ISSUE-12: Comment is under UserInteractions not CreativeWork; the former focus on aggregation
Comment versus UserComments
Comment is under UserInteractions not CreativeWork; the former focus on aggregation
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Feedback on Schema.org
- Raised by:
- Dan Brickley
- Opened on:
- 2012-01-18
- Description:
- Raised by Daniel Dulitz, seconded by Stéphane Corlosquet
Daniel writes """I wanted to raise an issue about how to represent comments (e.g. on blog posts).
There are many subtypes of CreativeWork, but Comment is not one of them. Perhaps it should be?
Instead, it seems like comments are to be represented by UserComments, which is a subtype of UserInteractions. But apart from UserComments those types appear to be for aggregates, not for an individual comment/tweet/like/etc. The type names are plural and don't really fit for non-aggregates.
I think the aggregate types are useful, but for each aggregate type I'd like to have a clearly defined type for the individual thing. What's the right way to achieve that?"""
URL http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2012Jan/0037.html
Stephane, """I agree that Comment would be a relevant type to be added to schema.org. [...]"""
...and cites previous discussion as well as Drupal 7 experience/requirements w/ SIOC.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2012Jan/0038.html
Previous thread 'UserInteraction inconsistency problems',
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/schemaorg-discussion/N7u4Z8356Ao/JIiFO0WWNF4J
Nearby: http://schema.org/UserComments http://schema.org/UserInteraction
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: Comment versus UserComments (from danbri@danbri.org on 2012-03-09)
- Re: Comment versus UserComments (from scorlosquet@gmail.com on 2012-02-29)
- Re: Comment versus UserComments (from danbri@danbri.org on 2012-02-29)
- Re: Comment versus UserComments (from giurca@tu-cottbus.de on 2012-01-19)
- Re: Comment versus UserComments (from daniel@google.com on 2012-01-18)
- Re: Comment versus UserComments (from danbri@danbri.org on 2012-01-18)
- webschema-ISSUE-12 (Comment versus UserComments): Comment is under UserInteractions not CreativeWork; the former focus on aggregation [Feedback on Schema.org] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2012-01-18)
Related notes:
see proposal in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2012Feb/0148.html
wiki: http://www.w3.org/wiki/Comment that (partially) addresses this.
Closed 2012-03-09 in favour of adoption a new class Comment, and a ''text'' property on CreativeWork. Details in wiki at http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/Comment
Dan Brickley, 9 Mar 2012, 20:38:46Display change log