Graph Terminology/Options
From RDF Working Group Wiki
< Graph Terminology(Difference between revisions)
(Created page with "== Option 1 (baseline) == (this was the agreement the last time this was brought to a decision; things seem to have changed enough in the model since then for the decision to no…") |
(→Option 2) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:RDF Graph | :RDF Graph | ||
;g-box | ;g-box | ||
| - | + | :RDF data source | |
== Option 3 (retronym) == | == Option 3 (retronym) == | ||
Latest revision as of 11:03, 24 August 2012
Option 1 (baseline)
(this was the agreement the last time this was brought to a decision; things seem to have changed enough in the model since then for the decision to no longer be binding.)
- g-snap
- RDF Graph
- g-box
- Graph Container
Option 2
- g-snap
- RDF Graph
- g-box
- RDF data source
Option 3 (retronym)
- g-snap
- abstract graph, abstract RDF graph
- g-box
- [something] graph, [something] RDF graph.
... where [something] hasn't quite been determined yet. Options include:
- maintained (but what if it's been abandoned?)
- mutable (but what if it's a frozen snapshot?)
- named (but wont that really confuse people?)
- stored (but what if it's dynamically generated?)
- available (but what if it's access controlled?)
- concrete (awkward word)
- real
- nonabstract
- located
- distinct
- ...
The idea here is that when people say "graph" or "RDF graph" these days, they often mean g-box. So we could go with the flow here, let them do that, and just come up with adjectives people can use to distinguish between g-snaps and g-boxes when necessary. What kind of graph is a g-box?
