UniverseOfDiscourse

From Provenance WG Wiki
Revision as of 16:23, 26 January 2012 by Lmoreau (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Proposal 1: Entities and Activities belong to the universe of discourse.
  • +1 GK
  • +1 Khalid
  • +1 Paolo
  • +1 Daniel
  • +1 Simon
  • +1 Curt
  • +1 Satya
  • +1 Tim
  • +1 Stian
  • +1 Jim
  • +1 James
Proposal 2: Events (Entity Usage event, Entity Generation Event, Activity Start Event, Activity End event) belong to the universe of discourse
  • no clear view GK
  • +1 Khalid
  • +1 Paolo
  • +1 Daniel
  • +1 Simon
  • +1 Curt
  • +1 Satya
  • +1 Tim
  • +1 Stian
  • +1 Jim
  • +1 James
Proposal 3: Derivation, Association, Responsibility chains, Traceability, Activity Ordering, Revision, Attribution, Quotation, Summary, Original SOurce, CollectionAfterInsertion/Collection After removal belong to the universe of discourse.
  • I'm inclined to say not, but I'm not sure I understand the proposal, GK
  • +1 for assoication and responsibility chain Khalid
  • +0 for the rest Khalid
  • +1 Paolo
  • +1 Daniel
  • +1 Simon
  • +1 Curt
  • +1 Satya
  • -1 0 +1 Tim
  • +1 for Assocation Stian
  • -1 for the others (these are relations) Stian
  • +0 Jim
  • 0 James


Proposal 4: AlternateOf and SpecializationOf belong to the universe of discourse
  • -1 These seem to me to be statements *about* things in the domain of discourse. GK
  • 0 Khalid
  • +1 Paolo
  • +1 Daniel
  • +1 Simon
  • +1 Curt
  • 0 Satya
  • -1 Tim
  • -1 Stian
  • +0 Jim
  • -1 James


Proposal 5: Records do not belong to the Universe of discourse This includes Account Record.
  • +1 GK
  • +1 Khalid
  • +1 Paolo
  • +1 Daniel
  • +1 Simon
  • 0 Curt
  • -1 Satya
  • +1 Tim
  • +1 Stian
  • +0 Jim
  • +1 James


Proposal 6: Things do no belong to the universe of discourse
  • -0 GK
  • 0 Khalid
  • +1 Paolo
  • +1 Daniel
  • +1 Simon
  • 0 Curt
  • +1 Satya
  • +1 Tim
  • +1 Stian
  • +0 Jim
  • +1 James
Proposal 7: Note/hasAnnotation do not belong to the universe of discourse
  • +1 GK
  • +1 Khalid
  • +1 Paolo
  • +1 Daniel
  • +1 Simon
  • +1 Curt
  • 0 Satya
  • +1 Tim
  • +1 Stian
  • +0 Jim
  • +1 James
Proposal 8: Event ordering constraints do not belong to the universe of discourse.
  • +1 GK
  • +1 Khalid
  • +1 Paolo
  • +1 Daniel
  • +1 Simon
  • +1 Curt
  • 0 Satya
  • +1 Tim
  • +1 Stian
  • +0 Jim
  • +1 James
Proposal 9: Attributes do not belong to the universe of discourse.


  • I think I agree, but ... GK
  • +1 Khalid
  • +1 Paolo
  • +1 Daniel
  • 0 Simon
  • +1 Curt
  • 0 Satya
  • +1 Tim
  • +1 Stian
  • +0 Jim
  • +1 James