ACTION-65: Propose clarification on ISSUE-39
Propose clarification on ISSUE-39
- State:
- closed
- Person:
- Thomas Lowenthal
- Due on:
- February 3, 2012
- Created on:
- January 25, 2012
- Associated Issue:
- ISSUE-39
- Related emails:
- Re: Issue-39: Tracking of Geographic Data (from tom@mozilla.com on 2012-02-29)
- Re: Housekeeping from today's call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-02-08)
- Re: Housekeeping from today's call (from achapell@chapellassociates.com on 2012-02-08)
- Housekeeping from today's call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-02-08)
- Re: Issue-39: Tracking of Geographic Data, Action-67 (from justin@cdt.org on 2012-02-08)
- Re: Issue-39: Tracking of Geographic Data (from gelman@blurryedge.com on 2012-02-06)
- Re: Issue-39: Tracking of Geographic Data (from dwainberg@appnexus.com on 2012-02-06)
- RE: Issue-39: Tracking of Geographic Data (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-02-06)
- Re: Issue-39: Tracking of Geographic Data (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-02-03)
- Re: Issue-39: Tracking of Geographic Data (from tom@mozilla.com on 2012-02-03)
Related notes:
From discussion on the 8 February call, editors to please add to the document:
- Tom's text from http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2012Feb/0081.html
- Update to add that geo-location more granular than zip code is too granular
- Update to add that if there is a specific consent for more granular location data, that prevails
Display change log.