Difference between revisions of "ComplementarityUseCases"

From Provenance WG Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Complementarity Use Cases)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
=Complementarity Use Cases=
 
=Complementarity Use Cases=
 +
 +
== "viewOf" as the fubndemental underpinning relation (GK) ==
 +
 +
For me, the relationship I call "viewOf, where "a viewOf b" means that a is a constrained view or version of b (e.g. Luc in Boston is a constrained view of Luc), is the fundamental underpinning on which other kinds of complementarity may be built.  As a notion, it's quite easy to understand (if not describe), and is the basic idea which explains relationships between Resopurces/Entities which allows us to make provenance statements with enduring truth, hence tractability for analysis.
  
 
=See also=
 
=See also=
  
 
* [[PROV OWL ontology component examples]]
 
* [[PROV OWL ontology component examples]]

Revision as of 17:07, 1 December 2011

Complementarity Use Cases

"viewOf" as the fubndemental underpinning relation (GK)

For me, the relationship I call "viewOf, where "a viewOf b" means that a is a constrained view or version of b (e.g. Luc in Boston is a constrained view of Luc), is the fundamental underpinning on which other kinds of complementarity may be built. As a notion, it's quite easy to understand (if not describe), and is the basic idea which explains relationships between Resopurces/Entities which allows us to make provenance statements with enduring truth, hence tractability for analysis.

See also