15:05:07 RRSAgent has joined #html-a11y 15:05:07 logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/05/10-html-a11y-irc 15:05:09 RRSAgent, make logs world 15:05:09 Zakim has joined #html-a11y 15:05:10 zakim, please wake up. 15:05:10 I don't understand 'please wake up', paulc 15:05:11 Zakim, this will be 2119 15:05:11 ok, trackbot; I see WAI_PFWG(HTML TF)10:00AM scheduled to start 65 minutes ago 15:05:12 Meeting: HTML Accessibility Task Force Teleconference 15:05:12 Date: 10 May 2012 15:05:25 zakim, [Microsoft] has paulc 15:05:25 sorry, paulc, I do not recognize a party named '[Microsoft]' 15:05:25 zakim, who's here? 15:05:26 WAI_PFWG(HTML TF)10:00AM has not yet started, janina 15:05:26 On IRC I see RRSAgent, janina, Judy, Stevef, paulc, JF, davidb, MichaelC, MikeSmith, trackbot, [tm] 15:05:46 zakim, this will be 2119 15:05:46 ok, janina; I see WAI_PFWG(HTML TF)10:00AM scheduled to start 65 minutes ago 15:05:59 zakim, who's here? 15:05:59 WAI_PFWG(HTML TF)10:00AM has not yet started, janina 15:06:00 On IRC I see RRSAgent, janina, Judy, Stevef, paulc, JF, davidb, MichaelC, MikeSmith, trackbot, [tm] 15:06:14 richardschwerdtfe has joined #html-a11y 15:06:17 Zakim, call Mike 15:06:17 ok, MikeSmith; the call is being made 15:06:49 rrsagent, make minutes 15:06:49 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/05/10-html-a11y-minutes.html janina 15:06:50 Zakim, who's on the phone? 15:06:50 WAI_PFWG(HTML TF)10:00AM has not yet started, MikeSmith 15:06:51 On IRC I see richardschwerdtfe, Zakim, RRSAgent, janina, Judy, Stevef, paulc, JF, davidb, MichaelC, MikeSmith, trackbot, [tm] 15:06:59 trackbot, start 15:06:59 Sorry, MikeSmith, I don't understand 'trackbot, start'. Please refer to http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/irc for help 15:07:03 trackbot, start meeting 15:07:06 RRSAgent, make logs world 15:07:08 Zakim, this will be 2119 15:07:08 ok, trackbot; I see WAI_PFWG(HTML TF)10:00AM scheduled to start 67 minutes ago 15:07:09 Meeting: HTML Accessibility Task Force Teleconference 15:07:09 Date: 10 May 2012 15:07:21 agenda+ issue 204 discussion + possible TF resolution 15:07:21 agenda+ Media Accessibility User Requirements, annotations/pointers to spec 15:07:21 agenda+ status updates on issues agreed from the F2F or otherwise in process 15:07:21 agenda+ subteam reports 15:07:21 agenda+ other business 15:08:06 scribe: janina 15:08:14 zakim, take up item 1 15:08:15 agendum 1. "issue 204 discussion + possible TF resolution" taken up [from Judy] 15:08:50 Thanks, John! 15:09:10 scribe: JF 15:09:38 Janina : status update - Text subteam review the new changes and agree that they ere good changes 15:09:48 PF reviewed yeteday and voted a resolution to support 15:10:14 have put out an advanced 48 hour consensus call with a deadline of Friday midnight Boston 15:10:37 have one objection to date from Ben H-L reiterating his concerns 15:11:15 Laura, after initial concerns, seems to feel that these are improvements - she had concerns over V2 and V3 tracking 15:11:34 RRSAgent, make minutes 15:11:34 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/05/10-html-a11y-minutes.html MikeSmith 15:11:57 based on progress on other issues, the chairs asked if we could try for amicable resolution of Issue 204 at the F2F last week 15:12:49 it became obvious to remove restrictions on future development was a no-brainer, and the new V3 now has stronger conformance language, which was a win in our eyes as well 15:13:11 q? 15:13:32 JF: any other changes were grammatical in nature 15:14:16 MS: what we should try for today is to seek a TF resolution today, are we ready to do so now? 15:14:27 JS: unless there are further questions or comments 15:14:39 MS: will make the proposal now 15:15:10 http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/Correct_Hidden_Attribute_Section_v3 15:15:51 proposed RESOLUTION: TF supports the CP at http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/Correct_Hidden_Attribute_Section_v3 as written 15:16:01 +1 15:16:28 +1 15:16:39 MS: are there any objections to this? 15:16:57 anybody on IRC who objects to that resolution? 15:17:19 RESOLUTION: TF supports the CP at http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/Correct_Hidden_Attribute_Section_v3 as written 15:17:32 RESOLUTION: TF supports the CP at http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/Correct_Hidden_Attribute_Section_v3 as written 15:17:33 MS: not seeing any objections 15:17:42 RRSAgent, make minutes 15:17:42 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/05/10-html-a11y-minutes.html MikeSmith 15:18:03 RESOLUTION: TF supports the CP at http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/Correct_Hidden_Attribute_Section_v3 as written 15:18:07 scribe: janina 15:18:08 RESOLUTION: TF supports the CP at http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/Correct_Hidden_Attribute_Section_v3 as written 15:18:24 RRSAgent, make minutes 15:18:24 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/05/10-html-a11y-minutes.html MikeSmith 15:18:33 +1 15:18:56 JS: thankful for the great discussion last week, this was a great consensus building exercise 15:19:03 q? 15:19:06 zakim, next item 15:19:06 agendum 2. "Media Accessibility User Requirements, annotations/pointers to spec" taken up [from Judy] 15:19:35 scribe: JF 15:19:51 JS: have been meaning to surface this for some time 15:20:01 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2012May/0054.html 15:20:08 would like to move the user requirements from a Draft note 15:20:32 thought it might be useful to annotate this in the HTML5 spec to link technologies to techniques (etc.) 15:20:43 Silvia offered to do this and felt it would be easy to do 15:21:02 so, do we want to take that document in that direction? 15:21:26 PF thought this was a good idea on their call yesterday 15:21:33 should we pursue? 15:21:36 q? 15:21:41 (JF says +1) 15:21:59 Q+ 15:23:20 q+ 15:23:26 ack JF 15:23:47 ack JF 15:23:51 ack j 15:24:06 ack Stevef 15:24:35 SF: Is this annotating the HTML5 spec of the User Reqs docuemtn? 15:24:42 JS: the user reqs doc 15:25:00 s/of the User/or the User/ 15:25:50 MS: question seems does anyone thing this is a good idea. If Silvia has offered to do this, and it has no direct changes to HTML5 spec, then are there objections? 15:26:01 MS: seems like a useful bit of work 15:26:32 MS: guessing that Silvia wanted to ensure that others saw the value, and agreed before she undertook the effort 15:26:57 JF: +1 for Silvia improving things - with thanks 15:27:10 +1 for Silvia improving things - with thanks 15:27:46 JS: I will discuss this with Silvia - worth noting that the media team are re-convening on short notice - actually meeting later today 15:28:12 zakim, next item 15:28:12 agendum 3. "status updates on issues agreed from the F2F or otherwise in process" taken up [from Judy] 15:28:12 JS: looking to come to grips with Issue 194 - but will discuss this with Silvia then 15:28:29 scribe: janina 15:28:32 Thanks, John! 15:29:05 s/docuemtn/document/ 15:29:46 ms: Good in person participation from the TF at the F2F 15:29:59 ms: Good canvas discussion and agreement 15:30:28 ms: With Ted and Frank -- melding their two proposals 15:30:35 rs: I'm starting on that 15:30:35 q+ 15:31:23 rs: Elipses included in Ted's proposal, but perhaps for html.next 15:31:23 q? 15:31:25 q+ 15:31:26 ack Judy 15:31:47 judy: Should we ask Paul's help pinging for Frank's active participation here as we're on a tight timeframe? 15:32:05 paul: If Rich sends a note cc'ing me, I'll make sure there's a response. 15:32:25 rs: Pointing out that I'm on holliday late next week and want to get as much of this done before that as possible 15:32:58 -> http://www.w3.org/2012/05/03-html-wg-minutes.html minutes from HTML WG 03 May 2012 f2f meeting 15:33:06 q? 15:33:10 paul: Just so everyone knows, Microsoft is currently trying to get Windows 8 out the door, and this takes people's attention 15:33:12 ack paulc 15:33:52 rich: Just want to make sure that we all agree that elipses 15:34:01 judy: Rich cc me too, on your response request 15:34:04 rich is not to be included at this time 15:34:30 janina: apologizing that I can't spell! 15:34:55 paul: pointing out no agreement yet to add the shape for hit testing 15:34:59 rich: correct 15:35:06 paul: so need to make this more visible 15:35:11 cyns: please also cc me 15:35:15 q? 15:35:30 paul: at some point we need this visible--to the list 15:35:45 q+ 15:36:58 rich: believe we resolve first with ted and frank 15:37:06 ack Stevef 15:37:08 email with questions sent last week to HTML WG - no response http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012May/0008.html 15:38:59 sf: question of focus 15:39:09 rich: need to see how, don't have the answer yet 15:39:47 rich: we also need a way to map lightweight objects to a11y apis -- discuss that in the uaig 15:42:07 rich: it's all achievable, but will take some time 15:42:40 zakim, next item 15:42:40 agendum 4. "subteam reports" taken up [from Judy] 15:42:50 ms: text? 15:44:10 judy: in addition to 204 above we talked about alt--alts on images in the spec, and buggy alt guidance in the spec 15:44:25 judy: we're evolving our documentation of these 15:45:21 judy: also issue-31c meta generator exemption 15:45:39 judy: now a comprehensive reopen request cp forwarded to chairs last week 15:45:54 judy: we're expecting feedback or a reopen from the h5ccs 15:46:49 Q+ to update on media sub-team 15:47:13 q+ for paul 15:48:20 ack JF 15:48:20 JF, you wanted to update on media sub-team 15:48:46 jf: Noting that I194 has a foot in each camp, want to add good discussion on i194 at the F2F 15:48:56 jf: And, it's the basis of us resuming media telecons 15:49:28 jf: Silvia is working up another proposal, a new h5 element transcript 15:49:47 jf: Meanwhile, I'm under the gun to put out a i194 proposal by Friday 15:49:56 paul: where's the dialog on this? 15:50:02 jf: On the TF list 15:51:10 http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposal/Issue194_SP 15:51:23 q? 15:51:32 janina: our concern is that i194 not expire in the wg while direct discussion on approaches is active 15:51:52 jf: exactly, we need some lattitude from the chairs 15:52:21 RRSAgent, make minute 15:52:21 I'm logging. I don't understand 'make minute', MikeSmith. Try /msg RRSAgent help 15:52:23 paul: I see Silvia's CP pointer ... looking at the thread 15:52:25 RRSAgent, make minutes 15:52:25 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/05/10-html-a11y-minutes.html MikeSmith 15:53:25 paul: can you summarize where we are? 15:53:45 jf: at the f2f we agreed i would rewrite my cp to propose using track, and ted to propose idref 15:53:57 jf: now we have this additional approach from silvia 15:55:09 q? 15:55:43 janina: I'm concerned that we really should consider these proposals from the perspective of user experience 15:56:00 janina: a single way to get whichever alternate media 15:56:24 paul: noting that this is all post the due date for cps 15:57:57 sf: wanted an update on hgroup? 15:58:08 paul: reviewed all 5 proposals and will be sending reviews shortly 15:59:25 richardschwerdtfe has left #html-a11y 15:59:53 RRSAgent, make minutes 15:59:53 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/05/10-html-a11y-minutes.html MikeSmith 16:00:18 zakim, bye 16:00:18 Zakim has left #html-a11y 16:00:25 rrsagent, make log public 16:00:32 rrsagent, make minutes 16:00:32 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/05/10-html-a11y-minutes.html janina 16:26:03 janina has left #html-a11y 17:28:26 Stevef has joined #html-a11y 19:00:07 Judy has joined #html-a11y 19:36:40 davidb has joined #html-a11y 20:44:45 Judy-clone has joined #html-a11y 21:34:21 silvia has joined #html-a11y 21:35:34 anyone here? 21:35:42 where is the media a11y meeting happening?