ISSUE-211: Should we specify retention periods (extended with transparency) for permitted uses?
Should we specify retention periods (extended with transparency) for permitted uses?
- State:
- RAISED
- Product:
- Compliance Current
- Raised by:
- Dan Auerbach
- Opened on:
- 2013-06-27
- Description:
- Note change proposal: http://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Retention_Permitted_Uses
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Batch closing of old issues (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2015-03-24)
- Agenda for July 9 TPWG call (from npdoty@w3.org on 2014-07-08)
- Re: Agenda for June 25 TPWG call (from sstamm@mozilla.com on 2014-06-25)
- Agenda for June 25 TPWG call (from ninja@w3.org on 2014-06-24)
- Agenda for June 18 TPWG call (from ninja@w3.org on 2014-06-17)
- Re: Agenda for June 11 TPWG call (from singer@apple.com on 2014-06-10)
- Agenda for June 11 TPWG call (from ninja@w3.org on 2014-06-09)
- Agenda for June 4 TPWG call (from ninja@w3.org on 2014-06-02)
- Compliance document updates for review before next WD publication (was CVS WWW/2011/tracking-protection/drafts) (from npdoty@w3.org on 2013-09-28)
- Re: June change proposal: permitted uses (from npdoty@w3.org on 2013-07-08)
- Re: June change proposal: permitted uses (from npdoty@w3.org on 2013-07-08)
- Re: June change proposal: permitted uses (from dan@eff.org on 2013-07-08)
- Re: June change proposal: permitted uses (from npdoty@w3.org on 2013-06-28)
- tracking-ISSUE-211: Should we specify retention periods (extended with transparency) for permitted uses? [Compliance June] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-06-27)
Related notes:
No additional notes.
Display change log
