Edit ISSUE-81: Do we need a response at all from server?

Nickname:

Title:

State:

Product:

Raised By:

Description:

Add notes (no markup allowed, URIs get automatically hyperlinked):

Related emails:

  1. RE: Well-known URI vs response headers? [ISSUE-81, ISSUE-47, ISSUE-80] (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2012-03-05) (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2012-03-05)
  2. Re: Well-known URI vs response headers? [ISSUE-81, ISSUE-47, ISSUE-80] (from npdoty@w3.org on 2012-03-05) (from npdoty@w3.org on 2012-03-05)
  3. RE: Well-known URI vs response headers? [ISSUE-81, ISSUE-47, ISSUE-80] (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2012-03-05) (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2012-03-05)
  4. Re: Well-known URI vs response headers? [ISSUE-81, ISSUE-47, ISSUE-80] (from npdoty@w3.org on 2012-03-05) (from npdoty@w3.org on 2012-03-05)
  5. Re: Well-known URI vs response headers? [ISSUE-81, ISSUE-47, ISSUE-80] (from npdoty@w3.org on 2012-03-05) (from npdoty@w3.org on 2012-03-05)
  6. RE: SHOULD or MUST for responses to DNT;1? (from acolando@microsoft.com on 2012-01-19) (from acolando@microsoft.com on 2012-01-19)
  7. Re: SHOULD or MUST for responses to DNT;1? (from v.toubiana@free.fr on 2012-01-19) (from v.toubiana@free.fr on 2012-01-19)
  8. RE: SHOULD or MUST for responses to DNT;1? (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-01-19) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-01-19)
  9. Re: SHOULD or MUST for responses to DNT;1? (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2012-01-19) (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2012-01-19)
  10. Agenda for 2012-1-17 call (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2012-01-17) (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2012-01-17)
  11. SHOULD or MUST for responses to DNT;1? (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2012-01-17) (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2012-01-17)
  12. diff of TPE editing since the FPWD (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-01-10) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-01-10)
  13. Re: Request to close ISSUE-81 (from singer@apple.com on 2011-12-20) (from singer@apple.com on 2011-12-20)
  14. Re: Request to close ISSUE-81 (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2011-12-20) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2011-12-20)
  15. Re: Request to close ISSUE-81 (from singer@apple.com on 2011-12-20) (from singer@apple.com on 2011-12-20)
  16. Re: Request to close ISSUE-81 (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2011-12-20) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2011-12-20)
  17. Proposed Agenda for 2011-12-21 TPWG call (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-12-20) (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-12-20)
  18. Request to close ISSUE-81 (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-12-20) (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-12-20)
  19. RE: Proposed Agenda for 2011-11-30 TPWG call (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-11-30) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-11-30)
  20. RE: Proposed Agenda for 2011-11-30 TPWG call (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-11-30) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-11-30)
  21. Proposed Agenda for 2011-11-30 TPWG call (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-11-30) (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-11-30)
  22. Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (from rigo@w3.org on 2011-11-01) (from rigo@w3.org on 2011-11-01)
  23. TPE site-specific exemption (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2011-10-31) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2011-10-31)
  24. Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (from singer@apple.com on 2011-10-31) (from singer@apple.com on 2011-10-31)
  25. Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2011-10-31) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2011-10-31)
  26. Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (from singer@apple.com on 2011-10-31) (from singer@apple.com on 2011-10-31)
  27. Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2011-10-30) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2011-10-30)
  28. Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (from npdoty@w3.org on 2011-10-28) (from npdoty@w3.org on 2011-10-28)
  29. Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (from derhoermi@gmx.net on 2011-10-28) (from derhoermi@gmx.net on 2011-10-28)
  30. Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (from karld@opera.com on 2011-10-28) (from karld@opera.com on 2011-10-28)
  31. Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (from karld@opera.com on 2011-10-28) (from karld@opera.com on 2011-10-28)
  32. Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2011-10-28) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2011-10-28)
  33. Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (from karld@opera.com on 2011-10-28) (from karld@opera.com on 2011-10-28)
  34. Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (from ronansan@gmail.com on 2011-10-28) (from ronansan@gmail.com on 2011-10-28)
  35. Re: Well-known URI vs response headers? [ISSUE-81, ISSUE-47, ISSUE-80] (from karld@opera.com on 2011-10-28) (from karld@opera.com on 2011-10-28)
  36. Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (from karld@opera.com on 2011-10-28) (from karld@opera.com on 2011-10-28)
  37. Re: Well-known URI vs response headers? [ISSUE-81, ISSUE-47, ISSUE-80] (from singer@apple.com on 2011-10-28) (from singer@apple.com on 2011-10-28)
  38. Re: Well-known URI vs response headers? [ISSUE-81, ISSUE-47, ISSUE-80] (from ronansan@gmail.com on 2011-10-28) (from ronansan@gmail.com on 2011-10-28)
  39. Re: tracking-ISSUE-81: Do we need a response at all from server? (from rigo@w3.org on 2011-10-28) (from rigo@w3.org on 2011-10-28)
  40. Re: Well-known URI vs response headers? [ISSUE-81, ISSUE-47, ISSUE-80] (from rigo@w3.org on 2011-10-28) (from rigo@w3.org on 2011-10-28)
  41. Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (from rigo@w3.org on 2011-10-28) (from rigo@w3.org on 2011-10-28)
  42. Re: Well-known URI vs response headers? [ISSUE-81, ISSUE-47, ISSUE-80] (from ronansan@gmail.com on 2011-10-27) (from ronansan@gmail.com on 2011-10-27)
  43. Re: Well-known URI vs response headers? [ISSUE-81, ISSUE-47, ISSUE-80] (from singer@apple.com on 2011-10-27) (from singer@apple.com on 2011-10-27)
  44. Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (from singer@apple.com on 2011-10-27) (from singer@apple.com on 2011-10-27)
  45. Re: tracking-ISSUE-81: Do we need a response at all from server? (from tom@mozilla.com on 2011-10-27) (from tom@mozilla.com on 2011-10-27)
  46. RE: Well-known URI vs response headers? [ISSUE-81, ISSUE-47, ISSUE-80] (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-10-27) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-10-27)
  47. Re: Well-known URI vs response headers? [ISSUE-81, ISSUE-47, ISSUE-80] (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2011-10-27) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2011-10-27)
  48. Re: Well-known URI vs response headers? [ISSUE-81, ISSUE-47, ISSUE-80] (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-10-27) (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-10-27)
  49. RE: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (from acolando@microsoft.com on 2011-10-26) (from acolando@microsoft.com on 2011-10-26)
  50. Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (from rigo@w3.org on 2011-10-26) (from rigo@w3.org on 2011-10-26)
  51. Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (from dwainberg@appnexus.com on 2011-10-26) (from dwainberg@appnexus.com on 2011-10-26)
  52. Re: Well-known URI vs response headers? [ISSUE-81, ISSUE-47, ISSUE-80] (from rigo@w3.org on 2011-10-26) (from rigo@w3.org on 2011-10-26)
  53. Re: tracking-ISSUE-81: Do we need a response at all from server? (from rigo@w3.org on 2011-10-26) (from rigo@w3.org on 2011-10-26)
  54. Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-10-26) (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-10-26)
  55. Re: Well-known URI vs response headers? [ISSUE-81, ISSUE-47, ISSUE-80] (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-10-26) (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-10-26)
  56. Re: Well-known URI vs response headers? [ISSUE-81, ISSUE-47, ISSUE-80] (from karld@opera.com on 2011-10-21) (from karld@opera.com on 2011-10-21)
  57. Re: tracking-ISSUE-81: Do we need a response at all from server? (from karld@opera.com on 2011-10-21) (from karld@opera.com on 2011-10-21)
  58. Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2011-10-21) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2011-10-21)
  59. RE: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (from acolando@microsoft.com on 2011-10-21) (from acolando@microsoft.com on 2011-10-21)
  60. Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (from singer@apple.com on 2011-10-21) (from singer@apple.com on 2011-10-21)
  61. RE: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (from dwainberg@appnexus.com on 2011-10-21) (from dwainberg@appnexus.com on 2011-10-21)
  62. Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2011-10-20) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2011-10-20)
  63. Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (from derhoermi@gmx.net on 2011-10-20) (from derhoermi@gmx.net on 2011-10-20)
  64. Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (from singer@apple.com on 2011-10-20) (from singer@apple.com on 2011-10-20)
  65. Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (from derhoermi@gmx.net on 2011-10-20) (from derhoermi@gmx.net on 2011-10-20)
  66. Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (from tom@mozilla.com on 2011-10-19) (from tom@mozilla.com on 2011-10-19)
  67. Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (from singer@apple.com on 2011-10-19) (from singer@apple.com on 2011-10-19)
  68. RE: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-10-19) (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-10-19)
  69. Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-10-19) (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-10-19)
  70. Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2011-10-18) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2011-10-18)
  71. Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2011-10-18) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2011-10-18)
  72. Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (from singer@apple.com on 2011-10-18) (from singer@apple.com on 2011-10-18)
  73. RE: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (from jccannon@microsoft.com on 2011-10-18) (from jccannon@microsoft.com on 2011-10-18)
  74. Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (from singer@apple.com on 2011-10-18) (from singer@apple.com on 2011-10-18)
  75. RE: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-10-18) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-10-18)
  76. Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (from singer@apple.com on 2011-10-18) (from singer@apple.com on 2011-10-18)
  77. RE: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2011-10-18) (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2011-10-18)
  78. RE: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-10-15) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-10-15)
  79. RE: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2011-10-15) (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2011-10-15)
  80. RE: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (from jccannon@microsoft.com on 2011-10-15) (from jccannon@microsoft.com on 2011-10-15)
  81. [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2011-10-14) (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2011-10-14)
  82. Re: Agenda for 2011-10-12 DNT Workgroup Meeting (from npdoty@w3.org on 2011-10-13) (from npdoty@w3.org on 2011-10-13)
  83. Well-known URI vs response headers? [ISSUE-81, ISSUE-47, ISSUE-80] (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-10-13) (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-10-13)
  84. Re: tracking-ISSUE-81: Do we need a response at all from server? (from ktrilli@truste.com on 2011-10-12) (from ktrilli@truste.com on 2011-10-12)
  85. Re: tracking-ISSUE-81: Do we need a response at all from server? (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-10-12) (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-10-12)
  86. Re: tracking-ISSUE-81: Do we need a response at all from server? (from derhoermi@gmx.net on 2011-10-12) (from derhoermi@gmx.net on 2011-10-12)
  87. Re: tracking-ISSUE-81: Do we need a response at all from server? (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-10-12) (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-10-12)
  88. Re: tracking-ISSUE-81: Do we need a response at all from server? (from tien@eff.org on 2011-10-11) (from tien@eff.org on 2011-10-11)
  89. RE: tracking-ISSUE-81: Do we need a response at all from server? (from jccannon@microsoft.com on 2011-10-11) (from jccannon@microsoft.com on 2011-10-11)
  90. tracking-ISSUE-81: Do we need a response at all from server? (from jccannon@microsoft.com on 2011-10-11) (from jccannon@microsoft.com on 2011-10-11)
  91. Re: Agenda for 2011-10-12 DNT Workgroup Meeting (from nmarnau@datenschutzzentrum.de on 2011-10-11) (from nmarnau@datenschutzzentrum.de on 2011-10-11)
  92. Agenda for 2011-10-12 DNT Workgroup Meeting (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-10-11) (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-10-11)
  93. Re: Agenda for 2011-10-05 TPWG call (from npdoty@w3.org on 2011-10-09) (from npdoty@w3.org on 2011-10-09)
  94. Agenda for 2011-10-04 TPWG call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2011-10-04) (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2011-10-04)
  95. Response Headers [ISSUE-47,ISSUE-48,ISSUE-51,ISSUE-76,ISSUE-79,ISSUE-80,ISSUE-81,ISSUE-87] (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-10-04) (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-10-04)
  96. ISSUE-81: Do we need a response at all from server? (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-09-22) (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-09-22)

Related notes:

[npdoty]: ifette suggests that the user either trusts the site or doesn't, so why would the browser bother to expose this response to the user?

22 Sep 2011, 17:56:35

I believe we cannot since users expect to be able to tell whether a DNT=1 header has been accepted by a site or not.

Matthias Schunter, 27 Oct 2011, 14:49:29


Matthias Schunter <matthias.schunter@intel.com>, Chair, Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: index.php,v 1.326 2018/10/13 17:29:51 vivien Exp $