13:58:35 RRSAgent has joined #ldp 13:58:35 logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/07/09-ldp-irc 13:58:36 LeeF has joined #ldp 13:58:37 RRSAgent, make logs 181 13:58:37 Zakim has joined #ldp 13:58:39 Zakim, this will be 13:58:39 I don't understand 'this will be', trackbot 13:58:40 Meeting: Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group Teleconference 13:58:42 Date: 09 July 2012 13:58:52 zakim, this will be lpd 13:58:52 I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, AndyS1 13:59:08 zakim, this will be 53794 13:59:08 ok, AndyS1; I see SW_LDP()10:00AM scheduled to start in 1 minute 13:59:18 zakim, this is 53794 13:59:19 ok, AndyS1; that matches SW_LDP()10:00AM 13:59:19 zakim, who is here? 13:59:19 On the phone I see ??P1, ??P2, ??P0, [IBM], ??P3, ??P5 13:59:20 On IRC I see LeeF, RRSAgent, Andras, AndyS1, krp, ghard, domel, boris, Arnaud, dret, MacTed, betehess, deiu, SteveS, oberger, sandro, Yves, trackbot, ericP 13:59:24 relves has joined #ldp 13:59:28 -??P2 13:59:54 steve has joined #ldp 13:59:55 + +33.9.50.97.aaaa 14:00:04 +??P9 14:00:04 zakim, who is here? 14:00:06 +LeeF 14:00:13 On the phone I see ??P1, ??P0, [IBM], ??P3, ??P5, +33.9.50.97.aaaa, ??P9, LeeF 14:00:14 zakim, ??P9 is me 14:00:20 +??P10 14:00:25 zakim, ??P10 is me 14:00:27 +boris; got it 14:00:29 list participants 14:00:30 mhausenblas has joined #ldp 14:00:31 zakim, aaaa is me 14:00:33 On IRC I see steve, relves, Zakim, LeeF, RRSAgent, Andras, AndyS1, krp, ghard, domel, boris, Arnaud, dret, MacTed, betehess, deiu, SteveS, oberger, sandro, Yves, trackbot, ericP 14:00:38 +??P13 14:00:43 Zakim, [IBM] is me 14:00:44 +AndyS1; got it 14:00:48 -boris 14:00:50 +Arnaud; got it 14:01:12 +SteveS; got it 14:01:13 cgueret_work has joined #ldp 14:01:13 kalpa has joined #ldp 14:01:23 mkerrin has joined #ldp 14:01:29 +OpenLink_Software 14:01:32 zakim, who is here? 14:01:36 zakim, who is here? 14:01:38 RRSAgent, make logs member 14:01:44 'steve' is Steve Battle - just joined the WG - hello all. 14:01:47 Zakim, OpenLink_Software is temporarily me 14:01:48 Zakim, mute me 14:01:52 -??P3 14:01:52 hello 14:02:09 +Sandro 14:02:12 +??P25 14:02:14 +??P21 14:02:29 +??P3 14:02:30 Hi Steve 14:02:36 JohnArwe has joined #ldp 14:02:38 On the phone I see ??P1, ??P0, SteveS, ??P5, Arnaud, LeeF, AndyS1, ??P13, OpenLink_Software, ??P25, Sandro, ??P21, ??P3 14:02:43 On the phone I see ??P1, ??P0, SteveS, ??P5, Arnaud, LeeF, AndyS1, ??P13, OpenLink_Software, ??P25, Sandro, ??P21, ??P3 14:02:46 cygri has joined #ldp 14:02:55 Zakim, I am mhausenblas 14:02:58 +MacTed; got it 14:02:58 zakim, ??P3 is me 14:03:00 MacTed should now be muted 14:03:06 zakim, i'm with mhausenblas 14:03:12 -??P25 14:03:14 + +1.804.991.aabb 14:03:27 zakim, ??P25 is me 14:03:29 +JohnArwe 14:03:32 +mhausenblas 14:03:34 zakim, ??P1 is probably me 14:03:36 jkopecky has joined #ldp 14:03:38 On IRC I see mkerrin, kalpa, cgueret_work, mhausenblas, steve, relves, Zakim, LeeF, RRSAgent, Andras, AndyS1, krp, ghard, domel, boris, Arnaud, dret, MacTed, betehess, deiu, 14:03:43 ... SteveS, oberger, sandro, Yves, trackbot, ericP 14:03:47 +??P35 14:04:00 +??P38 14:04:01 ok, mhausenblas, I now associate you with mhausenblas 14:04:04 +krp; got it 14:04:06 zakim, i'm with mhausenblas 14:04:07 +cygri; got it 14:04:21 + +1.937.775.aacc 14:04:23 I already had ??P25 as JohnArwe, ghard 14:04:27 cgueret_work has joined #ldp 14:04:29 +boris?; got it 14:04:30 Ummh 14:04:36 zakim, ??PP13 may be me 14:04:43 zakim, ??p38 is probably me 14:04:45 +??P41 14:04:49 +mkerrin; got it 14:04:51 zakim, who is there? 14:04:53 + +44.117.370.aadd 14:04:57 how can I get to know my conference phone number to let know Zakim? 14:05:04 zakim, ??P35 is probably me 14:05:10 bblfish has joined #ldp 14:05:15 sorry, Andras, I do not understand your question 14:05:19 +jkopecky?; got it 14:05:20 hihi 14:05:21 I don't understand your question, dret. 14:05:21 Zakim, who's noisy? 14:05:26 +ghard?; got it 14:05:49 -/me waves 14:05:50 MacTed, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: ??P0 (59%), Arnaud (38%), +44.117.370.aadd (19%) 14:05:52 zakim, ??PP13 is probably me 14:05:55 +Yves 14:06:01 sorry, Andras, I do not understand your question 14:06:14 s/-\/me waves// 14:06:27 cgueret_work has joined #ldp 14:07:19 zakim, ??PP13 is probably Andras 14:07:19 sorry, Andras, I do not understand your question 14:07:52 zakim aacc is me 14:08:47 zakim, ??P35 is me 14:08:47 I already had ??P35 as ghard?, ghard 14:08:52 +??P49 14:08:54 Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2012.07.09 14:08:59 Chair: Arnaud 14:09:24 Zakim, ??P49 is me 14:09:24 +ericP; got it 14:09:40 Cheers Yves ;) 14:10:33 krp has joined #ldp 14:12:07 +Arthur 14:12:43 Zakim, aacc is me 14:12:43 +kalpa; got it 14:13:02 Topic: Minutes of last meeting 14:13:12 +1 for meetings 14:13:19 was not there 14:13:23 but read it 14:13:26 +1 for minutes 14:13:26 +sandro.a 14:13:29 +1 14:14:05 Minutes are approved 14:14:35 close ACTION-2 14:14:35 ACTION-2 Set up commonscribe closed 14:15:37 next meeting 23 July 14:15:38 ArthurK has joined #ldp 14:15:57 -krp 14:16:01 TPAC to be used for f2f 14:16:25 -boris? 14:16:31 ah btw. I think it would be good for the WebID Community Group and the Read Write Web Community Group to meet with this group too 14:16:55 +??P3 14:17:09 http://www.w3.org/2010/11/TPAC/ 14:17:14 zakim, ??P3 is me 14:17:14 +krp; got it 14:17:28 bblfish indeed a good idea 14:17:53 volunteers for hosting a meeintg in US 14:18:08 in the same time as TPAC 14:18:43 by the end of August we should define the exact details 14:19:06 oops could I mention something on this topic? 14:19:10 (note, planned time for TPAC for ldp should be nov 1 and 2) 14:19:15 topic: Sandro's "Proposal" 14:19:17 -??P41 14:19:19 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/REST 14:19:20 zakim, who is on the phone? 14:19:20 On the phone I see ??P0, SteveS, ??P5, Arnaud, LeeF, AndyS1, ??P13, MacTed (muted), Sandro, ??P21, +1.804.991.aabb, JohnArwe, mhausenblas, ghard, jkopecky?, kalpa, 14:19:22 q+ 14:19:24 ... +44.117.370.aadd, Yves, ericP, Arthur, sandro.a, krp 14:19:24 mhausenblas has cygri, mkerrin 14:19:26 Topic: RDF Simple Data Interface Protocol 14:19:28 "RDF Simple Data Interface Protocol - Level Zero" http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/REST (from Sandro) 14:20:00 +??P1 14:20:17 zakim, ??P13 is me 14:20:17 +Andras; got it 14:21:08 this is already almost in the specs... 14:21:39 level 0 - get and put 14:22:09 not in level 0 - questions and possible solutions 14:23:02 for example PATCH 14:23:48 Arnaud: is it higher level than the graph store prootocol? 14:24:00 q+ 14:24:06 Sandro: SDI is more abstract 14:24:13 q? 14:24:16 +??P41 14:24:31 -??P41 14:25:02 +??P41 14:25:06 (Henry Story speaking) 14:25:10 'steve' is steve battle - on the phone also 14:25:26 zakim, who is talking? 14:25:37 boris, listening for 10 seconds I could not identify any sounds 14:25:57 -??P41 14:26:01 q? 14:26:04 Henry: I think it would be good for the WebID Community Group and the Read Write Web Community Group to meet with this group too 14:26:54 it's good to see many very similar proposals 14:27:47 Henry: also to organize a hackathon in Lyon 14:28:03 these groups are overlapping 14:28:24 ok, will do 14:28:40 Arnaud: send a mail about these ideas 14:28:40 q? 14:28:43 q- 14:28:44 +1 to bblfish's proposals 14:28:49 ack bblfish 14:28:50 q? 14:28:53 ack cygri 14:29:06 +??P17 14:29:27 Zakim: +??P17 is probably me 14:29:37 Richard: collection resources are existing in your domain or new ones? 14:30:11 Zakim, +??P17 is probably me 14:30:11 sorry, oberger, I do not understand your question 14:30:20 Zakim, +??P17 is me 14:30:20 sorry, oberger, I do not recognize a party named '+??P17' 14:30:30 Zakim, ??p17 is oberger 14:30:30 +oberger; got it 14:30:37 Arnaud has joined #ldp 14:30:42 thx MacTed 14:31:02 sorry for late arrival (visiting my doctor :-/) 14:31:03 Richard: a resource can be in several collections, how do you manage this? 14:31:31 cygri: more Not in Level Zero: (1) removing things from a collection (is it the same as deleting), and (2) signaling what kinds of properties a new resource can/should have. 14:31:37 ericP: thx, obvious, but was in too much hurry 14:31:49 Richard: can a client learn in advance what properties should be defined before inserting a new resource? 14:32:24 Sandro: these are for future considerations 14:32:36 q+ 14:33:41 q- 14:33:59 sandro: Have you tried putting this list into the tracker, or the list in the charter? 14:35:16 -??P1 14:35:47 +??P1 14:35:51 zakim, ??P1 is me 14:35:51 +jkopecky; got it 14:35:59 q+ to ask if the LDBP UC&R were motivated by OSCL 14:36:16 ericP: s/OSCL/OSLC/ 14:36:19 -sandro.a 14:36:25 Topic: list of issues in the charter 14:37:06 Does existing specs cover any of the issues? 14:37:46 of course it helps to implement it to know what the issues are 14:37:57 q+ 14:38:30 issue numbers can be put into emails 14:38:45 q? 14:38:52 Arnaud has joined #ldp 14:38:57 ack me 14:38:57 ericP, you wanted to ask if the LDBP UC&R were motivated by OSCL 14:38:59 wb Arnaud 14:39:44 s/OSCL/OSLC/ 14:39:56 ericP - those are already here -- http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/Use_Cases_And_Requirements 14:39:57 and somewhat expanded already... 14:40:49 Steve: some of the UC are from OSLC and they could be expanded 14:40:50 http://www.w3.org/Submission/2012/SUBM-ldbpucr-20120326/#oslc obviously is labeled purposely ? ;) 14:41:27 achille has joined #ldp 14:41:34 ack next 14:41:56 q+ 14:42:49 Arnaud: please contribute to http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/Use_Cases_And_Requirements 14:43:06 SteveS: ;-) 14:44:26 Henry: details come up when they start implementing the proposal 14:44:33 q+ 14:44:43 but it will be totally re-written probably... 14:45:11 q+ to discuss the "hosting" use case, i.e. rewriting certain BNodes to URLs, potentially the graph URL 14:45:13 q- 14:45:50 ack next 14:45:51 q+ to ask re getting a quick overview on the overall direction 14:46:31 Steve: implementation is coming 14:47:15 maybe that would be interesting to list in a page 14:47:30 ack andys 14:48:01 -Arnaud 14:48:06 +1 to Andy's point re what does EAI in this context mean (and how it is enabled through our work) 14:48:11 Andy: how it enables integration based on UC? IBM could comment 14:48:52 sorry can you hear me? 14:49:29 +1 to Andy's point about EAI 14:49:47 dret, please, take over :-/ 14:49:59 my phone died somehow 14:50:09 ack me 14:50:09 mhausenblas, you wanted to ask re getting a quick overview on the overall direction 14:50:44 SteveS: sounds reasonable 14:50:52 Michael: who would object to go forward with IBM submission? 14:51:07 -jkopecky 14:51:10 what do you mean by "go forward"? 14:51:51 +Arnaud 14:52:52 I'm not sure I understood what mhausenblas opinion is WRT to the submission... but maybe he hasn't mentioned ;) 14:52:59 Michael is asking for a straw poll on who is generally positive about the IBM submission or who is more on something else 14:53:01 q? 14:53:11 zakim, who is talking? 14:53:16 +??P6 14:53:21 Andras, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Arnaud (86%), Sandro (24%), ericP (19%) 14:53:47 Michael: as someone involved both in the chartering and supporting the IBM submission I agree with Eric 14:55:04 +1 sandro ... with those "concern points" being an easy list of issues to start into the Tracker 14:56:01 telling the world this is what we're doing 14:56:12 sounds like a good idea, it will force much more careful reading 14:56:35 unless if done during time when too many people are on vacation ? 14:57:48 publish current submission as first draft? 14:57:49 q? 14:57:50 kalpa has joined #ldp 14:58:24 summertime may not be the best period 14:59:04 q- 14:59:06 q+ 14:59:26 yes, the question is good: if we think what would it be if we were to publish the IBM draft as a working draft - makes one focus 14:59:33 -> http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/Use_Cases_And_Requirements#Hosting_POSTed_Resources Low Level use cas 15:01:14 ericP: OSLC-CM could provide guidance on that particular one 15:01:31 how to solve this using the current submission? 15:02:25 ericP this is already covered in LDBP as 5.4.8 http://www.w3.org/Submission/ldbp/#bpc-HTTP_POST but not with this example specifically 15:02:42 Plenty of work to do: use cases, comments on submission, etc. 15:02:58 when's next time ? 15:02:59 so within scope of original submission but maybe needs to be clarified or expanded 15:02:59 great. thanks. 15:03:08 bye 15:03:12 -MacTed 15:03:13 -Sandro 15:03:13 -LeeF 15:03:13 -??P21 15:03:15 -SteveS 15:03:16 -Yves 15:03:19 bye 15:03:19 - +44.117.370.aadd 15:03:20 next time should be in +2 weeks, based on last call's decision 15:03:21 -Arthur 15:03:22 -ghard 15:03:22 -oberger 15:03:22 -mhausenblas 15:03:24 -Arnaud 15:03:26 -JohnArwe 15:03:30 -??P0 15:03:31 steve has left #ldp 15:03:32 -krp 15:03:34 -AndyS1 15:03:36 -Andras 15:03:39 -ericP 15:03:39 s/last call/previous call/ 15:03:39 AndyS1 has left #ldp 15:03:40 - +1.804.991.aabb 15:03:44 -kalpa 15:03:50 -??P5 15:05:02 mkerrin has left #ldp 15:08:22 -??P6 15:13:22 disconnecting the lone participant, jkopecky?, in SW_LDP()10:00AM 15:13:23 SW_LDP()10:00AM has ended 15:13:23 Attendees were +33.9.50.97.aaaa, LeeF, boris, AndyS1, Arnaud, SteveS, Sandro, MacTed, +1.804.991.aabb, JohnArwe, mhausenblas, krp, cygri, +1.937.775.aacc, boris?, mkerrin, 15:13:23 ... +44.117.370.aadd, jkopecky?, Yves, ghard, ericP, Arthur, kalpa, Andras, oberger, jkopecky 15:58:20 krp has joined #ldp 17:23:10 Zakim has left #ldp 18:12:07 bblfish has joined #ldp 19:00:48 SteveS_ has joined #ldp 19:02:43 SteveS has joined #ldp 20:00:50 bblfish has joined #ldp 20:05:22 SteveS has joined #ldp 20:05:34 SteveS has joined #ldp 21:29:07 SteveS_ has joined #ldp 21:54:56 cygri has joined #ldp 22:13:27 cygri has joined #ldp