ISSUE-87: Revisit RDF 2004 datatypes that have proven troublesome in OWL and RIF

Revisit 2004 types

Revisit RDF 2004 datatypes that have proven troublesome in OWL and RIF

State:

CLOSED

Product:

Raised by:

Richard Cyganiak

Opened on:

2012-05-02

Description:

Some RDF datatypes included in RDF 2004, such as xsd:gYear, have proven troublesome in RIF and OWL due to not being well-behaved w.r.t. ordering.

Revisit them to decide if anything is to be done about it.

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. Re: Publish RDF Concepts as revised WD? (was: Re: Agenda 16 May telecon) (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2012-05-16)
2. Publish RDF Concepts as revised WD? (was: Re: Agenda 16 May telecon) (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2012-05-15)
3. Re: Proposal to resolve two XSD datatype issues (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2012-05-10)
4. Re: Proposal to resolve two XSD datatype issues (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2012-05-10)
5. Re: Proposal to resolve two XSD datatype issues (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2012-05-10)
6. Re: Proposal to resolve two XSD datatype issues (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-05-10)
7. Proposal to resolve two XSD datatype issues (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2012-05-10)
8. Re: Proposal to resolve two XSD datatype issues (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2012-05-09)
9. Re: RDF-ISSUE-87 (Revisit 2004 types): Revisit RDF 2004 datatypes that have proven troublesome in OWL and RIF (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-05-02)
10. RDF-ISSUE-87 (Revisit 2004 types): Revisit RDF 2004 datatypes that have proven troublesome in OWL and RIF (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2012-05-02)

Related notes:

Display change log