ProvDMWorkingDraft5

From Provenance WG Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

PROV-DM Towards Fifth Working Draft

Binary Relations

The Prov-O ontology has defined alternateOf, specializationOf, and hasNote a object properties, since they don't naturally fall into the "Involvement Pattern". Translating back to prov-dm, this would mean that these relations should not have identifiers nor attributes.

To facilitate alignment between prov-dm and we prov-o, we propose to the following.

  1. Remove id and attribute from alternateOf, specializationOf, and hasNote
  2. Reorganize section 4.2 into
    • New section 4.2 with all relations with id and attributes.
    • New section 4.3 with the three relations without id and attributes.

It would be nice to come up with some terminology to distinguish these relation types. Suggestions?


This proposal was approved (cf resolution: http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/meeting/2012-03-01#resolution_3)

Derivation

Proposal on derivations http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/working-copy/wd5-prov-dm-derivation.html was approved (cf resolution http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/meeting/2012-03-08#resolution_1)


TODO

DM

  • invalidation:
    • revisit the invalidation issue in light of the latest discussion [LM, LOW PRIO]
    • incorporate MacTed's example?
    • incorporate a BBC news site that gets updated
  • account

N

    • align collection productions [PM]

CONSTRAINTS


DONE