15:03:03 RRSAgent has joined #rdf-wg 15:03:03 logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/04/04-rdf-wg-irc 15:03:09 trackbot, start meeting 15:03:11 RRSAgent, make logs world 15:03:13 Zakim, this will be 73394 15:03:13 ok, trackbot; I see SW_RDFWG()11:00AM scheduled to start 3 minutes ago 15:03:14 Meeting: RDF Working Group Teleconference 15:03:14 Date: 04 April 2012 15:03:16 Zakim, who is here? 15:03:16 I notice SW_RDFWG()11:00AM has restarted 15:03:17 On the phone I see ??P0, Guus, +1.408.996.aaaa, David_Wood, ??P10, Sandro, Ivan 15:03:17 On IRC I see RRSAgent, Zakim, Guus, SteveH, yvesr, pchampin, AZ, mischat, gavinc, MacTed, LeeF, ivan, Arnaud1, danbri, davidwood, manu, manu1, mdmdm_, NickH, trackbot, sandro, 15:03:18 ... ericP 15:03:20 + +1.707.861.aabb 15:03:32 PatH has joined #rdf-wg 15:03:34 Zakim, aabb is me 15:03:34 +gavinc; got it 15:03:35 Zakim, ??P0 is me 15:03:36 +yvesr; got it 15:03:38 zakim, aaaa is me 15:03:38 +Arnaud1; got it 15:03:56 zakim, who is here? 15:03:56 On the phone I see yvesr, Guus, Arnaud1, David_Wood, ??P10, Sandro, Ivan, gavinc 15:03:58 zakim, aaaa is me 15:03:59 On IRC I see PatH, RRSAgent, Zakim, Guus, SteveH, yvesr, pchampin, AZ, mischat, gavinc, MacTed, LeeF, ivan, Arnaud, danbri, davidwood, manu, manu1, mdmdm_, NickH, trackbot, sandro, 15:03:59 ... ericP 15:03:59 sorry, AZ, I do not recognize a party named 'aaaa' 15:04:42 +PatH 15:04:49 zakim, ??P10 is me 15:04:49 +AZ; got it 15:05:17 zakim, mute me 15:05:17 PatH should now be muted 15:05:35 + +1.781.273.aacc 15:05:50 Zakim, aacc is OpenLink_Software 15:05:50 +OpenLink_Software; got it 15:05:55 Zakim, OpenLink_Software is temporarily me 15:05:55 +MacTed; got it 15:05:59 Zakim, mute me 15:05:59 MacTed should now be muted 15:06:03 cgreer has joined #rdf-wg 15:06:11 Zakim, unmute me 15:06:11 MacTed should no longer be muted 15:06:22 zakim, mute me 15:06:22 Ivan should now be muted 15:06:45 + +1.707.318.aadd 15:07:42 Sebastopol! Forever! 15:08:12 zakim, +1.707 is cgreer 15:08:12 +cgreer; got it 15:09:12 zwu2 has joined #rdf-wg 15:09:18 zakim, code? 15:09:18 the conference code is 73394 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), zwu2 15:09:23 scribenick: MacTed 15:09:49 PROPOSED: accept minutes of 2012-03-28, http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2012-03-28 15:09:57 + +1.650.265.aaee 15:09:59 RESOLVED: accept minutes of 2012-03-28, http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2012-03-28 15:10:11 zakim, +1.650.265.aaee is me 15:10:11 +zwu2; got it 15:10:16 AlexHall has joined #rdf-wg 15:10:17 zakim, mute me 15:10:17 zwu2 should now be muted 15:10:18 TOPIC: Action Items 15:10:38 + +1.443.212.aaff 15:10:48 zakim, aaff is me 15:10:48 +AlexHall; got it 15:13:54 TOPIC: Turtle LC 15:15:04 +EricP 15:15:18 -EricP 15:16:38 [[ colon-related actions taken, followup expected on list ]] 15:17:15 TOPIC: Turtle LC intermediate comments, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Mar/0156.html 15:17:52 +EricP 15:18:23 Gavin: summarizing main issues... consistency and import of whether N-Triples is defined as a subset of Turtle, or Turtle is defined an extension of N-Triples 15:18:29 pchampin_ has joined #rdf-wg 15:19:58 Eric: initially tried to write with more distinction between Turtle being distinct from N-Triples, but it became easier to write with a blur 15:20:22 s/Turtle being distinct from N-Triples/Turtle and N-Triples/ 15:21:45 ... priority is to make spec explicit for parsers and implementers, but also try to be nice and make something readable for authors 15:24:44 [[ discussion of which really takes priority ... ]] 15:25:47 pchampin has joined #rdf-wg 15:28:19 [[ discussion about title and thus doc focus -- perhaps Turtle with N-Triples as appendix/chapter? ]] 15:29:07 q+ 15:30:15 rnaudack 15:30:25 ack Arnaud 15:30:27 Arnaud: agrees we should focus on Turtle, and introduce N-Triples at the end 15:31:21 q? 15:31:23 +1 call it "simple statement", etc, and then later say n-triples == simple statements, simple terms. 15:31:31 simple is good 15:31:33 :) 15:31:54 pchampin has joined #rdf-wg 15:32:10 Guus: call for any other points from review needing discussion 15:32:39 http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/index.html#sec-escapes 15:33:07 gavinc: "5.3 Escape Sequences" needs touch 15:34:21 [[ quick discussion resolved ]] 15:34:49 gavinc: no qname defined for Turtle... do we need one? 15:34:52 -PatH 15:34:56 http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/index.html#sec-identifiers 15:35:22 Im still on IRC, will call back on phone. 15:35:58 ... why are we defining an XML namespace for Turtle? 15:36:00 q+ 15:36:37 ack ivan 15:36:50 http://www.w3.org/ns/formats/data/Turtle 15:37:08 http://www.w3.org/ns/formats/Turtle 15:37:25 ivan: there is a URI to identify the format, http://www.w3.org/ns/formats/Turtle ... is that what we're talking about? 15:38:03 gavinc: submission defined format URI, as well as XML namespace and localname. still wondering why the latter are there. 15:38:34 ... 15:38:37 ? 15:38:49 The XML (Namespace name, Local name) pair that identifies the Turtle language is: 15:38:51 Namespace: http://www.dajobe.org/2004/01/turtle# 15:38:52 Local name: turtle 15:38:54 The suggested namespace prefix is ttl (informative) which would make this ttl:turtle as an XML QName. 15:39:08 gavinc: any objections to removing XML namespace and localname? 15:39:31 PROPOSAL: remove XML namespace and localname definitions (from 2004 draft) from current doc 15:39:36 +! 15:39:39 +1 15:39:39 PROPOSED: remove XML namespace and localname from Turtle 15:39:40 +1 15:40:05 RESOLVED: remove XML namespace and localname definitions (from 2004 draft) from current doc 15:41:15 TOPIC: Turtle LC planning 15:42:41 [[ do we need another draft round? or will LC be next output? ]] 15:43:33 [[ rough consensus that this round of editorial ToDo will result in LC-ready draft, but timing probably pushes back ]] 15:45:12 zakim, who ishere? 15:45:12 I don't understand your question, Guus. 15:45:24 +PatH 15:45:29 Zakim, who's here? 15:45:29 On the phone I see yvesr, Guus, Arnaud1 (muted), David_Wood, AZ, Sandro, Ivan, gavinc, MacTed, cgreer, zwu2 (muted), AlexHall, EricP, PatH 15:45:32 On IRC I see pchampin, AlexHall, zwu2, cgreer, PatH, RRSAgent, Zakim, Guus, SteveH, yvesr, AZ, mischat, gavinc, MacTed, LeeF, ivan, Arnaud, danbri, davidwood, manu, manu1, mdmdm_, 15:45:32 ... NickH, trackbot, sandro, ericP 15:45:39 I'm on IRC, but I can't manage to dial in :-( 15:45:43 zakim, mute me 15:45:43 PatH should now be muted 15:45:58 I confirm: *I* volunteeded to review the turtle document, not Antoine... 15:46:55 pchampin, andy's review has prompted a major re-write. to save frustration, you may as well wait for word that the doc is stable 15:47:11 no problem 15:47:50 TOPIC: aside, re JSON-LD... 15:48:14 davidwood: JSON-LD spec has made much progress, no other WG has charter to deal with it 15:48:17 +0.5 for JSON-LD in this working group 15:48:22 Guus: we may revisit it soon 15:48:32 TOPIC: Named Graphs semantics 15:49:24 Guus: current proposal on wiki is extra nice because it has lots of tests 15:50:34 +Arnaud.a 15:50:41 -Arnaud1 15:51:06 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Apr/0027.html 15:51:49 -Arnaud.a 15:52:12 zakim, unmute me 15:52:12 PatH should no longer be muted 15:52:55 sandro, why do you want to impose this functionality? 15:53:19 sandro: most everyone agrees that Graph Names are unique within a data set. less agreement that Graph Names are unique in the world. 15:53:19 ... if you're going to say something hasGraph it can *only* have *one* graph, regardless of context 15:54:37 PatH: could weaken that (or break it) and then be able to handle more cases 15:54:57 +Arnaud 15:57:40 DB1 matches SELECT*{GRAPH {:Fido a :Dog}} while DB2 matches SELECT*{GRAPH {:Fido a :Dog, :Mammal}} 15:57:41 sandro: strawman proposal is that when you say graphName holds { triples }, that's a closed and complete list 15:59:34 q+ 16:00:10 ack ivan 16:00:51 [[ discussion of strawmen ]] 16:01:00 PatH: could be two snapshots of the same container 16:01:03 q+ to characterize that restriction 16:01:13 +1 to ivan 16:01:16 q+ 16:01:34 ivan: restriction proposed seems entirely unenforceable 16:02:21 ... people *will* use same name for GRAPHs with different tripleset content 16:02:34 if we make the rules stiff, people will snap them. 16:02:36 ... (they *do* today) 16:03:30 I will say that if Ivan doesnt. 16:03:55 q+ 16:04:12 sandro: they're saying "GRAPH contains" rather than "GRAPH is" "this data" 16:04:22 what if we have two semantics?: high-semantics: make sure all names refer to the same thing, low: do what you want 16:04:23 ack ericP 16:04:28 ericP, you wanted to characterize that restriction 16:05:00 q+ to ask about the current state of container 16:06:12 sandro: prefers simply high-semantics 16:06:28 ack MacTed 16:06:29 MacTed: Gbox, Gsnap distinction seems lacking. this discussion seems to blur the two. 16:07:00 good point. 16:08:30 ack PatH 16:09:55 PatH: instincts are to support sandro. problem is that there are lots of "lower" semantics which are internally consistent, but don't fit into strict CoolURI picture. 16:10:19 SteveH has joined #rdf-wg 16:11:23 ack Guus 16:11:23 Guus, you wanted to ask about the current state of container 16:11:40 q+ 16:12:24 pat: q? 16:12:26 q? 16:12:48 Guus: question... URI of a graph container. if I get two snapshots with two different sets of triples, they should have different labels? 16:12:57 sandro: change over time is a different question... 16:13:55 ack cgreer 16:13:57 q? 16:14:21 we could always start a new WG... 16:14:24 q+ to say that there are use case examples which address time 16:14:27 sandro: If we're going to talk about change-over-time, let's settle it for foaf:age *before* we try to settle it for dereference. 16:15:12 MacTed: time is just another axis of context. it's all contextual. 16:15:39 do i detect a certtain burnout? 16:15:48 yes. 16:15:50 so done. 16:17:41 -Ivan 16:17:42 -PatH 16:17:44 -David_Wood 16:17:46 -AlexHall 16:17:46 -gavinc 16:17:47 -Arnaud 16:17:48 AlexHall has left #rdf-wg 16:17:49 -AZ 16:17:51 -cgreer 16:17:57 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:17:57 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/04/04-rdf-wg-minutes.html MacTed 16:18:01 RRSAgent, make logs public 16:18:09 -zwu2 16:18:32 -yvesr 16:23:35 -Guus 16:23:43 -MacTed 16:23:46 done! 16:25:30 -Sandro 16:25:39 sorry, accidentally hung up 16:25:54 -EricP 16:25:55 np 16:25:56 SW_RDFWG()11:00AM has ended 16:25:56 Attendees were Guus, +1.408.996.aaaa, David_Wood, Sandro, Ivan, +1.707.861.aabb, gavinc, yvesr, Arnaud1, PatH, AZ, +1.781.273.aacc, MacTed, +1.707.318.aadd, cgreer, zwu2, 16:25:56 ... +1.443.212.aaff, AlexHall, EricP, Arnaud 16:25:57 but yes, we can geek about this soon, ericP 16:51:09 mischat has joined #rdf-wg 17:29:10 mischat_ has joined #rdf-wg 17:40:21 EricP and Sandro, It looks like I'm going to be in Boston a couple of times in coming months. Perhaps we can arrange some hours to geek. 17:45:52 that would presume that we were geeks 17:57:57 OK, I'll just meet with Sandro then :) 18:18:08 mischat_ has joined #rdf-wg 18:30:59 Zakim has left #rdf-wg 19:53:38 mox601 has joined #rdf-wg 21:14:43 swh has joined #rdf-wg 21:22:21 mischat has joined #rdf-wg 22:12:31 mox601 has joined #rdf-wg