Meetings:Telecon2012.11.21

From RDF Working Group Wiki

Revision as of 16:50, 16 November 2012 (view source) Dwood4 (Talk | contribs) (Created page with " Wednesdays at 11am US Eastern time for 75 minutes 17:00 Paris/Berlin/A'dam; 16:00 London) Telephone US: +1.617.761.6200 SIP: zakim@voip.w3.org Zakim code: 73394 IRC ch…") ← Older edit		Revision as of 16:52, 16 November 2012 (view source) Dwood4 (Talk | contribs) (→Review of issue list) Newer edit →
Line 55:		Line 55:
	== Review of issue list ==		== Review of issue list ==
-
-	Pending review:
-	* https://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/93
-	* https://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/97
-	* https://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/103
	Open issues:		Open issues:

---

Revision as of 16:52, 16 November 2012

Wednesdays at 11am US Eastern time for 75 minutes
  17:00 Paris/Berlin/A'dam; 16:00 London)
Telephone US: +1.617.761.6200
  SIP: zakim@voip.w3.org
 Zakim code: 73394
IRC channel: #rdf-wg on irc.w3.org on port 6665
Zakim instructions:  http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot.html
RRSAgent instructions: http://www.w3.org/2002/03/RRSAgent
Scribe list: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Scribes

Contents 1 Admin 1.1 Minutes of last meeting 1.2 Review of action items 2 RDF Concepts 3 Turtle LC 4 JSON-LD 5 Review of issue list 6 AOB

Admin

• Chair: David Wood
• Scribe: Yves Raimond
• Alternate: Zhe Wu

Minutes of last meeting

PROPOSED to accept the minutes of the 7 Nov telecon:

   http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2012-11-07

Review of action items

• http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/pendingreview
• http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/open

RDF Concepts

1. Update from Sandro on ACTION-82 (.well-known registration) ACTION-82
2. Update from Dave on ACTION-193 (Migration Guide ED) ACTION-193
3. Close PENDINGREVIEW ISSUE-107 (Blank Nodes definition)
4. Check for consensus on ISSUE-104 (Too many Notes)
   1. PROPOSAL: Delete four informative Notes from Concepts as described in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Nov/0131.html
5. Check for consensus on ISSUE-110 (Term for g-box)
   1. PROPOSAL 1: Informally call g-boxes “RDF sources” in Concepts
   2. PROPOSAL 2: Keep the informal term “g-box” in Concepts
6. Discuss ISSUE-109 (Consequence of ill-typed literals)
7. Assign reviewers

Turtle LC

• Review of status comments
• Test suite
  • See Andy's work at http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/file/default/rdf-turtle/tests-ttl and http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Turtle_Test_Suite

JSON-LD

• Status report

Review of issue list

Open issues:

• http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/open

• New actions to tackle issues?
• Planning

AOB