ISSUE-69: Should the spec say anything about minimal notice? (ie. don't bury in a privacy policy)

Should the spec say anything about minimal notice? (ie. don't bury in a privacy policy)

State:

CLOSED

Product:

Compliance Next

Raised by:

Opened on:

2011-09-22

Description:

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

RE: Proposed agenda for Amsterdam F2F on October 03-05, 2012 (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-09-23)
Proposed agenda for Amsterdam F2F on October 03-05, 2012 (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2012-09-21)
agenda: 18 April 2012 call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-04-18)
Agenda for 2012-Mar-21 call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-03-21)
Re: Out-of-Band Consent Standard (ISSUE-65) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-03-14)
Re: Out-of-Band Consent Standard (ISSUE-65) (from Ted.Leung@disney.com on 2012-03-14)
RE: Out-of-Band Consent Standard (ISSUE-65) (from acolando@microsoft.com on 2012-03-14)
RE: Logged-In Exception (ISSUE-65) (from jccannon@microsoft.com on 2012-03-14)
Re: Logged-In Exception (ISSUE-65) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-03-13)
Out-of-Band Consent Standard (ISSUE-65) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-03-13)
Re: Logged-In Exception (ISSUE-65) (from Ted.Leung@disney.com on 2012-03-13)
Re: Logged-In Exception (ISSUE-65) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-03-13)
ISSUE-69: Should the spec say anything about minimal notice? (ie. don't bury in a privacy policy) (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-09-22)

Aleecia McDonald, 28 Nov 2011, 11:11:34

On 18 April call, discussed that option 2 is still being revised, with work from Shane and Justin. Waiting for that to settle before we move forward.

Aleecia McDonald, 18 Apr 2012, 17:14:32