13:53:04 RRSAgent has joined #rdfa 13:53:04 logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/05/31-rdfa-irc 13:53:06 RRSAgent, make logs world 13:53:06 Zakim has joined #rdfa 13:53:08 Zakim, this will be 7332 13:53:08 ok, trackbot; I see SW_RDFa()10:00AM scheduled to start in 7 minutes 13:53:09 Meeting: RDF Web Applications Working Group Teleconference 13:53:09 Date: 31 May 2012 13:54:35 SW_RDFa()10:00AM has now started 13:54:42 +scor 13:54:55 scor has joined #rdfa 13:55:10 Steven_ has joined #rdfa 13:56:04 zakim, dial ivan-voip 13:56:04 ok, ivan; the call is being made 13:56:05 +Ivan 13:58:19 +??P10 13:58:24 zakim, I am ??P10 13:58:24 +gkellogg; got it 13:59:27 +??P18 13:59:31 zakim, I am ??P18 13:59:31 +manu1; got it 13:59:33 niklasl has joined #rdfa 14:00:27 +OpenLink_Software 14:00:39 Zakim, OpenLink_Software is temporarily me 14:00:40 +MacTed; got it 14:00:41 Zakim, mute me 14:00:41 MacTed should now be muted 14:00:52 zakim, who is on the call? 14:00:52 On the phone I see scor, Ivan, gkellogg, manu1, MacTed (muted) 14:01:01 +??P30 14:01:04 zakim, I am ??P30 14:01:08 +niklasl; got it 14:01:29 ShaneM has joined #rdfa 14:02:52 +??P37 14:03:10 zakim, I am ??p37 14:03:10 +Steven_; got it 14:03:44 zakim, who is on the call? 14:03:44 On the phone I see scor, Ivan, gkellogg, manu1, MacTed (muted), niklasl, Steven_ 14:04:13 +??P40 14:04:21 zakim, I am ??P40 14:04:21 +ShaneM; got it 14:04:40 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2012May/0139.html 14:05:25 Zakim, unmute me 14:05:25 MacTed should no longer be muted 14:05:36 Scribe: Steven 14:05:37 Zakim, mute me 14:05:37 MacTed should now be muted 14:05:43 Topic: Last Minute Issues and Concerns 14:06:01 Manu: Anything? 14:09:04 Topic: RDFa 1.1 REC Documents and Publication 14:09:06 Ivan: Hopefully nothing will happen between now and next Tuesday 14:09:59 Manu: Status sections, and timing of primer 14:10:34 ... we want to publish the primer as a note, but I want it to have a bit more review 14:11:44 Zakim, unmute me 14:11:44 MacTed should no longer be muted 14:12:04 Zakim, mute me 14:12:04 MacTed should now be muted 14:14:21 Manu: Can we update a primer? 14:14:24 Steven: Yes 14:15:00 Manu: So planning to publish next Thursday 14:15:19 ... status sections need to be included 14:15:48 Steven: Status sections are Ivan's responsibility 14:15:54 Ivan: Yes, boilerplate is fine 14:16:04 ... I'll check it tomorrow 14:16:09 it is here: http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdfa-core/Overview-src.html 14:16:53 Ivan: We have to send an official pub request 14:17:51 ... I have it prepared 14:19:14 ... but I am at Semtech on the day it needs to be sent, so I'd prefer someone else to do it 14:19:58 ... and I would like Manu and Shane to be around to answer questions from the webmaster 14:20:36 Manu: No call next week. 14:20:58 ... but two or more meetings before the group ends 14:25:22 q+ 14:29:00 [Discussion on which email list to use; decided on public-rdfa@ 14:29:04 ] 14:29:15 Shane: No link to errata in lite. OK to add? 14:29:18 Manu: Sure 14:29:22 Topic: RDFa 1.1 Press and Blog Posts 14:30:02 Manu: Press we have lined up is the announcement at Semtech 14:30:18 ... and another article 14:30:28 ... anyone else planning? 14:31:06 Ivan: There's a panel at Semtech, where it will be mentioned 14:31:34 Manu: Will that be scribed? 14:31:41 Ivan: Dunno 14:32:00 Ivan: And there is the question of a W3C press-release 14:32:43 ... we're reaching out to companies to see if it is possivle 14:32:50 s/ivle/ible/ 14:35:01 ... it might happen 14:35:36 Manu: We can plan something for in a week or so, I'm working on contact 14:35:46 s/contact/contacts/ 14:36:06 Manu: and keep announcements coming 14:37:04 Steven: Is the old content on rdfa.info around 14:37:12 Manu: We have an archive, but it's not up 14:37:20 Steven: So old URLs are currently nroken 14:37:28 s/nroken/broken?/ 14:37:34 Manu: Yeah, for now 14:39:08 Steven: Are we publishing on rdfa.info? 14:39:23 Manu: No, on your own blog, or elsewhere 14:39:59 Shane: Note that the specs use xhtml+rdfa, and it's worth pointing it out 14:40:09 Ivan: And the primer 14:42:19 XXX: RDF and SPARQL WGs should use it as well 14:42:24 Shane: Good idea! 14:42:44 s/XXX/gkellogg/ 14:43:06 Topic: RDF API and RDFa API publication 14:43:18 Manu: Publishing as notes 14:43:23 ... just requires time 14:45:53 Ivan: It is a valuable document, and actually already usable 14:46:37 Topic: @role attribute 14:46:50 q+ 14:46:54 Shane: PFWG owns this 14:46:55 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2012Feb/0069.html 14:46:57 ack ivan 14:47:00 ... what should we do? 14:47:24 Niklas: vocab shouldn't apply to role 14:47:32 ack niklasl 14:47:44 q+ to talk about role and vocab 14:48:32 Ivan: The role people have a bunch of values they want to use 14:48:53 ... role should behave as if the vocab is set to xhd 14:48:58 Niklas: Agree 14:49:02 s/xhd/xhv/ 14:49:23 ack shanem 14:49:23 ShaneM, you wanted to talk about role and vocab 14:49:56 Shane: the intention was that role would have a collection of reserved words in the xhv space 14:50:09 ... ARIA relies heavily on @role 14:50:13 ... they already use it 14:50:27 ... they want to be able to extend the collection 14:50:41 ... and cite predefined roles without anything special 14:51:00 ... It's fine if vocab doesn't apply, as long as prefix applies 14:51:10 ... and full URIs work 14:51:57 Ivan: This means that rdfa implementations won't look at @role 14:52:00 q+ 14:52:28 Shane: I'm ok with that 14:53:29 q+ 14:53:36 ack niklasl 14:54:02 Niklas: In atom @rel is always set to IANA relations 14:54:18 Manu: That is a parallel issue 14:54:38 ... are you suggesting we use that as a model for how to deal with @role? 14:55:37 Niklas: We need to think about the future and increasing possibilities 14:55:52 Ivan: That is for RDF2 14:56:06 s/RDF2/RDFa2/ 14:57:05 ack ivan 14:57:22 Ivan: With 4 minutes to go, should we try to do RDFa+Atom as a note? 14:57:30 Manu: We need to review it 14:57:46 Ivan: I have implemented it, it is doable 14:59:17 Manu: Should we publish it as a note? 14:59:58 Gregg: Future discussion 15:00:37 Manu: We should pull in Sam Ruby 15:00:41 w.r.t role - I am changing the spec to read:
  • Each value of role is an object, forming an 15:00:41 RDF triple with the subject and predicate defined above. An RDFa Processor MUST behave as if there is an in-scope vocabulary of http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab/ for the value(s) of the role attribute.
  • 15:00:55 No call next week. 15:01:17 Manu: Thanks all! 15:01:32 [ADJOURN] 15:01:34 -gkellogg 15:01:37 -manu1 15:01:41 -Steven_ 15:01:44 trackbot, end call 15:01:44 Sorry, MacTed, I don't understand 'trackbot, end call'. Please refer to http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/irc for help 15:01:48 trackbot, end conference 15:01:48 Zakim, list attendees 15:01:54 -scor 15:01:55 ivan has changed the topic to: no telco planned for the 7th of June 15:01:55 -niklasl 15:01:56 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 15:01:56 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/05/31-rdfa-minutes.html trackbot 15:01:57 RRSAgent, bye 15:01:57 I see no action items 15:01:59 As of this point the attendees have been scor, Ivan, gkellogg, manu1, MacTed, niklasl, Steven_, ShaneM