19:49:38 RRSAgent has joined #au 19:49:38 logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/01/30-au-irc 19:49:44 Zakim, this will be AUWG 19:49:44 ok, Jan; I see WAI_AUWG()3:00PM scheduled to start in 11 minutes 19:49:49 Meeting: WAI AU 19:50:18 Agenda:http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2012JanMar/0018.html 19:59:44 andrewronksley has joined #au 20:00:05 AlastairC has joined #au 20:00:12 WAI_AUWG()3:00PM has now started 20:00:19 +??P4 20:00:29 zakim, ??P4 is really Jan 20:00:29 +Jan; got it 20:01:07 +[IPcaller] 20:01:31 +Jeanne 20:01:37 jeanne has joined #au 20:01:41 zakim, [IPcaller] is really Jutta 20:01:42 +Jutta; got it 20:01:54 Chair: Jutta Treviranus 20:02:35 +[IPcaller] 20:03:40 zakim, [IPcaller] is really Alastair 20:03:40 +Alastair; got it 20:04:02 +??P2 20:04:21 zakim, ??P2 is really Andrew 20:04:21 +Andrew; got it 20:04:31 Scribe: Jan 20:04:51 +Greg 20:04:55 +[Microsoft] 20:05:07 -Jan 20:06:14 +[IPcaller] 20:06:35 zakim, [IPcaller] is really Alex 20:06:35 +Alex; got it 20:06:45 Topic: 1. Is the group satisfied with the "accessible content" proposal 20:07:07 JT: Status of meeting with WCAG, Jeanne? 20:07:25 JS: Will take care of that this PM 20:07:32 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2012JanMar/0014.html 20:07:51 JT: Suggestions, concerns - we brought it up last week? 20:08:35 Alex: What is the goal of the meeting? 20:08:48 JT: Mutually agreeable solution. 20:09:26 AL: Would we be ok with a search-and-replace term? 20:11:02 AL: Is there a list of terms. 20:11:12 JR: I sent a list to WAI-CG a while back 20:11:45 AL: Right, accessibility can be a loaded term 20:14:15 GP: WCAG has a note on this 20:14:59 AL: What about WCAG conformant 20:16:49 JR: Then there is the "accessibility supported" issue 20:17:13 JS: For me , readability is the most important issue 20:17:33 +Tim_Boland 20:17:37 GP: How can you describe "accessible" without that term? 20:17:49 AL: Its all complicated by context of use etc. 20:18:03 Tim has joined #au 20:18:14 AL: And WCAG has been very careful to describe that and the y just want us to respect that 20:19:10 GP: Reads WCAG's disclaimer note... 20:19:36 AL: But WCAG2 does not use term accessible in the SC's 20:20:15 JS: OK to remove from our SC but want to keep in principles and guidelihnes 20:20:45 AL: Assuming we are entering a negotiation...know your bottom line ahead of time 20:23:15 AC: I support the proposed text...not trying to be hard line...just wondering what compromise would look like. 20:24:20 JT: I hear the group saying we should start with our proposal here, trying to keep our document simple 20:24:24 AC: Agreed 20:24:28 GP: Agreed 20:24:56 JT: So Jeanne, you will set up meeting? 20:24:58 JS: Yes 20:25:08 Topic: 2. Copy-paste and ATAG2 B.1.2.1 Restructuring and Recoding Transformations 20:25:14 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2012JanMar/0017.html 20:30:13 +[Microsoft.a] 20:50:05 AC: Makes sense, I hadn't thought it applied to copy-paste when reading about re-structuring the first time. 20:50:41 Resolution: All accept splitting copy-paste from content transformations] 20:50:52 regrets: Cherie E. 20:50:58 -[Microsoft] 20:51:01 -[Microsoft.a] 20:51:02 -Alastair 20:51:02 -Jutta 20:51:04 -Greg 20:51:05 -Andrew 20:51:14 -Jeanne 20:51:15 regrets: 20:51:31 oops I think Cherie was here afterall 20:51:51 RRSAgent, make minutes 20:51:51 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/01/30-au-minutes.html Jan 20:51:58 RRSAgent, set logs public 20:52:04 Zakim, bye 20:52:04 leaving. As of this point the attendees were Jan, Jeanne, Jutta, Alastair, Andrew, Greg, [Microsoft], Alex, Tim_Boland 20:52:04 Zakim has left #au 20:52:10 RRSAgent, bye 20:52:10 I see no action items