15:42:12 RRSAgent has joined #prov 15:42:12 logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/02/09-prov-irc 15:42:14 RRSAgent, make logs world 15:42:14 Zakim has joined #prov 15:42:16 Zakim, this will be 15:42:16 I don't understand 'this will be', trackbot 15:42:17 Meeting: Provenance Working Group Teleconference 15:42:17 Date: 09 February 2012 15:42:18 Zakim, this will be PROV 15:42:18 ok, Luc; I see SW_(PROV)11:00AM scheduled to start in 18 minutes 15:42:31 Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2012.02.09 15:42:34 Chair: Luc Moreau 15:42:47 rrsagent, make logs public 15:42:51 zakim, who is here? 15:42:51 SW_(PROV)11:00AM has not yet started, Luc 15:42:51 On IRC I see RRSAgent, Luc, MacTed, Stian, trackbot, sandro 15:54:21 q? 15:55:24 q? 15:57:45 Curt has joined #prov 15:58:17 SW_(PROV)11:00AM has now started 15:58:24 +Curt_Tilmes 15:59:17 + +44.238.059.aaaa 15:59:19 satya has joined #prov 15:59:27 tlebo has joined #prov 15:59:35 zakim, +44.238.059.aaaa is me 15:59:44 +Luc; got it 15:59:50 davidschaengold has joined #prov 16:00:25 + +1.315.330.aabb 16:00:28 +Satya_Sahoo 16:00:30 +[IPcaller] 16:00:32 smiles has joined #prov 16:00:32 zakim, I am aabb 16:00:34 Hi, we still need a scribe .... 16:00:39 I'll scribe 16:00:40 + +1.646.389.aacc 16:00:48 thanks tim, everything is setup for you 16:00:51 Zakim, aacc is me 16:00:55 yup, thanks. 16:00:56 scribe: Tim Lebo 16:01:00 +tlebo; got it 16:01:18 +davidschaengold; got it 16:01:21 christine has joined #prov 16:01:50 +[IPcaller.a] 16:02:06 estephan has joined #prov 16:02:23 + +1.509.967.aadd 16:02:58 dgarijo has joined #prov 16:03:15 khalidbelhajjame has joined #prov 16:03:27 jcheney has joined #prov 16:03:46 topic: approve minutes 16:03:59 luc: paul hasn't finished the long minutes, we'll do next week. 16:04:02 http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/actions/open 16:04:03 topic: actions 16:04:30 action 51 16:04:30 Sorry, bad ACTION syntax 16:04:32 http://www.w3.org/blog/SW/2012/02/08/the-provenance-data-model-third-working-draft/ 16:04:53 luc finished the blog on action 51; closed. 16:05:03 +??P77 16:05:13 +??P80 16:05:16 action 52 on satya - continue DM issues. 16:05:16 Sorry, couldn't find user - 52 16:05:17 +??P81 16:05:41 satya: can be folded into the due date next thursday. 16:05:44 action-52? 16:05:44 ACTION-52 -- Satya Sahoo to address issues in http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2012.01.05#prov-dm -- due 2012-01-19 -- OPEN 16:05:44 http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/actions/52 16:05:51 +OpenLink_Software 16:06:00 Zakim, OpenLink_Software is temporarily me 16:06:02 Zakim, mute me 16:06:23 luc: luc and paolo have asked questions that satya has not answered. please respond. 16:06:44 luc: we will be trying to close actions much faster. 16:06:50 +MacTed; got it 16:06:52 MacTed should now be muted 16:07:12 satya: today or tomorrow will respond 16:07:16 https://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/actions/53 16:07:19 zakim, ??P77 is me 16:07:28 action 53 to Kai - bootstrapping dc best practices. 16:07:28 Sorry, couldn't find user - 53 16:07:39 +jcheney; got it 16:08:31 daniel: kai has been working on it, has been getting good responses from other users groups. they seem happy. 16:08:50 luc: will the activity be seen by prov-wg? 16:09:00 +[ISI] 16:09:06 +Sandro 16:09:07 daniel: mostly on the dc side, kai will come back and report. 16:09:18 daniel: eric is hosting a call next monday 16:09:33 daniel is on dc call 16:09:35 YolandaGil has joined #prov 16:09:42 luc: how to monitor progress? 16:09:58 daniel: still getting started. 16:10:20 luc: action is completed because activity is bootstrapped. please report back regularlly. 16:10:33 q? 16:11:10 https://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/actions/54 16:11:11 action-54? 16:11:11 ACTION-54 -- Paul Groth to engage implementation task force to begin developing of a test harness around examples (from tim or others) -- due 2012-02-10 -- OPEN 16:11:11 http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/actions/54 16:11:17 next action is #54 on paolo. Engaging implemenation task force for a test harness 16:11:32 luc: helena or stephen? 16:11:47 -MacTed 16:11:52 s/paolo/paul/ 16:12:03 https://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/actions/55 16:12:04 Helena has joined #prov 16:12:26 next action was #55 on mike. make an owl file for next week. 16:12:31 +q 16:12:58 ack dg 16:13:10 daniel: khalid and daniel have made a list of terms to agree on and give rules for. (and a list of those we won't) 16:13:24 ( http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF ) 16:13:25 http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF 16:13:49 luc: timing - next telecon due. on track to meet? 16:13:52 +??P20 16:13:52 daniel: yes 16:13:57 (+1) 16:14:00 https://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/actions/56 16:14:16 next is action 56 to james update rdf rules and align with dm. 16:14:47 jcheney: coupled with previous issue. using ProvRDF to keep track of DM and ont. 16:15:02 I forgot to say that Tim also worked on the list initiated by James. 16:15:17 jcheney: daniel, khalid, satya, tim have been working around the doc. 16:15:25 stephenc has joined #prov 16:15:30 jcheney: planning to fill in early next week 16:15:35 q+ 16:16:05 tlebo: clarification about the rules James is talking about. 16:16:23 jcheney: the rules in the provRDF file. 16:16:31 Translation rules 16:17:02 https://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/actions/57 16:17:04 tlebo: the plan is to have completed the left side part of the list 16:17:05 (anyone is welcome to help me fill in the left-hand sides from DM - this needs to be done by Friday) 16:17:30 luc: paq, paul, graham. #57 due end of month. we'll leave it 16:17:31 https://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/actions/58 16:17:37 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-wg/2012Feb/0021.html 16:17:56 @tlebo: I though that that was what Khalid and I did with the lists :) 16:17:58 luc: action 58 to paul. he wrote summary of f2f. 16:18:07 http://www.w3.org/blog/SW/?p=451 16:18:09 @daniel, nope, as I said in email. 16:18:23 GK_ has joined #prov 16:18:23 luc: closing 58 16:18:37 Oops, sorry I'm late. Connecting now. 16:19:01 https://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/actions/60 16:19:41 luc: 60 on luc, xml schema. he sent email to list. some responses. james' approach similar? 16:19:47 @tlebo: ok. 16:19:51 jcheney: was using attributes, but can change to elemetns. 16:20:02 luc: stephen, tim is interested 16:20:07 +OpenLink_Software 16:20:07 (+1) 16:20:11 +??P0 16:20:13 Zakim, OpenLink_Software is temporarily me 16:20:13 +MacTed; got it 16:20:15 Zakim, mute me 16:20:15 MacTed should now be muted 16:20:29 zakim, ??p0 is me 16:20:29 +GK_; got it 16:20:55 tim: will look through it, not sure what he'll do with it. 16:21:11 luc: aim for an agreement in two weeks time? 16:21:28 tlebo: yes 16:21:42 https://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/actions/61 16:21:55 luc: 61 on james update semantics to suit DM WD3 16:22:27 jcheney: provrdf an mappings are part of it and due ealier. so focusing on that. 16:22:30 https://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/actions/62 16:22:45 luc: 62 on luc to simplify intro do DM 16:22:55 luc: will report later in agenda. 16:23:17 q? 16:23:23 q- 16:23:49 zednik has joined #prov 16:24:22 luc: next face to face... coordinate with semweb activity.... mroe next week. 16:24:38 q? 16:24:42 luc: other issues? 16:24:56 -Curt_Tilmes 16:25:01 can we see this list of term? 16:25:10 satya: reviewing wd3, have terms to map, nothing else to report. Mike finished blog post. 16:25:20 satya: simple exmaple of how to use prov-o. sent update yesterday 16:25:21 can we see the blog post example? 16:25:26 (I didn't see update) 16:25:42 (ok) 16:25:51 satya: blog post coming outt 16:26:01 http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF 16:26:03 http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvRDF#List_of_terms_that_are_going_to_be_modeled_in_order_to_align_PROV-O_to_WD3 16:26:10 +Curt_Tilmes 16:26:18 q? 16:26:35 q+ to note that I think a different format would be better, will try to address on email and skype. 16:26:36 although that list has to be merged with Khalid's 16:26:41 luc: wasAssociatedWith - why not? 16:26:50 luc: quite important. 16:27:14 q? 16:27:17 ack tle 16:27:17 tlebo, you wanted to note that I think a different format would be better, will try to address on email and skype. 16:28:05 q- 16:28:26 luc: good to see that we can be systematic in translation. 16:28:35 luc: issues in DM? 16:29:27 +??P25 16:29:39 @GK: yes, it is a discussion board 16:29:50 Mike has joined #prov 16:30:09 luc: would be good for dm and provo teams to discuss 16:30:16 + +1.443.708.aaee 16:30:27 tlebo: we can do that after the owl file and mapping page 16:30:33 luc: we need the HTML, too. 16:30:47 q? 16:30:53 @GK: Tim's point I think is that the wiki page should be DM-centric in order to aid producing the deliverable(s) 16:30:54 luc: we need a doc that semweb community will look at after the primer. 16:31:20 We also need to thing about the structure of the document 16:31:23 think 16:31:32 satya: having concensus on owl file will aid HTML writing. 16:31:45 luc: but thought on how to structure doc before hand. 16:31:56 (I think we agreed to get rid of this laundry list approach in the HTML) 16:32:09 @khalid : +1. 16:32:47 luc: ivan's feedback after f2f. many ontologies that were well presented. OPMV, FOAF, (not enough examples in foaf html) 16:33:02 luc: good to think about how the HTML will be structured. 16:33:05 q? 16:33:32 (I've an idea that some of the FOAF/OPMV content is auto-generated from the OWN description) 16:33:45 luc: DMers shouldn't impose the provo html structure. 16:34:09 luc: action on structure of provo doc? 16:34:28 satya: will take action on structure of prov-o html 16:34:53 action: satya to design structure of provo-html 16:34:53 Created ACTION-63 - Design structure of provo-html [on Satya Sahoo - due 2012-02-16]. 16:35:01 action to satya to outline the new structure of the prov-o document, to be discussed on 23 16:35:01 Sorry, couldn't find user - to 16:35:29 luc: ivan suggested that it is usful to line up reviewers of the draft. 16:35:30 @luc: that action got created with 16-feb due date, not 23rd 16:35:46 luc: need reviewers to provo html 16:35:51 luc: volunteers? 16:36:00 q? 16:36:12 I will review 16:36:18 satya: think it would be helpful to have DMers review, too. 16:36:36 luc: volunteers? 16:36:56 luc: zednick? 16:36:58 (I probably shall review it, but I'm reluctant to make formal commitment at this time, until it's actually available.) 16:37:13 @etephan said he would, too 16:37:21 luc: simon? 16:37:34 I am willing to review prov-o 16:37:36 perhaps both Simon and Yolanda? 16:37:38 +1 16:37:44 smiles: sure, from pov of primer 16:38:17 too many stephans ;-) 16:38:23 (too many "steph*n"s) 16:39:08 I'll volunteer as well to review it 16:39:21 @Stephan: you are co-author :) 16:39:35 +q 16:39:50 (What I'd like to do is review the ontology side-by-side with the *simplified* DM) 16:39:51 core dump 16:39:59 ack es 16:40:11 luc, paolo, eric stephen, cresswell, perhaps GK 16:40:31 estephan: hwo to give feedback? 16:41:07 luc: we need to know someone looked at it. 16:41:18 @Eric: raise issues? 16:41:21 q? 16:41:38 topic: dm 16:41:57 http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvDMWorkingDraft4 16:42:12 luc: wiki page on current activities 16:42:20 luc: trying to adderss action 62 - simplify 16:42:41 luc: created new directory in hg 16:42:53 http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/working-copy/towards-wd4.html 16:43:04 luc: welcome to look, but still in progress. 16:43:11 luc: decided to structure into 3 parts 16:43:45 luc: part 1: model based on no "Thing" 16:44:07 luc: part 1: support scruffy prov (so no attributes, charact intervals, constraints) 16:44:11 luc: all moved out of doc 16:44:20 luc: dropped Account Record. 16:44:27 q+ to ask if the first part will be anything more than a summary of the ASN expression types 16:44:42 http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/working-copy/prov-asn.html 16:44:51 luc: part 3: ASN and grammar 16:45:06 luc: part 2: "upgrade path" 16:45:15 (from scruffy to proper prov) 16:45:32 Would prefer to see it described as a "refinement path" rather than "upgrade" 16:45:36 q? 16:45:38 luc: first version of this draft by next telecon 16:46:11 yesterday on the DC call, Thom Baker said that he really liked the distinction between scruffy/proper provenance. 16:46:14 gk: part 1 any mor than summary of expression types? 16:46:20 gk: want it that simple. 16:46:20 http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/working-copy/towards-wd4.html 16:46:34 q? 16:47:03 luc: tried to provide intuitive def for all concepts with examples in english 16:47:43 q? 16:47:44 luc: list of terms an dtheir componetns with illustration 16:47:49 ack GK 16:47:49 GK_, you wanted to ask if the first part will be anything more than a summary of the ASN expression types 16:48:15 gk: looks closer to waht group was asked to do. 16:48:45 luc: happy with anyone to look at and comment on (do not raise issues) 16:49:06 luc: if have commetns, write notes on page and send email notifying 16:49:30 q? 16:49:40 luc: comments? 16:49:46 Zakim, unmute me 16:49:46 MacTed should no longer be muted 16:49:46 I'll probably hold off detailed review untilk that 1st draft is available for co9mment 16:50:03 macted: which URLs are which part of breakout 16:50:14 part 1: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/working-copy/towards-wd4.html 16:50:26 part 3: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/working-copy/prov-asn.html 16:50:52 luc: will add link to wiki page 16:50:58 Zakim, mute me 16:50:58 MacTed should now be muted 16:51:07 luc: would like reviewers of docs for next week 16:51:23 q? 16:51:23 +1 16:51:25 +1 (Eric Stephan) 16:51:27 I intend to review 16:51:44 I'll try too 16:51:55 I'll try 16:52:33 topic: coordinate dm and prov-o 16:52:54 reading list: primer, prov-o, dm 16:53:09 luc: comments on joint release 16:53:10 ? 16:53:16 q? 16:53:17 q+ 16:53:40 ack smiles 16:53:59 smiles: from f2f, we have a schedule. prov-o owl next week and html week after. 16:54:05 ... primer 8 march. 16:54:27 ... then 1-2 weeks from that (20 march) 16:54:36 luc: we've slipped by 1 month 16:54:57 luc: timetable discussed at f2f 16:55:06 ... 4th draft 1 march 16:55:13 ... 5th draft 1 apri.l 16:55:30 ... release of all 1 april? 16:55:55 ... concerned. 16:56:00 q? 16:56:00 ... all docs earlier? 16:57:02 satya: last feb first march 16:57:05 I personally think we need to get the simplified DM nailed and stabilized (in broad principle) before charging too fast with the other docs. 16:57:14 (I think first week march would be reasonable) 16:57:23 -[IPcaller.a] 16:57:33 @GK: I agree 16:58:01 q? 16:58:12 simon: if we agree on the owl, primer by end of feb. but what if there are concerns on the owl? 16:58:30 I don't think that the primer is going to change a lot.. 16:58:48 gk_: really helpful if broad DM stable before pushing on other docs. 16:59:24 @dgarijo yes, I hope you're right :) 16:59:33 luc: provo due fairly soon 16:59:47 satya: agree that we need DM stable. 17:00:10 q+ to point out that the concepts aren't changing in DM. so it's "stable" 17:00:41 Apologies, but I will have to leave in a minute... 17:01:01 luc: we need to close issues. 17:01:11 I'm fine that there may be outstanding issues (near term); but the DM sets a general direction that we're all trying to follow 17:01:22 ack tle 17:01:22 tlebo, you wanted to point out that the concepts aren't changing in DM. so it's "stable" 17:01:53 q? 17:01:57 @tlebo:+1 17:02:13 -[IPcaller] 17:02:18 topic: connection task force 17:02:38 estephan: kai did report on plans from f2f2. dc mapping. great effort. 17:02:50 Sorry, I will have to leave as I have another meeting 17:02:53 ... while that continues, we should meet as a task force periodically. 17:03:03 Simon: there were a few minor things we wanted to update on the planner, we can discuss them when we meet at the end of the month. 17:03:11 ... most on task force have connections and would be good to keep the report alive. 17:03:15 -??P80 17:03:35 q? 17:03:45 +q 17:03:57 ack e 17:04:14 estephan: monday call details on email 17:04:20 I'll be joining the conn TF call 17:04:23 luc: that's it. meet next week. 17:04:24 -davidschaengold 17:04:25 -Satya_Sahoo 17:04:26 -??P81 17:04:27 Bye 17:04:27 - +1.443.708.aaee 17:04:27 - +1.509.967.aadd 17:04:27 -jcheney 17:04:29 -[ISI] 17:04:29 -Sandro 17:04:31 -MacTed 17:04:33 estephan has left #prov 17:04:33 -Curt_Tilmes 17:04:35 -tlebo 17:04:39 -Luc 17:04:51 rrsagent, set log public 17:04:53 -GK_ 17:04:55 rrsagent, draft minutes 17:04:55 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/02/09-prov-minutes.html Luc 17:04:59 trackbot, end telcon 17:04:59 Sorry, Luc, I don't understand 'trackbot, end telcon '. Please refer to http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/irc for help 17:05:00 -??P25 17:05:16 -??P20 17:05:18 SW_(PROV)11:00AM has ended 17:05:18 Attendees were Curt_Tilmes, Luc, +1.315.330.aabb, Satya_Sahoo, [IPcaller], +1.646.389.aacc, tlebo, davidschaengold, +1.509.967.aadd, MacTed, jcheney, [ISI], Sandro, GK_, 17:05:18 ... +1.443.708.aaee