ACTION-123: Draft a response to 1st/3rd proposal (with Lauren)

Draft a response to 1st/3rd proposal (with Lauren)

State:
closed
Person:
Jeffrey Chester
Due on:
April 4, 2012
Created on:
February 15, 2012
Associated Product:
Compliance Next
Related emails:
  1. agenda: 18 April 2012 call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-04-18)
  2. Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-03-28)
  3. Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from gelman@blurryedge.com on 2012-03-27)
  4. Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-03-26)
  5. RE: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from acolando@microsoft.com on 2012-03-25)
  6. Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-03-22)
  7. Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from gelman@blurryedge.com on 2012-03-22)
  8. RE: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from acolando@microsoft.com on 2012-03-22)
  9. Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from gelman@blurryedge.com on 2012-03-22)
  10. Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from achapell@chapellassociates.com on 2012-03-22)
  11. Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2012-03-22)
  12. Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-03-21)
  13. Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-03-21)
  14. RE: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from acolando@microsoft.com on 2012-03-21)
  15. Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2012-03-20)
  16. Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2012-03-20)
  17. RE: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-03-18)
  18. Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from vp@iabeurope.eu on 2012-03-16)
  19. Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-03-16)
  20. RE: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-03-16)
  21. Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-03-16)
  22. RE: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-03-16)
  23. RE: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from acolando@microsoft.com on 2012-03-16)
  24. Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-03-16)
  25. Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-03-16)
  26. Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from ggieron@adtruth.com on 2012-03-16)
  27. Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from achapell@chapellassociates.com on 2012-03-16)
  28. Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-03-16)
  29. RE: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2012-03-16)
  30. Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from vp@iabeurope.eu on 2012-03-16)
  31. Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from ggieron@adtruth.com on 2012-03-16)
  32. Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-03-16)
  33. Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-03-16)
  34. RE: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from jccannon@microsoft.com on 2012-03-16)
  35. Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-03-16)
  36. RE: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from acolando@microsoft.com on 2012-03-16)
  37. Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2012-03-14)
  38. RE: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-03-14)
  39. RE: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2012-03-14)
  40. Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-03-14)
  41. Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-03-14)
  42. RE: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2012-03-14)
  43. RE: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from CPedigo@online-publishers.org on 2012-03-14)
  44. RE: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-03-14)
  45. Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2012-03-14)
  46. Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from mike@iab.net on 2012-03-14)
  47. Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from sharvey@google.com on 2012-03-14)
  48. Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-03-13)
  49. RE: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-03-13)
  50. Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-03-13)
  51. Re: Parties and First Party vs. Third Party (ISSUE-10) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-03-13)

Related notes:

Overtaken by events; Jeff and Lauren will not get to this

Aleecia McDonald, 18 Apr 2012, 07:21:18

Display change log.

Chair, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 123.html,v 1.1 2019/02/01 09:31:50 vivien Exp $