Meetings:Telecon2012.10.24
From RDF Working Group Wiki
Wednesdays at 11am US Eastern time for 75 minutes 17:00 Paris/Berlin/A'dam; 16:00 London) Telephone US: +1.617.761.6200 SIP: zakim@voip.w3.org Zakim code: 73394 IRC channel: #rdf-wg on irc.w3.org on port 6665 Zakim instructions: http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot.html RRSAgent instructions: http://www.w3.org/2002/03/RRSAgent Scribe list: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Scribes
Contents |
Admin
- Chair: Guus Schreiber
- Scribe: Pierre-Antoine Champin
- Alternate: Richard Cyganik
Minutes of last meeting
PROPOSED to accept the minutes of the 17 Oct telecon:
http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2012-10-17
Review of action items
- http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/pendingreview
- http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/open
Next meeting
- Next meeting: TPAC FTF, Lyon, 29-30 Oct
- Note: US still in Summer Time, Europe not
- Next telecon: 05 November 2012
Next FTF
Mon-Tue 29-30 Oct, Lyon, France, co-located with TPAC.
Please see the Agenda and the Objectives.
JSON-LD
Discussion started with:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Oct/0093.html
Three discussions appear to be going on in the thread:
Relationship JSON-LD <=> RDF
E.g. Peter's questions (in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Oct/0107.html)
- Is JSON-LD a serialization syntax for all RDF graphs?
- Is JSON-LD only a serialization syntax for RDF graphs?
Description of the JSON-LD&RDF relationsip in the documents
- Are
Linked Data & foormats =
This discussion is interesting but should not be on the critical path of this WG.
Provenance Constraints Review
Progress on LC reviews (actions 184+185)
What are we going to tell the Provenance WG? Use RDF datasets and serialize via either TriG or JSON-LD? We are late and should respond soon.
Turtle Tests
Andy's seed of test cases and Andy's announcement
Graphs
TriG Syntax
Discuss whether in our dataset syntax, triples of the dataset's default graph MUST or MAY be surrounded by curly braces.
Related question: How can a human tell a Turtle document from a TriG document?
PROPOSED: In TriG, triples of the dataset's default graph [MUST|MAY] be surrounded by curly braces.
PROPOSED: Implementations that parse and store information from TriG documents MAY turn the TriG default graph into a named graph with a name chosen in an implementation-dependent way.
PROPOSED: The WG suggests it's a good practice to put metadata about a TriG document in the document's default graph.
