15:29:14 RRSAgent has joined #css 15:29:14 logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/08/01-css-irc 15:29:20 Zakim, this will be Style 15:29:20 ok, glazou; I see Style_CSS FP()12:00PM scheduled to start in 31 minutes 15:29:27 RRSAgent, make logs public 15:29:33 leaverou: congrats :-) 15:29:38 welcome onboard 15:42:01 Regrets: plinss 15:47:55 cabanier has joined #css 15:51:49 lstorset has joined #css 15:55:35 dbaron has joined #css 15:56:08 Style_CSS FP()12:00PM has now started 15:56:14 +fantasai 15:56:57 +??P8 15:57:03 Zakim, ??P8 is me 15:57:03 +glazou; got it 15:58:43 antonp has joined #css 15:58:47 dstorey has joined #css 15:59:01 lstorset has joined #css 15:59:20 + +1.206.675.aaaa 15:59:34 +Bert 15:59:39 Zakim, aaaa is cabanier 15:59:40 +cabanier; got it 15:59:42 Zakim, 206.675.aaa is me 15:59:42 sorry, cabanier, I do not recognize a party named '206.675.aaa' 15:59:46 + +1.206.324.aabb 15:59:54 Zakim, +206.675.aaa is me 15:59:54 sorry, cabanier, I do not recognize a party named '+206.675.aaa' 15:59:56 Zakim, aabb is sylvaing 15:59:56 +sylvaing; got it 16:00:01 cabanier: I already did it 16:00:10 florian has joined #css 16:00:18 Thanks! 16:00:20 I'll be on IRC only today. Don't have phone access right now 16:00:34 Zakim, who is noisy? 16:00:38 dstorey: ok 16:00:50 glazou, listening for 10 seconds I could not identify any sounds 16:00:59 + +47.23.69.aacc 16:01:02 +??P24 16:01:08 +[Microsoft] 16:01:10 + +1.415.308.aadd 16:01:13 Zakim, I am aacc 16:01:16 +florian; got it 16:01:29 JohnJansen has joined #css 16:01:43 smfr has joined #css 16:01:44 Zakim, Microsoft has JohnJansen 16:01:50 +JohnJansen; got it 16:01:51 + +1.206.390.aaee 16:01:57 + +93550aaff 16:01:58 zakim, aaee is me 16:01:59 +[Microsoft.a] 16:02:01 + +1.604.312.aagg 16:02:06 Zakim, aaff is me 16:02:07 +stearns; got it 16:02:07 Katie has joined #css 16:02:13 +antonp; got it 16:02:14 sylvaing: http://lea.verou.me/2012/08/lea-at-w3-org/ 16:02:15 Zakim, aacc has lstorset 16:02:17 +??P43 16:02:24 sorry, florian, I do not recognize a party named 'aacc' 16:02:26 zakim, ??p43 is me 16:02:32 +??P45 16:02:34 +glenn; got it 16:02:40 + +1.408.636.aahh 16:02:47 Zakin, aahh is me 16:02:50 Zakim, florian has lstorset 16:02:50 +lstorset; got it 16:03:23 +[Microsoft.aa] 16:03:41 zakim, microsoft has me 16:03:41 +arronei_; got it 16:03:44 maybe lea can get them to fix zakim 16:04:00 eheh 16:04:08 + +1.415.766.aaii 16:04:15 Zakim, aaii is dbaron 16:04:15 +dbaron; got it 16:04:25 Zakim, who is here? 16:04:25 On the phone I see fantasai, glazou, cabanier, Bert, sylvaing, florian, ??P24, +1.415.308.aadd, [Microsoft], stearns, antonp, [Microsoft.a], +1.604.312.aagg, glenn, ??P45, 16:04:29 ... +1.408.636.aahh, [Microsoft.aa], dbaron 16:04:29 [Microsoft] has arronei_ 16:04:29 florian has lstorset 16:04:31 On IRC I see Katie, smfr, JohnJansen, florian, lstorset, dstorey, antonp, dbaron, cabanier, RRSAgent, Zakim, glazou, Ms2ger, glenn, Ankh, florianr, drublic, SimonSapin, leaverou, 16:04:33 ScribeNick: fantasai 16:04:36 ... SteveZ, krijnh, arronei_, isherman, TabAtkins, shepazu, decadance, alexmog, sylvaing, shans, vhardy, CSSWG_LogBot, logbot, Bert, jwir3, dglazkov, gsnedders, stearns, trackbot, 16:04:39 ... heycam|away, paul___irish, hober, fantasai, plinss, Hixie 16:04:43 glazou: any additions to agenda? 16:04:43 TabAtkins_ has joined #css 16:04:48 http://wiki.csswg.org/planning/sandiego-2012#participants 16:04:53 JohnJansen_ has joined #css 16:05:08 glazou: If you plan to attend or not attend, please add your name to the wiki so we know who is coming / when / where 16:05:19 -??P24 16:05:25 Zakim, Microsoft has JohnJansen 16:05:25 +JohnJansen; got it 16:05:25 Florian: For TPAC meeting, Opera is joining Adobe as a sponsor 16:05:40 glazou: Thank you very much 16:05:44 glazou: Any other organization? 16:05:46 zakim, [Microsoft.aa] has me 16:05:46 +Katie; got it 16:05:50 + +1.281.305.aajj 16:05:57 +??P59 16:06:19 Glenn: Sunday before or Sunday after? 16:06:21 glazou: before 16:06:29 link: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/FXTF/rawfile/4b53107dd95d/compositing/index.html 16:06:29 Topic: Compositing FPWD 16:06:31 https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/FXTF/rawfile/tip/compositing/index.html 16:07:01 Rik: SVGWG already approved to move to FPWD 16:07:09 Rik: Think the spec is in reasonable shape. 16:07:16 Rik: need to get more consensus on CSS keywords 16:07:23 Rik: There are many; some people requesed fewer 16:07:33 Rik: As WD will get more exposure 16:07:38 Rik: e.g. dbaron gave me very good feedback 16:07:44 Rik: Think it's in readable shape, would like to move to WD 16:07:51 glazou: Opinions? 16:07:59 Florian: I haven't read everything, but I like it so, yeah 16:08:16 Tab: I approve 16:08:23 dbaron: The biggest thing I was worried about was z-ordering stuff, possible I confused people 16:08:26 +SteveZ 16:08:36 dbaron: If it's either fixed, or there's a note that it needs to be fixed, I'm ok with it 16:08:41 krit has joined #css 16:08:46 Rik: I rewrote it with stacking context, like you said, and linked to Appendix E 16:09:02 Zakim, who os here? 16:09:02 Rik: ... add an example that shows what is happening, ppl will not get confused. 16:09:11 I don't understand your question, krit. 16:09:14 Zakim, who is here? 16:09:22 On the phone I see fantasai, glazou, cabanier, Bert, sylvaing, florian, +1.415.308.aadd, [Microsoft], stearns, antonp, [Microsoft.a], +1.604.312.aagg, glenn, ??P45, 16:09:28 ... +1.408.636.aahh, [Microsoft.aa], dbaron, +1.281.305.aajj, ??P59, SteveZ 16:09:29 ScribeNick: TabAtkins 16:09:30 [Microsoft.aa] has Katie 16:09:32 florian has lstorset 16:09:34 [Microsoft] has JohnJansen 16:09:38 glazou: So, no objections against FPWD of compositing? 16:09:38 On IRC I see krit, TabAtkins_, Katie, smfr, florian, lstorset, dstorey, antonp, dbaron, cabanier, RRSAgent, Zakim, glazou, Ms2ger, glenn, Ankh, florianr, drublic, SimonSapin, 16:09:42 Zakim, aadd is me 16:09:45 ... leaverou, SteveZ, krijnh, arronei_, isherman, TabAtkins, shepazu, decadance, alexmog, sylvaing, shans, vhardy, CSSWG_LogBot, logbot, Bert, jwir3, dglazkov, gsnedders, stearns, 16:09:47 glazou: Okay, so let's do that. 16:09:48 JohnJansen has joined #css 16:09:53 ... trackbot, heycam|away, paul___irish, hober, fantasai, plinss, Hixie 16:09:55 RESOLVED: Publish FPWD of the Compositing draft. 16:09:57 -fantasai 16:10:00 rbetts has joined #css 16:10:02 Zakim, Microsoft has JohnJansen 16:10:14 +krit; got it 16:10:19 JohnJansen was already listed in [Microsoft], JohnJansen 16:10:23 +fantasai 16:10:37 + +1.619.846.aakk 16:10:38 glazou: Anything else wrt compositing? 16:10:43 Topic: Flexbox 16:10:43 Topic: Flexbox 16:10:55 Bert: It's part of CSS and SVG, who does the publishing, is that me? 16:11:14 Rik: I think it's part of CSS, so we opened a Bugzilla as part of CSS 16:11:31 Rik: FX will not get as much exposure, and it's not specific to SVG, just adding CSS properties 16:11:40 Rik: Let me know if I need to change anything 16:11:48 http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-flexbox/ 16:11:48 Zakim, aakk is me 16:11:48 +hober; got it 16:11:49 ACTION Bert: Publish Compositing FPWD 16:11:50 Created ACTION-487 - Publish Compositing FPWD [on Bert Bos - due 2012-08-08]. 16:11:52 TOpic: Flexbox 16:12:13 Tab: We concluded last week with some resolutions that should cover what we need to do, and left actual resolutions to me and fantasai 16:12:36 Tab: We tried to go with Option D, and to match it thematically with how abspos works in block layout 16:12:53 Tab: You look for your next/previous item and attach it there 16:13:08 Tab: fantasai worked out how to treat it as a placeholder and just do some packing-space suppression 16:13:27 Florian: As long as Morten is happy, it's good with me 16:13:39 szilles: If there's a sequence of abspos, they are processed and attached to the same edge 16:13:42 fantasai: yes 16:13:53 szilles: And order means that I don't choose the adjacent edge until after I've finished reordering. 16:14:02 szilles: If you could make the wording a little more obvious in that direciton, would be helpful 16:14:15 Tab: wrt first one, we do talk about in-flow items--abspos is out of flow 16:14:25 Tab: Second one, we're explicit that you run reordering first. 16:14:42 Florian: Maybe clarify in a note or something 16:14:57 Morten's response - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Aug/0023.html 16:15:04 szilles: great job 16:15:23 Tab: One bit that's important, last week WG officially resolved that 'order' doesn't apply to abspos 16:15:36 Tab: Wanted to ask WG if ok with reverting that. 16:15:46 Tab: As written right now, order affects the abspos. 16:16:17 Florian: Sounds fine to me. Was only concerned about applying to placeholders. 16:16:22 arno has joined #css 16:16:23 Tab: Morten's ok with it, and chrome is ok today 16:17:00 Anton: I'm wondering, do we expect abspos static positioning to work with layout models in this way? 16:17:19 Anton: It's ok, but I think we need to think about the consequences with other layout models 16:17:25 Anton: Note also that float or clear doesn't affect abspos 16:18:01 Anton: Might decide that's an anomaly 16:18:10 fantasai: or maybe it was added for compat 16:18:48 Tab: Could have principle that do layout, then position abspos 16:19:02 dbaron: Concerned about that. Don't really want to do layout 16:19:14 ... 16:19:44 Florian: I think it's in line with what we called the Rossen Principle. In block layout, if you abspos and don't give coordinates it goes where it would have been 16:19:50 Florian: Flexbox does roughly the same thing 16:19:58 Florian: Don't think anything very different here wrt high-level view 16:20:24 Tab: I think dbaron just wants a clarification of whether for future models you do any work 16:20:55 Florian: Hard to discuss without a specific case in mind 16:21:06 Rossen: Wrt Grid, we always position in the origin of a grid cell in Grid 16:21:29 Rossen: You honor grid-row/grid-column positioning, but otherwise put in origin 16:21:59 Rossen: I do agree that higher-order question of should follow block/flow layout model in other layout models, where that doesn't make any sense? 16:22:22 Rossen: Or go with something simpler, like Tab was suggesting (origin of flex container) last week 16:22:32 Rossen: I'm still in favor of going for something simpler in layout models that have no concept of flow. 16:22:48 ... 16:23:08 szilles: Positioning of flexboxes is ... 16:23:24 For reference, my position in last week's straw poll would have been A. 16:23:38 Tab: Want to request resolution of reversing order, and of going to CR 16:23:54 RESOLVED: order affects abspos, Flexbox goes to CR 16:24:11 ACTION Bert: send Flexbox CR transition request 16:24:11 Created ACTION-488 - Send Flexbox CR transition request [on Bert Bos - due 2012-08-08]. 16:24:49 dbaron: The idea of this model is that you apply order to the abspos to figure out where it goes in the order, and then use that as the static positoin? 16:24:53 Tab: yes 16:25:30 Anton: You're not really treating it as a flex item, you're using order to figure out which item is the next/previous item to attach its position to 16:25:46 dbaron: So I'm not really happy with adding 100 lines of code for something I haven't heard a use case for 16:25:53 Tab: Brad produced some things in the mail thread 16:26:39 fantasai: ... 16:26:46 glazou: But you are not objecting to the change? 16:26:49 dbaron: No. Close to it, but no. 16:26:55 glazou: Ok, let's move on 16:26:58 Topic: Transforms 16:27:03 http://wiki.csswg.org/topics/transform-interpolation 16:27:20 Krit: Issue was ... 16:27:45 Krit: Request from implementers that we don't do that, that we interpolate on each function pair 16:27:57 Krit: So changed the spec to do interpolate on function pairs 16:28:13 Krit: For perspective we do matrix decompse then interpolate [??] 16:28:22 Krit: Thought it'd be a perf issue, but browsers didn't think so 16:28:40 Krit: Have request from smfr that functions along same axis are interpolated, not matrix 16:28:56 glazou: In thread WebKit says they can't change to the preferred way anyway 16:29:02 smfr: Could, but would prefer not to 16:29:23 dbaron: I was originally askin ght espec change back to what it used to be 16:29:30 s/in thread/in wiki 16:29:42 dbaron: Also worried in general that this spec changes too much in ways that are incompatible with Web content 16:29:58 dbaron: Afraid might have to come back 3 months and have to request revert of changes 16:30:03 dbaron: But can't say sooner than 3 months 16:30:10 Krit: Can you be more specific? 16:30:17 dbaron: There's a lot of content using this 16:30:41 dbaron: They stuff the result of all prefixed values into the same variable and use it the same way 16:30:47 dbaron: prefixes isn't getting us anything ehre 16:31:06 smfr: Risk of interpolating transforms is in cases where we used to not do convert then decompose, cases where we would now if we change the spec 16:31:17 smfr: The spec is going away from using matrix interpolation, which is a good thing 16:31:28 dbaron: Yes, worried about changing things *to* matrix interpolation 16:31:49 Krit: ... feedback on specific part that need changed, I change it 16:31:58 dbaron: was specified when I implemented it. If it's not anynmore, someone deleted it 16:32:03 smfr: notion of premitives and derived 16:32:13 I am also worried about making incompatible changes at this point 16:32:14 smfr: e.g. translateX will interolated with translate 16:32:21 smfr: WebKit didn't implement that 16:32:25 Krit: ... 16:32:34 Florian: I'm not very up to speed on how this behaves, but do completely agree with dbaron 16:32:37 Gecko implemented that a few weeks ago, but we haven't shipped it yet. 16:32:38 at a minimum testcases showing some level of interop are warranted 16:32:46 Florian: Used too much to be changed without trouble 16:32:49 (or lack thereof) 16:32:57 Florian: Need to document things, but not change suboptimal behavior 16:33:10 smfr: But whose implementation do we pick? Webkit, Gecko, Opera, IE? 16:33:22 sylvaing: Need to write some test cases to figure that out 16:33:34 Krit: These changes several months ago, 16:33:54 Krit: even translatex and translate, was something not specified before, just sayd "transform function of he same type", had to address, what does "same type" even mean 16:34:02 Krit: So we said "transform function with same name" 16:34:12 Krit: This is different from editors 16:34:21 Krit: I'm fine with changing everything to match transform names 16:34:33 Krit: Still think it's useful for translate functions to interpolate 16:34:42 Krit: e.g. you have translate() and translateX() 16:34:51 Krit: with your interpretation we need to decompose to a matrix 16:34:58 Krit: whereas I would prefer a numeric intrpolation 16:35:01 smfr: I agree, that's better 16:35:10 smfr: I think that's safe, because in the direction of less matrix interpolation 16:35:25 Krit: Same issue with scaleX 16:35:33 http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-transforms/#transform-primitives 16:35:52 Krit: Things that are affected are scale(), translate3D() and ?? 16:35:59 Krit: Not sure that's implemented by browsers, I don't think so 16:36:05 Krit: But from our pov seems useful 16:36:10 smfr: Seems unlikely that these changes break content 16:36:23 smfr: one thing that happens when you fall into matrix interpolation is that you lose rotations greater than 360 deg 16:36:41 smfr: So if someone has a high deg rotation and has one of these functions, you fall into matrix interpolation 16:36:47 smfr: might be ppl doing that now 16:36:59 Krit: second request, you said you'd like to interpolate between that and ....?????? 16:37:11 Krit: so rotations around same axis, would like to interpolate 16:37:23 smfr: WebKit will interpolate between rotate?() and rotate??() 16:37:33 smfr: And for rotate3d() will check if axes match, otherwise go to matrix path 16:37:40 smfr: that's just for that 1 function 16:37:59 smfr: I believe it will fill due to transform individualy in the list if there are rotate3Ds in corresponding places even if axes are different 16:38:14 dbaron is fine with that 16:38:23 Krit: Everything else, implementers requested it. So should be ok 16:38:49 Florian: In general I would like to see test cases for these, to check if we are picking the interoperable solution 16:39:32 Florian: If there is a difference, we need to figure out whether we want good or compatible 16:39:42 It's really easy to write script tests for interpolation by using a negative transition-delay. 16:39:45 Florian: These are used a lot out there, so we can't break compatibility 16:39:51 some question of how to write testcases 16:40:01 fantasai: Can always write a manual test 16:40:17 drublic has joined #css 16:40:26 fantasai: That's good enough to see what browsers are doing for purpose of speccing it 16:40:30 jet has joined #CSS 16:40:46 Topic: CSS2.1 16:40:53 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2012JulSep/0090.html 16:41:03 JohnJansen has joined #css 16:41:21 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2012JulSep/0101.html 16:41:32 first issue is marked as [A] ?!? shocking :-) 16:41:32 Anton: First one is follow-up on adding concept of formatting contexts 16:41:42 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17121#c2 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17121#c5 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17122#c1 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15686#c2 16:41:58 Anton: Rossen wanted it clearer when a box establishes an inline formatting context 16:42:26 fantasai: Those edits all look good to me 16:42:42 Anton: proposal to satisfy Rossen is https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17121#c5 16:42:54 Anton: This was what was implied in the text before, now just explicitly stating it 16:43:09 Rossen: Change sounds good to me 16:43:26 looks good to me 16:43:31 RESOLVED: Accept edits listed above 16:43:42 Item B 16:43:58 Anton: We raised issue that there was no interop on whether overflow affects wrapper box or table box 16:44:09 Anton: Agreed to implement whatever most widely implemented 16:44:13 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17121#c5 16:44:24 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17505#c6 16:44:57 Anton: Answer was some UAs are using the table box (Gecko and Trident) whereas WebKit and Opera 12 seemd to apply to wrapper box but doing something weird 16:45:16 Anton: Which one resolve to? 16:45:49 fantasai: height applies to table box, so makes sense for overflow to also apply to table box 16:45:58 dbaron: What values of overflow apply to the table box? 16:46:08 Anton: Didn't investigate that one. Personally tested overflow: hidden 16:46:28 Florian: We'll align with whatever sensible behavior we agree on 16:47:20 fantasai: Do we want to resolve that 'overflow' applies to the table box, and later figure out whether 'overflow: scroll' applies? 16:47:30 dbaron: I'm reading the spec, and the spec says overflow doesn't apply to tables 16:47:40 Anton: We have bugs, we know that is kind-of wrong 16:47:59 Anton: In reality it does apply to tables, it's a question of which box it applies to 16:48:08 Anton: The formatting context edits will fix the Applies to line 16:48:18 Anton: But first we have to resolve on is the table box or table wrapper box 16:48:41 Florian: Test results sound good enough reason to say apply to table box 16:49:02 Rossen has joined #css 16:49:10 -krit 16:49:24 Florian: Is anyone disagreeing? 16:49:35 Bert: Don't see how it would affect table 16:49:45 -??P45 16:49:49 fantasai: could have a fixed-height div inside a cell, that has overflowing content 16:49:51 +[Microsoft.aaa] 16:50:03 Anton: Question is where do we truncate it, or where do we put the scroll bar 16:50:04 arno has joined #css 16:50:10 Zakim, [Microsoft.aaa] is me 16:50:10 +Rossen; got it 16:50:23 Bert: Isn't it easiest to say it doesn't apply? 16:51:26 glazou: I'm still not hearing any important change or removal on this issue... 16:51:43 glazou: Do we need more time? 16:52:22 dbaron: I'm trying to figure out why we do anything for overflow on tables 16:52:26 dbaron: I haven't found the code yet 16:53:24 dbaron: I'm concerned about saying that overflow applies to tables 16:53:35 dbaron: Not sure anyone applies values other than 'hidden' to tables 16:53:37 +1 16:54:16 Anton: The spec used to say it applied to tables, but during the terminology fixes, it accidentally got removed 16:54:23 Anton: Separate question of whether we want that or not 16:54:58 Florian: Not exactly excited for 'overflow: paged' applying to tables 16:55:17 dbaron: Found list of where we support 'overflow: hidden' but not other overflow values -- 16:55:25 dbaron: table cells, tables, and SVG stuff 16:55:35 table, table cell, svg:svg, svg:foreignObject 16:55:45 Florian: Is anyone interested in other values on table 16:56:00 Florian: Or should we just spec that only 'hidden' applies 16:57:49 -Rossen 16:58:07 -[Microsoft] 16:58:08 glazou: suggest deferring to next week 16:58:19 Arronei offers to help Anton work on testcases 16:59:33 Topic: CSS3 Text 16:59:53 because it's almost ended 17:00:15 fantasai: Thinking about publishing WD 17:00:20 fantasai: Would like people to review 17:00:24 in that case - talk to you next week :-) 17:00:26 - +1.604.312.aagg 17:00:32 fantasai: Also thinking about splitting it, with text decoration parts in separate module 17:00:43 -dbaron 17:00:48 -glenn 17:00:51 -hober 17:00:52 Zakim, aagg was rbetts 17:00:52 -SteveZ 17:00:52 I don't understand 'aagg was rbetts', rbetts 17:00:53 - +1.281.305.aajj 17:00:54 -fantasai 17:01:00 antonp: I have a couple questions on your item [C] we didn't get to today 17:01:02 - +1.408.636.aahh 17:01:05 szilles: where would parts common to both go? 17:01:07 -[Microsoft.aa] 17:01:08 -[Microsoft.a] 17:01:09 fantasai: There aren't really any 17:01:34 fantasai: It's a very long module 17:01:48 glazou: Everyone, please add agenda items to F2F wiki 17:01:48 -florian 17:01:49 -Bert 17:01:49 -antonp 17:01:49 -glazou 17:01:51 -sylvaing 17:01:53 Meeting closed. 17:01:55 -stearns 17:02:01 -cabanier 17:02:20 fantasai: ask cabanier 17:02:23 -??P59 17:02:24 Style_CSS FP()12:00PM has ended 17:02:24 Attendees were fantasai, glazou, +1.206.675.aaaa, Bert, cabanier, +1.206.324.aabb, sylvaing, +47.23.69.aacc, +1.415.308.aadd, JohnJansen, +1.206.390.aaee, +93550aaff, [Microsoft], 17:02:24 ... +1.604.312.aagg, stearns, antonp, glenn, +1.408.636.aahh, lstorset, arronei_, +1.415.766.aaii, dbaron, Katie, +1.281.305.aajj, SteveZ, krit, +1.619.846.aakk, hober, Rossen 17:03:10 s/cabinier/krit/ 17:03:15 for transforms stuff 17:03:29 grr - cabanier 17:03:38 :-) 17:04:07 antonp: ping 17:06:20 stearns: was my name on transforms stuff?!? 17:06:35 krit: I need help fixing holes in the minutes :) 17:06:58 oh, looking 17:06:59 krit: look back for ??? in the minutes when you were speaking, and see if you can fill in the details 17:08:02 s/So we said "transform function with same name"/So we say "transform function with same name"?/ 17:08:10 miketaylr has joined #css 17:08:43 lol 17:08:49 I can fix all the typos and things :) 17:08:53 it's the missing info that I can't fix! 17:09:03 you can make stuff up 17:09:05 s/Things that are affected are scale(), translate3D() and ??/Things that are affected are scale(), translate(), translate3d() and scale3d() 17:09:33 stearns: ? 17:09:52 (sorry, lame attempt at humor) 17:10:12 ahhh. Don't use make-up :P 17:12:32 s/second request, you said you'd like to interpolate between that and ….??????/second request, you said you'd like to interpolate between rotate3d along same axis?/ 17:14:23 antonp: added my questions to https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18346 17:14:26 s/WebKit will interpolate between rotate?() and rotate??()/WebKit will interpolate between rotateZ() and rotate()/ 17:14:45 fantasai: think that are the important information 17:14:51 thanks krit! 17:16:51 Thanks Alan, I'll address them 17:21:59 antonp has left #css 18:06:16 arno has joined #css 18:38:08 jet has joined #CSS 18:44:03 jet has joined #CSS 18:50:02 aharon has joined #css 19:02:15 TabAtkins: I'm heading to MV to meet up with aharon tomorrow. Want to hang out afterwards and work on stuff? 19:21:56 glenn has joined #css 19:32:15 Zakim has left #css 19:50:38 drublic has joined #css 20:08:50 glenn has joined #css 20:17:45 dbaron has joined #css 20:20:01 arno has joined #css 21:32:50 dstorey has joined #css 21:44:35 aharon has left #css 21:56:08 jet has joined #CSS 22:45:40 arronei has joined #css 23:05:28 dstorey1 has joined #css