ComplementarityUseCases
From Provenance WG Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(→Complementarity Use Cases) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Complementarity Use Cases= | =Complementarity Use Cases= | ||
| + | |||
| + | == "viewOf" as the fubndemental underpinning relation (GK) == | ||
| + | |||
| + | For me, the relationship I call "viewOf, where "a viewOf b" means that a is a constrained view or version of b (e.g. Luc in Boston is a constrained view of Luc), is the fundamental underpinning on which other kinds of complementarity may be built. As a notion, it's quite easy to understand (if not describe), and is the basic idea which explains relationships between Resopurces/Entities which allows us to make provenance statements with enduring truth, hence tractability for analysis. | ||
=See also= | =See also= | ||
* [[PROV OWL ontology component examples]] | * [[PROV OWL ontology component examples]] | ||
Revision as of 17:07, 1 December 2011
Complementarity Use Cases
"viewOf" as the fubndemental underpinning relation (GK)
For me, the relationship I call "viewOf, where "a viewOf b" means that a is a constrained view or version of b (e.g. Luc in Boston is a constrained view of Luc), is the fundamental underpinning on which other kinds of complementarity may be built. As a notion, it's quite easy to understand (if not describe), and is the basic idea which explains relationships between Resopurces/Entities which allows us to make provenance statements with enduring truth, hence tractability for analysis.
