15:00:02 RRSAgent has joined #webtv 15:00:02 logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/05/17-webtv-irc 15:00:10 agenda: http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/MPTF/Agenda_Telco_17th_May_2012 15:00:19 duncanr has joined #webtv 15:00:26 joesteele has joined #webtv 15:00:33 Meeting: Media Pipeline Task Force Teleconference 15:01:02 narm_gadiraju has joined #webtv 15:01:20 + +44.303.040.aaaa 15:01:20 + +1.408.536.aabb 15:01:30 Zakim, aabb is joesteele 15:01:34 +joesteele; got it 15:01:39 zakim, aaaa is Duncan 15:01:48 +Duncan; got it 15:02:05 +Narm_Gadiraju 15:02:25 + +1.425.269.aacc 15:02:44 scribe: Narm Gadiraju 15:02:56 ScribeNick: narm 15:03:12 +??P36 15:03:24 Meeting: Media Pipeline TF meeting 15:03:36 + +1.415.867.aadd 15:03:42 Zakim, nisc is Niklas_Schmuecker 15:03:42 sorry, nisc, I do not recognize a party named 'nisc' 15:03:57 zakim, ??P36 is Niklas_Schmuecker 15:03:57 +Niklas_Schmuecker; got it 15:03:58 +??P41 15:04:17 kstreeter has joined #webtv 15:04:29 + +1.908.541.aaee 15:04:33 acolwell has joined #webtv 15:04:41 agenda: http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/MPTF/Agenda_Telco_17th_May_2012 15:05:00 Topic: Agenda Reivew by Chair 15:05:01 Zakim, nisc is Niklas_Schmuecker 15:05:01 sorry, nisc, I do not recognize a party named 'nisc' 15:05:15 Chair: Clarke Stevens 15:05:16 + +1.858.735.aaff 15:05:30 + +1.206.218.aagg 15:06:02 zakim, aagg is Aaron(?) 15:06:04 Agenda: video in RTC context 15:06:08 +Aaron(?); got it 15:06:20 yes aagg is me 15:06:38 s/Agenda: video in RTC context/topic: video in RTC context/ 15:06:39 Bob has joined #webtv 15:06:48 zakim, who is here? 15:06:51 Clarke: RTC uses some formats for Video and need to confirm what kind of video we use. Broadcase or Stored? 15:06:56 On the phone I see Kazuyuki, Clarke, glenn (muted), Duncan, joesteele, Narm_Gadiraju, +1.425.269.aacc, Niklas_Schmuecker, +1.415.867.aadd, ??P41, +1.908.541.aaee, +1.858.735.aaff, 15:07:02 ... Aaron(?) 15:07:13 zakim, aacc is John 15:07:18 On IRC I see Bob, acolwell, kstreeter, narm_gadiraju, joesteele, duncanr, RRSAgent, Zakim, kaz, Clarke, glenn, nisc, masao, timeless, trackbot 15:07:23 ... should the tags for the Video in RTC be same as what we have here? 15:07:29 zakim, aadd is MarkW 15:07:38 zakim, aaff is me 15:07:41 +John; got it 15:07:53 Joe: are there any online resources about RTC 15:07:58 +MarkW; got it 15:08:11 ACTION: Clarke send details of RTC WG 15:08:11 Created ACTION-98 - Send details of RTC WG [on Clarke Stevens - due 2012-05-24]. 15:08:11 +kstreeter; got it 15:08:47 q+ 15:09:01 ...Clarke is travelling, so no meeting next week. 15:09:07 q? 15:09:18 Topic: WebPerf group from Mark Watkins 15:09:25 -MarkW 15:09:59 s/Waekins/Watson 15:10:01 s/Mark Watkins/Mark Watson/ 15:10:04 +MarkW 15:11:56 zakim, Aaron(?) is Aaron 15:11:56 +Aaron; got it 15:12:29 MarkW: For each HTTP request, is the performance information is provided? Mark checked this with the WebPerf WG 15:12:51 ...the intent was to estimate the bandwidth via JavaScript. 15:13:37 ...they have an API at the top level window object to get the performance information at the HTTP level. 15:13:58 ...all this can be done via JavaScript 15:14:00 fyi, LCWD announcement for 2 specs of the group: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2012AprJun/0052.html 15:14:32 Duncan: Will this work only through JavaScript and no other method need to be used? 15:15:23 MarkW: Yes. the JavaScript module will directly get the information from HTTP layer. 15:15:47 [ also Navigation Timing CR: http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/CR-navigation-timing-20110602/ ] 15:16:01 ...they dont increase the byte range. 15:16:02 s/fyi,/[ fyi,/ 15:16:11 s/0052.html/0052.html ] 15:17:11 Clarke: You have mentioned that they use a buffer. Does this create a problem? 15:17:57 q? 15:17:59 q- 15:19:38 johnsim has joined #webtv 15:20:13 MarkW:The buffer is only added when the HTTP request complete. The estimation can be done in short requests. 15:20:23 Topic: Bug Review 15:20:45 No change since last week. Any new bugs to report? 15:20:57 Topics: Use cases in Content Protection 15:21:05 s/No change/Clarke: No change/ 15:21:20 CP Spec: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webtv/raw-file/tip/mpreq/MPTF-CP-Requirements.html 15:22:00 -> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webtv/raw-file/tip/mpreq/MPTF-CP-Requirements.html#use-cases Use Cases section 15:22:55 Clarke: Reviewing the Usecase: Support Authorized Access to Content 15:26:20 Joe:this is high level and requirements of the use case are not discussed 15:26:25 s/Usecase/Use case/ 15:26:50 Clarke:this is use case and may need more detail. Open to changes. 15:27:49 John:Authorized Access: focus is on Content Protection, but authorized access is a seperate function. Is there a requirement for supporting authorization itself? 15:28:08 +q 15:28:14 Clarke: No, a seperate requirement is not captured 15:28:44 John: We should either separate requirement or expand this. 15:29:06 s/should/should have/ 15:29:31 Bob: Authorization is a saperate requirement 15:29:52 s/seperate/separate/ 15:30:10 ...web cryptography is looking into doing tools for these and we should co-ordinate. 15:30:36 s/seperate/separate/g 15:30:41 John: In addition Authorization we should look into Device Authentication 15:31:09 ...this is a requirement for TV devices 15:31:27 ...should be able to initiate from a web app. 15:32:10 ...even if Authorization and Authentication are not W3C specs, we should have a way to do it from web app. 15:33:58 q? 15:34:01 ack joe 15:35:12 Joe:prefer anonymous for authentication. Current spec does not cover Authentication. User Identification is not covered by current spec. Not sure if appropriate to put in this use case! 15:35:51 Clarke:Users already have to authenticate. We need to think if we should formalize this or not ... 15:36:13 -q 15:36:13 Joe: Upto CDM, not sure if we can standardize 15:36:55 Aaron: Authentication may be controversial, because it may make tracking users easier. 15:37:13 agiladi has joined #webtv 15:37:33 +1 15:37:45 need to be careful about privacy 15:37:54 Bob: The DNT we have to make sure we are doing right. 15:38:50 ???: with webcrypto the identity you see via JavaScript is different from real identity. 15:39:02 s/???:/MarkW:/ 15:40:26 Clarke: Summary: This will have to be broken up into multiple concepts and will work on it. 15:41:03 Topic: Use Case 2: Support for Commonly-used Container Formats 15:41:06 zakim, mute me 15:41:06 Kazuyuki should now be muted 15:41:21 zakim, unmute me 15:41:21 Kazuyuki should no longer be muted 15:41:24 Clarke: Reviewing the Use Case 2 15:42:28 Joe:Will there be multiple of these for commonly used container formats? 15:42:45 s/these for/these, each for/ 15:43:37 Clarke:container format is to be defined. 15:47:14 John:your requirement is written as design guideline and may need rephrasing as a requirement that does not have content protection markup. 15:47:51 present: Kazuyuki, Clarke, Glenn, Duncan, Joe, Narm, John, Niklas, ??P41, +1.908.541.aaee, Kevin, Aaron, Mark_Watson 15:49:24 Clarke: The requirement says that content protection does not favor any specific container format 15:49:39 zakim, who is talking 15:49:39 I don't understand 'who is talking', narm_gadiraju 15:49:55 zakim, who is speaking? 15:50:06 kaz, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Clarke (20%), Narm_Gadiraju (14%), kstreeter (23%) 15:50:59 Toipc: Use case 3: Support for a Baseline CDM 15:51:19 -Narm_Gadiraju 15:51:21 Clarke: Reviewing the use case. 15:52:09 +Narm_Gadiraju 15:52:52 Topic: Use Case 4: Support for Browser-independent Implementation 15:52:57 -Narm_Gadiraju 15:53:37 +Narm_Gadiraju 15:53:48 Clarke: Reviewing the use case 15:54:14 yes 15:54:25 -Narm_Gadiraju 15:54:33 the bridge is disconnecting me constantly 15:55:00 Joe: difference between U3 and U4? 15:55:09 +Narm_Gadiraju 15:55:16 Clarke: you can support U4 without supporting U3 15:55:53 ... opinions to express? 15:55:58 -Narm_Gadiraju 15:56:16 Joe: ability to get access the content 15:56:35 ... unclear about the player actually play the content 15:56:41 +Narm_Gadiraju 15:56:58 zakim, who is here? 15:56:58 On the phone I see Kazuyuki, Clarke, glenn (muted), Duncan, joesteele, John, Niklas_Schmuecker, ??P41, +1.908.541.aaee, kstreeter, Aaron, MarkW, Narm_Gadiraju 15:57:01 On IRC I see agiladi, johnsim, Bob, acolwell, kstreeter, narm_gadiraju, joesteele, duncanr, RRSAgent, Zakim, kaz, Clarke, glenn, nisc, masao, timeless, trackbot 15:57:27 topic: U5. Support for Playback of Encrypted Adaptive Bit-rate Content 15:57:31 Clarke: comments? 15:57:41 zakim, mute me 15:57:41 Kazuyuki should now be muted 15:57:47 zakim, unmute me 15:57:47 Kazuyuki should no longer be muted 15:57:55 Clarke: out of time 15:57:55 -Narm_Gadiraju 15:57:59 ... no call next week 15:58:04 -glenn 15:58:13 -John 15:58:15 -joesteele 15:58:16 -Aaron 15:58:16 -Duncan 15:58:17 -??P41 15:58:17 -MarkW 15:58:19 -kstreeter 15:58:19 acolwell has left #webtv 15:58:19 - +1.908.541.aaee 15:58:21 -Clarke 15:58:21 kaz, will you generate the meeting minutes? 15:58:22 -Niklas_Schmuecker 15:58:27 -Kazuyuki 15:58:28 duncanr has left #webtv 15:58:28 Thanks, Narm 15:58:29 UW_WebTVIG()11:00AM has ended 15:58:30 Attendees were Kazuyuki, Clarke, glenn, +44.303.040.aaaa, +1.408.536.aabb, joesteele, Duncan, Narm_Gadiraju, +1.425.269.aacc, +1.415.867.aadd, Niklas_Schmuecker, +1.908.541.aaee, 15:58:32 rrsagent, make log public 15:58:34 ... +1.858.735.aaff, +1.206.218.aagg, John, MarkW, kstreeter, Aaron 16:45:59 [ adjourned ] 16:46:05 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:46:05 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/05/17-webtv-minutes.html kaz 16:47:24 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:47:24 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/05/17-webtv-minutes.html kaz 18:02:51 Zakim has left #webtv 18:04:19 glenn has joined #webtv