ISSUE-21: Person type has 'children' property instead of 'child'
children -> child
Person type has 'children' property instead of 'child'
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Feedback on Schema.org
- Raised by:
- Dan Brickley
- Opened on:
- 2013-05-08
- Description:
- This was missed in the http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/Singularity cleanup, due to non-s-based plural form.
Reported http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2013May/0055.html
From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 09:11:05 +1000
Message-ID: <518ADB89.5030008@topquadrant.com>
To: "public-vocabs@w3.org Org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Regarding
http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/Singularity
which was a very good change, but why has the property "children" not
been renamed to "child"?
NB: I also believe the legacy spellings should be more actively
discouraged by marking them more clearly in the documentation and also
by attaching metadata to a machine-readable version.
Thanks
Holger - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: Singularity: why has "children" not been renamed to "child"? (from danbri@danbri.org on 2013-05-09)
- webschema-ISSUE-21 (children -> child): Person type has 'children' property instead of 'child' [Feedback on Schema.org] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-05-08)
Related notes:
Migrated to https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/244
Dan Brickley, 21 Jan 2015, 13:31:55Display change log