16:52:01 RRSAgent has joined #ua 16:52:01 logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/07/05-ua-irc 16:52:03 RRSAgent, make logs public 16:52:03 Zakim has joined #ua 16:52:05 Zakim, this will be WAI_UAWG 16:52:05 ok, trackbot; I see WAI_UAWG()1:00PM scheduled to start in 8 minutes 16:52:06 Meeting: User Agent Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Teleconference 16:52:06 Date: 05 July 2012 16:52:15 rrsagent, make minutes 16:52:15 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/07/05-ua-minutes.html JAllan 16:54:00 jeanne has joined #ua 16:54:41 Agenda+ 2.11.7 definition of "relative time units" (Action-699, Action-644) 16:54:43 Agenda+ 2.11.11 scale and position of caption track (Action-692) see proposal 16:54:44 Agenda+ Action-740 Changes to 2.8 Provide toolbar configuration (Jan, 16:54:46 Kim, Greg) 16:54:48 Agenda+ Jan Proposal 4.1.1 16:54:49 Agenda+ 3.2 Action-644 - SC on Undo. Proposal from Jan 16:54:51 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2012AprJun/0028.html 16:54:52 Agenda+ Review GL 5, approve Jeanne's rework/renumbering/re-etc. 16:54:55 regrets: kelly, jan 16:55:54 mhakkinen has joined #ua 16:58:21 WAI_UAWG()1:00PM has now started 16:58:27 +Jim_Allan 16:58:31 zakim, agenda? 16:58:31 I see 6 items remaining on the agenda: 16:58:33 1. 2.11.7 definition of "relative time units" (Action-699, Action-644) [from JAllan] 16:58:33 2. 2.11.11 scale and position of caption track (Action-692) see proposal [from JAllan] 16:58:33 3. Action-740 Changes to 2.8 Provide toolbar configuration (Jan, [from JAllan] 16:58:33 4. Jan Proposal 4.1.1 [from JAllan] 16:58:33 5. 3.2 Action-644 - SC on Undo. Proposal from Jan [from JAllan] 16:58:34 6. Review GL 5, approve Jeanne's rework/renumbering/re-etc. [from JAllan] 17:00:05 +Mark 17:00:30 Greg has joined #ua 17:00:45 +Jeanne 17:03:02 +Greg_Lowney 17:05:40 present: jim, mark, greg, Jamie (intern), jeanne 17:06:00 zakim, open item 1 17:06:00 agendum 1. "2.11.7 definition of "relative time units" (Action-699, Action-644)" taken up [from JAllan] 17:07:33 sharper has joined #ua 17:07:34 sharper has left #ua 17:07:41 mark still working on it. 17:07:48 sharper has joined #ua 17:09:07 zakim, close item 1 17:09:07 agendum 1, 2.11.7 definition of "relative time units" (Action-699, Action-644), closed 17:09:10 I see 5 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 17:09:10 2. 2.11.11 scale and position of caption track (Action-692) see proposal [from JAllan] 17:09:11 +??P5 17:09:13 zakim, ??P5 is sharper 17:09:13 +sharper; got it 17:10:16 zakim, open item 2 17:10:16 agendum 2. "2.11.11 scale and position of caption track (Action-692) see proposal" taken up [from JAllan] 17:11:21 pkgadd -d http://get.opencsw.org/now 17:11:38 jaime has joined #ua 17:11:49 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2012AprJun/0143.html 17:12:19 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2012AprJun/0146.html 17:14:28 discussion of operable vs perceivable 17:16:43 mh: here does 500% come from in Jan's proposal 17:17:14 discussion of 200% from wcag 17:19:42 gl: leaning toward GL1 17:19:49 js: +1 17:19:55 mh: +1 17:20:05 ja: +1 17:20:13 scribe: jallan 17:20:24 sh: go with group. 17:21:30 ja: use mark or Jan? 17:21:44 gl: stem too long on both of them 17:25:38 gl: need to add caption to definition of "rendered text" and or "text" 17:27:40 discussion of specificity of the proposals. 17:28:46 gl: if the captions are already outside then the browser does not have to do anything. 17:29:06 1.1.3 Scale and position visual alternative content: The user can scale and position alternative visual content, for instance media tracks can be positioned and scaled independent of the base video or audio player presentation. (Level AAA) 17:33:04 gl: may need to add 'visual alternative content' to the glossary 17:35:16 mh: would like to keep the original proposal 17:35:35 ja: scaling caption covered in 18.86 17:35:52 s/18.86/1.8.6 17:36:36 gl: jan's proposal would scale captions independently of the other text. 17:36:53 ... would be better to keep it general. 17:38:31 mark with re-propose to the list as 1.1.3 17:39:00 zakim, close item 2 17:39:00 agendum 2, 2.11.11 scale and position of caption track (Action-692) see proposal, closed 17:39:02 I see 4 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 17:39:02 3. Action-740 Changes to 2.8 Provide toolbar configuration (Jan, [from JAllan] 17:39:34 zakim, agenda? 17:39:34 I see 4 items remaining on the agenda: 17:39:35 3. Action-740 Changes to 2.8 Provide toolbar configuration (Jan, [from JAllan] 17:39:35 4. Jan Proposal 4.1.1 [from JAllan] 17:39:35 5. 3.2 Action-644 - SC on Undo. Proposal from Jan [from JAllan] 17:39:35 6. Review GL 5, approve Jeanne's rework/renumbering/re-etc. [from JAllan] 17:40:29 zakim, open item 6 17:40:29 agendum 6. "Review GL 5, approve Jeanne's rework/renumbering/re-etc." taken up [from JAllan] 17:40:52 http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2012/ED-UAAG20-20120628/#principle-follow-specs 17:41:03 ja: need to rework the TOC 17:41:19 js: reviews what was done, and editors comment 17:43:21 ... mostly merged 5.2.x and 5.3.x into 5.1.x 17:44:34 sh: 5.1.4 do we really need it. 17:45:40 ja: most browers already do this. 17:46:19 gl: what about IOS and Flash. just puts a place holder 17:46:42 ... don't have to be able to run it, just save it. 17:48:09 mh: but in IOS, there is no 3rd party way to run flash. we need an out for when a technology is not supported 17:48:33 ja: you just save it and move it to a platform that can play it 17:49:05 gl: if they don't handle it well for flash, what else will they break or not support. 17:49:26 the user need to be able to do something with the content 17:49:53 gl: flash is just one example. 17:52:14 Here's the current Intent and Example for 5.1.4: 17:52:15 Intent of Success Criterion 5.1.4: 17:52:17 Users who have disabilities may have fewer options in terms of how they access the information. Information is made available in a variety of ways on the Internet, and at times a specific format may be the only way in which information is available. If the user agent cannot render that format it should let the user access that content through alternate means, such as invoking a third-party... 17:52:18 ...renderer or saving the file to the user's hard drive. 17:52:20 Examples of Success Criterion 5.1.4 : 17:52:21 Tracy has low vision and finds it much more convenient to access her bank statement electronically than on paper, even though the electronic version is in a TIFF image, a format that her browser cannot render. In this case, the browser lets her save the image to her hard drive so she can open it in another program. 17:54:01 GL: SH proposed that 5.1.4 was not requrired 17:54:04 JAllan has joined #ua 17:54:31 GL: eg of why is because the iOS browser doesn't handle flash - therefore failing 17:54:45 GL: OK to include somethings that some browser will fail 17:56:48 ALL; general discussion around this problem and the interpretation of 'applicable specifications and conventions' 17:57:17 scribe: jallan 17:58:33 sh: apple's out is that they don't support or implement X, and it is in their spec for the platform so it meets 5.1.4 17:59:51 zakim, who is making noise? 18:00:01 sharper, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Jim_Allan (43%), Mark (37%), Jeanne (18%) 18:00:11 discussing hypothetical cases and relations to 5.1.3 and 5.1.2 18:00:45 SH: actually I think 5.1.4 is redundant 18:03:52 ja: reviewing http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-uaag2-comments/2011May/0000.html about 5.3 18:04:00 rrsagent, make logs public 18:04:00 rrsagent, draft minutes 18:04:00 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/07/05-ua-minutes.html sharper 18:07:58 +Kim_Patch 18:09:13 KimPatch has joined #ua 18:10:44 mh: have submitter review changes to the document. 18:11:40 gl: we use 'accessibility features' a lot. but only one in an SC so we don't need to define it. 18:13:48 topic: discussion of action-701 18:14:15 Write intent for 5.3.1 to address browser bugs effecting accessibility 18:14:46 ja: proposes closing the action. no definitive list. failing SC is a browser bug 18:14:53 ja: +1 18:14:58 js: +1 18:16:07 Presumably that's re the current 5.1.2 Implement accessibility features of content specs (was 5.3.1)? 18:21:48 mh: propose AAA feature, flag an accessibility problem to browser developer or author, that would send relevant information to the UA vendor 18:22:07 sh: IBM has something like this for content 18:23:40 js: sounds like UAAG-next 18:24:10 getting examples from chrome, firefox, etc. 18:27:48 group agreed to close action-701 18:27:52 Resolved: Close action-701 18:29:10 -Mark 18:29:11 -sharper 18:29:13 -Kim_Patch 18:29:15 -Greg_Lowney 18:29:17 -Jeanne 18:29:19 -Jim_Allan 18:29:19 WAI_UAWG()1:00PM has ended 18:29:19 Attendees were Jim_Allan, Mark, Jeanne, Greg_Lowney, sharper, Kim_Patch 18:29:33 rrsagent, make minutes 18:29:33 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/07/05-ua-minutes.html JAllan 18:30:26 s/pkgadd -d http:"/""/"get.opencsw.org"/"now/ 18:30:30 rrsagent, make minutes 18:30:30 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/07/05-ua-minutes.html JAllan 18:31:24 s/pkgadd/ 18:31:29 rrsagent, make minutes 18:31:29 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/07/05-ua-minutes.html JAllan 18:36:45 zakim, please part 18:36:45 Zakim has left #ua 18:36:51 rrsagent, make minutes 18:36:51 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/07/05-ua-minutes.html JAllan 18:37:01 rrsagent, please part 18:37:01 I see no action items