16:00:38  RRSAgent has joined #html-techs-tf
16:00:38  logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/04/09-html-techs-tf-irc
16:00:45  zakim, this will be 9224
16:00:45  ok, jamesn; I see WAI_HTML TT()11:30AM scheduled to start 30 minutes ago
16:01:31  zakim, this is 9224
16:01:31  ok, jamesn; that matches WAI_HTML TT()11:30AM
16:01:39  zakim, who is on the phone?
16:01:39  On the phone I see James_Nurthen
16:02:16  meeting: HTML Techniques Task Force
16:02:23  chair: James_Nurthen
16:03:08  agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2012AprJun/0008.html
16:03:33  jamesn has changed the topic to: Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2012AprJun/0008.html (jamesn)
16:04:03  +??P15
16:04:22  zakim, P15 is Loretta
16:04:22  sorry, jamesn, I do not recognize a party named 'P15'
16:04:31  zakim, ??P15 is Loretta
16:04:31  +Loretta; got it
16:04:33  Loretta has joined #html-techs-tf
16:05:46  + +1.217.244.aaaa
16:05:51  marcjohlic has joined #html-techs-tf
16:06:03  regrets+ Bruce_Bailey Joshue_O_Connor
16:06:15  +Marc_Johlic
16:06:17  +Cooper
16:06:32  zakim, aaaa is Jon_Gunderson
16:06:32  +Jon_Gunderson; got it
16:07:11  rrsagent, make log world
16:07:28  rrsagent, make minutes
16:07:28  I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/04/09-html-techs-tf-minutes.html jamesn
16:08:10  scribe: Jon
16:08:18  scribeNick: jongund
16:08:22  zakim, scribe: jon
16:08:22  I don't understand 'scribe: jon', jongund
16:08:52  JN: There were two items on the survey, and the people are not here who proposed them
16:09:03  JN: We could send the minutes to them
16:09:19  TOPIC: 332
16:09:46  LG: Maybe it is fine, but it could be a topic of discussion
16:10:06  LG: There is no way to find out the original placeholder
16:10:17  JN: AT could do that and maybe a plug-in
16:10:34  JN: I see your concern, whether it is correct or not
16:10:50  LG: Clearly meets the spirit when it is there
16:11:03  JN: Does WCAG require the label must be visible?
16:11:10  LG: Not directly
16:11:42  LG: This is definitely 3.3.2
16:11:52  JN: This is not a 3.3.1
16:12:16  LG: You still need a label for a screen reader, maybe it is a 3.3.5 technqiue
16:13:17  LG: It seems more like 332
16:13:38  LG: This type of example is in 3.3.2 techniques
16:14:01  JN: It should always be in combination with a label
16:14:16  JN: Provide descriptive labels and one of the following
16:16:14  JN: Are you happy with your concerns of the place holder label disappearing?
16:16:19  LG: yes
16:17:51  JN: JG: I am not sure
16:18:30  JG: I could try testing it
16:19:58  http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/html-api-map/raw-file/tip/Overview.html
16:22:05  JN: There is a reference in the accessible description section to the use of @placeholder
16:22:16  JN: Not sure if actually supported
16:25:48  JN: @placeholder can be used for example values
16:26:46  JN: @placeholder is an example 
16:26:59  The placeholder attribute represents a short hint (a word or short phrase) intended to aid the user with data entry. A hint could be a sample value or a brief description of the expected format. 
16:27:11  The placeholder attribute should not be used as an alternative to a label.
16:27:18  LN: What could you use @placeholder for in WCAG 2.0, is the question
16:28:08  JN: @placeholder could be a visual lable and search button next to it
16:28:35  JN: Should be an HTML5 validation failure if you do not have a label
16:28:45  JN: Anything else on placeholder
16:28:54  https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/htmltechs-20120409/results
16:29:29  http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Using_HTML5_section_elements
16:29:46  TOPIC: Using HTML5 Section element
16:29:57  https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/htmltechs-20120409/results#xsection
16:30:27  LG: Working on the test procedure would help with the technique
16:31:18  JG: Is that the proper use of ARTICLE?
16:31:26  LG: I not sure
16:31:49  LG: It is good if a test procedure can be used in isolation
16:33:45  Discuss this technique next week
16:34:09  JN: FTF meeting at Lyon, get more people involved
16:34:28  JN: Try to get some techniques written
16:34:33  LG: I will be there
16:34:45  JN: Josh will be there, I may be able to come
16:35:07  MC: People from other groups will be there, PF, Authoring
16:35:32  JN: The overlap ones are a big issue, there are mon/tues and thurs/fri
16:36:08  LG: I think we can make it a working session with an agenda, may attact participation
16:36:24  LG: We would need to have a detailed draft agenda soon
16:36:30  JN: MC what are the timeline?
16:36:53  MC: There is a survey now, I am looking when it closes
16:37:41  MC: 30 April is the deadline
16:37:55  MC: Difficult to backout if things don't work
16:38:04  JN: Who will be attending
16:38:24  LG: having an agenda will help
16:38:47  MC: We have enough people to fill time, it is a question of people participating
16:39:30  LG: Maybe we can get a discussion going
16:40:33  rrsagent draft, minutes
16:40:43  rrsagent, draft minutes
16:40:43  I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/04/09-html-techs-tf-minutes.html jongund
16:40:57  -James_Nurthen
16:40:58  -Jon_Gunderson
16:40:58  -Marc_Johlic
16:41:00  -Loretta
16:41:06  -Cooper
16:41:07  WAI_HTML TT()11:30AM has ended
16:41:07  Attendees were James_Nurthen, Loretta, +1.217.244.aaaa, Marc_Johlic, Cooper, Jon_Gunderson
17:04:03  MichaelC_ has joined #html-techs-tf
18:48:27  Zakim has left #html-techs-tf
19:56:21  jamesn has joined #html-techs-tf