Difference between revisions of "Meetings:Telecon2013.02.20"
(Created page with "Wednesdays at 11am US Eastern time for 75 minutes 17:00 Paris/Berlin/A'dam; 16:00 London) Telephone US: +1.617.761.6200 SIP: email@example.com Zakim code: 73394 IRC cha…")
Revision as of 20:56, 19 February 2013
Wednesdays at 11am US Eastern time for 75 minutes
17:00 Paris/Berlin/A'dam; 16:00 London) Telephone US: +1.617.761.6200 SIP: firstname.lastname@example.org Zakim code: 73394 IRC channel: #rdf-wg on irc.w3.org on port 6665 Zakim instructions: http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot.html RRSAgent instructions: http://www.w3.org/2002/03/RRSAgent Scribe list: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Scribes
- Chair: David Wood
- Scribe: <to be assigned>
- Alternate: <to be assigned>
Minutes of last meeting
PROPOSED to accept the minutes of the 06 February telecon:
Review of action items
Congratulations to all!
Turtle - Terse RDF Triple Language specification is now a W3C Candidate Recommendation:
- Should we allow blank nodes to be used as graph names? That is, allow a graph name to be both (IRI, graph), and (blank node, graph).
NB: JSON-LD has a preference to allow blank nodes as graph names.
From Manu: PROPOSAL: Allow blank nodes to be used as graph names. Specifically, allow associating (IRI, graph) and (blank node, graph) when naming graphs.
- Do blank node identifiers, when used as graph names, denote graphs?
From Manu: PREFERENCE POLL: Blank nodes, when used as graph names, denote the graph that they are paired with.
- ISSUE-109: What's the consequence of a literal being ill-typed?
Review of WG status