Government Linked Data Working Group Teleconference -- 29 Mar 2012

<trackbot> Date: 29 March 2012

<cgueret> hello!

<BenediktKaempgen> hello?

Preliminary Items

Proposal: to accept the minutes from the 22-March-2012 meeting http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/meeting/2012-03-22

<bhyland> Propose to accept minutes: http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/meeting/2012-03-22

<MartinKaltenboeck> very noisy here

<DaveReynolds> I was already muted

<mhausenblas> +1

<martinAlvarez> +1

<boris> +1

<MartinKaltenboeck> +1

resolution: accepted minutes

Discuss any important and timely matters and opportunities to liaise with other WG/CG/IG

<bhyland> Agenda: +1 Copenhagen event

Thanks!

<MartinKaltenboeck> http://www.data-forum.eu/

Main Agenda: W3C Transition Process, GeoLinkedData, update on FPWDs: http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20120329

Four FPWD back

<sandro> https://www.w3.org/Guide/

What to expect in FPWD to Rec Track Process (Sandro)

Recommendation Track Process

<BenediktKaempgen> Nice, thankgs for the link, sandro.

<Yigal> Need password...

<DaveReynolds> Sandro, I have access even though I'm an IE

Invited Experts may not be able to see page.

<bhyland> If you cannot see the "Art of Consensus" please indicate this to the chairs so we can try to organize access for you

<BartvanLeeuwen> no access either

Sandro will argue to make page open.

<MartinKaltenboeck> no access either

<bhyland> Sandro: Is going to request that this page be made public as there is nothing confidential in it

<rreck> what is "the page" Sandro is talking about?

<sandro> https://www.w3.org/Guide/

<rreck> thanks

<sandro> http://services.w3.org/xslt?xmlfile=http://www.w3.org/2005/08/01-transitions.html&xslfile=http://www.w3.org/2005/08/transitions.xsl

<rreck> nope, me neither.

<MartinKaltenboeck> this one is open

<sandro> https://www.w3.org/2005/07/pubrules

<Yigal> That one's public, yes.

The Art of Consensus - https://www.w3.org/Guide/ This Guidebook is the collected wisdom of the W3C Group Chairs and other collaborators.

This resource describes the internal W3C Technical Report publication processes.

infrastructure is in place. Once you figure it out, publishing goes pretty quickly.

<Zakim> mhausenblas, you wanted to note that example.com as of RFC2606 http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2606 is also an exception

Benedikt: use example.com

<sandro> or example.org

<DaveReynolds> The Data Cube draft will need editing for that then.

<PhilA2> you can also use any subdomain of the (fictitious) TLD of example, i.e. foo.example is an OK domain name to use

Sandro: will need to run the checkers
... legalese applied and communicate with world about why are we doing this

Bernedette: Placing the work in context via abstract

Bernadette: Abstract should be solid

<PhilA2> ACTION: PhilA2 to work on the abstract of DCAT [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2012/03/29-gld-minutes.html#action01]

<trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - PhilA2

<PhilA2> ACTION: Phil Archer to work on the abstract of DCAT [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2012/03/29-gld-minutes.html#action02]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-60 - Archer to work on the abstract of DCAT [on Phil Archer - due 2012-04-05].

<sandro> folks -- please change your Pub Date to 3 April.

<scribe> ACTION: each leader generate a revised abstract by 20120403 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2012/03/29-gld-minutes.html#action03]

<trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - each

<DaveReynolds> What's the changes to the abstracts?

<bhyland> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/dcat/index.html

<DaveReynolds> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/dcat/index.html

<scribe> ACTION: each DaveRenolds, Mike_Pendleton, generate a revised abstract by 20120403 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2012/03/29-gld-minutes.html#action04]

<trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - each

<rreck> I do not believe I am otherwise committed, if someone needs another set of eyes please let me know.

<boris> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/29a3dd6dc12c/data-cube/index.html

<MartinKaltenboeck> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/data-cube/index.html

*Failing at creating action...

*Thanks!

<PhilA2> ACTION: Dave Reynolds to generate revised abstract for Cube Vocab [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2012/03/29-gld-minutes.html#action05]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-61 - Reynolds to generate revised abstract for Cube Vocab [on Dave Reynolds - due 2012-04-05].

<boris> http://mccarthy.dia.fi.upm.es/ppt/GEOEG.pdf

GeoLinkData Initiative

*Yes, you are correct.

<PhilA2> ACTION: Hausenblas to revise abstract of People vocab by 2012-04001 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2012/03/29-gld-minutes.html#action06]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-62 - Revise abstract of People vocab by 2012-04001 [on Michael Hausenblas - due 2012-04-05].

<boris> http://geovocab.org/doc/neogeo/

<boris> UKARL

<BenediktKaempgen> neogeo, karlsruhe

<rreck> can i forward the slide URL to someone?

<boris> http://mccarthy.dia.fi.upm.es/ppt/GEOEG.pdf

<BenediktKaempgen> KIT, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (UKARL is not existing any more)

<bhyland> Thanks Benedikt

Bernedette: where did funding come from?
... are tools available from the project?

<boris> http://www.oeg-upm.net/index.php/en/downloads/151-geometry2rdf

Yes, it's available.

<boris> http://oegdev.dia.fi.upm.es/projects/map4rdf/

<boris> http://mccarthy.dia.fi.upm.es/goodrelations/#dashboard

<boris> http://mccarthy.dia.fi.upm.es:8181/map4rdf-0.0.3

<Biplav> good idea!

* with a billion countrymen?

<lbermudez> +1

<BenediktKaempgen> Thanks, Boris!

<PhilA2> Thanks Boris

<BenediktKaempgen> +q

<BartvanLeeuwen> indeed great work, can't wait to get started with the dutch dataset ;)

Bernedette: Nice tools, scripts. A great contribution to the world.

<cgueret> very nice work

Bernedette: Looking at integrating map4rdf at work.

<lbermudez> +q

<rreck> *clap*

Biplav: Ease of use in <industry?>?

<Biplav> How easy to use geo LD by a transportation operator?

Boris: should be pretty easy.

Bernedette: Callimachus is template-driven. It looks like map4rdf can be integrated in a coupkle days and create a web 2.0 service.

Benedikt: document some use cases would be good.

Bernadette: Yes, please give some use cases to consider.

* Missing questions :(

<bhyland> @GeraldSteeman, you have the power of "Scribe Interupt" in your toolkit

*Okay.

??: looking to gather data from many places.

*Too embarrassed, you mean.

<lbermudez> Link: Look at Cross-Community Interoperability (CCI): Thread OWS-9 http://www.opengeospatial.org/projects/initiatives/ows-9

Phil: Status NeoGoe vocab. Is it a standard as yet?

<bhyland> Lots of kudos to GeoLinkedData brains trust, the Ontology Engineering Group and your sponsors.

<lbermudez> Question 1: Are you using rules and how are you integrating different community models?

<bhyland> Really nice project from a cooperation perspective, both research & government, and international involvement.

<mhausenblas> +q to talk about NeoGeo as well a bit

<bhyland> PhilA: EU sponsored projects overlap with what NeoGeo and related projects Boris mentioned today.

<mhausenblas> +1 to PhilA2 suggestion

<BartvanLeeuwen> +1 for geo vocab

<bhyland> … Possible support from W3C for geospatial vocab based on work PhilA and Boris are separately involved with ...

Phil: number of EC standards coming out. Hope that NeoGeo would be a W3C standard

<cgueret> +1 for Phil

<lbermudez> +q

<bhyland> We do have this topic in our charter, see: optional: Geography, Spatial Information, such as latitude and longitude. Inputs include http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/geo/XGR-geo-ont/ the European http://inspire.jrc.ec.europa.eu/, and vocabulary elements of http://www.opengeospatial.org/projects/groups/geosparqlswg. (See http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/charter#coordination.)

<BartvanLeeuwen> +q

Phil: may be in good position with W3C based with option item in GLD charter.

<bhyland> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/glossary/index.html

Bernedette: leaders please check your actions.

<MartinKaltenboeck> how can I contribute to the glossary Bernadette?

<PhilA2> Also we *already* have a location vocab coming into the WG imminently - NeoGeo could be another input to create a combined vocab

LOD Glossary

<Mike_Pendleton> Q about the glossary

Announcements

AAAI-12, focus on "Semantic Cities". The idea of the workshop is to discuss open data and how semantics can provide a foundation to facilitate high-value analytics. See: http://research.ihost.com/semanticcities12/index.html

<MartinKaltenboeck> sorry have to jump out for another meeting - bye everybody

<MartinKaltenboeck> @mhausenblas thanks for EDF2012 promo

<MartinKaltenboeck> cheers...

<bhyland> bye Martin

<mhausenblas> akc me

<Mike_Pendleton> +q

<Zakim> mhausenblas, you wanted to talk about NeoGeo as well a bit

Bart: A lot work and $$ in europe for linking data

<Mike_Pendleton> I unmuted

<cgueret> bye

<rreck> ok bye

Mike P: Are terms is glossary tied directly to documents?

<DaveReynolds> bye

<BartvanLeeuwen> thx bye !

<BenediktKaempgen> Thanks, bye

Bernedette: no not that tight.

<Yigal> Bye!

<mhausenblas> Michael: did my action

<mhausenblas> ACTION-62?

<trackbot> ACTION-62 -- Michael Hausenblas to revise abstract of People vocab by 2012-04001 -- due 2012-04-05 -- OPEN

<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/actions/62

<mhausenblas> close ACTION-62

<trackbot> ACTION-62 Revise abstract of People vocab by 2012-04001 closed

<bhyland> @Gerald, are you going to walk thru checklist now?

* Yes

<bhyland> http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Meetings:Telecon20120329#Scribe.27s_End_of_Meeting_Checklist

<bhyland> If you get stuck, I'm standing by.

<bhyland> Thanks for scribing today

@bernadette, got an error with IRC copy log

<bhyland> yes, I see that .. let me try ...

- DRAFT -

Government Linked Data Working Group Teleconference

29 Mar 2012

Attendees

Contents