13:26:51 RRSAgent has joined #rd 13:26:51 logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/06/27-rd-irc 13:26:53 RRSAgent, make logs world 13:26:53 Zakim has joined #rd 13:26:55 Zakim, this will be 7394 13:26:55 ok, trackbot; I see WAI_RDWG()9:30AM scheduled to start in 4 minutes 13:26:56 Meeting: Research and Development Working Group Teleconference 13:26:56 Date: 27 June 2012 13:28:13 zakim, who is on the phone? 13:28:13 WAI_RDWG()9:30AM has not yet started, shadi 13:28:14 On IRC I see RRSAgent, peter, shadi, nonge_, Mate, trackbot 13:28:23 zakim, this is rdwg 13:28:23 ok, shadi; that matches WAI_RDWG()9:30AM 13:28:26 zakim, who is on the phone? 13:28:26 On the phone I see ??P5, Shadi 13:28:35 zakim, ??p5 is Justin 13:28:35 +Justin; got it 13:28:50 +??P7 13:29:02 Klaus has joined #rd 13:29:11 JB has joined #rd 13:29:19 test from justin 13:29:24 vivienne has joined #rd 13:29:29 zakim, ??p7 is Klaus 13:29:29 +Klaus; got it 13:29:29 sharper has joined #rd 13:29:41 zakim, agenda? 13:29:41 I see nothing on the agenda 13:29:51 trackbot, start meeting 13:29:51 zakim, please clear the agenda 13:29:51 agenda cleared 13:29:53 RRSAgent, make logs world 13:29:54 +??P8 13:29:55 Zakim, this will be 7394 13:29:55 ok, trackbot; I see WAI_RDWG()9:30AM scheduled to start in 1 minute 13:29:56 Meeting: Research and Development Working Group Teleconference 13:29:56 Date: 27 June 2012 13:30:04 zakim, ??p8 is me 13:30:04 I already had ??P8 as ??P8, peter 13:30:06 Chair: Harper_Simon 13:30:06 Agenda+ Welcome & Logistics (Regrets, Agenda Requests, Comments) [shadi] 13:30:07 Agenda+ Mobile Topic De-Brief (5m) [yeliz] 13:30:07 Agenda+ 'Text Customization' Progress (5m) [shawn] 13:30:07 Agenda+ Text customisation + E2R call and interoperation strategy (50m) [sharper] 13:30:07 Agenda+ Issues and Actions (Standing Item): https://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/tracker/ [shadi] 13:30:09 Agenda+ Any Other Business (Standing Item) [shadi] 13:30:20 zakim, save agenda 13:30:26 ok, sharper, the agenda has been written to http://www.w3.org/2012/06/27-rd-agenda.rdf 13:30:30 zakim, take up item 1 13:30:30 agendum 1. "Welcome & Logistics (Regrets, Agenda Requests, Comments)" taken up [from shadi via sharper] 13:30:42 regrets+ Mohamad_Yehya 13:30:59 christos has joined #rd 13:31:12 zakim, who is on the phone? 13:31:12 I notice WAI_RDWG()9:30AM has restarted 13:31:14 On the phone I see Justin, Shadi, Klaus, ??P8, ??P12 13:31:31 zakim, ??P12 is me 13:31:31 +vivienne; got it 13:31:32 +??P15 13:31:41 zakim, ??P12 is me 13:31:41 I already had ??P12 as vivienne, christos 13:31:52 zakim, mute me 13:31:52 sorry, peter, I do not know which phone connection belongs to you 13:31:56 zakim, who is on the phone? 13:31:56 On the phone I see Justin, Shadi, Klaus, ??P8, vivienne, ??P15 13:32:06 zakim, ??P15 is me 13:32:06 +christos; got it 13:32:08 +??P16 13:32:13 zakim, ??p8 is Peter 13:32:13 +Peter; got it 13:32:14 zakim, mute me 13:32:15 vivienne should now be muted 13:32:21 zakim, ??P16 is sharper 13:32:21 +sharper; got it 13:32:22 zakim, mute me 13:32:22 christos should now be muted 13:32:23 thanks 13:32:30 zakim, mute me 13:32:30 Peter should now be muted 13:33:14 http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/scribes 13:33:25 markel has joined #rd 13:33:47 zakim, who is making noise? 13:33:59 sharper, listening for 11 seconds I heard sound from the following: Klaus (56%) 13:34:02 +??P17 13:34:12 zakim, ??P17 is markel 13:34:12 +markel; got it 13:34:19 +Shawn_Henry 13:35:03 zakim, mute me 13:35:03 Shadi should now be muted 13:35:11 zakim, mute me 13:35:11 Klaus should now be muted 13:35:18 ack me 13:35:29 zakim, mute me 13:35:29 Shadi should now be muted 13:35:43 ack me 13:35:43 I can scribe 13:35:43 I can scribe 13:35:45 ack me 13:36:03 zakim, mute me 13:36:03 Shadi should now be muted 13:36:04 zakim, mute me 13:36:05 vivienne should now be muted 13:36:08 scribe: Markel 13:36:14 scribenick: markel 13:36:23 zakim, take up item 2 13:36:23 agendum 2. "Mobile Topic De-Brief (5m)" taken up [from yeliz via sharper] 13:36:54 ack me 13:37:06 SH: PT, do you want to talk about the mobile symposium? 13:37:17 PT: maybe we have to talk about what to do next. 13:37:26 q+ 13:37:36 q- 13:37:39 q+ 13:38:05 zakim, mute me 13:38:05 Peter should now be muted 13:38:08 ack me 13:38:24 SH: the actual format went better than last time. These two hours went quicker than in the previous one. The chairs should meet soon. In general the symposium went all and I'd like to thank all: Shadi, Yeliz, Peter and attendees. 13:39:11 VC: having read the papers the current format was more interesting; overall went better than the last one. 13:39:13 zakim, mute me 13:39:13 vivienne should now be muted 13:39:18 q? 13:39:24 ack me 13:39:26 I agree with Vivienne 13:40:11 q+ 13:41:04 SAZ: it went really well, we had good discussions, speakers were very knowledgeable and had more to share than the papers themselves. Kudos to chairs also, it went really well. I received transcript but it's not in a very good HTML. 13:42:53 SAZ: it does not validate so far...we will put it online soon. The fact that we had two channels (one for control, another for the discussion) was somewhat confusing. For the future, also, we should investigate how to put captioning and the chat in the same window. 13:43:59 zakim, mute me 13:43:59 Shadi should now be muted 13:44:02 ack me 13:44:03 SAZ: considering our time limitations for submission, reviews etc...we need to refine the mechanics although overall it was a big improvement over the last one. 13:44:47 q+ 13:45:00 PT: I agree with that one. Just two comments: (1) noise on IRC was confusion, (2) I was to ask more questions but time constraints did not allow to do that. 13:45:07 q1: questions in IRC log? 13:46:13 SH: you're right regarding the noise...it'd be good if we put the questions on IRC as there may be some participants that did not access through the phone. 13:46:55 PT: would it be a good idea to have chairs doing different things? 13:47:46 zakim, mute me 13:47:46 Peter should now be muted 13:47:46 q+ 13:48:04 SH: it's good to have questions ready 13:48:13 SLH: kudos for chairs and organisers 13:48:50 SLH: SAZ mentioned that we need to check the rebuttal time. I have some ideas about the next symposium if you want to discuss them. 13:49:21 SH: let's address these changes in the real context of the next symposium 13:49:26 ack me 13:49:36 ack shaw 13:49:47 zakim, mute Shaw 13:49:47 Shawn_Henry should now be muted 13:49:59 zakim, q? 13:49:59 I see shadi on the speaker queue 13:50:15 zakim, mute me 13:50:15 vivienne should now be muted 13:50:28 VC: I have some comments about the captioning..which was useful to distinguish accents and helps to follow the talk more easily 13:50:43 ack me 13:51:27 SAZ: I'm happy for the chairs to take up IRC management but they should learn the commands 13:51:52 zakim, mute me 13:51:52 Shadi should now be muted 13:51:52 SAZ: if we had had more time...that would have help 13:52:23 +1 13:52:27 ack me 13:52:59 SH: the current systems requires some expertise...one chair could manage IRC with the help of somebody who is expert (e.g. SAZ); I learned and I can help for the next time 13:53:11 SAZ: I support this 13:53:13 zakim, mute me 13:53:13 Shadi should now be muted 13:53:37 SH: as more training occurs it will be easier 13:53:49 zakim, close item 2 13:53:49 agendum 2, Mobile Topic De-Brief (5m), closed 13:53:50 I see 5 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 13:53:50 1. Welcome & Logistics (Regrets, Agenda Requests, Comments) [from shadi via sharper] 13:53:59 zakim, take up item 3 13:53:59 agendum 3. "'Text Customization' Progress (5m)" taken up [from shawn via sharper] 13:54:23 SH: let's have some update from SLH 13:55:43 q+ 13:55:44 SLH: there is no significant move since last time...couple of things: (1) what we learned from the last symposium: rebuttals and so on and the length of papers and (2) how we are going to work with the easy to read symposium 13:55:48 ack me 13:57:30 SH: ...how we want to run the two topics...two calls and one submission place or closely together but still separate with some linkage regarding infraestructure 13:57:46 ack sh 13:58:43 q+ to talk about paper length and review effort and to talk about proximity of two topics 13:59:15 ack me 13:59:15 shadi, you wanted to talk about paper length and review effort and to talk about proximity of two topics 13:59:16 ack shad 13:59:33 SH: I don't think we'll gonna have any problem with symposium...we already decided we are having two symposium...just I want to discuss the mechanics 14:01:00 SAZ: longer papers entail more effort to review...there were some papers with weird HTML..I don't know how other conferences approach to the length issue... 14:01:22 q+ 14:01:45 Shadi: do you need help with menial tasks like converting papers, transcripts, * to HTML and or other tasks? 14:02:09 SAZ: regarding the proximity...the type of papers we get..it can depend on the papers we get in the first call and decide afterwards...we can shift them back and forth 14:02:10 ack me 14:02:11 zakim, mute me 14:02:12 Shadi should now be muted 14:03:37 shadi: nope that's a fine tool - happy to help you if you ever feel overwhelmed 14:03:42 SH: regarding 1000, one should be able to do it for a extended abstract. When the SC suggests changes there is no much room to removing/adding stuff. 1000 words is okay as long as it is tighted... 14:04:21 great idea 14:04:21 +1 form idea 14:05:04 SH: we could be more constrained about the abstract like providing forms that would match sections. Regarding time-frame we removed 2 weeks from the established schedule 14:05:26 SH: but this does not have necessarily happen again 14:05:48 SH: for the next one we have SLH and Wayne Dick? 14:05:52 zakim, q? 14:05:52 I see no one on the speaker queue 14:06:06 SLH: really like the idea of 1000 word limit 14:06:45 SLH: now the SC is listed 14:07:37 SLH: there is a couple of possibilities for chairs, some who are in the scientific committee that would agree to chair..also if you have any suggestion for the SC that'd be great 14:07:57 +1 14:07:57 1+ what simon just said 14:07:59 +1 14:07:59 +1 14:08:01 q+ 14:08:03 +1 14:08:03 +1 14:08:05 ack me 14:09:06 give it a try and see what happens 14:10:04 shall I do it? 14:10:44 SH: let's put that on the Wiki on the symposium mechanics section 14:10:56 zakim, q? 14:10:56 I see no one on the speaker queue 14:11:27 SAZ: we have wiki pages which are public, some other for the group and some other are in between 14:12:29 SAZ: we can discuss the visibility of pages in a future agenda 14:12:33 RESOLUTION: word limit for submissions will be around 1000 words and if the SC suggests changes it can be extended to address such changes. 14:12:46 ok, was waiting for your confirmation :-) 14:12:46 zakim, mute me 14:12:46 Shadi should now be muted 14:14:14 zakim, unmute me 14:14:14 Klaus should no longer be muted 14:16:27 q+ 14:16:50 ack me 14:16:59 KM: I'm open to any organisation format. From my experience, the broader the call is the higher number of submissions you get...but text customisation deserves a separate call. The sooner we decide the easier it'll be to adjust to organisational protocols. 14:17:40 queue+ Klaus 14:18:16 ack Kla 14:18:25 SH: we can run them separately but staggering them with one month separation. Also we can have the same call and still run them separately... 14:19:10 KM: I support SH's idea...and would be happy to have an overlap between the SC and chairs 14:19:11 zakim, mute me 14:19:11 Klaus should now be muted 14:20:05 SH: my 2nd suggestion: we run it separately, but deadline is the same, reviews are done by same people and symposiums are run one month apart 14:20:06 รง 14:20:17 so if I understood we'd work on both symposiums in the background at the same time but run the symposiums separately? 14:20:48 +1 14:20:51 +1 14:20:55 good idea 14:20:58 +1 14:20:58 ack me 14:20:59 +1 14:21:13 +1 (though tending to be complicated) 14:22:40 -Shawn_Henry 14:22:56 zakim, mute me 14:22:56 Shadi should now be muted 14:23:15 [[for the record, this sound really promising but i would like to think more about it too]] 14:24:08 +Shawn_Henry 14:24:22 RESOLUTION: there will be 2 separate calls for the forthcoming 2 symposiums, the same submission system will be used, same deadline and reviewers will be coordinated coordinated; symposiums will run separately where text customisation will be first and after one month easy to read. 14:24:38 +1 14:24:41 +1 14:24:42 +1 14:24:43 +1 14:24:45 +1 14:24:52 +1 14:24:59 +1 14:25:34 SH: any other business? 14:25:35 q+ 14:25:45 ack ma 14:25:46 ack me 14:26:01 MV: which is the status of the 1st report? 14:26:11 -Klaus 14:26:20 have to leave, sorry! 14:26:52 SAZ: is still awaiting, SLH is redesigning which will benefit the 14:27:20 SAZ: there were some issues on the review...some minor stuff 14:27:35 SAZ: I have an action to contact the editors in the following days 14:27:42 OK thanks for the update 14:28:09 SLH: it's looking very good, I'll send for before the next meeting 14:28:24 ack me 14:28:27 zakim, mute me 14:28:27 Shadi should now be muted 14:28:33 bye now 14:28:34 cya 14:28:34 cheers 14:28:38 vivienne has left #rd 14:28:44 -Peter 14:28:44 goodbye... 14:28:47 -sharper 14:28:48 -vivienne 14:28:48 -christos 14:28:53 -Shadi 14:28:54 -Shawn_Henry 14:29:14 markel has left #rd 14:29:14 -Justin 14:29:32 -markel 14:29:33 WAI_RDWG()9:30AM has ended 14:29:33 Attendees were Shadi, Justin, Klaus, vivienne, christos, Peter, sharper, markel, Shawn_Henry 14:30:10 trackbot, end meeting 14:30:10 Zakim, list attendees 14:30:10 sorry, trackbot, I don't know what conference this is 14:30:18 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 14:30:18 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/06/27-rd-minutes.html trackbot 14:30:19 RRSAgent, bye 14:30:19 I see no action items