17:01:15 RRSAgent has joined #tagmem 17:01:15 logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/04/12-tagmem-irc 17:01:17 RRSAgent, make logs public 17:01:17 Zakim has joined #tagmem 17:01:19 Zakim, this will be TAG 17:01:19 ok, trackbot, I see TAG_Weekly()1:00PM already started 17:01:20 Meeting: Technical Architecture Group Teleconference 17:01:20 Date: 12 April 2012 17:02:00 +jar 17:02:12 +??P10 17:02:25 I may be interrupted and have to leave 17:05:00 +Yves 17:05:16 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose ht 17:06:18 Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/04/12-agenda 17:06:24 Scribe: Yves 17:06:46 zakim, who is on the call? 17:06:46 On the phone I see JeniT, Ashok_Malhotra, timbl_, jar, ht, Yves 17:06:54 +plinss 17:07:58 next scribe should be Peter 17:08:33 F2F minutes, wednesday minutes were out yesterday, there are still work to do in there (mark in red) 17:08:47 tim: I worked on those 17:08:48 +Noah_Mendelsohn 17:08:51 noah has joined #tagmem 17:09:04 ht: let's postpone until next week 17:09:05 zakim, who is here? 17:09:05 On the phone I see JeniT, Ashok_Malhotra, timbl_, jar, ht, Yves, plinss, Noah_Mendelsohn 17:09:07 On IRC I see noah, Zakim, RRSAgent, NoahDroid, Ashok, jar, Norm, ht, timbl, JeniT, plinss, trackbot, Yves 17:09:13 zakim, Noah_Mendelsohn is me 17:09:13 +noah; got it 17:09:13 ht, I think you mean Tuesday's minutes 17:09:26 so for all, we need you to review tuesday's minutes 17:10:49 ht, there is a draft action form Robin (on tuesday), but it didn't make it in the action list 17:11:09 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/04/03-minutes 17:12:46 noah: we should probably assign that issue 17:12:56 Based on imperfect record in http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2012/04/03-minutes assigning 17:13:02 ACTION: Robin to draft scope and goals for the Patterns/Pitfalls work in local/remote storage synch 17:13:02 Created ACTION-693 - Draft scope and goals for the Patterns/Pitfalls work in local/remote storage synch [on Robin Berjon - due 2012-04-19]. 17:14:00 Topic: Administrative items 17:14:10 Chair solicits guidance on level of TAG interest in issues like the proposed http+aes URI scheme 17:14:50 +1 to have a brief look 17:15:00 timbl: interested to have something presented about it 17:16:22 ACTION: Noah to work up simple intro to http+aes uri scheme and schedule discussion, possibly with PLH - Due 2012-04-24 17:16:22 Created ACTION-694 - work up simple intro to http+aes uri scheme and schedule discussion, possibly with PLH [on Noah Mendelsohn - due 2012-04-24]. 17:16:51 Topic: Close pending Actions without discussion 17:17:08 there are 4 issues to be closed, talk now or else we will close them 17:17:41 Proposal to close in bulk ACTION-627,ACTION-662, ACTION-673, ACTION-674, ACTION-676 17:18:07 RESOLVED: to close in bulk ACTION-627,ACTION-662, ACTION-673, ACTION-674, ACTION-676 17:18:27 close ACTION-627 17:18:27 ACTION-627 Schedule very detailed line-by-line review of Pub&Linking draft at January F2F closed 17:18:35 close ACTION-662 17:18:35 ACTION-662 Redraft proposed product page on API Minimization (http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/apiminimization.html) closed 17:18:43 close ACTION-673 17:18:45 ACTION-673 Prepare for F2F discussion of httpRange-14 change proposals Due 2012-03-13 closed 17:18:48 close ACTION-674 17:18:48 ACTION-674 encourage Chris Lilley to meet with us to discuss 3023bis and semantics of Fragment Identifiers closed 17:18:49 zakim, who is here? 17:18:49 On the phone I see JeniT, Ashok_Malhotra, timbl_, jar, ht, Yves, plinss, noah 17:18:52 On IRC I see noah, Zakim, RRSAgent, Ashok, jar, Norm, ht, timbl, JeniT, plinss, trackbot, Yves 17:18:52 close ACTION-676 17:18:52 ACTION-676 Check with Norm whether there is sufficient feedback on HTML/XML to merit F2F discussion closed 17:19:09 Topic: ISSUE-50 (URNsAndRegistries-50): Registries 17:19:17 Noah: should we wait to have Larry ? 17:19:20 Looking at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-appsawg-media-type-regs-04 17:19:32 Jeni: would be far better to have Larry to discuss this 17:19:59 jar: there was a deadline soon (like this week) 17:20:23 jar: reviewed the diff, I find it weak wrt fragment ids 17:22:18 jeni: might be good to wait until next week and have a short call about that 17:22:19 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2012Apr/0043.html 17:22:34 deadline is tomorrow 17:22:37 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2012Apr/0043.html 17:23:12 ht: it's WGLC so we are not entirely too late 17:24:07 noah: regarding Jeni's document, there was a 2 days of silence = consent 17:24:39 https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2012Apr/0003.html 17:26:22 ACTION-680? 17:26:22 ACTION-680 -- Noah Mendelsohn to schedule (soon) TAG telcon review of http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-appsawg-media-type-regs-04 -- due 2012-04-17 -- PENDINGREVIEW 17:26:22 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/680 17:27:11 ACTION-680? 17:27:12 ACTION-680 -- Jeni Tennison to lead TAG telcon review (rescheduled) of http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-appsawg-media-type-regs-04 -- due 2012-04-24 -- PENDINGREVIEW 17:27:12 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/680 17:27:47 Topic: Web Applications: Security 17:27:48 ACTION-344? 17:27:48 ACTION-344 -- Jonathan Rees to alert TAG chair when CORS and/or UMP goes to LC to trigger security review -- due 2012-03-27 -- PENDINGREVIEW 17:27:48 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/344 17:28:30 jar: the question is "is the security consideration section is accurate" 17:28:32 q+ 17:28:40 http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-cors-20120403/#security 17:28:44 s/is accurate/accurate?/ 17:29:49 jar: some suggestion were requested but not sure they made it in the security consideration section. Having an external review would be helpful 17:30:17 ack next 17:30:52 ashok: looked at the webapps wg charter and it looks like they stopped working on UMP. 17:30:59 jar: UMP was folded into CORS 17:32:37 the flag says: Use my ambient credentials, or don't. 17:32:43 q? 17:32:52 if the flag is off, you have UMP 17:34:35 noah: do you think we should invite tlr when larry is around (to see if there are plans for ietf review of this document) 17:34:49 ht: first instance would be to ask tlr via email 17:35:02 close ACTION-344 17:35:02 ACTION-344 Alert TAG chair when CORS and/or UMP goes to LC to trigger security review closed 17:35:29 ACTION: Jonathan to check with Thomas Roessler on whether security review of CORS is coming up in W3C/IETF liaison 17:35:29 Created ACTION-695 - Check with Thomas Roessler on whether security review of CORS is coming up in W3C/IETF liaison [on Jonathan Rees - due 2012-04-19]. 17:36:11 NoahDroid has joined #tagmem 17:36:35 Per HT request on 15 March 2012, I think we should discuss whether we think XML-ER is adopting the right goals and use cases. At F2F if it fits. 17:37:02 noah: it seems suboptimal to talk about that without Robin 17:37:36 ht: would be good to wait two weeks 17:38:57 ACTION: Jeni to frame discussion of XML-ER goals and use cases - Due 2012-04-24 17:38:57 Created ACTION-696 - frame discussion of XML-ER goals and use cases [on Jeni Tennison - due 2012-04-24]. 17:39:22 ACTION-656? 17:39:22 ACTION-656 -- Noah Mendelsohn to schedule discussion of possibly getting W3C to invest in technologies for liberal XML processing (e.g. XML5) -- due 2012-04-24 -- PENDINGREVIEW 17:39:22 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/656 17:39:50 topic: closing actions 17:39:53 The question for me is: Are languages for which all strings are valid (nonerroneous) sentences architecturally good or bad? 17:39:58 ACTION-564? 17:39:58 ACTION-564 -- Henry Thompson to track fragid issues in 3023bis, report to TAG and/or communicate with 3023bis editors as appropriate -- due 2012-04-02 -- PENDINGREVIEW 17:39:58 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/564 17:40:15 ACTION-628? 17:40:15 ACTION-628 -- Henry Thompson to work with Chris Lilley to bring forward prose for 3023bis wrt generic processing of fragment identifiers which addresses the rdf+xml and xhtml+xml issues -- due 2012-04-02 -- PENDINGREVIEW 17:40:15 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/628 17:40:23 Topic: Pending review actions 17:40:26 close ACTION-628 17:40:26 ACTION-628 Work with Chris Lilley to bring forward prose for 3023bis wrt generic processing of fragment identifiers which addresses the rdf+xml and xhtml+xml issues closed 17:40:30 -Ashok_Malhotra 17:41:04 Henry to reopen and reschedule ACTION-564 17:41:52 Noah: is there a volunteer for chairing and the agenda for next week? 17:43:08 chair for next week: ht 17:43:20 ACTION-680? 17:43:20 ACTION-680 -- Jeni Tennison to lead TAG telcon review (rescheduled) of http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-appsawg-media-type-regs-04 -- due 2012-04-24 -- PENDINGREVIEW 17:43:20 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/680 17:43:33 +Ashok_Malhotra 17:43:47 NoahDroid has joined #tagmem 17:44:16 topic: Overdue actions 17:44:57 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/overdue?sort=owner 17:45:04 ACTION-678? 17:45:04 ACTION-678 -- Robin Berjon to ask Dom if there's something he think would be worth discussing with the TAG -- due 2012-03-22 -- OPEN 17:45:04 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/678 17:45:10 close ACTION-678 17:45:10 ACTION-678 Ask Dom if there's something he think would be worth discussing with the TAG closed 17:45:20 ACTION-659? 17:45:20 ACTION-659 -- Yves Lafon to track IETF efforts on HTTP 2.0 & SPDY Due: 2012-03-20 -- due 2012-03-20 -- OPEN 17:45:20 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/659 17:46:17 ACTION-659 Due: 2012-07-31 17:46:25 ACTION-659 - Due 2012-07-31 17:46:32 ACTION-659? 17:46:32 ACTION-659 -- Yves Lafon to track IETF efforts on HTTP 2.0 & SPDY Due: 2012-03-20 -- due 2012-03-20 -- OPEN 17:46:32 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/659 17:46:49 ACTION-659 Due: 2012-07-31 17:46:54 ACTION-659: Due 2012-07-31 17:46:54 ACTION-659 Track IETF efforts on HTTP 2.0 & SPDY Due: 2012-03-20 notes added 17:48:03 masinter has joined #tagmem 17:48:09 ACTION-638 17:48:12 close ACTION-638 17:48:12 ACTION-638 Help Noah figure out best ways, if at all, for TAG to participate in IETF paris closed 17:48:16 ACTION-594? 17:48:16 ACTION-594 -- Yves Lafon to with Peter and Henry produce partial revision of fragment id finding -- due 2012-03-13 -- OPEN 17:48:16 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/594 17:48:25 close ACTION-594? 17:48:29 was discussed at F2f 17:48:30 +1 for closing 17:48:41 ACTION-683? 17:48:41 ACTION-683 -- Yves Lafon to figure out who might be a good choice to present Hybi (and as appropriate WebSocket protocols) to the TAG -- due 2012-04-09 -- OPEN 17:48:41 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/683 17:49:56 ACTION-683 Due 2012-04-24 17:49:56 ACTION-683 Figure out who might be a good choice to present Hybi (and as appropriate WebSocket protocols) to the TAG due date now 2012-04-24 17:50:12 ACTION-679? 17:50:12 ACTION-679 -- Yves Lafon to check how Appcache should fit into Ashok's storage document -- due 2012-04-02 -- OPEN 17:50:12 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/679 17:50:37 ACTION-679 Due 2012-04-31 17:50:37 ACTION-679 check how Appcache should fit into Ashok's storage document due date now 2012-04-31 17:51:01 close ACTION-594 17:51:01 ACTION-594 With Peter and Henry produce partial revision of fragment id finding closed 17:51:15 ACTION-677? 17:51:15 ACTION-677 -- Noah Mendelsohn to contact HTML WG co-chairs to ask about timing for output of Encrypted Media TF -- due 2012-03-24 -- OPEN 17:51:15 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/677 17:52:49 ACTION-677 Due 2012-04-24 17:52:49 ACTION-677 Contact HTML WG co-chairs to ask about timing for output of Encrypted Media TF due date now 2012-04-24 17:53:07 ACTION-687? 17:53:07 ACTION-687 -- Noah Mendelsohn to look for opportunities to discuss putting forward something to the AB about the Process and the failed reference from RECs to expired RFCs as a side-effect of scope creep etc. -- due 2012-04-04 -- OPEN 17:53:07 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/687 17:53:33 expired internet drafts 17:53:49 RFCs don't expire 17:54:53 ACTION-687 Due 2012-04-24 17:54:53 ACTION-687 Look for opportunities to discuss putting forward something to the AB about the Process and the failed reference from REC drafts to expired RFCs as a side-effect of scope creep etc. due date now 2012-04-24 17:55:05 edited action name 17:55:05 ACTION-677? 17:55:05 ACTION-677 -- Noah Mendelsohn to contact HTML WG co-chairs to ask about timing for output of Encrypted Media TF -- due 2012-04-24 -- OPEN 17:55:05 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/677 17:55:14 ACTION-667? 17:55:14 ACTION-667 -- Noah Mendelsohn to check, when publishing and linking wraps, whether it's time to reinvest in http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/12/evolution/Registries.html -- due 2012-04-01 -- OPEN 17:55:14 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/667 17:55:27 ACTION-667 Due 2012-07-15 17:55:27 ACTION-667 Check, when publishing and linking wraps, whether it's time to reinvest in http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/12/evolution/Registries.html due date now 2012-07-15 17:55:36 ACTION-657? 17:55:36 ACTION-657 -- Noah Mendelsohn to schedule telcon discussion of possible XML/HTML Unification next steps -- due 2012-04-10 -- OPEN 17:55:36 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/657 17:55:59 close ACTION-657 17:55:59 ACTION-657 Schedule telcon discussion of possible XML/HTML Unification next steps closed 17:56:16 ACTION-636 Due 2012-07-15 17:56:16 ACTION-636 Update product page for Mime and the Web due date now 2012-07-15 17:56:27 ACTION-201? 17:56:27 ACTION-201 -- Jonathan Rees to report on status of AWWSW discussions -- due 2012-03-31 -- OPEN 17:56:27 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/201 17:56:31 +??P15 17:57:02 zakim, +??p15 is me 17:57:02 sorry, masinter, I do not recognize a party named '+??p15' 17:57:11 ACTION-201 Due 2012-05-15 17:57:11 ACTION-201 Report on status of AWWSW discussions due date now 2012-05-15 17:57:20 ACTION-649 17:57:22 ACTION-649? 17:57:22 ACTION-649 -- Jeni Tennison to produce a document with examples motivating the technical points in the Copyright/Linking document -- due 2012-03-20 -- OPEN 17:57:22 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/649 17:57:26 [Larry Masinter joins the call] 17:57:42 JT: I found this hard to do, would like to just close this. 17:57:51 close ACTION-649 17:57:51 ACTION-649 Produce a document with examples motivating the technical points in the Copyright/Linking document closed 17:59:37 q+ 17:59:49 ack mext 17:59:50 Topic: (URNsAndRegistries-50): Registries 18:00:11 BTW, Larry, I will send the e-mail after the call today 18:00:11 larry: we need to ensure that fragment identifiers are well defined 18:00:43 jeni: there should also be a place where top-level schemes could have a hook to define fragments 18:01:20 people who register media types should have guidance 18:02:18 jeni: and the +xml/+json/+... schemes as well 18:02:33 if we're going to ask them to make a reference to a document we haven't written, we should have a schedule for when we're going to do it 18:03:30 Our draft note says: 18:03:31 We believe media type registration authors should be pointed to these recommendations by reference from draft-ietf-appsawg-media-type-regs. 18:03:31 We would like to coordinate the development of these documents effectively and would appreciate your feedback on how best to accomplish this. 18:04:05 -Ashok_Malhotra 18:05:06 +Ashok_Malhotra 18:06:20 i'm willing to help, the question is what others on the TAG think about priorities 18:07:03 if the rest of the TAG doesn't want to make this a top priority, we oculd just say "they should do something but we can't be ready in time to really write it ourselves", but even then we'd need to review it 18:09:51 well, if you look at their document, i'd imagine they'd want something in a similar tone. I'm not sure if it's an internet draft / rfc format 18:10:19 noah: would be better to write it in the form of a TAG document 18:10:43 main issue is to have the content right 18:10:48 i'd ask appsawg chairs 18:11:05 i don't have anything to say about ORS now 18:11:10 CORS 18:12:42 CORS is in webappsec 18:12:50 Brad Hill 18:13:21 larry: I trust form the people in the groups that there is coordination 18:13:24 s/form/from/ 18:13:31 EKR is co-chair of webappsec 18:13:36 noah: make sense 18:13:50 DANE last call today 18:16:53 LM is not suggesting security research in isolation, but rather as a test of ideas that we are thinking about elsewhere (such as URI semantics and "ownership") 18:17:10 thanks, Jonathan, yes 18:17:20 Yves, can you help? 18:17:32 ACTION: Larry to prepare overview of DANE for TAG consideration - Due 2012-05-15 18:17:32 Created ACTION-697 - prepare overview of DANE for TAG consideration [on Larry Masinter - due 2012-05-15]. 18:18:42 noah: I delegate to ht the right to cancel the meeting for next week 18:18:50 -ht 18:18:51 ADJOURNED 18:18:52 -Ashok_Malhotra 18:18:54 -noah 18:18:56 -Yves 18:18:57 -plinss 18:19:01 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/04/12-tagmem-minutes.html Yves 18:19:01 -masinter 18:23:23 Zakim, who is making noise? 18:23:26 zakim, who is on the call? 18:23:26 On the phone I see JeniT, timbl_, jar 18:23:37 timbl, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: JeniT (41%) 18:23:52 -JeniT 18:24:11 +??P4 18:24:15 timbl, http://www.w3.org/wiki/HR14aCompromise is my compromise proposal. 18:35:35 -??P4 18:43:21 -timbl_ 18:43:22 -jar 18:43:22 TAG_Weekly()1:00PM has ended 18:43:22 Attendees were Ashok_Malhotra, timbl_, JeniT, jar, ht, Yves, plinss, noah, masinter 19:38:30 ht has joined #tagmem 20:47:46 timbl has joined #tagmem 20:47:59 Zakim has left #tagmem 21:07:23 JeniT has joined #tagmem