Chatlog 2013-03-28

See original RRSAgent log or preview nicely formatted version.

Please justify/explain all edits to this page, in your "edit summary" text.

14:50:52 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #prov
14:50:52 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/03/28-prov-irc
14:50:54 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs world
14:50:54 <Zakim> Zakim has joined #prov
14:50:56 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be PROV
14:50:56 <Zakim> ok, trackbot; I see SW_(PROV)11:00AM scheduled to start in 10 minutes
14:50:56 <Luc> zakim, this will be PROV
14:50:57 <trackbot> Meeting: Provenance Working Group Teleconference
14:50:57 <trackbot> Date: 28 March 2013
14:50:58 <Zakim> ok, Luc; I see SW_(PROV)11:00AM scheduled to start in 10 minutes
14:51:07 <Luc> Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2013.03.28
14:51:22 <Luc> Chair: Luc Moreau
14:52:00 <Luc> Scribe: dgarijo
14:52:23 <Luc> rrsagent, make logs public
14:53:14 <dgarijo> dgarijo has joined #prov
14:55:35 <dgarijo> Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2013.03.28
14:56:39 <Luc> Hi daniel, are you OK to scribe?
14:57:04 <khalidBelhajjame> khalidBelhajjame has joined #prov
14:57:55 <Zakim> SW_(PROV)11:00AM has now started
14:58:03 <Zakim> + +44.238.059.aaaa
14:58:32 <Zakim> +??P2
14:58:53 <Luc> zakim, +44.238.059.aaaa is me
14:58:54 <Zakim> +Luc; got it
14:59:01 <GK> GK has joined #prov
14:59:08 <Luc> Hi daniel, are you OK to scribe?
14:59:12 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
14:59:13 <zednik> zednik has joined #prov
14:59:15 <GK> zakim, ??p2 is me
14:59:15 <Zakim> +GK; got it
14:59:27 <Paolo> Paolo has joined #prov
14:59:34 <dgarijo> Hi Luc, yes, I'm ok.
15:00:03 <Zakim> +??P13
15:00:09 <dgarijo> Zakim, ??P13 is me
15:00:10 <Zakim> +dgarijo; got it
15:00:42 <jcheney> jcheney has joined #prov
15:00:55 <Zakim> + +1.818.731.aabb
15:01:20 <hook> hook has joined #prov
15:01:24 <Zakim> - +1.818.731.aabb
15:01:47 <Zakim> + +1.818.731.aacc
15:01:59 <dgarijo> scribe: dgarijo
15:02:23 <dgarijo> Luc: today we are going to Luc at the documents we are going to release+ organize reviews.
15:02:25 <Luc> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/meeting/2013-03-21
15:02:26 <GK> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2013.03.28
15:02:32 <christine> christine has joined #prov
15:02:34 <Luc> Proposed: approved last week's minutes
15:02:43 <Zakim> +jcheney
15:02:46 <dgarijo> dgarijo:+0 (I wasn't)
15:02:51 <Luc> zakim, who is here?
15:02:51 <Zakim> On the phone I see Luc, GK, [IPcaller], dgarijo, +1.818.731.aacc, jcheney
15:02:54 <Zakim> On IRC I see christine, hook, jcheney, Paolo, zednik, GK, khalidBelhajjame, dgarijo, Zakim, RRSAgent, Luc, GK-alt, TallTed, ivan, stain, trackbot
15:02:58 <Zakim> +[IPcaller.a]
15:03:06 <GK> I'm here
15:03:08 <dgarijo> me :)
15:03:10 <jcheney> here
15:03:16 <hook> here
15:03:16 <christine> Zakim, [IPcaller.a] is christine
15:03:16 <Zakim> +christine; got it
15:03:18 <jcheney> +1
15:03:19 <Zakim> +SamCoppens
15:03:19 <GK> Wasn't present last week meeting.
15:03:21 <hook> +1
15:03:23 <dgarijo> +0
15:03:24 <TomDN> TomDN has joined #prov
15:03:35 <khalidBelhajjame> +0
15:03:35 <ivan> zakim, code?
15:03:35 <Zakim> the conference code is 7768 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), ivan
15:03:36 <Luc> RESOLVED: last week's minutes
15:03:39 <Paolo> 0 (not present)
15:03:51 <dgarijo> Luc:a few open actions left
15:03:57 <Zakim> +ivan
15:04:00 <dgarijo> ... Paul -> prov overview document
15:04:07 <Zakim> +[IPcaller.a]
15:04:14 <dgarijo> ... another one for Graham. Is it done (about PAQ).
15:04:25 <TomDN> Zakim, who is on the phone?
15:04:25 <Zakim> On the phone I see Luc, GK, [IPcaller], dgarijo, +1.818.731.aacc, jcheney, christine, SamCoppens, ivan, [IPcaller.a]
15:04:34 <Luc> actuib0-166?
15:04:39 <GK> Looking...
15:04:40 <Luc> action-166?
15:04:40 <trackbot> ACTION-166 -- Graham Klyne to add a bit of text explaining the inconsistency between html/rdf and http -- due 2013-03-21 -- OPEN
15:04:40 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/actions/166
15:04:44 <TomDN> Zakim, tomDN is with SamCoppens
15:04:44 <Zakim> +tomDN; got it
15:04:51 <GK> Yes, did it.
15:04:58 <TomDN> Zakim, tomDN is me
15:04:58 <Zakim> sorry, TomDN, I do not recognize a party named 'tomDN'
15:05:01 <dgarijo> GK: (can't understand).
15:05:06 <smiles> smiles has joined #prov
15:05:08 <GK> I'm going to re-connect
15:05:10 <TomDN> Zakim, mute me
15:05:10 <Zakim> sorry, TomDN, I do not know which phone connection belongs to you
15:05:12 <Zakim> -GK
15:05:22 <TomDN> Zakim, TomDN is with SamCoppens
15:05:22 <Zakim> tomDN was already listed in SamCoppens, TomDN
15:05:41 <Zakim> +??P32
15:05:47 <dgarijo> Luc: Action to Paul to talk to james about reviewing xml
15:05:51 <smiles> zakim, ??P32 is smiles
15:05:53 <Zakim> +smiles; got it
15:05:59 <Zakim> +??P1
15:06:02 <Luc> q?
15:06:06 <GK> zakim, ??p1 is me
15:06:06 <Zakim> +GK; got it
15:06:37 <dgarijo> jcheney: ran across Henry Thompson, who is willing in principle o take a look, but not sure. Will try to ask other people
15:06:45 <dgarijo> Luc: Action is now closed.
15:06:48 <Luc> topic: prov-xml
<luc>Summary: Feedback was received about the mime-type application. Stephan to draft a response.  The issue on JAXB is not resolved yet, but the editors propose to try a solution, and share it with the group early next week. The plan is to have the document ready for internal review by Thursday (04/04).
15:06:50 <dgarijo> ... PROV-XML
15:07:07 <dgarijo> ... we had a few issues. The first one is about the media type
15:07:21 <dgarijo> ... we have received some feedback this morning
15:07:33 <dgarijo> ... stephan, have you had a chance to look at it?
15:07:54 <dgarijo> zednik:will read it and provide a response before the end of the day
15:08:12 <Luc> q?
15:08:25 <dgarijo> Luc: next item is the jaxb issue
15:08:53 <dgarijo> hook: we may have a potential candidate solution.
15:09:27 <dgarijo> ... it may be depending the jaxb implementation.
15:10:40 <CraigTrim> CraigTrim has joined #PROV
15:10:44 <Luc> zakim, who is noisy?
15:10:50 <dgarijo> ... One possible solution is to remove the sequence inside to ??? (I'm getting a lot of noise).
15:10:55 <Zakim> Luc, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Luc (8%), GK (18%), +1.818.731.aacc (94%), ivan (43%)
15:11:09 <GK> That\'s odd - I'm muted.
15:11:18 <GK> Reconnecting again.
15:11:21 <Zakim> -GK
15:11:23 <ivan> I muted myself
15:11:26 <ivan> is it better?
15:11:29 <Zakim> +Satya_Sahoo
15:11:39 <satya> satya has joined #prov
15:12:00 <Zakim> +??P1
15:12:08 <GK> zakim, ??p1 is me
15:12:08 <Zakim> +GK; got it
15:12:17 <dgarijo> Luc: what is the timetable, was it today? How are you planning to move towards a decission.
15:12:26 <zednik> q+
15:12:59 <Luc> ack z
15:13:02 <dgarijo> hook: we may need to get some confirmation. The possible solution requires one edit, but that will be the only change (adding the document bundling class).
15:13:10 <Zakim> +CraigTrim
15:13:48 <Luc> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/WorkplanTillFinalPublication
15:13:55 <dgarijo> zednik: We are going to add a level of indirection to the xml serialization. I was not aware that we were going to release something today.
15:14:41 <dgarijo> Luc: somebody said that in the current timetable. If that's not the case then we should correct it. This will be the final internal review.
15:14:49 <Luc> q?
15:15:05 <dgarijo> Luc: when could we hope to have a proposal to the group.
15:15:08 <dgarijo> ... ?
15:15:27 <Luc> q?
15:16:26 <dgarijo> hook: it will be a very small edit change. It can be done shortly after we get confirmation to the solution.
15:16:37 <dgarijo> zednik: by next thursday would be good?
15:16:52 <dgarijo> Luc: we need to have the document staged by the 23 of April.
15:17:23 <dgarijo> ... If there is a vote on the 4th and a release on the 11th then we are tight on time.
15:17:37 <dgarijo> zednik: ok, we will have it by tuesday.
15:17:39 <dgarijo> Luc: ok
15:18:07 <dgarijo> ... the we don't need to set up reviewers yet.
15:18:16 <Luc> q?
15:18:17 <dgarijo> zednik: ok. I'll stage the document as well.
15:18:21 <dgarijo> Luc: thanks.
15:18:27 <Luc> topic: prov-aq
<luc>Summary: Document is out for review. Stian and Sam will review the document. Any other volunteer?  Reviews due by next call on (04/04).
15:18:41 <dgarijo> Luc: Is the doc ready for review?
15:18:54 <GK> Yes, dpocument is ready
15:19:00 <dgarijo> GK: I'll write down my responses
15:19:03 <GK> See http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/products/5
15:19:18 <TomDN> Sam volunteers
15:19:24 <dgarijo> Luc: reviewers for PROV-AQ?
15:20:07 <Zakim> +[IPcaller.aa]
15:20:08 <dgarijo> Luc: it would be nice to have Tim's input as well.
15:20:16 <stain> Zakim, IPcaller.aa is me
15:20:16 <Zakim> +stain; got it
15:20:31 <TomDN> (I'll take a look at it as well, but will integrate my comments in Sam's review)
15:20:35 <dgarijo> Luc: stian?
15:20:58 <dgarijo> stain: ok, I'll do a quick one
15:21:06 <stain> log that Stian won't do an evil review this time
15:21:17 <dgarijo> :D
15:21:21 <GK> For reviewers, the comments in the tracker may help you locate the chamnges
15:21:30 <dgarijo> Luc: anything else?
15:21:38 <GK> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/products/5
15:21:48 <GK> Also change log in document.
15:22:02 <dgarijo> ... the intent is that we'd like to have the reviews complete by the 4th of April.
15:22:06 <GK> Mercurial can provide diffs if required.
15:22:08 <Luc> q?
15:22:22 <dgarijo> Luc: prov-primer
15:22:24 <Luc> topic: prov-primer
<luc>Summary: Editors are still making a few changes. Document is planned to be out tomorrow. Paul and Craig to review prov-primer.  Any other volunteer? Reviews due by the next teleconference (04/04).
15:22:46 <dgarijo> Luc: status?
15:23:04 <dgarijo> smiles: I thiyght that it was going to be easy, but I'm struggling a bit.
15:23:18 <dgarijo> r/thiyght/thought
15:23:27 <dgarijo> ... I'm aiming to finish tomorrow
15:23:29 <dgarijo> Luc: ok
15:23:43 <dgarijo> ... will the document be staged tomorrow?
15:23:49 <dgarijo> smiles: I don't know.
15:24:00 <dgarijo> ... working as fast as I can
15:24:23 <dgarijo> Luc: ok, as soon as you can stage the document
15:24:30 <dgarijo> smiles: sure.
15:24:59 <stain> zakim, who is noisy?
15:25:09 <dgarijo> I can have a look at the primer
15:25:10 <Zakim> stain, listening for 10 seconds I could not identify any sounds
15:25:22 <stain> zakim, who is noisy?
15:25:33 <Zakim> stain, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Luc (36%), smiles (91%)
15:26:02 <dgarijo> smiles: influence relationship. Should that be included in the primer?
15:26:13 <Luc> +1
15:26:20 <Luc> q?
15:26:51 <Luc> q?
15:27:27 <Luc> q+
15:27:30 <dgarijo> smiles: I have the feeling that it might not be that important. Is there any objection to include bundles and collections?
15:27:31 <stain> +1 - it could also be used for "other provenance" we don't quite cover - like I've used wasInfluencedBy as a superproperty of purl.org/pav/html#http://purl.org/pav/sourceAccessedAt
15:28:01 <dgarijo> Luc: you can include a small section for provenance of provenance.
15:28:06 <Luc> q?
15:28:13 <Luc> ack Luc
15:28:20 <dgarijo> +1 for provenance of provenance section
15:28:40 <Luc> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/WorkplanTillFinalPublication
15:28:44 <dgarijo> Luc: Simon, please update the timetable.
15:28:56 <pgroth> pgroth has joined #prov
15:29:24 <dgarijo> smiles: sure. The timetable should be left as it is.
15:29:32 <Luc> topic: prov-dc
<luc>Summary: Daniel to finalize the document by tomorrow. Paul and Simon to review. Any other volunteer? Reviews due by the next teleconference (04/04(.
15:29:34 <pgroth> i'm not on the call
15:29:39 <pgroth> but will follow irc
15:31:39 <Luc> q?
15:32:06 <Luc> q?
15:32:23 <stain> I can volunteer as I've been doing something similar mapping with dcterms recently
15:32:40 <pgroth> i'm already going to read it
15:32:47 <stain> what is the deadline for the review?
15:32:49 <pgroth> assuming we're talking about prov-dc
15:32:58 <stain> and the URI for what to review
15:33:05 <stain> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/dc-note/dc-note.html ?
15:33:34 <Luc> q?
15:33:37 <dgarijo> Paul and Stian will review prov-dc
15:33:45 <Luc> topic: prov-dictionary
<luc>Summary: Sam and Tom finalizing the document. It should be ready tomorrow.  Simon and Luc to review the document.  Any other volunteer? Reviews due by next teleconference.
15:33:47 <dgarijo> dgarijo: 2 issues remain to be added to tghe document: 1- finish the dc:references debate. 2) add something about prov:hasProvenance.
15:34:00 <Luc> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/WorkplanTillFinalPublication
15:34:03 <dgarijo> Reviews complete by: 2013-04-04
15:34:20 <dgarijo> dgarijo: Will finish and stage the document tomorrow for internal reviw.
15:34:21 <TomDN> https://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/products/19
15:35:02 <dgarijo> Tom: we are running a bit behind but it will be done by the end of today/tomorrow morning.
15:35:16 <stain> dgarijo, is it just the default/dc-note/dc-note.html in mercurial?
15:35:31 <dgarijo> @stian: yes.
15:35:34 <stain> great
15:36:01 <TomDN> changed prov:KeyValuePair to prov:KeyEntityPair; prov:keyValuePair to prov:keyEntityPair; prov:pairValue to prov:pairEntity.
15:36:04 <dgarijo> Tom: I have done a little change to key entity pair in order to make it less ambiguous.
15:36:34 <dgarijo> ... makes things a lot more consistent
15:36:44 <stain> +1
15:36:44 <Luc> +1 to this change
15:36:52 <dgarijo> ... if there are objections I can change it back
15:36:53 <Luc> q+
15:37:22 <Luc> ack L
15:37:24 <Zakim> - +1.818.731.aacc
15:37:56 <Luc> q?
15:38:00 <dgarijo> Tom: we don't want to touch the definition of influence, so the proposal is to leave things as they are.
15:38:09 <dgarijo> Luc: what is the implication for the owl file?
15:38:15 <pgroth> +1 for not touching influence
15:38:23 <dgarijo> Tom: it still needs to be updated. And the xml schema.
15:38:51 <dgarijo> Luc: once you've completed the doc it will be fine to inform Tim and Stephan about the latest changes
15:39:21 <Luc> q?
15:39:26 <dgarijo> Luc: we had identified some reviewer: Luc, Simon. Anybody else?
15:40:03 <Luc> q?
15:40:06 <dgarijo> ... the reviews are due by next week.
15:40:10 <dgarijo> ... anything else?
15:40:13 <Luc> topic: prov-overview
<luc>Summary: Suggestions were due by today. Document will be ready for review at the next teleconference.
15:40:44 <pgroth> suggestions due today
15:40:57 <dgarijo> Luc: There was a call for suggestions and the deadline was today. Paul was going to produce the next version for next week
15:41:03 <Luc> document ready for review next week?
15:41:09 <pgroth> I had some from Tim, Graham, and also outside
15:41:16 <pgroth> it will be ready for review next week
15:41:17 <pgroth> yes
15:41:26 <Luc> thanks
15:41:48 <dgarijo> We have craig also. Anybody else?
15:41:58 <pgroth> it's not long :-)
15:42:11 <dgarijo> Ivan, it would be nice if you could have a look with your w3c hat.
15:42:26 <Luc> q?
15:42:32 <dgarijo> Ivan: I have to go to China, I don't think I'll be able.
15:42:42 <Luc> q?
15:42:58 <dgarijo> ... if the doc is ready at the beggining of next week, I'll do it.
15:43:08 <pgroth> ok
15:43:11 <TomDN> (Small note on prov-dictionary: there is a small change in the prov-n grammar: the production rules keyValuePairs and keyValuePair changed to keyEntityPairs and keyEntityPair. Will update the grammar file and notify Luc, sorry)
15:43:14 <pgroth> i'll try and make sure it's up-to-date
15:43:18 <pgroth> before then
15:43:20 <Luc> topic: prov-links
<luc>Summary: Document is out for review. Simon and Tom will review it, Graham just completed a review. Any other volunteer? Reviews due in by next teleconference on 04/04.
15:43:29 <dgarijo> Luc: PROV-Links is ready for review.
15:43:45 <smiles> Yes
15:43:46 <GK> I just sent a brief review of prov-links to the mailing list
15:43:53 <dgarijo> ... I sent an email earlier today. smiles had volunteeres. Is it still the case?
15:43:59 <TomDN> I volunteer for prov-links as well
15:44:00 <GK> (Just now!)
15:44:06 <dgarijo> ...anybody else'
15:44:10 <dgarijo> ...?
15:44:36 <dgarijo> Tom, Simon and Graham will review prov-links.
15:44:39 <Luc> q?
15:44:47 <smiles> q+
15:44:54 <dgarijo> Do any editors want to bring any issues ?
15:45:03 <Luc> ack sm
15:45:58 <dgarijo> smiles: section about collections and bundles to the primer. My concern is about prov-o examples. There is no "official" way.
15:45:58 <Luc> q?
15:45:58 <stain> that sounds like the most obvious way to do it
15:46:04 <stain> q+
15:46:15 <Luc> ack st
15:46:20 <GK> (I'm checking what PROV-AQ says here - I think it's compatible)
15:46:43 <Zakim> -CraigTrim
15:46:54 <dgarijo> stian: yes, prov-o examples are fine. But it's not the only way.
15:46:58 <stain> for instance when using SPARQL it would make more sense to do them as named graphs
15:47:10 <smiles> yes thanks
15:47:21 <dgarijo> Luc: are you fine with this?
15:47:24 <dgarijo> smiles: yes
15:47:27 <Luc> topic: Updates to FAQ / posts / other
<luc>Summary: We spent some time reminding group members to get their Ac Rep to vote for prov recommendations. Stian, Daniel and Paolo drafted some blogs. Paul is happy to post them (or a link to them) on the W3C Semantic Web blog.  Daniel made a suggestion for the FAQ entry. Membership invited to think about good topics to add to the FAQ.
15:47:28 <ivan> q+
15:47:52 <dgarijo> Luc: stian, were you preparing a blog post?
15:47:53 <GK> Confirm no disagreement with note in PROV-AQ (re bundles in primer discussion)
15:48:04 <dgarijo> stian: yes, it's a bit long.
15:48:14 <Luc> q?
15:48:29 <dgarijo> ... I can post it in my blog and then referr from the w3c blog
15:48:33 <dgarijo> Luc: up to you
15:48:38 <Luc> q?
15:48:46 <Luc> zakim, who is noisy
15:48:46 <Zakim> I don't understand 'who is noisy', Luc
15:48:48 <Luc> zakim, who is noisy?
15:48:59 <Zakim> Luc, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: smiles (60%)
15:49:07 <dgarijo> ivan: we have slightly more than 2 weeks to take all the votes together.
15:49:11 <ivan> iMinds, Apple, VU, NASA, Newcastle Univ, OpenLink, IBM, Pacific Northwest, Wright Univ, INRIA
15:49:22 <dgarijo> ... large nubmer of members that have not voted.
15:49:29 <Luc> I am talking to my acrep!
15:49:40 <dgarijo> @ivan: UPM has voted.
15:49:47 <GK> Hmmm… I did ask our AC rep (Oxford)
15:50:06 <Luc> @tallted, last week you said you would talk to your acrep?
15:50:14 <dgarijo> ... there are a number of companies that they are not anymore here.
15:50:29 <dgarijo> ivan: yes, UPM has voted.
15:50:56 <dgarijo> ... we have to get emails to the missing persons in the group and their acrep.
15:50:59 <GK> @Ivan, only AC rep can vote?  Or can we as members do it?
15:51:28 <dgarijo> Luc: we have already contacted all members individually, last week.
15:51:33 <stain> 9 days ago I got the reminder from Luc
15:51:55 <dgarijo> ivan: do you have the list with the AC rep?
15:52:07 <dgarijo> Luc: very few of them responded to me directly.
15:52:22 <dgarijo> ivan: some of them are here.
15:52:52 <dgarijo> ivan: Edinbourgh? Manchester?
15:52:59 <dgarijo> ... those are here.
15:53:03 <stain> I have just reminded my Manchester contact again, but he's been on holiday this week
15:53:28 <dgarijo> ivan: how do you want to handle that? WHat is the best to do it?
15:53:43 <dgarijo> Luc: Ted said he would talk to his acrep. Ted?
15:53:58 <pgroth> open link already voted ?
15:54:05 <dgarijo> ivan: at some point in time we have to contact the acreps
15:54:58 <dgarijo> ... I don't want to contact the acreps again. If I have the list of those acreps that don't have an active member, I can contact them
15:55:04 <christine> apologies - moving to next call - thank you Luc, all
15:55:10 <stain> 2013-04-09 23:59 boston time
15:55:16 <Zakim> -christine
15:55:23 <dgarijo> ...^^deadline for votes
15:55:37 <dgarijo> ... next thursday is sort of ok.
15:56:04 <dgarijo> Luc: thx for bringing that up
15:56:15 <GK> I've just sent a chasing email to our AC Rep.
15:56:44 <Luc> action pgroth to post daniel'post
15:56:44 <trackbot> Created ACTION-169 - Post daniel'post [on Paul Groth - due 2013-04-04].
15:56:51 <satya> Daniel has sent blog post to Paul
15:57:11 <dgarijo> Luc: many people have given tutorials.
15:57:36 <dgarijo> Paolo: I how do I do it?
15:57:38 <pgroth> will do
15:57:48 <pgroth> paolo: you can send the blog post to me
15:58:14 <Luc> zakim, mute ivan
15:58:14 <Zakim> ivan should now be muted
15:58:16 <Paolo> @pgroth I did send it earlier today
15:58:19 <dgarijo> Luc: send the tutorials to Paul
15:58:22 <Paolo> will send a slightly revised version
15:58:42 <pgroth> cool
15:58:51 <Luc> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/PROV-FAQ
15:58:53 <dgarijo> Luc: FAQ brainstorm
15:59:02 <dgarijo> ... what do we want to add?
15:59:03 <dgarijo> +q
15:59:16 <dgarijo> who is going to add it?
15:59:25 <Zakim> -smiles
15:59:37 <Luc> zakim, unmute ivan
15:59:37 <Zakim> ivan should no longer be muted
15:59:50 <Luc> zakim, mute ivan
15:59:50 <Zakim> ivan should now be muted
15:59:58 <Luc> ack iv
16:00:13 <Luc> zakim, mute ivan
16:00:13 <Zakim> ivan should now be muted
16:00:35 <Paolo> need to go...
16:00:39 <Zakim> -[IPcaller]
16:00:52 <Luc> action dgarijo to draft blog post on provenance as rdfa in html documents
16:00:52 <trackbot> Created ACTION-170 - Draft blog post on provenance as rdfa in html documents [on Daniel Garijo - due 2013-04-04].
16:00:53 <dgarijo> dgarijo: draft blog post on rdf-a and PROV.
16:01:17 <pgroth> @daniel, I can help with this
16:01:18 <dgarijo> Luc: If you think on something, could you circulate it to the list?
16:01:24 <dgarijo> @paul: thanks
16:01:27 <Zakim> -ivan
16:01:27 <dgarijo> Luc goodbye
16:01:30 <Zakim> -Satya_Sahoo
16:01:33 <Zakim> -jcheney
16:01:34 <Zakim> -dgarijo
16:01:36 <GK> Bye
16:01:40 <Zakim> -Luc
16:01:41 <Zakim> -GK
16:01:47 <Zakim> -SamCoppens
16:03:41 <GK> GK has left #prov
16:03:55 <Zakim> -stain
# SPECIAL MARKER FOR CHATSYNC.  DO NOT EDIT THIS LINE OR BELOW.  SRCLINESUSED=00000381