15:56:55 RRSAgent has joined #rd 15:56:55 logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/01/26-rd-irc 15:56:55 zakim, ??P14 is me 15:56:55 +christos; got it 15:56:57 RRSAgent, make logs world 15:57:00 Zakim, this will be 7394 15:57:00 ok, trackbot; I see WAI_RDWG()11:00AM scheduled to start in 3 minutes 15:57:02 Meeting: Research and Development Working Group Teleconference 15:57:04 Date: 26 January 2012 15:57:10 chair: Simon 15:57:53 sharper has joined #rd 15:58:18 Joshue108 has joined #rd 15:58:43 trackbot, start meeting 15:58:45 RRSAgent, make logs world 15:58:47 Zakim, this will be 7394 15:58:47 ok, trackbot; I see WAI_RDWG()11:00AM scheduled to start in 2 minutes 15:58:48 Meeting: Research and Development Working Group Teleconference 15:58:48 Date: 26 January 2012 15:58:53 Chair: Harper_Simon 15:58:53 Agenda+ Welcome & Logistics (Regrets, Agenda Requests, Comments) 15:58:54 Agenda+ Discuss availability and meeting timing (please fill out the survey) 15:58:54 https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/47076/RDWG_meeting_time/ 15:58:54 Agenda+ Discuss W3C Note Status 15:58:55 Agenda+ Discuss Next Topic 15:58:56 Agenda+ Any Other Business 15:59:01 zakim, code 15:59:04 I don't understand 'code', Joshue108 15:59:10 zakim, code? 15:59:10 the conference code is 7394 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), Joshue108 15:59:58 zakim, save agenda 16:00:04 ok, sharper, the agenda has been written to http://www.w3.org/2012/01/26-rd-agenda.rdf 16:00:12 zakim, agenda? 16:00:12 I see 9 items remaining on the agenda: 16:00:13 1. Welcome & Logistics (Regrets, Agenda Requests, Comments) [from shadi] 16:00:17 2. W3C Note Status [from shadi] 16:00:19 3. Next Topic [from shadi] 16:00:21 4. Any Other Business [from shadi] 16:00:25 5. Welcome & Logistics (Regrets, Agenda Requests, Comments) [from sharper] 16:00:27 6. Discuss availability and meeting timing (please fill out the survey) [from sharper] 16:00:29 7. Discuss W3C Note Status [from sharper] 16:00:31 8. Discuss Next Topic [from sharper] 16:00:37 9. Any Other Business [from sharper] 16:00:40 zakim, delete item 1 16:00:51 agendum 1, Welcome & Logistics (Regrets, Agenda Requests, Comments), dropped 16:00:55 member:zakim, delete item 2 16:01:09 zakim, delete item 2 16:01:11 zakim, delete item 3 16:01:12 zakim, delete item 2 16:01:18 zakim, delete item 4 16:01:26 zakim, save agenda 16:01:29 agendum 2, W3C Note Status, dropped 16:01:33 agendum 3, Next Topic, dropped 16:01:37 agendum 2, W3C Note Status, dropped 16:01:41 agendum 4, Any Other Business, dropped 16:01:45 zakim, take up item 1 16:01:49 ok, sharper, the agenda has been written to http://www.w3.org/2012/01/26-rd-agenda.rdf 16:02:16 agendum 1. "Welcome & Logistics (Regrets, Agenda Requests, Comments)" taken up [from shadi] 16:02:17 giorgio has joined #rd 16:02:31 regrets: Thiessen_Peter, Conway_Vivienne 16:02:48 rrsagent, make logs public 16:02:48 rrsagent, draft minutes 16:02:48 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/01/26-rd-minutes.html sharper 16:03:03 zakim, code? 16:03:14 test has joined #rd 16:03:24 markel has joined #rd 16:03:55 the conference code is 7394 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), sharper 16:04:13 zakim, agenda? 16:05:15 I see 6 items remaining on the agenda: 16:05:18 1. Welcome & Logistics (Regrets, Agenda Requests, Comments) [from shadi] 16:05:20 5. Welcome & Logistics (Regrets, Agenda Requests, Comments) [from sharper] 16:05:23 6. Discuss availability and meeting timing (please fill out the survey) [from sharper] 16:05:25 7. Discuss W3C Note Status [from sharper] 16:05:28 8. Discuss Next Topic [from sharper] 16:05:37 9. Any Other Business [from sharper] 16:06:12 zakim, delete item 1 16:06:19 zakim take up item 5 16:06:29 zakim, take up item 5 16:07:08 agendum 1, Welcome & Logistics (Regrets, Agenda Requests, Comments), dropped 16:07:15 agendum 5. "Welcome & Logistics (Regrets, Agenda Requests, Comments)" taken up [from sharper] 16:07:22 zakim, mute me 16:07:54 sorry, christos, I don't know what conference this is 16:09:31 I did 16:09:36 I did too 16:09:37 I did not! 16:09:52 https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/47076/RDWG_meeting_time/ 16:10:12 ok: I'll do it 16:11:49 scribenick: Joshue 16:12:09 zakim, take up item 1 16:12:09 agendum 1. "Welcome & Logistics (Regrets, Agenda Requests, Comments)" taken up [from shadi] 16:12:18 zakim, take up item 2 16:12:18 agendum 2. "W3C Note Status" taken up [from shadi] 16:12:34 TOPIC: Time survey 16:12:42 SS: Thoughts on the time survey? 16:13:08 how many people answered to the survey? 16:13:11 SH: We thought Monday would be good. The survey looks like this is the best time. 16:13:16 s/SS/SH 16:13:41 SH: I looks like everyone is happy with the current time. 16:13:52 https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/47076/RDWG_meeting_time/results 16:16:10 SH: Lets wait for Yeliz and Giorgio and see where we are at then. 16:16:33 JOC: This time is fine for me, but I would like Weds. 16:16:42 SH: Doesn't suit Christos. 16:16:48 zakim, mute me 16:16:48 sorry, Joshue108, I don't know what conference this is 16:16:51 I can do it on Wed or Thursdays. 16:17:05 zakim, this is 7394 16:17:05 ok, Joshue108; that matches WAI_RDWG()11:00AM 16:17:17 SH: We will finalise it next week 16:17:59 16:19:24 zakim, mute me 16:19:24 Shadi should now be muted 16:19:25 zakim, take up item 7 16:19:25 agendum 7. "Discuss W3C Note Status" taken up [from sharper] 16:19:38 SH: I'll pass this over to the editors. 16:20:15 M: We agreed to have an inital meeting before today but there were a couple of set backs. We have a very early draft. 16:20:30 q+ 16:20:32 MV: We will have a proper one next week that we can discuss at the meeting 16:20:41 ack g 16:21:21 GB: I want to add that I wasn't well, but we had some exchanges and an idea of the document structure. 16:21:55 GB: We can show you an outline of what we want to say. 16:22:00 SH: Great stuff. 16:22:02 1 Introduction 16:22:02 1.1 Definition and background 16:22:03 1.2 The benefits of using metrics 16:22:03 2 Overview of current accessibility challenges 16:22:04 2.1 Validity 16:22:04 2.2 Reliability 16:22:05 2.3 Sensitivity 16:22:06 2.4 Adequacy 16:22:09 2.5 Tailorability 16:22:11 3 Current research actions 16:22:13 3.1 Addressing current challenges 16:22:15 3.2 Tool support for metrics 16:22:17 3.3 Addressing large scale measurement 16:22:18 3.4 Targeting particular accessibility issues 16:22:20 3.5 Novel measurement approaches 16:22:23 3.6 Beyond conformance 16:22:25 4 A research roadmap for web accessibility metrics 16:22:26 4.1 A Corpus for benchmarking purposes 16:22:29 4.2 User-tailored metrics 16:22:31 4.3 Dealing with dynamic content 16:22:32 4.4 Credibility issues 16:23:40 GB: We have three parts. An intro, the context of the problem, a framework etc. Then in the middle Section 3, provides an overview of the main thrust of the seminar discussion etc. Then Section 4, finally, is the roadmap. Our view of how these issues that were raised can inform us. New directions etc. 16:24:05 MV: The last section should be understood as a research program. 16:24:24 q+ 16:24:36 GB: I was thinking that a new Phd student would find inspiration here. 16:24:46 ack me 16:25:08 thanks shadi. 16:25:51 SAZ: Thanks for making the call. The TOC looks great. I look forward to reading it. Regarding the target audience for the last section. There are also lots of discussions research such as MEAC and other national monitors. 16:26:01 SAZ: This could be useful for a wider audience. 16:26:18 This TOC looks great! 16:26:25 q 16:26:27 q+ 16:26:27 SAZ: Think of the wider audience, or is it too early? 16:27:01 q+ 16:27:14 SAZ: It may be for others and not just Phd students. It could be used to develop indicators for large scale evaluations. I hope this makes sense. 16:27:20 ack gio 16:27:24 yes of course we are not limiting it to what GB's case study 16:28:06 GB: You made a good point, this could be one type of usage. Web a11y metrics are still very immature and a lot of R and D, validation etc needs to happen for the metric to mature. 16:28:28 GB: If the EU, or others want to invest in the metric at this stage I would advise caution. 16:28:42 GB: I don't see metrics as being ready for industrial use. 16:28:49 SAZ: Will you express this in the doc? 16:29:07 GB: Yes. We will highlight the possible risks for end users. 16:30:07 GB: Metrics appear to be a quick and easy solution, easy to take up and say roughly some arbitraty figure - but what does that really mean. The a11y community is not happy with this approach and we need to do something about this. 16:30:31 SAZ: We need to make people aware. This kind of thing will happen anyway, so we need to provide advice. 16:30:40 GB: A test corpus would be good. 16:30:44 +q 16:31:13 zakim, mute me 16:31:13 Shadi should now be muted 16:31:17 ack sharper 16:31:34 SH: I'm really looking forwad to reading this. How well did the contributions we got inform the decision. Was the seminar useful? Did you have to go to other places. 16:31:55 GB: No, we should base it on what participants wrote and gave to the Webinar. 16:32:16 SH: Did you have to interpret it or is it taken directly? 16:33:07 MV: There were challenges and not all contributions addressed this. 16:33:18 MV: The symposium was useful. 16:33:46 -[IPcaller] 16:33:50 GB Number of metrics we didn't expect 16:34:06 GB metrics for lexical quality etc etc 16:34:14 GB for example 16:34:25 by Josh 16:34:33 s/by/bye 16:35:24 GB one direction that the research community could go in addressing each point individually and by so doing advance the area 16:35:40 ScribeNick: markel 16:35:48 SH: sounds really good 16:36:14 zakim, take up item 8 16:36:14 agendum 8. "Discuss Next Topic" taken up [from sharper] 16:36:44 SH: we should discuss the next note and probably the note after that 16:37:27 SH: in order to create a landscape for the next year; candidly it is unlikely to attract more people to the group until we show our potential to the community 16:37:28 + 16:37:55 SH: which means that is only us to work and edit on next topics and documents 16:38:25 SH: first, we should think who can the next editors be. We did a very good symposium 16:39:01 SH: I wonder what people think about that 16:39:17 q+ 16:39:28 ack josh 16:39:31 q- josh 16:39:32 ack chris 16:40:01 CK: I think it's a good plan for the next seminars to get ready. We can also get ready beforehand. 16:40:25 SH: right, we know now it works and there is no need to discuss these issues again 16:41:19 SH: once we got 2-3 reports we'll start to gain more people into the group that will allow us to push on 16:41:36 SH: I have the impression that people are not aware of what's going on 16:41:37 q+ 16:41:46 ack markel 16:42:14 MV: are you suggesting we should first choose editors before topics 16:42:32 q+ 16:42:39 SH: we should be aware which are our resources 16:43:04 SH: people should be able to put their names forward if their are interested 16:43:09 ack giorgio 16:43:38 GB: let's choose editors that are passionate about a topic and tell them to work on that 16:44:08 GB: emphasize on "passionate" 16:44:27 ack me 16:44:37 SH: if we are talking about june we should have one every two months 16:44:44 SAZ: I agree. 16:45:03 [[we are chartered to do 3-4 per year]] 16:45:07 SH: we know that YY and PT want to do he mobile stuff 16:45:48 SAZ: there's a new topic SLH is passionate about: low vision aspect 16:46:42 SH: it's just SAZ, CK and I who haven't been editors 16:47:10 q+ 16:47:27 SH: maybe we should approach to Yeliz and Peter 16:47:34 MV: I agree with that 16:48:03 SH: there is another one about "Touch interfaces" and "Mobile Accessibility" 16:48:07 I agree with simon 16:48:20 ack christos 16:48:37 CK: I was ready to make the point to say that we have some overlap 16:48:43 q+ 16:49:41 CK: I don't know if it's better to keep them separated or merge them. I think that merging them...we might end up handling many things 16:49:49 I agree with CK 16:50:12 ack giorgio 16:50:48 GB: let's decide who could be de editor of the mobile thing and ask them whether they want to focus on one topic or merge different ones 16:50:54 q+ 16:50:57 SH: I agree with that 100% 16:51:04 ack christos 16:51:31 CK: there's another topic I've already added: Augmented reality which is also related to mobile 16:51:53 SH: it could be the augmented reality on the virtual reality 16:52:15 SH: would you be an editor? 16:52:22 CK: I'm ok with that 16:53:03 SH: I'm going to speak to Yeliz and Peter and hopefully we will get them 16:53:48 -Shadi 16:53:49 -??P61 16:53:50 -??P33 16:53:51 -??P64 16:54:02 -christos 16:54:04 zakim, close item 7 16:54:04 agendum 7, Discuss W3C Note Status, closed 16:54:05 I see 6 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 16:54:06 1. Welcome & Logistics (Regrets, Agenda Requests, Comments) [from shadi] 16:54:22 zakim, close item 8 16:54:23 agendum 8, Discuss Next Topic, closed 16:54:24 I see 5 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 16:54:26 1. Welcome & Logistics (Regrets, Agenda Requests, Comments) [from shadi] 16:54:37 zakim, close item 1 16:54:37 agendum 1, Welcome & Logistics (Regrets, Agenda Requests, Comments), closed 16:54:40 I see 4 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 16:54:42 2. W3C Note Status [from shadi] 16:54:42 zakim, close item 2 16:54:45 zakim, close item 3 16:54:47 zakim, close item 4 16:54:48 agendum 2, W3C Note Status, closed 16:54:49 zakim, close item 5 16:54:50 I see 3 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 16:54:54 5. Welcome & Logistics (Regrets, Agenda Requests, Comments) [from sharper] 16:54:55 zakim, close item 6 16:54:56 agendum 3, Next Topic, closed 16:54:58 I see 3 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 16:55:00 5. Welcome & Logistics (Regrets, Agenda Requests, Comments) [from sharper] 16:55:05 zakim, close item 5 16:55:06 agendum 4, Any Other Business, closed 16:55:10 I see 3 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 16:55:13 5. Welcome & Logistics (Regrets, Agenda Requests, Comments) [from sharper] 16:55:15 agendum 5, Welcome & Logistics (Regrets, Agenda Requests, Comments), closed 16:55:17 I see 2 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 16:55:19 6. Discuss availability and meeting timing (please fill out the survey) [from sharper] 16:55:22 agendum 6, Discuss availability and meeting timing (please fill out the survey), closed 16:55:25 I see 1 item remaining on the agenda: 16:55:26 9. Any Other Business [from sharper] 16:55:27 agendum 5, Welcome & Logistics (Regrets, Agenda Requests, Comments), closed 16:55:29 I see 1 item remaining on the agenda: 16:55:30 9. Any Other Business [from sharper] 16:55:36 zakim, close item 9 16:55:36 agendum 9, Any Other Business, closed 16:55:38 I see nothing remaining on the agenda 16:55:55 -??P69 16:55:56 WAI_RDWG()11:00AM has ended 16:55:58 Attendees were christos, [IPcaller], Shadi 16:56:02 markel has left #rd 16:56:12 trackbot, end meeting 16:56:12 Zakim, list attendees 16:56:12 sorry, trackbot, I don't know what conference this is 16:56:15 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 16:56:15 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/01/26-rd-minutes.html trackbot 16:56:16 RRSAgent, bye 16:56:16 I see no action items