15:02:16 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #htmlt
15:02:16 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/05/08-htmlt-irc
15:03:42 <krisk> Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-testsuite/2012May/0008.html
15:04:22 <krisk> Let's start with agenda item #3 Spring Cleaning
15:05:00 <krisk> Since this has alot of discussion...
15:05:57 <krisk> I agree that with jgraham's last comment about the whole point is to not have tests running on w3.org for security reasons.
15:06:27 <jgraham> I think Aryeh's request is reasonable
15:06:43 <jgraham> To run hgweb on w3c-test.org
15:07:16 <jgraham> I guess we need to ask plh/systeam
15:07:20 <krisk> I am open to this as well...
15:08:02 <krisk> Yes it shoud be a system/w3c team ask to get this in place
15:08:22 <krisk> So that one can just expect /resources/ to work
15:08:43 <krisk> Then everyone can really use this as the way to include testharness.js,etc...
15:09:29 <krisk> Though this doesn't seem to block fixing tests in the HTML test suite
15:10:14 <krisk> Let me take a quick peek at webapps and see what we have...
15:11:01 <krisk> Since I was under the impression that Aryeh's issue was limited to his editing and dom4 work
15:11:52 <jgraham> Yes, I'm not sure exactly what his usecase is but he seems to particularly want to link to specific revisions of the editing testsuite
15:15:48 <krisk> OK taking a peek at tests that have been submitted in webapps, I only see one for shadowdom that has an odd path to testharness.js
15:16:36 <krisk> Some websocket tests do point to w3c-test.org, but they don't have the same constraint as the editing/selection tests that Aryeh has mentioned.
15:17:01 <krisk> So it seems fine to update the tests in webapps and html to use /resources/
15:18:36 <krisk> Do you agree james?
15:19:07 <jgraham> Yes
15:19:26 <jgraham> Are you also going to fix the relative order of testharness and testharnessreport.js?
15:20:45 <krisk> I should be able to do that as well...
15:21:22 <krisk> It should be easy though if I hit an issue I'll just update the path
15:21:50 <krisk> sound good?
15:22:01 <jgraham> Yup
15:23:57 <krisk> Agenda Item #2 New Test Submissions
15:24:43 <krisk> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/html/shortlog shows one new test for an Opera 'feature' by Ms2Ger
15:24:54 <krisk> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/html/rev/1c74dd6990e9
15:25:50 <krisk> http://www.w3c-test.org/html/tests/submission/Ms2ger/the-elements-of-html/scripting/the-script-element/script-onload-string.html
15:27:18 <krisk> James do you understand his comment about a Opera 'feature'?
15:29:18 <jgraham> Yup
15:29:37 <jgraham> It is a test that Opera fails because we implement some behavior that isn't in the spec
15:29:46 <jgraham> I will check and see if we have a bug on fixing it
15:29:54 <gsnedders> (Isn't that theoretically a permissable extension, therefore?)
15:31:13 <jgraham> No
15:31:22 <jgraham> The HTML spec doesn't work like the ES spec
15:31:51 <jgraham> It could be a permissable extension if we wrote a spec for it and got people to agree to implement that spec rather than HTML5
15:31:58 <jgraham> (on this point)
15:32:10 <jgraham> But we're not going to :)
15:33:39 <krisk> Next Agenda Item: Bugs on Approved Tests
15:34:07 <krisk> tinyurl -> http://tinyurl.com/6mvghxx
15:34:46 <krisk> We have no new bugs
15:36:07 <krisk> Shall we adjourn or does anyone have any other items they would like to discuss?
15:37:03 <jgraham> I don't have anything in particular I don't think
15:38:07 <krisk> Ok let's adjourn
15:38:44 <krisk> RRSAgent, make logs public
15:38:50 <krisk> rrsagent, generate minutes
15:38:50 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/05/08-htmlt-minutes.html krisk