14:00:13 RRSAgent has joined #sparql 14:00:13 logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/04/24-sparql-irc 14:00:15 RRSAgent, make logs world 14:00:17 Zakim, this will be 77277 14:00:17 ok, trackbot; I see SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM scheduled to start now 14:00:18 Meeting: SPARQL Working Group Teleconference 14:00:18 Date: 24 April 2012 14:01:10 zakim, this is 77277 14:01:10 ok, sandro; that matches SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM 14:01:15 zakim, who is on the call? 14:01:16 On the phone I see kasei, Sandro, ??P9 14:01:21 MattPerry has joined #sparql 14:01:30 + +33.4.92.38.aaaa 14:01:37 Zakim, ??P9 is me 14:01:43 +bglimm; got it 14:01:44 zakim, aaaa is me 14:01:56 +Olivier_; got it 14:02:05 Zakim, mute me 14:02:06 +??P15 14:02:09 zakim, ??P15 is me 14:02:23 +MattPerry 14:02:24 bglimm should now be muted 14:02:26 +cbuilara; got it 14:03:17 sandro has changed the topic to: pseudo agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012AprJun/0044.html 14:03:33 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012AprJun/0044.html 14:03:42 chair: sandro 14:03:49 Zakim, unmute me 14:03:49 bglimm should no longer be muted 14:04:17 it's somewhat up to date 14:04:49 scribe: Olivier_ 14:05:19 agenda: publishing overview 14:05:35 +??P26 14:05:41 test suites 14:05:41 zakim, ?P26 is me 14:05:41 sorry, AndyS, I do not recognize a party named '?P26' 14:05:45 comments 14:05:46 zakim, ??P26 is me 14:05:46 +AndyS; got it 14:06:07 Agenda+ publishing overview 14:06:12 agenda+ Comments 14:06:19 Agenda+ Test Suite 14:07:03 dig up what? 14:07:26 http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2012-04-10 14:07:52 http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2012-04-10 14:08:10 proposed: approve minutes from last meeting http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2012-04-10 14:08:18 +1 14:08:22 +1 14:08:24 +1 14:08:33 resolved: approve minutes from last meeting http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2012-04-10 14:08:39 zakim, take up agendum 1 14:08:39 agendum 1. "publishing overview" taken up [from sandro] 14:09:17 overview ok but some references 14:09:24 sandro: I think we're good to go except for the references 14:09:44 http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/sparql11-overview/Overview.xml 14:10:33 link to using rdf 1.1 14:10:54 2009/sparql/using-with-rdf11 14:10:56 link that we can redirect 14:11:05 Zakim, mute me 14:11:05 bglimm should now be muted 14:11:58 PROPOSAL: for "with RDF 1.1" will link to 2009/sparql/using-with-rdf1 and mark it AT RISK. 14:12:18 PROPOSAL: for "with RDF 1.1" will link to 2009/sparql/using-with-rdf11 and mark it AT RISK. 14:12:25 +1 14:12:28 +1 14:12:30 +1 14:12:39 RESOLVED: for "with RDF 1.1" will link to 2009/sparql/using-with-rdf11 and mark it AT RISK. 14:12:45 @@@Shall this document also link to the test suite? 14:13:16 link to readme.html ? 14:13:36 http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/README.html 14:13:57 Zakim, unmute me 14:13:57 bglimm should no longer be muted 14:14:23 change the title to test case or test suite 14:15:00 PROPOSED: Overview link to http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/README.html for Test Suite, and we try to get that page looking better soon. 14:15:11 +1 so long as we know the readme still needs work to reflect the current state of the test suite. 14:15:11 +1 14:15:15 +1 14:15:19 +1 14:15:50 RESOLVED: Overview link to http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/README.html for Test Suite, and we try to get that page looking better soon. 14:16:24 ACTION: kasei put a visible box near the top of http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/README.html to highlight what's out of date and where else folks should look for now. 14:16:24 Created ACTION-609 - Put a visible box near the top of http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/README.html to highlight what's out of date and where else folks should look for now. [on Gregory Williams - due 2012-05-01]. 14:17:05 CSV: @@@needs to be checked with final versions of CSV/TSV doc. 14:19:13 noted we think CSV and TSV examples are okay. 14:19:31 andy: TSV uses Turtle/SPARQL terms, so it uses the question marks, quotes, etc. 14:19:45 andy: (unlike CSV) 14:20:07 andy: we're not expecting CSV to go through a Turtle Parser, just a spreadsheet. 14:21:24 It was published in november 14:22:17 sandro: confiming overview is Rec Track 14:22:46 @@@Need to declare references to non rec specs non-normative? 14:23:26 sandro: lets just remove 14:23:26 @@@Need to declare references to non rec specs non-normative? 14:23:26 14:23:46 hearing agreement 14:24:42 Turtle: @@@This reference needs to be fixed, once RDF 1.1 publishes a new Turtle Rec. 14:26:06 FIX- Paul Gearon, Invited Expert 14:26:06 FIX- Birte Glimm, Oxford University Computing Laboratory 14:26:06 FIX- * cbuilara I no longer belong to UPM, I finished my phd and I moved 14:26:37 FIX- Turtle reference to TR/Turtle, and name it as Working Draft 14:27:07 FIX- CVS History 14:27:40 PROPOSED: Publish http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/sparql11-overview/Overview.xml as Last Call Working Draft, after making the changes agreed upon so far this meeting. 14:27:44 +1 14:27:54 +1 14:27:59 +1 14:28:00 +1 14:28:02 +1 14:28:06 +1 14:28:06 +1 14:28:19 RESOLVED: Publish http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/sparql11-overview/Overview.xml as Last Call Working Draft, after making the changes agreed upon so far this meeting. 14:28:51 ACTION: sandro make the discussed changes 14:28:51 Created ACTION-610 - Make the discussed changes [on Sandro Hawke - due 2012-05-01]. 14:29:14 Zakim, unmute me 14:29:14 bglimm was not muted, bglimm 14:29:17 action: birte to make sure Sandro made the changes correctly 14:29:17 Created ACTION-611 - Make sure Sandro made the changes correctly [on Birte Glimm - due 2012-05-01]. 14:30:40 q+ 14:30:43 Looking at -- " the SPARQL Query Results XML Format (please, particularly note that the SPARQL 1.1 WG has made some minor Errata to this specification)," and noting there are no Errata listed. 14:30:51 ack kasei 14:31:12 kasei: This started as my ACTION-504. I made the changes but never committed them. 14:32:54 action-503? 14:32:54 ACTION-503 -- Axel Polleres to contaxt sandro on whether we're allowed to change xsl in place in the course of errata -- due 2011-08-02 -- OPEN 14:32:54 http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/503 14:34:03 action-504 14:34:05 action-504? 14:34:05 ACTION-504 -- Gregory Williams to incorporate http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/SPARQL_Errata#SPARQL_XML_Results into http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/XMLres-errata -- due 2011-08-02 -- OPEN 14:34:05 http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/504 14:37:21 My copy says: 14:37:22 > - 14:37:22 > + 14:38:24 remove: @@@ this is a placeholder at the moment; note that also the version number for RDF 1.1 might need to be changed! 14:38:56 Yes, Olivier_ that's part of 'fixing turtle'. 14:41:46 sandro: Let's publsh the Errata Greg has now, labeled with 'PROPOSED' for now. 14:42:09 ACTION: kasei check in his version of XML Errata, with [PROPOSED] on each one 14:42:09 Created ACTION-612 - Check in his version of XML Errata, with [PROPOSED] on each one [on Gregory Williams - due 2012-05-01]. 14:44:25 sandro: Let's keep Carlos' old affil since it was the W3C member 14:44:46 zakim, take up next agendum 14:44:46 agendum 2. "Comments" taken up [from sandro] 14:44:56 http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Comments 14:46:56 AndyS:We can now respond go DRD-1, saying this is what Turtle and SPARQL are doing, it's a compromise. I'll take that one. 14:47:09 AndyS: other ppath ones. Come back to BINDINGS. 14:47:44 DBeckett-4 ? 14:47:54 kasei: I think the work is done, I'll draft a response. 14:49:05 DB-21 for Paul or Axel, who are not here 14:49:09 DB-22 same. 14:49:16 SA-3 on bindings 14:49:59 WW-1 on path expressions. Andy to draft response 14:50:40 birte to take SA-3 14:53:02 andy: In the WW-1 response I'd like to say a little on how there are choicepoints 14:53:46 subtopic: BINDINGS 14:54:11 andy: I'd propose we work through whether we can put bindings inside ANY group. So it's more data. So it's a syntax change. 14:54:11 bindings inside any group ? 14:54:41 bglimm: It'll also change the algebra. The processing order will be different 14:55:08 SELECT * { ?s ?p ?o BINDING(...) } 14:55:12 AndyS: But bindings are defined to be something you draw into what you're working on at the time. A Single BIND operation which adds a column in can be argued to be a join. 14:55:35 swh has joined #sparql 14:56:23 AndyS: So, where we have FILTER we'd also allow BINDING. And it means, Do th basic graph pattern, do the bind, join with any BINDING table. Still JOIN semantics rather than SUBSTITUTION. Which incidentally means you can write it as SUBSITUTION. It ends up doing the same. Most engines do something very similar. 14:56:43 ... It generalized from binding at the end of the query to something you join at any point. 14:56:56 ... which will make Eric's heart sing, since he's been on about this for a while. :-) 14:57:39 ... Given we have 3 outstanding comments on this, we should at least draft this. It's small spec changes, just moving a little of when you process it. 14:58:02 sounds good 14:58:59 sandro: I'm just worried about running out of Andy-time 14:59:53 AndyS: agreed, time is a concern 15:00:04 bglimm: Yes, but we have three comments, and this would address them. 15:01:44 sandro: Sounds like Andy should go ahead, as long as he's personally motivated. 15:01:54 AndyS: I at least want to go down the initial stages. 15:02:09 ADJOURN 15:02:14 -bglimm 15:02:17 -Sandro 15:02:18 -MattPerry 15:02:19 bye 15:02:21 -Olivier_ 15:02:22 -AndyS 15:02:29 -cbuilara 15:02:34 -kasei 15:02:37 SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM has ended 15:02:39 Attendees were kasei, Sandro, +33.4.92.38.aaaa, bglimm, Olivier_, MattPerry, cbuilara, AndyS 15:08:11 i have no idea. 15:08:28 oops. sandra: back on the channel! 15:08:39 sandro, even. 15:54:44 AndyS has joined #sparql