14:53:10 RRSAgent has joined #rdf-wg 14:53:10 logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/07/25-rdf-wg-irc 14:53:12 RRSAgent, make logs world 14:53:12 Zakim has joined #rdf-wg 14:53:14 Zakim, this will be 73394 14:53:14 ok, trackbot; I see SW_RDFWG()11:00AM scheduled to start in 7 minutes 14:53:15 Meeting: RDF Working Group Teleconference 14:53:15 Date: 25 July 2012 14:53:19 SW_RDFWG()11:00AM has now started 14:53:26 +Guus 14:53:38 Guus has joined #rdf-wg 14:57:13 mlnt has joined #rdf-wg 14:57:13 +sandro 14:59:00 gavinc has joined #rdf-wg 14:59:56 +gavinc 15:00:22 zakim, who is on the call? 15:00:22 On the phone I see Guus, sandro, gavinc 15:00:41 Arnaud has joined #rdf-wg 15:00:57 +OpenLink_Software 15:01:04 Zakim, OpenLink_Software is temporarily me 15:01:04 +MacTed; got it 15:01:07 Zakim, mute me 15:01:07 MacTed should now be muted 15:01:31 +??P14 15:01:33 +??P13 15:01:39 zakim, I am ??P13 15:01:39 +gkellogg; got it 15:01:42 +Arnaud 15:04:30 PatH has joined #rdf-wg 15:04:40 zakim, what's the code? 15:05:01 the conference code is 73394 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), mlnt 15:05:15 +PatH 15:05:31 +??P27 15:05:36 Zakim, ??P27 is me 15:05:38 +ericP; got it 15:06:01 Souri has joined #rdf-wg 15:06:33 +??P28 15:06:46 zakim, I am ??P28 15:06:46 +mlnt; got it 15:06:50 zakim, who is on the phone? 15:06:50 On the phone I see Guus, sandro, gavinc, MacTed (muted), ??P14, gkellogg, Arnaud, PatH, ericP, mlnt 15:07:08 zakim, ??P14 is me 15:07:08 +Souri; got it 15:07:13 +??P32 15:07:27 Guus: there's usually a helpful crowd 15:07:32 ... and some more 15:07:36 Zakim, ??P32 is me 15:07:36 +yvesr; got it 15:07:41 sandro: "usually" 15:07:55 +??P29 15:08:07 Zakim, ??P29 is me 15:08:07 +SteveH; got it 15:09:03 minutes from last meeting need to be cleaned up 15:09:06 cygri has joined #rdf-wg 15:09:28 sandro: nicknames should be put in tracker 15:09:36 http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/users 15:09:48 -ericP 15:10:16 minutes are accepted 15:11:03 no pending action items 15:11:09 +mhausenblas 15:11:14 zakim, mhausenblas is temporarily me 15:11:14 +cygri; got it 15:11:17 gkellogg: just did it, thanks 15:11:59 open actions stay as they stand 15:12:12 next telcon on August 8 15:12:27 next f2f in Lyon on Oct 29-30 15:12:52 for registration information see: http://www.w3.org/2012/10/TPAC/ 15:13:47 sandro: recommends staying at least on Wednesday and possibly Thursday and Friday to join other groups as observers although rooms are very small and it's not clear how many observers can be accommodated 15:14:32 gkellogg_ has joined #rdf-wg 15:14:59 arnaud: are we planning on meeting with other groups? 15:15:00 +??P27 15:15:08 guus: not sure yet 15:15:18 Zakim, ??P27 is me 15:15:18 +ericP; got it 15:16:09 sandro: one possibility would be with sparql wg, another would be linked data platform 15:16:35 guus: one obvious topic would be json-ld 15:16:45 guus: to be continued 15:18:17 i must have missed this. link to email? 15:18:25 cuus: Provenance LC - chair asked specific questions and we need volunteers to try and answer them 15:18:32 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Jul/0043.html 15:18:43 s/cuus/guus/ 15:18:45 s/cuus/guus/ 15:19:34 path volunteers 15:20:09 ACTION: PatH to start discussion on answer the questions on Provenance LC 15:20:09 Created ACTION-178 - Start discussion on answer the questions on Provenance LC [on Patrick Hayes - due 2012-08-01]. 15:20:20 s/anwer/answering/ 15:21:35 guus: would be nice to have volunteers to review the spec 15:21:41 ... none for now 15:21:52 Turtle LC 15:22:49 request from TimBL for addition 15:23:06 q+ 15:23:12 zakim, who is noisy? 15:23:27 cygri, listening for 11 seconds I heard sound from the following: Guus (40%) 15:23:57 gavinc: a number of small bugs, that are resolved in the ED but not sure how to resolve in LC 15:24:20 guus: we have not raised issues yet, have we? 15:24:43 gavinc: some are already solved and not worth recording as issues 15:25:23 q- 15:25:26 guus: turtle prefixes? 15:25:51 "a:b:c" was ambiguous 15:25:54 gavinc: was a bug in the grammar, regarding use of colon, that is now resolved in editor's draft 15:26:57 sandro: concern some people may think that's too big a change after LC but that'd be silly 15:27:01 gavinc: agreed 15:27:13 if we change tests, do we go back to LC? 15:27:19 I was told NO 15:27:20 no. 15:27:24 That tests were NOT part of the LC 15:27:44 guus: TimBL's request should be entered as an issue 15:27:46 tbaker has joined #rdf-wg 15:27:48 can we be more clear about the test cases? 15:28:00 q? 15:28:02 q+ 15:29:41 gavinc: regarding inverse property, would like to have a strawpoll from the group to find out whether people are interested 15:29:46 is foaf:mbox of . 15:30:06 gavinc: if people are interested, will then figure out a proposal 15:30:15 +1 from me 15:30:21 +1 from me 15:30:25 +1 from me 15:30:27 +1 syntax for inverse arcs, prefered syntax for me is ^ I think. 15:30:30 +1 15:30:31 +1 15:30:36 (although there is a strong case to use SPARQL-like syntax for that) 15:30:41 +0.5 from me 15:30:43 +1 to sandro's punctuation ammedment 15:30:49 +1 15:30:54 0 15:31:01 agree about the english part 15:31:04 +0.5 to ^, -0.5 for pseudo english 15:31:50 q+ to ask about SPARQL compat 15:31:51 what about implications for literal as subject? 15:31:52 its very handy in rdfa 15:31:52 i think the sayntax has to fit in a whole in the SPARQL punctuation 15:31:55 I prefer the inverse syntax ( ^p) over "is .. of" 15:31:56 gavinc: we need to liaise with sparql wg 15:32:07 gavinc will work on a proposal 15:32:16 q+ 15:32:30 danbri 15:32:40 ^elt InversePath Inverse path (object to subject). -- from http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/#pp-language 15:33:01 sandro, have you looked for grammar which doesn't conflict with SPARQL? 15:33:03 Re "is ... of", per rdf-comments thread, I'd support a punctuation-based notation if it were added to Turtle _and_ SPARQL. But let's not have pseudo-English... 15:33:33 (and I don't see any strong implications for literal as subject) 15:34:14 http://www.w3.org/TR/turtle/tests/ 15:35:18 sandro asked about status of test cases 15:35:46 ericP: done some worked on them but not aware of test cases being normative 15:35:53 s/worked/work/ 15:36:00 q- 15:36:20 sandro: the URL is really bad, would need a note indicating this is a proposal 15:36:21 q- 15:36:34 ericp: we could fix them 15:37:06 In the Microdata to RDF spec, we reference them non-nomatively in an appendix 15:37:11 http://www.w3.org/TR/microdata-rdf/#testing 15:37:11 sandro: need to be fixed for CR 15:37:29 gavinc: 4 or 5 are broken with regard to the new syntax 15:37:49 ericp: fix them or put a big warning on them? 15:38:48 sandro: this should never have been published as is, we aren't allowed to change them now 15:39:09 .. was the publication agreed by the group? 15:39:13 gavinc: no 15:39:31 q+ 15:39:36 q- 15:39:40 http://www.w3.org/TR/turtle/tests/base1.ttl 15:39:44 sandro: there is no commentary about the status of these tests 15:40:41 q+ 15:40:42 sandro will ask permission to add a note stating these have not been approved by the WG yet 15:41:03 action: sandro try to get permission to put a box on http://www.w3.org/TR/turtle/tests explaining that these tests have not been approved 15:41:03 Created ACTION-179 - Try to get permission to put a box on http://www.w3.org/TR/turtle/tests explaining that these tests have not been approved [on Sandro Hawke - due 2012-08-01]. 15:41:22 q- 15:41:37 ack g 15:42:01 "Bob" ^foaf:name . 15:43:30 q+ 15:43:54 ^foaf:bogusName "Bob" . 15:43:55 there are going to be people who want this flexibility in any case. 15:45:42 gkellogg: re: inverse property, not sure it's worth ensuring the syntax prevents not valid rdf 15:45:53 ack me 15:46:09 sandro: this will be controversial 15:46:40 guus: moving on to JSON-LD 15:46:45 (syntax rules can never protect against crappy data; for everything we rule out, someone'll find another way to screw up) 15:47:14 +1 danbri. And some of that crap is useful. 15:48:31 q+ to say gosh I wish this wasn't considered a SYNTAX issue :-( 15:49:47 gkellogg: group is discussing several requests they have received 15:51:44 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-linked-json/2012Jul/0040.html 15:51:59 gkellogg: we're thinking about a mechanism for macro expansion as part of parsing. 15:52:12 http://json-ld.org/minutes/2012-07-24/ 15:54:28 sandro: seems like you're reinventing a rule mechanism 15:55:42 gkellogg: most of the expansion mechanism is in the json domain, doesn't affect the rdf one 15:56:06 gkellogg: encourages people to read the minutes and participate in the discussion if they are interested 15:56:25 sandro: interested but doens't have time to participate, please, take my comment seriously 15:56:31 gkellogg: ok 15:56:38 q? 15:56:42 ack s 15:56:42 sandro, you wanted to say gosh I wish this wasn't considered a SYNTAX issue :-( 15:56:47 sandro: PLEASE don't create a new rule mechanism that's json-specific 15:57:53 link to the issue Gregg is currently talking about: https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/146 15:58:00 e.g. "position": ["18.324235", "-36.4387934"] 15:58:29 guus: haven't seen any comments on the mailing list 15:58:53 ... need you to pass along issues sent to the community list 15:59:58 q? 16:00:20 http://www.w3.org/2005/01/yacker/uploads/A?lang=perl&text=%22Bob%22+^foaf%3Aname+%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fbob.example%2F%23me%3E+.%0D%0A%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fbob.example%2F%23me%3E+^foaf%3Aknows+%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fsue.example%2F%23me%3E+.%0D%0A&action=validate+text 16:00:23 guus: any other agenda item? 16:00:40 http://www.w3.org/2005/01/yacker/uploads/A?lang=perl&text=%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fbob.example%2F%23me%3E+^foaf%3AbogusName+%22Bob%22+.&action=validate+text 16:00:51 http://www.w3.org/2005/01/yacker/uploads/A?lang=perl&text=%22Bob%22+foaf%3AbogusName+%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fbob.example%2F%23me%3E++.&action=validate+text 16:00:53 guus: meeting adjourned 16:00:57 -SteveH 16:01:06 see yall. 16:01:06 -cygri 16:01:07 -Arnaud 16:01:15 -PatH 16:01:17 -mlnt 16:01:32 I need to jump to another call, I leave it to you guys to do your magic to generate the minutes (hopefully not too crappy ;-) 16:01:43 -Souri 16:01:50 http://www.w3.org/2005/01/yacker/uploads/A/bnf?lang=perl 16:02:08 -[6] triples ::= subject predicateObjectList | blankNodePropertyList predicateObjectList? 16:02:11 +[6] triples ::= subject predicateObjectList | literal inversePredicateObjectList | blankNodePropertyList predicateObjectList? [7] predicateObjectList ::= verb objectList (';' verb objectList)* ';'? 16:02:14 trackbot, draft minutes 16:02:14 Sorry, Guus, I don't understand 'trackbot, draft minutes'. Please refer to http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/irc for help 16:02:15 +[7b] inversePredicateObjectList ::= inverseVerb subjectList (';' inverseVerb subjectList)* ';'? [8] objectList ::= object (',' object)* 16:02:18 +[8a] subjectList ::= subject (',' subject)* [9] verb ::= predicate | 'a' 16:02:21 +[9a] inverseVerb ::= '^' (predicate | 'a') 16:02:29 -[6] triples ::= subject predicateObjectList | blankNodePropertyList predicateObjectList? 16:02:32 +[6] triples ::= subject predicateObjectList | literal inversePredicateObjectList | blankNodePropertyList predicateObjectList? 16:02:35 +[7b] inversePredicateObjectList ::= inverseVerb subjectList (';' inverseVerb subjectList)* ';'? 16:02:38 +[8a] subjectList ::= subject (',' subject)* 16:02:40 +[9a] inverseVerb ::= '^' (predicate | 'a') 16:02:57 trackbot, end meeting 16:02:57 Zakim, list attendees 16:02:57 As of this point the attendees have been Guus, sandro, gavinc, MacTed, gkellogg, Arnaud, PatH, ericP, mlnt, Souri, yvesr, SteveH, cygri 16:03:05 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 16:03:05 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/07/25-rdf-wg-minutes.html trackbot 16:03:06 RRSAgent, bye 16:03:06 I see 2 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2012/07/25-rdf-wg-actions.rdf : 16:03:06 ACTION: PatH to start discussion on answer the questions on Provenance LC [1] 16:03:06 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2012/07/25-rdf-wg-irc#T15-20-09 16:03:06 ACTION: sandro try to get permission to put a box on http://www.w3.org/TR/turtle/tests explaining that these tests have not been approved [2] 16:03:06 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2012/07/25-rdf-wg-irc#T15-41-03