Meetings:Telecon2011.12.14

From RDF Working Group Wiki
Revision as of 16:05, 14 December 2011 by Aseaborne (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Agenda RDF-WG telecon 14 Dec 2011

Wednesdays at 11am US Eastern time for 75 minutes
  17:00 Paris/Berlin/A'dam; 16:00 London)
Telephone US: +1.617.761.6200
  SIP: zakim@voip.w3.org
  UK: +44.203.318.0479
  FR: +33.4.26.46.79.03
Zakim code: 73394
IRC channel: #rdf-wg on irc.w3.org on port 6665
Zakim instructions:  http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot.html
RRSAgent instructions: http://www.w3.org/2002/03/RRSAgent
Scribe list: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Scribes


Admin

  • Chair: Guus Schreiber
  • Scribe: Olivier Corby

Alternate: Andy Seaborne

PROPOSED to accept the minutes of the 30 Nov telecon:

   http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2011-11-30


Action item review:

   http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/pendingreview
   http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/open

Next telecon: 21 Dec 2011

Named Graphs

TriG document examples

See message from Andy: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011Dec/0002.html


Issue: should/must the 4th slot be an IRI?

see thread starting with http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011Nov/0116.html

Two alternative points of view (see minutes 30 Nov):

  1. we are not in a position to constrain the type of the "4th slot"
  2. we are standardizing graph identifiers, so they better be identifiers (= IRI)

Todo: list arguments in favor/against these positions (e.g. #1 breaks TriG).

Meta-discussion: routes for reaching consensus

  • 4th slot should be an IRI?!
  • no semantics for relationship between the Graph IRI and the graph?!
  • can we do more?