08:52:51 RRSAgent has joined #mlw-lt 08:52:51 logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/06/28-mlw-lt-irc 08:52:54 chair: felix 08:52:58 scribe: tbd 09:04:42 mhellwig has joined #mlw-lt 09:05:32 dgroves has joined #mlw-lt 09:05:53 scribeNick: fsasaki 09:06:47 topic: Your topics related to your WPs 09:07:30 declan: in WP4 and WP5, doing work in tandem 09:07:43 .. a lot of wrapper technologies will be both for trainign and translation result 09:08:03 felix: will domain also play a role in both WPs? 09:08:13 declan: depends on actual test data that we'll use 09:08:47 topic: our internal infrastructure 09:08:53 https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/ec-internal/wiki/Main_Page 09:09:03 lists.w3.org/Archives/Team/multilingualweb-lt-partners/ 09:10:00 moritz: will have a meeting 16-17 July with potential customers 09:10:09 .. has been going to slow so far, but will be fine 09:10:18 topic: Next call 09:10:47 felix - will schedule a call end of July 09:11:35 DrupalCon Munich August 20th through 24th, 2012 09:11:49 dublin: last week of July would be good 09:11:58 .. after that we'll kick in with implementation work 09:12:23 .. so first week of august would be better for me 09:12:27 s/dublin/declan/ 09:13:05 topic: Your opinion on time schedule 09:13:13 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Jun/0133.html 09:14:00 declan: time schedule would work for me 09:14:04 for moritz too 09:14:32 topic: implementations related to data categories 09:14:33 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvFh3PcCczdRdF9mZ1UyS3VXT2pNNnllLWtQa0lFOFE#gid=0 09:16:02 declan: will fill that in early next week 09:16:05 topic: Your input on potential candidates for reserved budget 09:18:10 declan: would be worth into looking into content provider 09:19:51 moritz: agree with above - tilde is interesting for us esp. 09:22:50 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/06/28-mlw-lt-minutes.html fsasaki 09:23:22 topic: MLW-LT WP leader call 09:23:23 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/06/28-mlw-lt-minutes.html fsasaki 09:23:47 meeting: MLW-LT WP leader call 09:23:48 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/06/28-mlw-lt-minutes.html fsasaki 09:24:34 present: moritz, declan, felix 09:24:35 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/06/28-mlw-lt-minutes.html fsasaki 09:26:41 rrsagent, bye 09:26:41 I see no action items 13:45:55 RRSAgent has joined #mlw-lt 13:45:55 logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/06/28-mlw-lt-irc 13:45:59 meeting: MLW-LT WG 13:46:03 chair: felix 13:46:16 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Jun/0159.html 13:46:19 scribe: tbd 13:51:40 regrets: olaf 13:53:24 Zakim has joined #mlw-lt 13:57:53 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/06/28-mlw-lt-minutes.html fsasaki 13:58:14 agenda+ actions 13:58:34 agenda+ general reminder about july 13:58:52 agenda+ general reminder for september 13:59:27 mhellwig has joined #mlw-lt 13:59:33 agenda+ propose to close issue-3 13:59:34 mlefranc has joined #mlw-lt 13:59:51 agenda+ propose to close issue-23 13:59:52 shaunm has joined #mlw-lt 13:59:55 agenda+ propose to close issue-1 14:00:00 agenda+ propose to close issue-6 14:00:03 Jirka has joined #mlw-lt 14:00:14 agenda+ volunteer for issue-9 14:00:21 agenda+ issue-13 14:00:27 agenda+ issue-16 14:00:33 agenda+ issue-24 14:00:33 Hi, I don't see gotomeeting details in agenda, can someone post it here pls? 14:00:43 agenda+ rdf serialization 14:00:50 agenda+ terminology discussion 14:01:17 hi all, gotomeeting id is 682416317 14:01:39 thx 14:03:02 present: dave, felix, dom, maxime, moritz, jirka, shaun 14:03:03 daveL has joined #mlw-lt 14:03:21 can anybody link me the call-in details? I can't seem to find them 14:03:34 hi shaun , the meeting id is 682416317 14:04:08 you can follow this link: https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/682416317 14:04:32 present+ tadej 14:05:06 Des has joined #mlw-lt 14:05:30 tadej has joined #mlw-lt 14:05:40 hi des, you can follow this link to join us on the phone : https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/682416317 14:05:44 present+ des 14:05:49 DomJones has joined #mlw-lt 14:06:11 I'm jisut downloading it just now Felix. Be on in a minute or so 14:06:25 scribe: tadej 14:06:34 rrsagent, draft minutes 14:06:34 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/06/28-mlw-lt-minutes.html tadej 14:06:49 topic: agenda 14:06:50 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Jun/0159.html 14:07:05 topic: last weeks minutes 14:07:13 http://www.w3.org/2012/06/21-mlw-lt-minutes.html 14:07:26 no comments 14:07:36 topic: action items 14:07:44 action-135? 14:07:44 ACTION-135 -- Pedro Luis Díez Orzas to pedro to have Giuseppe to flesh out specialRequirements -- due 2012-06-22 -- OPEN 14:07:44 http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/actions/135 14:07:53 action-126? 14:07:53 ACTION-126 -- David Filip to david to come up with a proposal for mtConfidence -- due 2012-07-02 -- OPEN 14:07:53 http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/actions/126 14:08:29 action-126 due to next thursday 14:08:29 ACTION-126 David to come up with a proposal for mtConfidence due date now to next thursday 14:08:38 action-107? 14:08:38 ACTION-107 -- Shaun McCance to flesh out locale proposal -- due 2012-07-05 -- OPEN 14:08:38 http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/actions/107 14:08:55 action-107 next thursday 14:09:16 close action-141 14:09:16 ACTION-141 Table in a staging wiki page to notify current state of all data categories in terms of consensus and impl comitments. closed 14:09:30 action-81? 14:09:30 ACTION-81 -- David Lewis to consider consolidation of author, revisionAgent and translationAgent -- due 2012-05-17 -- CLOSED 14:09:30 http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/actions/81 14:09:45 close action-81 14:09:45 ACTION-81 consider consolidation of author, revisionAgent and translationAgent closed 14:10:08 topic: General reminder - timeline in july 14:10:21 http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/Implementation_Commitments 14:10:30 fsasaki: By mid-July, we should decide on which data categories we need. 14:11:00 topic: General reminder: our plan until September 14:11:01 fsasaki: Implementation commitments to end of July 14:11:06 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Jun/0133.html 14:12:42 fsasaki: In september, we release an update draft version. Everyone should have a description of a prototype. 14:13:15 daveL: One level is a running prototype, and another level is passing the test suites. When do we need to do the latter? 14:13:35 http://www.w3.org/2011/12/mlw-lt-charter.html 14:14:24 fsasaki: The W3C process doesn't require that until next year. I would propose that people develop examples along with the prototypes. 14:15:11 daveL: Does it make sense to develop some common prototype test suites? 14:15:34 http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-its20-20120626/ 14:15:41 ... That might kick-start the process with developing tests. We might even start with ITS1.0 tests. 14:15:55 http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-its20-20120626/#usage-in-html5 14:16:20 http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-its20-20120626/examples/html5/EX-translate-html5-global-1.html 14:16:54 fsasaki: These are HTML5 examples for ITS, we'll put our examples in these directories. 14:16:57 q+ Maxime 14:17:34 fsasaki: These examples are simultaneously in the test files. 14:17:42 ack ma 14:18:03 http://www.w3.org/International/its/tests/ 14:18:18 Maxime: Would the test output files have a repository? 14:18:26 http://www.w3.org/International/its/tests/test1/Translate1-result.xml 14:18:30 fsasaki: We need to develop new tests for new data category features 14:18:40 ... Here's an example of a test output 14:19:15 ... However, we don't want to force implementors to reproduce this artificial output literally. 14:20:09 ... But it should be an illustrative example to help them. 14:20:36 Des: We're considering creating a default set of 'test contents' to demonstrate the implementation, in a complete round trip. 14:21:23 ... it could serve as a standard set of contents that other people can work with (and is realistic) 14:21:52 fsasaki: We developed different kinds of XLIFFs in various round-trips and use cases. 14:22:27 ... We might not end up with a single 'gold standard' of data, but more a set of best practice examples on what to do with metadata. 14:23:16 ... We can start discussing this in September. 14:23:27 ... And concentrate on the best practives 14:23:35 s/practives/practices/ 14:23:59 daveL: Would Adobe be a good example of what we're doing? 14:24:16 Des: Yes, interop of the metadata is the main goal here. 14:24:34 ... that would be a good way to demonstrate it, as long as it's on the agenda. 14:25:00 ... We might not have exact applicable content, but I can participate in constructing some examples content. 14:25:06 s/examples/example 14:25:07 s/examples/example/ 14:25:13 action: felix to think about a round tripping test suite data package 14:25:13 Created ACTION-145 - Think about a round tripping test suite data package [on Felix Sasaki - due 2012-07-05]. 14:25:52 present+ pedro 14:26:14 topic: Propose to close ISSUE-3 14:26:31 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Jun/0157.html 14:29:07 topic: Propose to close ISSUE-23 14:29:10 issue-23? 14:29:10 ISSUE-23 -- Re-draft section 7.6. "Removal, Archiving and Re-integration of ITS mark-up" -- open 14:29:10 http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/issues/23 14:29:24 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Jun/0042.html 14:29:46 fsasaki: No comments around ISSUE-3, let's close it and keep it in mind when defining best practices 14:30:22 Pedro has joined #mlw-lt 14:30:33 topic: ISSUE-1 14:30:35 fsasaki: Any issues with closing ISSUE-23? .. No, closing it. 14:31:49 topic: Propose to close "ISSUE-6: Process State" 14:32:45 fsasaki: We can close these by September when we finalize these. Any comments against closing it now? 14:34:18 daveL: Getting data categories closed by September. It would be beneficial to be able to demonstrate a concrete pipeline (Des) 14:34:36 issue-16? 14:34:36 ISSUE-16 -- Parameter for rules -- open 14:34:36 http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/issues/16 14:34:41 issue-24? 14:34:41 ISSUE-24 -- Proposal to change ITS term -- open 14:34:41 http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/issues/24 14:35:13 fsasaki: I propose closing ISSUE-16 and ISSUE-24? Any comments? 14:36:47 shaunm: (ISSUE-16) Global parameter default may encourage bad practices, but we should discuss what would be a way to specify them. 14:37:01 topic: RDF serialization 14:37:08 fsasaki: Let's keep ISSUE-16 open until further discussion. 14:37:37 https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1Y8yLjJpWTJFA-WTvRhTDd6zl6jBOE9P5ckTfCZqUZIk 14:38:19 scribe: fsasaki 14:38:45 maxime: there are two different ways to do the mapping to RDF 14:39:14 .. first one would be to compute each element and attribute in XML world, then convert that into rdf 14:39:19 s/one/approach/ 14:39:57 .. option b) would be to transform ITS metadata in RDF, that is ITS global rules in RDF 14:40:06 .. the google docs goes into option b 14:40:46 .. the dom fragments refer to one fragment in the element / or attribute. Pretty similar to what is shown in the artifical output at http://www.w3.org/International/its/tests/test1/Translate1-result.xml 14:41:12 .. question is: do we want to do that in RDF or do via option a? 14:41:24 .. if there is no use case, we can have standard output in XML like http://www.w3.org/International/its/tests/test1/Translate1-result.xml 14:41:31 and transform that into a RDF/XML document 14:41:43 .. so mapping would be a simple xslt stylesheet 14:42:10 tadej: right now the data that we expect in the rdf file will be for disambiguation, ne terms etc. 14:42:15 .. so things that don't appear in global rules 14:42:25 .. we can defintetely work with option a) to do that 14:42:33 .. so there is no use case in producing b) 14:42:59 .. so we can keep the use case in mind - in dublin we discussed a lot whether it is possible 14:43:08 .. it is possible but takes a lot of effort to implement 14:43:27 .. so for practical purposes the option a) is easier to do 14:43:44 maxime: writing two options in the draft, asking for comments would be good 14:44:12 I have to leave unfortunately. Apologies. Dom 14:44:19 dave: going back to use cases ... 14:44:35 .. obvious use case for option a is: extract connections between content and external entities 14:44:41 .. and publish it in NIF ontology 14:44:55 .. so that would be a way to collect the data from an ITS parser into RDF 14:45:18 .. use case is to collect it as a language resource for other NLP components 14:45:32 tadej: that is one of the things we proposed in Dublin 14:45:47 .. I'm worried about having an end-to-end use case 14:46:01 .. this is rather a bridge use case, not doing something with that 14:46:03 dave: sure 14:46:22 .. if anybody can see a use to cause an implementation, it is a valid use case 14:46:56 .. people in the localization industry won't jump into this soon, but maybe in language resources area 14:46:59 tadej: agree 14:47:11 .. sebastian wrote a long mail before the meeting describing that 14:47:19 .. even NIF has to grow more to accomodate these use cases 14:47:31 .. so this particular part might be delayed 14:48:42 maxime: for option a we would need a standard output 14:49:18 felix: that would be part of the recommendation 14:50:41 felix: Can someone update the google doc on ITS-RDF integration to update it to standards-language? 14:50:49 action: maxime to write something for option b) of rdf conversion 14:50:49 Created ACTION-146 - Write something for option b) of rdf conversion [on Maxime Lefrançois - due 2012-07-05]. 14:51:05 action: felix to write something for option a) of rdf conversion, plus XSLT 14:51:05 Created ACTION-147 - Write something for option a) of rdf conversion, plus XSLT [on Felix Sasaki - due 2012-07-05]. 14:52:06 topic: Terminology 14:53:00 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Jun/0158.html 14:53:20 tadej: above is the list of latest examples 14:53:33 .. I defined "entityRel" attribute to determine the relationship for the link 14:53:44 .. a NE, term, WSD, or NE type 14:54:04 .. only bigger mismatch is: instead of having entityRel for each type we would define individual attributes 14:54:13 .. that's the only way to keep this part consistent 14:54:25 .. other issue that in ITS 1.0, the attributes only mention "term" 14:54:28 action: maxime to use the standard output XML files and the already written RDF vocabulary to draft a XML->RDF/XML XSLT stylesheet 14:54:29 Created ACTION-148 - Use the standard output XML files and the already written RDF vocabulary to draft a XML->RDF/XML XSLT stylesheet [on Maxime Lefrançois - due 2012-07-05]. 14:54:35 .. i.e. term=yes, termInfo, termInfoRef 14:54:49 .. so I'd propose different attributes 14:55:03 .. at the end it is the question of markup - consistency vs. backwards compatibility 14:55:21 .. keeping strict compatibility will lead to more markup 14:55:43 .. more specifc, the term data category is the same 14:55:53 .. except that we allow people to specify terminology lexcion 14:56:01 .. and there is looser support for identifiers 14:58:08 sorry, but my micro does not work :-( 14:58:27 q+ pedro ? 14:58:54 pedro, you are now not muted anymore 14:59:08 Pedro: ... 14:59:41 Pedro: We wanted to discuss the event in Madrid. 15:00:16 fsasaki: Can we continue with this topic next week? 15:00:32 RRSAgent, draft minutes 15:00:32 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/06/28-mlw-lt-minutes.html tadej 15:01:08 sure 15:01:15 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/06/28-mlw-lt-minutes.html fsasaki 15:01:54 http://www.w3.org/2012/06/21-mlw-lt-minutes.html