Difference between revisions of "Meetings:Telecon2012.09.12"

From RDF Working Group Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(ISSUE-21: Can Node-IDs be shared)
m
 
Line 53: Line 53:
 
http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/21
 
http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/21
  
ROPOSED: When you use the same blank node identifier (like _:x) two different places in a TriG document, the identifier refers to the same blank node.  
+
PROPOSED: When you use the same blank node identifier (like _:x) two different places in a TriG document, the identifier refers to the same blank node.  
  
 
See associated thread:  
 
See associated thread:  

Latest revision as of 14:53, 12 September 2012

Wednesdays at 11am US Eastern time for 75 minutes
  17:00 Paris/Berlin/A'dam; 16:00 London)
Telephone US: +1.617.761.6200
  SIP: zakim@voip.w3.org
 Zakim code: 73394
IRC channel: #rdf-wg on irc.w3.org on port 6665
Zakim instructions:  http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot.html
RRSAgent instructions: http://www.w3.org/2002/03/RRSAgent
Scribe list: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Scribes


Admin

  • Chair: Guus Schreiber
  • Scribe: Arnaud Le Hors
  • Alternate: Charles Greer


Minutes of last meeting

PROPOSED to accept the minutes of the 5 September:

   http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2012-09-05


Review of action items

Next meeting

  • Next telecon: 19 September 2012


Next FTF

Mon-Tue 29-30 Oct, Lyon, France, co-located with TPAC.

Info and registration information:

 http://www.w3.org/2012/10/TPAC/

See also Sandro's recommendation for attending other meetings during TPAC:

 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Jul/0039.html
 

Turtle

Review of LC comments (LC period ends on 15 Sep).

Graphs

ISSUE-21: Can Node-IDs be shared?

http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/21

PROPOSED: When you use the same blank node identifier (like _:x) two different places in a TriG document, the identifier refers to the same blank node.

See associated thread: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Sep/0045.html

Dataset semantics

Minimal semantics proposal from Antoine:

 http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/TF-Graphs/Minimal-dataset-semantics

See associated thread: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Sep/0008.html

JSON-LD

Short status review.

AOB