14:48:25 RRSAgent has joined #eval 14:48:25 logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/03/08-eval-irc 14:48:27 RRSAgent, make logs world 14:48:27 Zakim has joined #eval 14:48:29 Zakim, this will be 3825 14:48:29 ok, trackbot; I see WAI_ERTWG(Eval TF)10:00AM scheduled to start in 12 minutes 14:48:30 Meeting: WCAG 2.0 Evaluation Methodology Task Force Teleconference 14:48:30 Date: 08 March 2012 14:48:40 chair: Eric 14:48:55 regrets: Elle, Alistair, Richard 14:50:24 regrets: Elle, Alistair, Richard, Liz, Tim 14:50:42 regrets: Elle, Alistair, Richard, Liz, Tim, Vincent 14:53:39 MartijnHoutepen has joined #eval 14:54:31 WAI_ERTWG(Eval TF)10:00AM has now started 14:54:38 +??P0 14:54:58 zakim, ??P0 is me 14:54:58 +sds; got it 14:55:19 + +1.602.824.aaaa 14:58:04 +Shadi 14:58:48 zakim, aaaa is Don 14:58:48 +Don; got it 14:58:55 + +31.30.239.aabb 14:59:07 zakim, sds is really ssirois 14:59:07 +ssirois; got it 14:59:16 zakim, aabb is me 14:59:16 +MartijnHoutepen; got it 15:00:15 zakim, mute me 15:00:15 MartijnHoutepen should now be muted 15:00:24 ericvelleman has joined #eval 15:00:48 +??P16 15:00:57 zakim, ??P16 is me 15:00:57 +vivienne; got it 15:01:17 zakim, mute me 15:01:17 vivienne should now be muted 15:01:21 + +31.30.239.aacc 15:01:27 zakim, mute me 15:01:27 ssirois should now be muted 15:01:28 Mike_Elledge has joined #eval 15:02:09 Kerstin has joined #eval 15:02:12 + +1.517.353.aadd 15:02:18 zakim, unmute me 15:02:18 MartijnHoutepen should no longer be muted 15:02:49 - +31.30.239.aacc 15:03:22 zakim, mute me 15:03:22 MartijnHoutepen should now be muted 15:03:34 + +31.30.239.aaee 15:04:19 zakim, aadd is, me 15:04:20 +??P26 15:04:20 I don't understand 'aadd is, me', Mike_Elledge 15:05:11 - +31.30.239.aaee 15:05:20 zakim, add is me 15:05:20 sorry, Mike_Elledge, I do not recognize a party named 'add' 15:05:25 Kathy has joined #eval 15:05:26 zakim, ??P26 is me 15:05:26 +Kerstin; got it 15:05:32 + +1.978.443.aaff 15:05:43 zakim, aadd is me 15:05:43 +Mike_Elledge; got it 15:05:47 + +31.30.239.aagg 15:05:48 Yay! 15:06:07 +1 for the Yay 15:06:12 zakim, aaff is me 15:06:12 +Kathy; got it 15:06:18 :^) 15:06:33 zakim, unmute me 15:06:33 MartijnHoutepen should no longer be muted 15:06:45 zakim, mute me 15:06:45 Kerstin should now be muted 15:06:51 zakim, mute me 15:06:51 Kathy should now be muted 15:06:52 zakim, unmute me 15:06:53 ssirois should no longer be muted 15:07:23 zakim, scribe is me 15:07:23 sorry, ssirois, I do not recognize a party named 'scribe' 15:07:34 scribe: Samuel 15:07:43 scribenick: ssirois 15:08:19 - +31.30.239.aagg 15:08:39 zakim, who is on the phone? 15:08:40 On the phone I see ssirois, Don, Shadi, MartijnHoutepen, vivienne (muted), Mike_Elledge, Kerstin (muted), Kathy (muted) 15:09:03 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-evaltf/2012Mar/0004.html 15:09:16 Topic: New Methodology version 15:09:30 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/ED-methodology-20120306 15:09:36 Sarah_Swierenga has joined #eval 15:09:44 +1 for the new document! 15:10:03 + +1.517.432.aahh 15:10:07 q+ 15:10:11 ericvelleman: New methodoly revision (mostly done by shadi). Section 3 is now more step based. 15:10:14 +1 I like it 15:10:15 q? 15:10:20 ack me 15:10:28 zakim, aahh is Sarah 15:10:28 +Sarah; got it 15:10:33 ericvelleman: What are the comments on that new version? Objections, suggestions? 15:11:01 ack viv 15:11:08 vivienne: Really likes the new flow of the document. Easier to understand. Just sent a couple of emails before this meeting. 15:11:25 [[Note: When a website is being re-evaluated, it is sometimes useful for comparison to include a portion of web pages from the sample selected for the previous evaluation. However, the majority of web pages should be freshly selected to provide an accurate representation of the entire website.]] 15:12:23 + +31.30.239.aaii 15:12:47 q? 15:12:53 zakim, aaii is me 15:12:53 +MartijnHoutepen; got it 15:12:56 zakim, mute me 15:12:56 vivienne should now be muted 15:13:05 zakim, mute me 15:13:05 MartijnHoutepen should now be muted 15:13:06 q+ 15:13:08 q+ 15:13:28 q? 15:13:44 can you take those that I've written already? 15:13:51 vivienne: Step 3.b, did we agree on adding new pages to the already selected pages or did we want to start on a fresh base? I think we have aggreed to add pages to the selected page. We might have to rephrase a little. 15:14:16 ericvelleman: Yes. We have aggreed on that and we shall rephrase. 15:14:33 zakim, unmute me 15:14:33 MartijnHoutepen should no longer be muted 15:14:42 q+ 15:14:50 ack me 15:15:08 [[change "majority" to "freshly"]] 15:15:16 Kathy: I agree that this is a much better draft now. 15:16:05 zakim, unmute me 15:16:05 Kerstin should no longer be muted 15:16:11 Kathy: I feel like we kind of repeat ourselves in 3.a,b and c. Maybe we should tighten things a little? 15:16:32 ericvelleman: Actually, we did try to make those different but if it seems to have overlaps, we shall review that. 15:16:46 [[repitition between 3.a and 3.c regarding pages relevant for people with disabilities]] 15:16:58 ericvelleman: If you see anything that is "already" there, just make sure to point it out. 15:17:01 q? 15:17:08 zakim, mute me 15:17:08 Kathy should now be muted 15:17:10 zakim, who is on the phone? 15:17:11 On the phone I see ssirois, Don, Shadi, MartijnHoutepen, vivienne (muted), Mike_Elledge, Kerstin, Kathy (muted), Sarah, MartijnHoutepen.a 15:17:37 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-evaltf/2012Mar/0016.html 15:18:17 Kerstin: Two major points that i have already sent through email (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-evaltf/2012Mar/0016.html) 15:18:43 -Don 15:19:11 Kerstin: On point 1e and 4b, i have submitted my comments. 15:19:24 +Don 15:19:49 scribe: (note) read through previous URL for more details on Kerstin's thoughts. 15:20:18 zakim, MartijnHoutepen.a is me 15:20:18 +MartijnHoutepen; got it 15:21:16 MartijnHoutepen has left #eval 15:21:25 MartijnHoutepen has joined #eval 15:22:21 shadi: i think that techniques are a good tool to "prove" the conformity declaration. 15:23:07 Kerstin: i think there is a big missunderstanding worldwide on the mandatory aspect of applied techniques for conformity. 15:23:08 q? 15:23:54 shadi: would it be ok if we rephrase the draft to make sure that it is understood that the techniques are not checkpoints for conformity. 15:24:49 "recommend use relevant WCAG 2.0 techniques or their equivalent" 15:24:54 zakim, mute me 15:24:54 Kerstin should now be muted 15:24:56 Kerstin: yes. it is important that the techniques are not looked as the ONLY way to achieve conformity. 15:25:07 q- ker 15:25:54 q+ 15:25:59 ack mike 15:26:25 Mike_Elledge: If the techniques for WCAG 2.0 are not correct, they should be revised because we really want to point to those techniques (not reinventing the wheel) for our methodology. 15:26:34 Mike_Elledge: the step by step process is really great. 15:26:36 ack me 15:26:45 q? 15:27:51 shadi: we have to be carefull that only the techniques published by the w3c are valid. there are great techniques out there. 15:28:39 shadi: it is bogus to think that if none of the techniques match on a website, the website is not conform. 15:29:07 Shadi, could you give us an example? 15:29:09 shadi: we should not add to this missunderstanding with our document. 15:31:17 [[add "resources from W3C" in 1.3]] 15:31:29 Topic: Section 2.1 Scope of Applicability 15:31:44 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/ED-methodology-20120306#applicability 15:32:22 I think that 2.1 covers our discussion well. 15:33:09 q+ 15:33:13 ack me 15:34:29 just 19? ;-) 15:34:58 vivienne: i like the examples. they are selfexplicit and covering a large part of our discussions. maybe add a couple more examples, to make sure to cover all our discussions. 15:35:09 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/ED-methodology-20120306#step1a 15:35:59 [[consider a link forward from 2.1 to Step 1.a]] 15:35:59 I like that the section emphasizes that "The methodology defined by this document applies to full, self-enclosed websites...." and "...the methodology always applies to a full website without exclusions or omissions of website parts...." 15:36:23 zakim, mute me 15:36:23 vivienne should now be muted 15:38:17 ericvelleman: by using the methodology, we might find out that we need more examples. we'll be able to address that in time. 15:39:11 Topic: Section 3 Evaluation Procedure 15:39:35 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/ED-methodology-20120306#procedure 15:39:47 ericvelleman: bringing light to each steps found in section 3. 15:40:21 ericvelleman: i suggess that we concentrate on steps 1,2 and 3 for this week and then go further. 15:40:35 q+ 15:40:41 Zakim, unmute me 15:40:41 Kerstin should no longer be muted 15:40:42 ericvelleman: does anyone think we are missing steps, or having too much steps? 15:40:52 ack ker 15:41:03 Kerstin: i think we are missing the number of pages. 15:41:13 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/ED-methodology-20120306#step3b 15:41:27 q+ 15:41:29 q+ 15:41:35 q- last 15:41:40 q- 15:41:46 q+ 15:41:47 q? 15:41:47 ack me 15:41:49 zakim, mute me 15:41:49 Kerstin should now be muted 15:42:26 ericvelleman: In step 3.b, we are suggesting having at least two distinct web pages. And we precise further more a little later. 15:42:29 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/ED-methodology-20120306#elemental 15:42:58 [[Fundamental web pages that are relevant to the entire website. This includes the homepage, login page, and other entry pages, and, where applicable, the sitemap, contacts, site help, legal information, and similar web pages that are typically linked from all web pages (usually from the header, footer, or navigation menu of a web page).]] 15:43:37 sorry, one of my headsets is broken, the other one empty 15:44:22 vivienne: we should recall "elemental web pages" in step three. 15:45:08 ericvelleman: we could reference it more directly. but it might looks like a repetition of section 1.4 15:45:10 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/ED-methodology-20120306#terms 15:46:00 q? 15:46:10 zakim, mute me 15:46:10 vivienne should now be muted 15:46:49 ack me 15:48:22 shadi: regarding the number of pages. step 3 of section 3 will suffer a lot of revisions before it actually works. but the approach is more "dynamic". even in very large websites, heavily template-driven, maybe just a handfull of pages might be ok, eventhough we have thousands of pages. 15:48:40 q+ 15:48:51 shadi: but in a small website, authored by a lot of contributors, might actually need more pages in the sample. 15:49:09 newbie has joined #eval 15:49:17 shadi: we need much more refinement as we go, but do we agree on the approach? 15:49:30 Mike_Elledge: yes, the approach is good. 15:49:45 ack me 15:49:52 Mike_Elledge: are we restricting the review to entire pages or could we sample just a feature in a page? 15:49:55 ack m 15:49:58 I like the steps so far ver y much, ok,.. except Step 4.b 15:50:08 ericvelleman: the idea (as in wcag2) is to evaluate the whole page. 15:51:04 MartijnHoutepen has joined #eval 15:52:21 shadi: lets say that one of the page contains a video (which is a unique feature of that page). that page would end up in the basket of the pages to evaluate. we previously had concensus that we do not need to re-evaluate the navigation on all pages. 15:52:43 Thanks! 15:52:51 ericvelleman: any other remarks on the document, until step 4? 15:53:13 Topic: Next Steps 15:53:40 I think it will be good to publish this as you suggest. 15:53:50 ericvelleman: would the group agree that we try to publish this version as the first draft? anyone have trouble with this? 15:53:51 https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/48225/WCAG-EM20120306/ 15:53:55 I would like to decide after the changes 15:54:24 shadi: i have prepared a web based survey for everyone to add additionnal comments to the current state of the document. 15:54:27 q+ 15:54:57 shadi: things that must be lookup up before publishing the draft. 15:55:10 shadi: the survey will go until next wednesday. 15:55:54 ack ssirois 15:56:21 shadi: the two parents WG will recieve the survey as well. (since both are responsible for this task force) 15:56:30 q? 15:57:27 ericvelleman: we shall have a "final" version of the first draft (which will be published). 15:58:41 shadi: we are in search of our first consensus on the draft. editor's draft does not represent the group (per say), but the public draft is representing a concensus of the group's ideas on the methodology. 15:58:51 thanks shadi and eric for all the work 15:59:06 zakim, unmute me 15:59:06 Kerstin should no longer be muted 15:59:11 ericvelleman: let's work on this on the comming week. thank you. 15:59:12 bye now see you next week. 15:59:13 -Sarah 15:59:15 bye 15:59:17 -vivienne 15:59:18 Bye! 15:59:19 -Kathy 15:59:20 -Don 15:59:22 -Shadi 15:59:23 -Mike_Elledge 15:59:27 -ssirois 15:59:28 -vivienne 15:59:28 -MartijnHoutepen.aa 15:59:36 -MartijnHoutepen 15:59:37 -Kerstin 15:59:39 WAI_ERTWG(Eval TF)10:00AM has ended 15:59:39 Attendees were +1.602.824.aaaa, Shadi, Don, +31.30.239.aabb, ssirois, MartijnHoutepen, vivienne, +31.30.239.aacc, +1.517.353.aadd, +31.30.239.aaee, Kerstin, +1.978.443.aaff, 15:59:39 ... Mike_Elledge, +31.30.239.aagg, Kathy, +1.517.432.aahh, Sarah, +31.30.239.aaii 16:02:27 ericvelleman has left #eval 16:09:34 trackbot, end meeting 16:09:34 Zakim, list attendees 16:09:34 sorry, trackbot, I don't know what conference this is 16:09:42 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 16:09:42 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/03/08-eval-minutes.html trackbot 16:09:43 RRSAgent, bye 16:09:43 I see no action items