From RDF Working Group Wiki
Revision as of 16:05, 20 February 2013 by Dwood4 (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Wednesdays at 11am US Eastern time for 75 minutes

  17:00 Paris/Berlin/A'dam; 16:00 London)
Telephone US: +1.617.761.6200
 Zakim code: 73394
IRC channel: #rdf-wg on on port 6665
Zakim instructions:
RRSAgent instructions:
Scribe list:


  • Chair: David Wood
  • Scribe: <to be assigned>
  • Alternate: <to be assigned>

Minutes of last meeting

PROPOSED to accept the minutes of the 13 February telecon:

Review of action items

Extension request



Congratulations to all!

Turtle - Terse RDF Triple Language specification is now a W3C Candidate Recommendation:


Editor's draft:
  • Should we allow blank nodes to be used as graph names? That is, allow a graph name to be both (IRI, graph), and (blank node, graph).

NB: JSON-LD has a preference to allow blank nodes as graph names.

From Manu: PROPOSAL: Allow blank nodes to be used as graph names. Specifically, allow associating (IRI, graph) and (blank node, graph) when naming graphs.

  • Do blank node identifiers, when used as graph names, denote graphs?

From Manu: PREFERENCE POLL: Blank nodes, when used as graph names, denote the graph that they are paired with.

  • ISSUE-109: What's the consequence of a literal being ill-typed?

Review of WG status

Open issues: