ISSUE-91: RDF Concepts feedback from Gavin and Pat
rdf-concepts-feedback
RDF Concepts feedback from Gavin and Pat
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- RDF Concepts
- Raised by:
- Richard Cyganiak
- Opened on:
- 2012-05-30
- Description:
- Comments from Gavin:
http://www.w3.org/mid/CAPqY83zdObPObZj=T5SFkjKq-bq7oiv8Nby8GaoyUp8YoBxAkg@mail.gmail.com
Comments from Pat:
http://www.w3.org/mid/A530E01C-69F0-4C2C-AFDD-10F5A45F48A4@ihmc.us
http://www.w3.org/mid/78DB39C1-65D1-4BC3-91B9-4656A579BC1E@ihmc.us
Mostly good editorial points.
Concerns about IRI/URI/URL terminology.
Concerns about XML 1.0 vs 1.1. Why did we change from 1.0 to 1.1 again? - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: rdf11-concepts WD ready (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2012-11-06)
- Re: rdf11-concepts WD ready (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2012-11-06)
- RDF-ISSUE-91 (rdf-concepts-feedback): RDF Concepts feedback from Gavin and Pat [RDF Concepts] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2012-05-30)
Related notes:
I believe all concerns are addressed (or raised as separate issues), as detailed here:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Nov/0072.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2012Nov/0073.html
Therefore, marking as PENDINGREVIEW.
Display change log
