14:01:24 RRSAgent has joined #gld 14:01:24 logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/05/03-gld-irc 14:01:26 RRSAgent, make logs world 14:01:26 Zakim has joined #gld 14:01:28 Zakim, this will be GLD 14:01:28 ok, trackbot, I see T&S_GLDWG()10:00AM already started 14:01:29 Meeting: Government Linked Data Working Group Teleconference 14:01:29 Date: 03 May 2012 14:01:30 +mhausenblas 14:02:15 gatemezi has joined #gld 14:02:55 cygri has joined #gld 14:03:00 +gatemezi 14:03:15 zakim, who is on the phone? 14:03:15 On the phone I see George, +3539149aaaa, Sandro, mhausenblas, gatemezi 14:03:17 +??P29 14:03:39 zakim, mhausenblas is temporarily me 14:03:39 +cygri; got it 14:03:50 Zakim, +35391 is me 14:03:50 +fadmaa; got it 14:04:33 scribe: cygri 14:04:54 +1 14:04:56 Zakim, mute me 14:04:56 topic: Admin 14:04:57 sandro has changed the topic to: Government Linked Data (GLD) WG -- http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20120503 14:04:59 fadmaa should now be muted 14:05:08 PROPOSAL: accept last meetings' minutes 14:05:16 RESOLUTION: accept last meetings' minutes 14:05:52 minutes were here: http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/meeting/2012-04-26 14:06:04 zakim, unmute me 14:06:04 fadmaa should no longer be muted 14:06:11 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-comments/2012Apr/0028.html 14:06:17 agenda: http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20120503 14:06:23 chair: George Thomas 14:06:38 topic: Main Vocab Agenda: DCAT 14:07:21 cygri: What I've been saying about this is "Oh Yeah, We'll be looking intot this... as part of void or dcat or something." 14:07:31 ... This needs to be worked out. Some people have looked at this 14:07:50 ... semantic CKAN, which unfort. is defunct now. It was emitting both -- we can look at how they did it. 14:08:08 ... I don't have a clear answer on how they can use them together. 14:08:19 ... that should be published as part of one or the other. 14:08:35 BenediktKaempgen has joined #gld 14:08:55 George: do we want to do this in GLD? or do we defer to void? 14:09:01 q+ 14:09:27 ack sandro 14:09:31 +BenediktKaempgen 14:09:56 I suggest we have the discussion in GLD.. 14:10:12 sandro: procedurally, it would fall on void to explain how they work together because void is not on REC track and hence not so stable 14:10:13 q+ 14:10:19 zakim, who's here? 14:10:19 On the phone I see George, fadmaa, Sandro, cygri, gatemezi, DaveReynolds, BenediktKaempgen 14:10:22 On IRC I see BenediktKaempgen, cygri, gatemezi, Zakim, RRSAgent, fadmaa, MacTed, DaveReynolds, George, danbri_, rreck, trackbot, sandro 14:10:46 zakim, mute me 14:10:46 fadmaa should now be muted 14:12:51 q? 14:12:57 ack cygri 14:15:53 sandro: GLD should probably address it somehow, because people already use void 14:16:04 i'll ping the CKAN list and see when semantic.ckan.net might be back 14:16:35 then we'll use how it emits both DCAT and VOID to seed a GLD wiki page on the topic 14:17:04 cygri: start with a wiki page and collect the obvious material - dcat example, void example, some options 14:17:42 sandro: start with ReSpec? 14:17:54 cygri: what are the possible/desired outcomes? 14:18:55 sandro: could be a working group note instead 14:19:24 cygri: separate doc is overkill - preference is to put this in the void note 14:19:47 ... could setup a void ED soon 14:19:58 ... but start with wiki to iterate a bit 14:20:29 +1 to create a wiki page 14:20:40 ACTION: cygri to create wiki page for void-dcat mapping 14:20:41 Created ACTION-69 - Create wiki page for void-dcat mapping [on Richard Cyganiak - due 2012-05-10]. 14:21:09 topic: DCAT Product Tracker http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/products/2 14:21:16 http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/actions/39 14:21:27 topic: DCAT Product Tracker Actions/Issues 14:22:25 http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/actions/68 14:22:36 cygri: i'll update DERI dcat page to point to the WD 14:24:15 ACTION: sandro to put in place proper HTML and RDF for the dcat namespace 14:24:15 Created ACTION-70 - Put in place proper HTML and RDF for the dcat namespace [on Sandro Hawke - due 2012-05-10]. 14:24:52 zakim, unmute me 14:24:52 fadmaa should no longer be muted 14:24:59 http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/products/2 14:25:51 issue-7? 14:25:51 ISSUE-7 -- Drop dcat:accessUrl, use the URI of the dcat:Download resource instead -- raised 14:25:51 http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/7 14:25:51 http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/7 14:26:41 fadmaa: on ISSUE-7, this is an old issue, i think olyerickson tried to follow up with edsu and got no reply 14:26:52 DaveReynolds: i thought we saw a response from Ed? 14:26:54 q+ 14:27:17 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2012Mar/0092.html 14:27:18 george: really? 14:30:03 +1 to cygri - propose resolutions ahead of time to allow for discussion and preparation 14:30:53 danbri has joined #gld 14:31:09 cygri: it would be helpful to propose resolutions before via email and have them explicitly on the agenda 14:31:23 george: yes, and it would be good if editors are prepared to address issues 14:31:48 sandro: i think it makes sense to close the loop with ed. tell him to please come back to the WG if you care 14:32:43 DaveReynolds: edsu offered to join a meeting where these issues are discussed. john's reply didn't respond to that 14:33:03 george: we'll ping him 14:33:23 ACTION: george to ping Ed Summers regarding DCAT ISSUE-7/8/9 14:33:23 Created ACTION-71 - Ping Ed Summers regarding DCAT ISSUE-7/8/9 [on George Thomas - due 2012-05-10]. 14:33:37 ACTION-71? 14:33:37 ACTION-71 -- George Thomas to ping Ed Summers regarding DCAT ISSUE-7/8/9 -- due 2012-05-10 -- OPEN 14:33:37 http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/actions/71 14:34:28 sandro: should dcat be on the agenda for every vocabulary call, or every *other* vocab call? 14:34:49 ... we'd like him to participate in more than one meeting 14:35:29 +1 14:35:41 q? 14:35:55 ack me 14:35:55 q+ 14:36:19 @Sandro: you mean having at least one dcat call per month? 14:37:02 fadmaa: Rufus from CKAN has some DCAT input 14:37:11 fadmaa: i got some personal feedback from Rufus Pollock 14:37:20 sandro: he should send an email to the comments list if he would 14:37:24 ... i told him to raise issues but he can't cause not WG member 14:37:35 sandro: ask him to mail the comments list, or forward his mail 14:38:04 fadmaa: he suggested to distinguish mandatory and optional properties 14:38:19 ... so consumers can be sure that some basic properties will be present 14:38:42 ... and he suggested to drop some properties because they are underspecified 14:39:14 ... things like dataQuality or dataDictionary 14:39:41 ... vague definitions don't help much, and precise definitions might require more work and might be out of scope 14:39:50 ... i found this reasonable 14:40:00 q+ 14:40:14 george: so should something like dataDictionary be optional, or completely removed? 14:40:24 fadmaa: he says completely removed/deprecated 14:40:35 ack fadmaa 14:42:09 ack me 14:44:45 cygri: defining something like "minimally complete record" is probably good 14:45:13 george: this might relate to the new Linked Data Protocol work 14:45:44 ... you want to say, here are properties that you can expect 14:46:05 ... on dataDictionary, it's possible that the CKAN folks don't find it useful, but we find it useful on data.gov 14:48:50 So maybe we can provide in the usage page here http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat/#property--data-dictionary how useful is on data.gov 14:51:29 q? 14:52:38 cygri: conversations regarding DCAT as JSON-LD 14:53:06 ... need to have an answer to 'can you use DCAT with JSON-LD?' kind of thing 14:53:42 DaveReynolds: specific to JSON-LD? what about Talis JSON-RDF? 14:56:56 (discussion on RDF in JSON) 14:58:08 JSON-LD unofficial Draft here.. http://json-ld.org/spec/latest/json-ld-syntax/ 14:58:24 +1 to cygri, vocabularies should be agnostic to RDF serializations 14:59:26 note that http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-primer/ has every example in FIVE syntaxes, with toggles. 14:59:49 sandro: the owl2 primer has all examples in five different syntaxes with a JS picker. we might want to do something like this 15:00:10 zakim, who is on the call? 15:00:13 On the phone I see George, fadmaa, Sandro, cygri, gatemezi, DaveReynolds, BenediktKaempgen 15:00:31 like i said i couldnt call in 15:01:56 W3C Members, please give feedback on http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/charter -- AC Members, please vote now. 15:01:58 -cygri 15:02:06 -fadmaa 15:02:09 DaveReynolds has left #gld 15:02:13 RRSAgent, make minutes public 15:02:13 I'm logging. I don't understand 'make minutes public', cygri. Try /msg RRSAgent help 15:02:17 -BenediktKaempgen 15:02:17 -gatemezin 15:02:18 -DaveReynolds 15:02:20 -Sandro 15:02:24 -gatemezi 15:02:24 -George 15:02:25 RRSAgent, make logs public 15:02:51 invited experts cannot vote? 15:03:56 thanks for scribing richard! 15:04:01 rreck, i don't think so. it's one vote per member org? 15:04:51 rreck has left #gld 15:05:04 correct. this a vote as to what W3C will work on, so it's paying members only. public input has been and remains welcome, though. 15:05:14 of course, rreck just left. 15:35:00 disconnecting the lone participant, gatemezi, in T&S_GLDWG()10:00AM 15:35:02 T&S_GLDWG()10:00AM has ended 15:35:02 Attendees were George, +3539149aaaa, Sandro, gatemezi, DaveReynolds, cygri, fadmaa, BenediktKaempgen 17:21:20 Zakim has left #gld 18:39:19 bhyland has joined #gld