways for meeting or for going beyond what is required by individual WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria. A WCAG 2.0 Success Criterion is likely met on a web page when:]] 20:32:49 + +1.617.584.aaaa 20:32:53 [[Conversely, failures are documented ways of not meeting individual WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria. A WCAG 2.0 Success Criterion is likely not met on a web page when a failure applies to any instance of web content that is addressed by the WCAG 2.0 Success Criterion.]] 20:33:35 zakim, aaaa is Andrew_Kirkpatrick 20:33:35 +Andrew_Kirkpatrick; got it 20:33:36 RESOLUTION: In 3.4.2 remove the word "likely" from the following sentence "WCAG 2.0 techniques are documented ways for meeting or for going beyond what is required by individual WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria. A WCAG 2.0 Success Criterion is likely met on a web page when" and this sentence "Conversely, failures are documented ways of not meeting individual WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria. A WCAG 2.0 Success Criterion is likely not met on a web page when a failure appli 20:34:07 [[WCAG 2.0 techniques are not the only way to meet WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria and WCAG 2.0 failures are not the only way in failing to meet WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria. [The working group documented] techniques and failures are not exhaustive and cannot cover every possible situation.]] 20:35:00 q+ 20:36:05 -Bruce_Bailey 20:38:24 ack g 20:41:45 WCAG-documented techniques? (note no 2.0 is intentional) 20:42:07 [[The evaluator must be considerate of these limitations when using [the] techniques and failures [provided by the WCAG working group] to evaluate conformance with WCAG 2.0.]] 20:43:21 It is hard to come up with an accurate short handle for the techniques. 20:44:33 right. Trying to find a handle for the techniques in the Techniques document, vs a technique that is sufficient to meet a success criteria but isn't listed there. 20:46:33 [[considerate]] -> [[be aware of]] or [[consider]] 20:47:01 RESOLUTION: approved for publication with the edits discussed during the meeting 20:48:53 ericvelleman_ has left #wai-wcag 20:48:53 -Eric_Velleman 20:49:01 -Shadi 20:49:03 -Cooper 20:49:05 -MoeKraft 20:49:05 -Loretta_Guarino_Reid 20:49:06 -Kathy 20:49:19 -Marc_Johlic 20:49:22 -Andrew_Kirkpatrick 20:51:52 As of this point the attendees have been Kathy, Cooper, Shadi, Bruce_Bailey, David_MacDonald, Eric_Velleman, Loretta_Guarino_Reid, Marc_Johlic, Gregg_Vanderheiden, MoeKraft, 20:51:55 ... +1.617.584.aaaa, Andrew_Kirkpatrick 20:52:14 present- +1.617.584.aaaa 20:52:17 rrsagent, make minutes 20:52:17 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/09/13-wai-wcag-minutes.html MichaelC 20:54:12 -Gregg_Vanderheiden 20:55:42 zakim, drop david 20:55:42 David_MacDonald is being disconnected 20:55:43 WAI_WCAG()4:00PM has ended 20:55:43 Attendees were Kathy, Cooper, Shadi, Bruce_Bailey, David_MacDonald, Eric_Velleman, Loretta_Guarino_Reid, Marc_Johlic, Gregg_Vanderheiden, MoeKraft, +1.617.584.aaaa, 20:55:43 ... Andrew_Kirkpatrick 20:55:54 scribeOptions: -final 20:55:58 trackbot, end meeting 20:55:58 Zakim, list attendees 20:55:58 sorry, trackbot, I don't know what conference this is 20:56:06 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 20:56:06 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/09/13-wai-wcag-minutes.html trackbot 20:56:07 RRSAgent, bye 20:56:07 I see no action items