15:20:04 RRSAgent has joined #css 15:20:04 logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/09/05-css-irc 15:20:08 Zakim, this will be Style 15:20:08 ok, glazou; I see Style_CSS FP()12:00PM scheduled to start in 40 minutes 15:20:13 RRSAgent, make logs public 15:28:38 Molly has joined #css 15:37:40 florianr has joined #css 15:39:52 florianr has joined #css 15:43:27 dbaron has joined #css 15:45:48 jet has joined #CSS 15:54:52 rbetts has joined #css 15:55:19 Style_CSS FP()12:00PM has now started 15:55:26 + +47.23.69.aaaa 15:55:56 bradk has joined #css 15:56:00 + +1.604.312.aabb 15:56:01 +plinss 15:56:15 Zakim, aabb is me 15:56:15 +rbetts; got it 15:56:17 lstorset has joined #css 15:56:44 +??P37 15:56:50 Zakim, ??P37 is me 15:56:50 +glazou; got it 15:57:09 Zakim, who is noisy? 15:57:20 glazou, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: +47.23.69.aaaa (36%) 15:57:26 +Lea 15:57:46 Zakim, aaaa is me 15:57:46 +lstorset; got it 15:59:08 arron has joined #css 15:59:24 +Molly_Holzschlag 15:59:30 + +1.650.275.aacc 15:59:49 Zakim, aacc is me 15:59:49 +bradk; got it 16:00:11 +??P54 16:00:18 Zakim, who is noisy? 16:00:26 + +1.206.390.aadd 16:00:29 glazou, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: 8 (9%), lstorset (5%), bradk (22%) 16:00:48 zakim, aadd is me 16:00:53 +stearns; got it 16:01:35 smfr has joined #css 16:02:04 + +1.408.636.aaee 16:02:11 Zakim, aaee is me 16:02:20 Zakim, you have the memory of a flea 16:02:21 +smfr; got it 16:02:26 I don't understand 'you have the memory of a flea', smfr 16:04:11 +SteveZ 16:05:10 +fantasai 16:05:28 koji has joined #css 16:05:54 + +1.415.766.aaff 16:06:49 zakim, who is here? 16:06:49 On the phone I see lstorset, plinss, rbetts, glazou, Lea, Molly_Holzschlag, bradk, ??P54, stearns, smfr, SteveZ, fantasai, dbaron 16:06:51 On IRC I see koji, smfr, arron, lstorset, bradk, rbetts, jet, dbaron, Molly, RRSAgent, Zakim, glazou, leaverou, miketaylr, lgombos, drublic, macpherson__, Ms2ger, Liam, shepazu, 16:06:51 ... decadance, isherman, arronei, logbot, ed, trackbot, Bert, dholbert, Hixie, hober, TabAtkins_, gsnedders, fantasai, jwir3, krijnh, alexmog, vhardy, sylvaing, shans, 16:06:52 ... CSSWG_LogBot, heycam|away, paul_irish, stearns, plinss 16:06:53 SteveZ has joined #css 16:07:10 + +1.650.253.aagg 16:07:15 +??P85 16:07:18 zakim, aagg is me 16:07:18 +TabAtkins_; got it 16:07:23 zakim, ??p85 is me 16:07:23 +koji; got it 16:07:58 scribenick: smfr 16:08:41 Topic: CSS Masking 16:09:01 dirk won't be on the call; regrets 16:09:11 deferring the topic 16:09:18 Topic: flex box and non-visible overflow 16:09:27 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Aug/0403.html 16:09:28 nimbu has joined #css 16:09:59 TabAtkins_: inline blocks, when they have overflow other than visible, baseline is calc as lower margin edge 16:10:05 should flex boxes do something similar? 16:10:26 http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-flexbox/#flex-baselines 16:10:33 -Lea 16:10:51 TabAtkins_: for non-visible overflow, sythensize baseline from border box of the flexbox 16:11:17 TabAtkins_: want to make sure it's stable based on whether there's an item or not. think that border box is most stable 16:11:29 +Lea 16:11:44 dbaron: mistake to change it at all based on whether there's overflow; authors are annoyed that overflow affects baselines 16:11:56 s/mistake/it was a mistake 16:12:02 TabAtkins_: i'm ok with that 16:12:21 leaverou: np 16:12:29 TabAtkins_: you speak too fast 16:12:44 TabAtkins_: proposal: do baseline calculation like normal, but if it's scrollable, treat it like it has its initial scroll position 16:13:13 florianr has joined #css 16:13:27 LOL 16:13:32 plinss: do we propose to change this just for flex box, or also inline-block 16:13:39 dbaron: no, not a proposal to change inline-block 16:13:55 TabAtkins_: we can make a final decision next week 16:14:02 dbaron: fine with me 16:14:23 Topic: CSS4 Images FPWD 16:14:28 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Sep/0059.html 16:15:01 TabAtkins_: CSS4 images ready for FPWD; still lots of issues but we can discuss them 16:15:30 smfr: would this be the first PWD of a CSS4 spec? 16:15:42 dbaron: no, we did selectors 4 16:15:48 smfr: ok, so this doesn't trigger anything special 16:16:20 plinss: this will trigger a call for exclusions, as a FPWD 16:16:32 no objections 16:16:42 RESOLVED: publish FPWD of CSS4 Images 16:16:58 Topic: at-risk counter styles 16:17:06 wait for jdagget next week 16:17:26 Topic: QuerySelector() with namespaces 16:17:30 bradk has joined #css 16:17:45 glazou: needed to query selectors with the selectors API with namespaces, not possible right now 16:17:53 glazou: Anne's draft doesn't have anything 16:18:06 glazou: should we resume that document inside the CSS WG, and work on this 16:18:19 http://www.w3.org/TR/selectors-api2/ <-- current Selectors API draft 16:18:23 dbaron: there was a draft as part of the original querySelector draft. it had issues; mozilla had much of it implemented 16:18:31 dbaron: we should get a list of what those issues were 16:18:37 bradk has joined #css 16:18:53 krit has joined #css 16:18:57 glazou: questions: do we want to resurrect this spec in the CSS WG, and if so, how should we proceed 16:19:08 TabAtkins_: do we need to or raise the issues with Lachlan? 16:19:26 TabAtkins_: it was last touched in late June, so is active 16:19:30 + +1.415.832.aahh 16:19:40 oyvind has joined #css 16:19:50 Zakim, aahh is me 16:19:50 +krit; got it 16:19:56 +[Apple] 16:19:58 Zakim, Apple is me 16:19:58 +hober; got it 16:20:11 glazou: is it something we want to do? 16:20:15 TabAtkins_: i would not object 16:20:23 ... as long as they're not cumbersome 16:20:42 smfr: glazou, and you explain more? 16:20:56 glazou: need is in arbitrary XML documents, e.g. ePub 16:21:05 bradk has joined #css 16:21:08 glazou: it's a hole in that API, and hard to work around 16:21:45 glazou: really useful in XML 16:22:20 smfr: is there a risk of feature creep where a lot of different APIs would need to be namespace aware? 16:22:30 glazou: i don't think so, mainly the selectors API 16:22:32 http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-selectors-api-20071221/#nsresolver-interface was the last TR draft with NSResolver, but NSResolver had issues, if memory serves 16:22:46 glazou to raise the issue with Lachlan 16:22:58 Topic: CSS Masking 16:23:15 krit would like another editor for CSS Masking 16:23:21 TabAtkins_: I volunteer 16:23:50 left off last week with mask-clip 16:24:14 defer discussing mask-clip 16:24:41 Topic: FPWD of Intrinsic Sizing 16:25:17 fantasai: a couple of sections not written yet (tables, multi-col), but the draft should be coherent and we'd like to publish FPWD 16:25:46 BradK_ has joined #CSS 16:25:55 RESOLVED: publish FPWD of Intrinsic Sizing level 3 16:26:02 Topic: CSS3 conditional 16:26:25 fantasai: CSS3 Conditional is ready to have another WD published 16:26:38 glazou: we have 2 different implementations? 16:26:47 fantasai: possibly 3 (prefixed one in IE) 16:26:53 plinss: how far from last call? 16:27:06 fantasai: WG needs to review this draft; next draft should be last call 16:27:17 plinss: any objections? 16:27:42 dbaron: no, but one comment. we had discussed having what's in CSS condition rule to be 2 separate interfaces 16:28:04 TabAtkins_: moving the grouping ?? up a level and having the condition rule inherit from that 16:28:44 fantasai: discussed at the F2F but didn't come up with final changes 16:29:28 TabAtkins_: in the CSS OM part, talking about splitting the CSSConditionRule 16:29:48 so we have a rule about @rules that contain other rules, then other rules that inherit from that 16:30:12 http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-conditional/#the-cssconditionrule-interface 16:30:54 TabAtkins_: i support breaking this up 16:31:13 plinss: before we publish? 16:31:14 TabAtkins_: yes 16:31:22 TabAtkins_: gonna do it live! 16:31:28 plinss: any objections? 16:31:31 I think CSSGroupRule would be the obvious name for the upper half 16:31:50 RESOLVED: TabAtkins_ to split CSSConditionRule 16:32:12 RESOLVED: publish WD of CSS3 conditional after TabAtkins_ makes the CSSConditionRule change 16:32:38 plinss: anyone working on a test suite for this? 16:32:48 -Lea 16:32:49 dbaron: mozilla and opera have both contributed a bunch of tests for @supports 16:32:53 plinss: we have almost 100 testes 16:33:00 s/testes/tests 16:33:42 Topic: Working Group Priorities 16:33:58 glazou: 4 years ago in San Diego, we started with a deep prioritization of the activities of the WG 16:34:20 glazou: now that CSS 2.1 is over, and we have so many documents under work, it is time to do the same again, 16:34:31 so make the specs advance at the right paces 16:34:36 +Lea 16:34:43 we have almost 30 documents; what are the right specs to work on Right Now? 16:35:00 glazou: it's the right time to discuss the priorities again 16:35:31 glazou: ideas: ping the browser vendors in the WG, in full confidentiality, and get info on their strategic focuses 16:35:52 plinss: also looking at interest in implementation 16:35:58 dbaron: i'd rather the discussion be public 16:36:15 glazou: i'd prefer that of course, but some members would like to keep it private 16:36:44 Edits to the Conditional spec done: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-conditional/#the-cssgroupingrule-interface 16:36:48 dbaron: would it be OK to ping everyone in private, including a question about whether it's OK to make the answers public 16:36:53 dbaron: that's fine 16:37:16 Molly: would also like to hear from the invited experts, as well as the vendors 16:37:36 glazou: yes, ping all the WG members, not just browser vendors 16:38:34 Molly: so there are 2 layers of prioritization; implementation by the vendors, and the rest of the WG 16:38:48 glazou: what really matters is the implementability of the specs 16:39:26 glazou: i will send email before next week; make sure those emails get to the right people 16:39:31 florianr has joined #css 16:39:32 give vendors 2 weeks to reply 16:40:05 plinss: data will be confidential, but the aggregated data will be public 16:40:38 krit: how is implementation defined? 16:40:47 plinss: how we normally do for getting a spec out of CR 16:41:08 plinss: any other topics to discuss? 16:42:01 -lstorset 16:42:02 glazou: speaking of selectors 4, mozilla implemented :dir. Is it prefixed? 16:42:10 dbaron: it is not prefixed 16:42:24 glazou: do you plan to prefix ti? 16:42:27 s/ti/it 16:42:36 dbaron: i can look into it 16:42:43 +lstorset 16:43:12 glazou: selectors are a very visible part of CSS; if we have anything to change before CR that could cause problems 16:43:25 glazou: we have only light reviews by i18n people 16:44:16 fantasai: we could take only the UI stuff for level for, and leave the other stuff (e.g. column selectors) for level 5 16:44:41 glazou: we should give people time to review 16:45:12 plinss: other topics? 16:45:34 arron_ has joined #css 16:45:39 http://www.xanthir.com/b4Ko0 16:45:40 glazou: TabAtkins_ published a "no such thing as CSS4 item on his blog". We should probably publish on the W3C blog under the WG's name 16:45:48 http://www.xanthir.com/b4Ko0 16:46:19 glazou: TabAtkins_ can you rephrase to make it more official, and submit to the WG for review? 16:46:29 TabAtkins_: can try but want glazou to check it 16:47:37 leaverou: does everyone agree with the level naming here? 16:48:05 fantasai: maybe leaverou can suggest some language to TabAtkins_ 16:48:40 dbaron: i think we're stuck because of the way we make short names of drafts (because that requires going to the director) 16:48:56 fantasai: we need to come up with a naming plan, and get batch approval 16:49:07 I disagree with Tab's assertion that there is a CSS3. 16:49:18 dbaron: That's exactly what I was saying 16:49:44 plinss: we should come up with a concrete list of short names changes 16:49:50 fantasai: i can set up a wiki page with proposals 16:50:17 I'd think shortnames should be either css-selectors-4, css-text-3, etc., or css-selectors4, css-text3, etc. 16:50:41 plinss: we haven't published a snapshot since 2010; supposed to do one every year 16:50:49 dbaron: +1 16:50:58 dbaron: they were also supposed to be normative until the director changed them 16:50:59 dbaron: +1 16:51:00 nothing's changed since 2012 wrt snapshots 16:51:13 they'd need a new section on CR drafts not yet tested 16:51:20 to require an update 16:51:25 discussion of the normative nature of the spec 16:51:37 plinss: let's get a 2012 snapshot published 16:51:46 bye BradK 16:51:54 TabAtkins_: we will do a 2012 snapshot near the end of the year 16:52:04 -bradk 16:52:29 SteveZ: can we list candidates for what will go into the 2012 snapshot 16:52:40 fantasai: we need a test suite for the snapshot 16:52:49 SteveZ: we need to drive some of those test suites 16:53:23 plinss: last time we talked about publishing multiple ones during the year; we don't necessarily have to wait 16:53:31 fantasai: there's nothing worth publishing at the moment 16:53:36 -Lea 16:53:57 plinss: we'll add a section to the wiki about renaming 16:54:05 -dbaron 16:54:06 Meeting closed 16:54:08 bye!!!! 16:54:09 -TabAtkins_ 16:54:10 -hober 16:54:10 -fantasai 16:54:11 -glazou 16:54:11 -SteveZ 16:54:11 -krit 16:54:13 -lstorset 16:54:14 -smfr 16:54:15 +Lea 16:54:17 -Molly_Holzschlag 16:54:20 -rbetts 16:54:22 -plinss 16:54:24 -stearns 16:54:25 -koji 16:54:27 -Lea 16:54:30 -??P54 16:54:32 Style_CSS FP()12:00PM has ended 16:54:33 Attendees were +47.23.69.aaaa, +1.604.312.aabb, plinss, rbetts, glazou, Lea, lstorset, Molly_Holzschlag, +1.650.275.aacc, bradk, +1.206.390.aadd, stearns, +1.408.636.aaee, smfr, 16:54:37 ... SteveZ, fantasai, +1.415.766.aaff, dbaron, +1.650.253.aagg, TabAtkins_, koji, +1.415.832.aahh, krit, hober 16:58:17 Heh, that's fine. 17:02:05 lstorset has left #css 17:05:08 leaverou_ has joined #css 17:16:11 drublic has joined #css 17:17:58 having "CSS3" not be a thing seems better than having CSS [whatever] Level 4 be part of CSS3, that's just confusing 17:18:34 oyvind++++ 17:26:20 smfr has joined #css 17:38:50 leaverou has joined #css 17:43:47 tantek has joined #css 18:03:28 nimbu has joined #css 18:08:23 arron has joined #css 18:25:12 lstorset has joined #css 18:25:22 lstorset has left #css 18:26:27 dbaron has joined #css 18:33:49 krit1 has joined #css 18:34:43 glazou has joined #css 18:35:42 TabAtkins_: you have the conditionalrules stuff all set to publish? 18:36:15 fantasai: what should we do to make it no longer css3? 18:36:20 i mean anything from w3c side? 18:36:41 i am sure every browser vendor would be happy to write articles/posts/tweets to promote whatever change happens on w3c specs. 18:37:49 we've done about as much as we can, aside from changing all the shortnames 18:37:59 drublic has joined #css 18:38:09 nimbu: although improvements to the Snapshot wording are always welcome :) 18:39:35 tantek has joined #css 18:46:22 Zakim has left #css 18:46:40 nimbu has joined #css 19:08:21 leaverou has joined #css 19:57:29 cabanier has joined #css 19:58:05 nimbu has joined #css 20:12:14 fantasai: i think we should definitely change the shortnames no? 20:12:20 i mean its the single biggest indication >_> 20:12:40 like css3-content/ 20:12:42 and so on 20:12:50 change it to css alone. 20:13:33 or css-content-3 20:13:42 o to indicate level? 20:13:48 yeah 20:13:55 idk i dont think it is critical. 20:13:58 and have css-content redirect to the largest level available 20:14:00 ya 20:14:02 basically 20:14:04 thats what we need. 20:14:07 css-content on parent 20:14:11 and levels maybe within? 20:14:17 oh, even better! 20:14:18 and parent redirects to highest level possible. 20:14:21 if that's possible 20:14:24 yaa 20:14:26 plinss: ^^^ 20:14:27 not sure if nested hierarchies are possible 20:14:34 no idea. 20:14:40 MAKE IT HAPPEN PLINSS 20:14:43 DO YOUR MAGICC 20:15:08 or fantasai if fantasai has the sekrit keys to the dev.csswg.org 20:15:15 i meann dev.w3.org 20:15:27 i assumed it was peter. or maybe it is Bert 20:15:52 nimbu: it's not so much about what's on dev.w3.org, it's what's on w3.org/TR/ that matters... 20:15:57 nimbu: in the call it was mentioned that changes to shortnames need to be approved by the director 20:16:04 if I heard it correctly at least 20:16:15 leaverou: correct 20:16:18 plinss: o how can we change that. 20:16:24 leaverou: o okay who is the director :) 20:16:28 we'll still need to leave redirects at the old URLs at the least 20:16:31 Tim Berners-Lee 20:16:33 ya definitely need. 20:16:34 ahaha 20:16:37 HEY TIMBL 20:16:44 ONE SMALL THING. 20:16:44 :P 20:16:51 Ralph generally fills that role at publishing telcons 20:16:58 plinss: o who is ralph? 20:17:06 leaverou: can you talk to this ralph person :))) 20:17:07 nimbu: Ralph Swick 20:17:12 ah. 20:17:28 plinss: I assume you mean Ralph Swick, right? 20:17:38 lasted tweeted 9th Feb :( 20:17:47 yes, the plan is to have a discussion with Ralph (and/or Tim) once we have a concrete list of the exact changes we want to make 20:17:54 ah thats awesome. 20:17:58 plinss: who is making that list. 20:18:00 nimbu: I didn't even know Ralph tweeted :P 20:18:12 i just did a handy twitter search leaverou :)) 20:18:15 fantasai is supposed to be setting up a wiki page 20:18:23 ah k. 20:19:03 fantasai: would it be members-only wiki page? 20:19:05 or anybody can edit. 20:20:04 I'd presume member only on that page 20:20:18 ah k. 20:20:18 leaverou_ has joined #css 20:20:25 http://www.w3.org/TR/#tr_CSS seems to have very few names as css3 20:20:31 and all using css3 seem dead or inactive. 20:20:33 except for ruby 20:20:34 you're welcome to edit it... 20:20:39 what did I miss? 20:20:44 my connection dropped 20:20:46 (again...) 20:21:05 oh leaverou i was asking who can edit the wiki 20:22:05 leaverou: I have an IRC bouncer running on csswg.org, would you like an account? 20:22:36 sure, but what's an IRC bouncer? (my ignorance on IRC stuff is showing) 20:23:24 it connectes to irc.w3.org as you, then you connect your irc client to it 20:23:44 like a proxy? 20:23:49 the advantage is that if you drop off, it stays connected, when you re-connect it plays back what happened while you were gone 20:23:58 oh that's awesome! 20:24:12 you can also connect multiple clients and irc.w3.org only sees one, but all your clients get all the messages 20:24:26 and it does push notifications to iPhones if your nick is mentioned 20:24:27 leaverou: i use http://znc.in/ .. it's fantastic. 20:24:39 plinss: wow, that sounds great! 20:24:46 paul_irish: that's what's on irc.csswg.org 20:25:03 plinss: it seems to be /TR/ doesnt actually show anything with css3 prefix that is active. 20:25:10 plinss: otoh the shortnames are all very css3 tho. 20:26:14 plinss: that rocks. :) 20:41:24 leaverou has joined #css 20:52:24 nimbu: pretty much everything listed on http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/current-work needs the short name changed... 20:54:26 plinss: ya thats whatt not the names themselves. 20:54:35 i suppose this would mean it would also change on dev.w3.org then 20:54:53 yes 20:54:59 so would fantasai be making a wiki page of all the short names that needs to be changed? 20:55:04 after /tr is changed 20:55:13 nice. 20:55:19 I WILL BUG YOU FANTASAI 20:55:27 I think she's just going to setup the page, it's up to everyone to fill it in 20:55:49 o okay. 20:55:57 i will be happy to add asap. 21:25:12 hi fantasai!!! 21:25:42 hi nimbu! 21:28:13 fantasai: plinss was saying you were gonna create that page so we can kill css3 forever. 21:28:19 umm, yeah 21:28:22 with the benevolent approval of TimBL 21:28:26 LETS DO IT 21:28:29 working on it 21:28:31 :) 21:28:50 k can do. 21:28:54 also i will be at TPACCC 21:28:57 (mostly) 21:29:52 okay :) 21:32:11 nimbu1 has joined #css 21:34:26 nimbu has joined #css 21:45:18 nimbu has joined #css 21:55:28 nimbu has joined #css 22:29:40 lgombos has joined #css 22:32:40 nimbu has joined #css 23:06:03 tantek has joined #css 23:57:07 jdaggett has joined #css